Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news
Live blog

“I wear bright colours, lights, and reflective bags – but drivers still close pass me every day”: Cyclists respond to hi-vis calls by claiming drivers “choose not to see” them, but others ask “What’s the problem with close passes?” + more on the live blog

Is there something going on across the pond today? Anyway, Ryan Mallon’s back to focus on the important things instead on your Tuesday cycling live blog
11:55
Chris Hoy and Skarper
Sir Chris Hoy opens up about “toughest year of our lives” in first TV interview since terminal cancer diagnosis, as Health Secretary says government is “actively looking at” lowering prostate cancer screening age

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has announced that the government is “actively looking at” lowering the screening age for prostate cancer, as Sir Chris Hoy took part in his first television interview since revealing that his cancer diagnosis is terminal two weeks ago.

Speaking to BBC Breakfast’s Sally Nugent, six-time Olympic gold medallist Hoy – whose announcement coincided with a sevenfold increase in prostate cancer advice searches on the NHS’s website – detailed the “living nightmare” that followed his diagnosis last year, the “overwhelming” support he’s received, and how he’s “grateful for each day”.

“It’s been the toughest year of our lives so far by some stretch,” the 11-time world champion track sprinter said on the programme, adding that the news in September 2023 that he had terminal cancer came “completely out the blue”.

“No symptoms, no warnings, nothing. All I had was a pain in my shoulder and a little bit of pain in my ribs. But this ache and pain didn’t go away.

“I assumed it was going to be tendonitis or something, and it was just going to be ‘lay off weights or lay off cycling for a wee while’, and get some treatment and it’ll be fine.”

Chris Hoy with gold medal at London 2012 (copyright Britishcycling.org.uk)

> Sir Chris Hoy reveals cancer diagnosis is terminal and he has two to four years to live: “I’m feeling fit, strong and positive, and overwhelmed by all the love and support shown”

A scan revealed a tumour, before Hoy was later told that the prostate cancer had spread to his bones.

“It was the biggest shock of my life. I remember the feeling of just absolute horror and shock. I’d had zero symptoms, nothing to point me towards that that might be an issue. We were given the news that this was incurable.

“Suddenly, everything, all your thoughts, everything rushes. It’s almost like your life is flashing before your eyes in that moment.

"How on earth are we going to tell the kids? It’s just this absolute horror, it is a waking nightmare, living nightmare.

“We just tried to be positive and tried to say do you know what, this is what we’re doing and you can help because when I’m not feeling well, you can come and give me cuddles, you can be supportive, you can be happy, you can be kind to each other.

“I’m sure lots of families do it in different ways and I think there’s no one right approach for anyone. There’s no one-size-fits-all, but for us I think that was the best way to do it.”

chris hoy london bike show

> Sir Chris Hoy “optimistic, positive, and surrounded by love” after revealing cancer diagnosis

Hoy also told Nugent that chemotherapy was “one of the biggest challenges I’ve ever faced” and that his wife Sarra’s multiple sclerosis diagnosis in November 2023, news she initially shared only with her sister, was the “lowest point”.

“I don’t think we necessarily give ourselves enough credit for what we’re able to deal with,” the 48-year-old said. “It’s only when you're in really difficult situations you find out what you’re made of and what you can deal with.

“And it puts it into perspective riding bikes for a living, you realise, ‘God, that was just a bit of fun really’, you know.”

As has been the case since he revealed the news two weeks ago, Hoy’s positivity has been a constant when discussing his diagnosis.

“The stakes are much higher now. It felt like life and death in the moment when you were battling it out for an Olympic gold medal, but the stakes have changed dramatically and it is life and death,” he says.

“But the principle is the same, it’s about focusing on what you have control over and not worrying about the stuff that you can’t control.

“You don't just suddenly have a leap forward and one day you wake up and everything’s OK. It takes time and you’ve got to be disciplined with how you approach it, and you’ve got to nip things in the bud before these negative thoughts start to take hold.”

Chris Hoy Autumn 7

> Sir Chris Hoy’s “brave” terminal cancer revelation prompts near sevenfold increase in prostate cancer advice searches, says NHS

He also hopes his status as an Olympic hero will encourage more men to take a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test to check for cancer – and potentially save more lives.

Calling for screening for men with a strong family history of prostate cancer to start at an earlier age, Hoy said: “If you’ve got family history of it like I have, if you’re over the age of 45, go and ask your doctor. I’ve got a friend who, when I told him my news early on confidentially, he went and got a PSA test and it turned out he had cancer. He’s had treatment and he’s been given the all-clear.

“Maybe people seeing this or hearing about my story, just by them asking their GP, will create enough of a surge of interest that people that make the decisions will go ‘you know what, we need to address this’. And in the long term this will save potentially millions of lives.”

Labour Health Secretary Wes Streeting also told BBC Breakfast that the government is looking into acting on his calls for lower screening ages, and that the Olympic champion is “already making a difference”.

“There will be lots of people out there living with cancer at the moment, either themselves or someone they love,” Streeting said. “The way he has spoken so openly and full of optimism about his own journey with cancer I think will have given hope and inspiration to millions of people across the country.”

Hoy, meanwhile, is busy organising his planned charity sportive for people with stage four cancer, the first edition of which will take place next year, while his memoir based on the past year, ‘All That Matters: My Toughest Race Yet’, is released this week.

The full interview with Nugent will also be broadcast tonight on BBC One at 8pm.

"My perspective on life has changed massively,” he says. “I am more thankful, I'm more grateful for each day. It’s been a tough year and it's going to be tough ahead in the future too but for now, right here right now, we’re doing pretty well.”

09:10
high-vis cyclists 2.PNG
“I wear bright colours, lights, and reflective bags – but drivers still close pass me every day”: Cyclists respond to “nonsense” hi-vis calls, claiming “none of it makes a difference” and drivers “choose not to see” them

Yes, it’s that time of the year again, folks.

‘Tis the season for hi-vis and lights cycling safety debates, when usually well-meaning police forces, local authorities, and road safety organisations deliver one-sided messages, videos, and social media posts calling on cyclists to ‘be safe, be seen’.

To be honest, it’s the only time I’ll allow a debate about being surrounded by lights to take place in November (and yes, I am talking about you early Christmas tree enthusiasts – get a life).

Anyway, before I go all Grinch on the live blog, just last week we reported that Northumberland County Council issued a social media warning telling “all cyclists and pedestrians” that “during the autumn and winter months motorists take longer to notice you. Take extra care near or when crossing roads or try to wear something bright or reflective to help motorists see you.”

> Conservative councillor wades into cyclist hi-vis clothing discussion with "reprehensible" rant... says "Lycra louts" who ride in roads instead of cycle lanes "suffer the consequences"

While that particular post sent one local councillor scurrying off to the anti-cycling bingo hall to rant about “Lycra louts”, others suggested that asking motorists to take extra care and look out for vulnerable road users may be a more effective approach to keep the roads safe during winter.

And yesterday, we heard from Worcester resident Roy Clarke, who used his local paper’s letters page to urge cyclists to make sure their lights are working, otherwise drivers just can’t see them.

In a response to Clarke’s hi-vis call, Bike Worcester’s chair Dan Brothwell penned his own letter, jokingly asking “now the clocks are changing and as we go into darker days and nights, that drivers of all abilities check the headlights are working on their vehicles. It is difficult for drivers to see cyclists in the dark if their headlights are faulty.”

“Joking aside, this is an important issue,” he continued. “I agree with Roy that everyone cycling at night should have working front and rear lights in accordance with the Highway Code and the same applies to drivers.

“I’d also recommend everyone takes time to refresh their Highway Code knowledge and drive to test standard.

“When cycling my lights are on continuously (dynamo), bags have reflective panels, and I’m usually wearing bright colours. I’m still close passed by, on average, five per cent of drivers on my commute to work and witness illegal driving and parking whenever I’m travelling, notably speeding and phone use.”

Police stop cyclist at night during long-distance ride to give him hi-vis vest and bag (Northern Ireland Road Policing and Safety unit)

Since appearing on yesterday’s live blog, Brothwell’s comments have sparked quite the debate on social media.

“Five per cent is better than 100 per cent in that case,” said Ady Suter on Twitter, in response to the cycling campaigner’s claimed rate of close passes per day.

“The hi-vis and lights help the more considerate drivers (that’s 95 per cent of them!) to see you in plenty of time and to prepare a safe pass. Better for everyone.”

However, not everyone was convinced of the powers of hi-vis.

“I get more close calls on the days I wear hi-vis sometimes,” said Les Jackson on Facebook.

Cycling campaigner Ruth Mayorcas added: “In broad daylight in high summer drivers still close pass.”

Cyclist in London hi-vis with cargo bike - copyright Simon MacMichael

> Mandatory hi-vis for cyclists a “timely proposal” coming up to Christmas, say councillors

Others, meanwhile, were quick to criticise the often one-sided nature of these winter road safety calls.

“Can we have an annual call for drivers to not speed?” asked Joe Gardias.

“It’s amazing that drivers see cyclists running red lights. Any other time not so much,” added Dean Lewis.

Niall McFarland concurred: “The only cyclists that drivers manage to see are those with no lights, those on footpaths and those riding four abreast. They fail to see any others.”

“Hi-vis makes very little difference, knocked off several times, with bright lights and hi-vis jackets, and always told ‘sorry I didn’t see you’, because they’re not looking and shouldn’t be allowed on the road,” said Mark Kingsland.

“Hi-vis and lots of flashing lights don’t stop people driving into highway maintenance and emergency vehicles,” wrote Gareth Roberts.

“I’ll just stick to a light and wearing what I feel is appropriate for the time of day/year and weather.”

> Good Morning Britain asks should cyclists have to wear a "hi-vis uniform" to ride a bike?

“It’s ultimately nonsense,” Michael Brown said of the yearly call for hi-vis. “Drivers choose ‘not to see’ most cyclists because they aren’t paying attention.

“Using a decent bike light is more than enough – and I’ve experimented over the years with hyper-fluorescent jackets, normal hi-vis tops and other have deliberately tried wearing dark clothes whilst still having a good bike light. My own experience is none of it makes a difference.”

“Yep, it’s never been about what a cyclist is wearing,” echoed Sam. “Some drivers see you and don’t care.”

Oxford Police stopping cyclists with no lights (Twitter: @OxonFireRescue)

> Police stop cyclists without lights, and issue “lights and hi-vis rucksack instead of a fine” so they can “get home safely and legally”

According to Nick Edwards, that can sometimes also apply to other cyclists, too.

“I was actually hit by another cyclist tonight, he was riding down and me up, I was wearing hi-vis, bar mounted light, helmet light and he still didn’t see me until he hit me head on,” he said.

Meanwhile, Gav Marten argued that some bike lights can do more harm than good.

“I’ve still got spots in my vision from an inconsiderate cyclist and his night-sun light,” he wrote.

“Car headlights are designed with a beam spread and height cut (not perfect) but cheap Chinese bike lights are friggin’ blinding as they hit the eyeball direct with thousands of lumens!”

> Mandatory hi-vis had no influence on number of cyclists involved in collisions according to Italian study

Of course, Richard Littlejohn came along to provide some, ahem, ‘balance’ to proceedings.

“Maybe if cyclists were more predictable with their movements, everyone would be a lot safer,” he said. “I see so many cyclists weaving out of traffic, entering on the road from the pavement without looking.

To be fair and honest, it's not normally the ones with the proper kit, they’re normally following the rules of the road, it’s the rest. Almost hit one the other day that was on the pavement and then randomly decided to join the road!”

He could get a job at Northumberland County Council’s social media department with that stance…

10:17
Share the Road to Zero close pass ad
“What is really the problem with a close pass? What other option is there for motorists?”

While everyone was else was busy discussing hi-vis, lights, and victim-blaming safety posts in the comments, one Facebook user – who purports to have cycled “around the world every day” for 18 years (blimey, that’s some mileage) – instead chose to question Bike Worcester chair Dan Brothwell’s point about close passes and, in doing so, raised an existential question for our Near Miss of the Day series.

“While I understand that it can be a little scary, what is really the problem with a close pass?” asked Mark Hartley on Facebook.

“I've been cycling around the world every day for 18 years in 36 countries and I’ve never had a problem with trucks, cars, and buses passing close to me. So long as they don’t hit me, obviously. Which nobody ever has.

“I mean, most roads are small and there’s no other way to pass. What other option is there for motorists?

“I’ve never been hit nor ever had reason to believe I would be hit and so it’s never bothered me. Are lots of people being hit because of close passes? Have I just been very lucky? Is it just a UK problem?”

Lorry driver narrowly misses cyclist in shocking close pass in Japan (Pedal Perspective, X)

> “He should be wearing hi-vis and not blocking the road”: Lorry driver in Japan turns himself in to police after “worst close pass ever” – but motorists still find ways to blame the cyclist

Errr, I’m not really sure where to start with all that.

Well, I suppose we should start with those in agreement.

“Close pass? What is a close pass?” wrote Shane Crowe (who may or may not be Russell’s brother).

“I ride to work and never have an issue with vehicles passing me, I ride about 1.5ft away from the kerb and ride steady, no wobbling or forcing cars to change lanes to overtake me, what’s the issue here!!!”

“It’s newbie cyclists trying to get popular on social media with close pass videos,” argued Bruce Swain (not Batman’s alter ego, either). “I agree it's not an issue, or certainly is not a big an issue as these people make out.

“This ‘campaign’ is further eroding the relationship between road users, and making the roads less safe, all in the hope to make some $$$ from social media.”

Close pass operation (Police Scotland Greater Glasgow)

> The real impact of close passes on cyclists — my children were nearly left fatherless due to the actions of one callous driver

And now for the opposition…

“While I understand that it can be a little scary, what is really the problem with people speeding at 100mph through residential areas?” asked Si Lowe.

“A close pass is always just a close pass until it isn’t,” noted Simon Boswell. “I’ve been knocked off by a driver who tried to squeeze between me and the car coming the other way and misjudged it. A broken wrist and four cracked ribs isn’t funny.”

“It’s unnecessary, plain and simple,” added Tom.

“Surprised that you think a vehicle coming close enough to touch is not a problem,” replied Will.

“Are you the one they shout at on the station for not standing behind the yellow line as well?

“When the same regular drivers go by you doing 50mph, close enough for you to feel the wing mirror difference, knowing that you have been hit by wing mirrors before, all for the sake of a touch of steering away.

“What makes their importance worth the risk to my life?”

11:32
Taxi driver who killed cyclist with “unsafe” turn while “blinded by sun” avoids jail
10:54
Oi, no cycling on the walking and cycling path!

So, to ask the age-old question, why don’t cyclists use the shared path?

Because, apparently on London’s Kew Bridge, they’re told they’re not allowed to…

Kew Bridge 'no cycling' sign on shared path (Cycle Calm)

Don’t you just love a pair of contradictory cycling signs?

After Cycle Calm posted photos of the odd couple – which appear at a glance to instruct cyclists to avoid using what the blue sign clearly indicates is a shared-use walking and cycling path – some locals have claimed that cycling is in fact prohibited there, though others pointed out that the ‘no cycling’ restriction only applies to the other, narrower side of the bridge.

Kew Bridge 'no cycling' sign on shared path (Cycle Calm) 2

Meanwhile, some suggested that the ‘no cycling’ sign actually refers to the carriageway, and that the blue sign actually underlines that cyclists must use the path in question.

Confused? Yeah, me too.

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

12 comments

Avatar
brooksby | 47 min ago
0 likes

Which London Borough is responsible for Kew Bridge?  What do they have to say for themselves?

Avatar
AidanR replied to brooksby | 7 min ago
0 likes

It'll be TfL

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 48 min ago
1 like

Richard Littlejohn wrote:

To be fair and honest

Two things that far-right, racist, xenophobic bloviator has never been in his life.

Avatar
the little onion replied to Rendel Harris | 45 min ago
2 likes

is that the Richard LIttlejohn who writes a column for the Daily Mail, often about migration issues, from his home in Florida?

Avatar
chrisonabike | 1 hour ago
3 likes

Mark Hartley on Facebook wrote:

I mean, most roads are small and there’s no other way to pass. What other option is there for motorists?

Because of cause you must pass cyclists, there is no other option...

Avatar
LeadenSkies replied to chrisonabike | 58 min ago
1 like

Not only that, but most roads are plenty wide enough to pass with plenty of space. Every road with two carriageways (one in each direction) is more than wide enough, as are plenty of single track country lanes if you pass slow and ensure you have your offside wheel close to the far edge. It really is only the smallest of lanes where you simply can't pass safely but then you also can't drive along them much faster than a bike will travel and these usually have passing places if the motorist just waits a few seconds.

Avatar
brooksby replied to LeadenSkies | 51 min ago
0 likes

LeadenSkies wrote:

Not only that, but most roads are plenty wide enough to pass with plenty of space. Every road with two carriageways (one in each direction) is more than wide enough…

But then you'd have to cross the white line in the middle and that's against the law isn't it, or something…  

Avatar
alexuk | 1 hour ago
1 like

What is the problem with a Close-Pass, seriously? The Law is clear. A close-pass is when the driver of a vehicle breaks the law! To address it, the police need to enforce the law! Nothing else will do. Just because some people claim to have nerves-of-steel, or are just dead inside, doesn't make it a non-issue. Crikey - that piture of the lorry is terrifying! 

Avatar
LeadenSkies | 1 hour ago
3 likes

The one I hate when people are trying to justify close passing is "Well if it's all right for a cyclist to pass within x distance of my car when coming towards me then it's ok for me to pass within x distance of them when passing". What they don't consider is with cars approaching in the opposite direction, both the car driver and the cyclist can see the other participant, both have a clear view of the road surface in front of them and are able to change speed or course to influence the point of passing and the passing distance so that they are happy with the result. When a car passes me from behind, I have little or no ability to influence either the position or distance and the car driver doesn't have a great vision of any road defects etc in front of me that I may need to avoid. That's a huge difference.

Avatar
chrisonabike | 2 hours ago
3 likes

Time for the annual visibility campaign post:

https://waronthemotorist.wordpress.com/2017/10/28/new-road-safety-campai...

If it saves one bollard...

Avatar
the little onion | 2 hours ago
3 likes

I'll pay attention when people are talking about mandatory high-vis for dark coloured motor vehicles.

Avatar
LeadenSkies replied to the little onion | 1 hour ago
0 likes

I use lots of lights and reflectors, and wear high viz of sorts but the high viz is mainly to keep the Mrs happy as if a driver doesn't spot the multiple lights then why on earth should anyone think they would spot the high viz?

Latest Comments