- News

New cycle lane has “ruined village”, made it more dangerous for drivers, and leads to cyclists “nearly taking children off their feet”, angry locals say; “People with penny-farthings need parking too!”; Massive fancy dress helmet + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

Do driving instructors think cyclists are nuisances on the roads? Not if they’ve taken the government’s new cycle awareness course, they don’t


> Driving instructors less likely to believe collisions “are usually the cyclist’s fault” and that cyclists are “nuisances” after cycle awareness course, new government pilot study finds
I wonder if Ashley Neal took part?
“Scottish innovation stifled by overzealous officialdom!” Police in Inverness seize craziest adapted e-scooter ever… with exercise bike stuck to the top of it
Sticking with bizarre Scottish inventions for the moment, we’re heading up to Inverness, where last week police stumbled upon the kind of ingenious, groundbreaking design even Graeme Obree wouldn’t have dared attempt during the mid-nineties – an e-scooter with an exercise bike attached on top.


No, your eyes aren’t deceiving you. And, as far as I can tell, it’s not the world’s weirdest Halloween costume ever, either. And no, I have no idea how it works.
“Highlands and Islands Roads Policing officers spotted this adapted e-scooter being ridden around Inverness last night without relevant docs,” Roads Policing Scotland posted on social media (though what the relevant documents would pertain to in this case, I have no idea).
“Yes, that is an exercise bike welded to it. Rider reported, vehicle seized.”
Let’s just say, the people of Scotland were not impressed by the authorities clamping down on their nation’s latest mould-shattering breakthrough.
“Scottish innovation stifled by overzealous officialdom!”
“Imagine punishing someone for top class Scottish engineering.”
“10 out 10 for ingenuity.”
“That is some talented recycling.”
“They are just exercising their rights…”
Can’t wait for Inverness to introduce a PSPO clamping down on these being ridden through the city centre.
Meanwhile, over in the United States, the home of the V8 muscle car
The irony deficiency is strong in this photo:


“The cardacity of suburban drivers knows no bounds,” wrote Matthew Lewis, the California-based cyclist and writer who spotted the sign calling for all Hunt wheel owners to keep the whirr to a minimum, wrote on Twitter.
(By the way, ‘Cardacity’ – great word, I’m going to steal that.)
“‘Please bike quietly’ – gonna bring my air horn next time,” he continued. “I was sure this was a Halloween prank and went back to look and, nope, they actually mean it.
“What’s amazing about this sign is, this exact spot overlooks eight lanes of the 24 freeway — droning at brain-damaging decibels 24/7 — less than 200 metres down the hill, but this pathetic suburbanite is bothered by… people on bikes talking to each other.
“Car noise is a leading cause of premature death in cities, and approximately zero drivers care about laws regarding same, so naturally, violent drivers come out of the woodwork to hate literally the quietest form of transport ever invented besides walking.”
Only in America… Then again, maybe not.
“Survive until 2025”: Bike industry mantra continues, as British brands view specialism as key to recovery
> “If we can get to the end of this year, we’ll be okay”: British bike manufacturers hoping to make it through industry woes
Multidisciplinary star Shirin van Anrooij out of action until May with iliac artery problem
The cyclocross season may have got off to a bang at the weekend for newly crowned European champions Fem van Empel and Thibau Nys, but it’s already over for one of Van Empel’s biggest rivals, Shirin van Anrooij, who won’t race again until May after undergoing surgery to widen her external iliac artery.
Van Anrooij, who had a successful classics campaign, finishing third at the Tour of Flanders, before placing second in the young rider’s classification and 13th overall at the Tour de France, endured a more troubling second half of the season, with her Lidl-Trek team revealing today that the 22-year-old experienced “unusual sensations in her left leg” during her final few road races of 2024.
The Dutch rider was then diagnosed with iliac artery endofibrosis – a narrowing of her external iliac artery (the same problem that plagued her compatriot Marianne Vos’s 2023 season) – and underwent surgery on 31st October to widen it.
In a statement this morning, Lidl-Trek said Van Anrooij will now take an extended period of rest before returning to training, meaning she will miss the entirety of the cyclocross season, as well as the first few months of the 2025 road campaign. She is expected to return to competition in May, in time for the grand tour season.
“My off-season is going to be a little longer this year,” former U23 cyclocross world champion Van Anrooij posted on Instagram this morning. “After some hard months on and off the bike, we finally got to the bottom of what was causing me problems in my left leg. I have had successful surgery to repair a narrowing of my external iliac artery.
“It was definitely a scary discovery at first, but everything went well and I am back to having a big smile on my face now that I can finally start my recovery.
“I’m grateful to be back home in Zeeland already, but I still have a long journey in front of me! It will be around six months until I can properly think about racing again so, sadly this will mean no CX for me in 2024/2025, but I’ll be watching and cheering for everyone all season.
“All the support I have received from my friends, family, team staff, and teammates has been incredible! It’s made this process a lot easier so, I want to thank everyone who has been with me every step of the way through this.”
The Ballad of Grimsby Town Centre
Grimsby’s quiet in the afternoon,
But the councillor’s singing the same old tune,
‘Bike are banned, there’ll be a business boon,
‘I’m sure someone will be around here soon.’


> Controversial cycling ban that saw cyclist ordered to pay £1,150 has “rejuvenated” town centre, claims councillor behind it… just days after ‘no cycling’ speaker message cut to twice an hour because “it was too repetitive”
Don’t give them any ideas!
Somewhat surprisingly, that isn’t the actual size of Visma-Lease a Bike and Giro’s outrageous Aerohead time trial helmet (I know, I was shocked too).
It’s just cyclocross rider Honor Elliott’s inspired fancy dress take on cycling’s sartorially challenged approach to marginal aero gains, which, in a worrying development, helped her to second place at Saturday’s annual Halloween Muddy Hell event at Herne Hill Velodrome.
I’m concerned some helmet boffins will be checking the results and taking notes – the bigger the better, and all that.
Niche cycling post of the week
Thanks to Hilary Evans for reminding us that, for all its many, many, many flaws, Twitter is still worth checking from time to time, for gold like this:


Now that’s what I call niche.
Yes, it really is that time of year – It’s Winter Essentials time on Five Cool (or should that be Cold?) Things


> Five winter essentials coming soon from Gorewear, Velocio, Jack Wolfskin, Oxford and Ciovita
“I wear bright colours, have reflective bags, and continuous lights, but five per cent of drivers still close pass me every day”: Cycling campaigner responds to annual hi-vis and lights safety call for people on bikes
The clocks have gone back, the afternoons are getting shorter, and everything feels that bit darker – which means one thing: We’re about to be inundated with often well-meaning but usually misguided videos, police social media posts, and council press releases calling for cyclists to ‘be safe, be seen’ on the roads by wearing certain clothing and accessories.
In Worcester, where plans to modify a town centre bike ban have dominated discussion in recent months, the hi-vis season has already begun, with a letter to the Worcester News last week, from resident Roy Clarke, urging cyclists to make sure their lights are working, as it’s mighty difficult for drivers to see them otherwise.


> “Hi-vis distracts from the real issues on our roads,” says makers of bike camera warning signs
So, it was only a matter of time before a retort from the cycling perspective made its way into the newspaper’s letters section.
“May I ask through the letters page, now the clocks are changing and as we go into darker days and nights, that drivers of all abilities check the headlights are working on their vehicles. It is difficult for drivers to see cyclists in the dark if their headlights are faulty,” came the perfectly executed reply from Bike Worcester’s chair Dan Brothwell yesterday.
“Joking aside, this is an important issue,” he continued. “I agree with Roy that everyone cycling at night should have working front and rear lights in accordance with the Highway Code and the same applies to drivers.
“I’d also recommend everyone takes time to refresh their Highway Code knowledge and drive to test standard.
“When cycling my lights are on continuously (dynamo), bags have reflective panels, and I’m usually wearing bright colours. I’m still close passed by, on average, five per cent of drivers on my commute to work and witness illegal driving and parking whenever I’m travelling, notably speeding and phone use.”
Well said.
16 Bee Bike stations set to close for a month due to anti-social behaviour, as staff work to locate stolen bikes
16 Bee Bike stations across Greater Manchester will be closed for the next month to “address issues with bike availability” as problems with anti-social behaviour, vandalism, and theft continue to plague the cycle hire scheme.
Last October, mayor Andy Burnham said the scheme, launched in November 2021 and operated by bike share firm Beryl, has proved a “victim of its own success” following “higher than expected levels of bicycle theft and vandalism”.
And this week the Manchester Evening News has reported that several bikes are understood to be missing, with 16 stations – spread across the boroughs of Manchester, Salford, and Trafford – closed to allow staff to find them.
Beryl has also deployed staff to search for the seemingly stolen bikes, while the police are also involved in the search, Transport for Greater Manchester’s Starling Bank Bike hire manager Iain Baxter confirmed.


> Recovery plan for Greater Manchester’s Bee Network hire scheme gets more bikes on the streets
“Due to recent issues with anti-social behaviour, we will be temporarily suspending 16 of the 225 total bike hire stations. This is a precautionary measure to help improve bike availability for all customers,” Baxter said in a statement.
“Getting more bikes available is our top priority and we are working alongside both the operator Beryl and Greater Manchester Police to recover any missing or damaged bikes quickly and get the stations re-opened as soon as possible. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause cyclists during this period.
“The Starling Bank Bikes remain incredibly popular as a key part of the Bee Network, providing people with easy and affordable access to a bike and our growing walking, wheeling and cycling infrastructure. We have seen record levels of use in recent weeks and the vast majority of bikes and stations remain available for use.”
Used bike retailer The Pro’s Closet set to re-open with new owner and old management, month after going out of business
The Pro’s Closet, the specialist used bike and gear retailer founded in 2006 by former professional mountain biker Nick Martin, is set to re-open today – a month after closing its doors and selling off its remaining inventory and other physical assets, another victim of the cycling industry’s post-pandemic struggles.
The company’s demise in October came amid online grumbles about customer service, a string of lay offs in recent years, and heavy discounting, including 75 per cent off across their entire range of pre-owned bikes, wheels, and clothing.
However, according to Bicycle Retailer and Industry News today, Elshair Companies, a private investment firm, acquired the American company’s digital assets last month, including its trademarks, website, software, and customer database.
Elshair has hired two long-time managers of the Pro’s Closet to run the company: Justin England, who was with TPC for 15 years, is the new company’s Chief Revenue Officer, while JP Gage has taken over as Chief Operating Officer, after 12 years with the brand. The new CEO, meanwhile, is Yassir Elshair, who e-commerce business Elshair two decades ago.


England told BRAIN that the Pro’s Closet planned to resume buying used bikes, wheels, and frames this week through its existing website, while also leasing a website and rehiring employees let go over the past year.
“It will be a bit of time before we have a healthy amount of inventory, but our aim is to fill the void that the closure of TPC created,” he said. “We will build back the dealer trade-in programme in a way that provides value to dealers across the country and which hopefully is never viewed as a competitor.”
“TPC is back!” the brand’s relaunched website says. “We took a bit of a spill, but TPC is back on track to being the destination for selling and buying pre-owned bikes. It will be a bit before we have bikes for sale, but our doors are open for sellers.”
Nick Martin, who founded the company originally as a personal venture to resell used cycling gear on eBay, is not involved in the relaunch, having stepped down as CEO in 2020.
“There is still hope”: Spanish cyclists bring supplies to flood-affected areas in Valencia by bike
“If you have to see anything today, it is these hundreds of cyclists bringing supplies to the affected areas that are not allowed to be reached by car. There is still hope.”
Si tienes que ver algo hoy es a estos cientos de ciclistas llevando suministros a las zonas afectadas a las que no se permite llegar en coche. Aún hay esperanza ❤️ pic.twitter.com/4GkhvveJYa
— Alejandro Cencerrado (@AlejandroCence2) October 31, 2024
“People with penny-farthings need cycle parking too!” Confusion as bizarrely tall bike stands “ordered from Temu” installed in Glasgow
Last August, you may remember, a new batch of bike stands in Edinburgh came under scrutiny after one local cyclist, along with a city councillor, pointed out that the Leith Walk racks were both extremely light and – worryingly – incredibly easy to unscrew from the ground, having already fallen victim to one tool-wielding (and I imagine pleasantly surprised) thief, within a month of being installed.


Of course, City of Edinburgh Council told us not to worry about the fact that the parking facilities used by cyclists in the city could be handily removed within seconds (along with our bikes), telling road.cc at the time that the racks “meet the project’s design requirements and use standard fixtures”.
So, it’s all grand, then.
Fast forward a year or so, and Glasgow has responded to Auld Reekie’s flimsy take on cycle parking by installing their own unique brand of Sheffield Stand, the design requirements of which – while looking extremely secure and even including a horizontal tapping bar for cane users – are anything but ‘standard’…


“Anybody know what is with Glasgow’s new cycle parking?” asked cycling campaigner Thomas Cornwallis on Twitter over the weekend.
“I got someone to stand there for scale… and she is only 5’6”.”
“Someone went with inches rather than centimetres,” suggested Robert, which may be bang on the money, you never know.
Meanwhile, everyone else in the comments was busy joining in on the merriment, and the possibility that Glasgow could soon be at the (Victorian) cutting edge of cycle commuting, thanks to the introduction of these new, skyscraper bike stands.
“The tall bike trend has taken off in Glasgow?” asked Cameron.
“People with Penny-farthings need cycle parking too!” noted Peter, along with about a dozen other commenters.
It’s so one can adequately secure their penny farthing pic.twitter.com/0FpW4gP7HI
— Not.Found (@Pingman28) November 4, 2024
Too right, maybe Jeremy Vine is planning a Scottish move in the near future, and Glasgow is just laying the groundwork for his much-feted arrival?
And after all, as tall as those stands may be, they are perfectly fit for ordinary cycles… (I’ll get my coat.)
Christopher then described the racks as “ordered from Temu (other discount retailers are available)”.
But then John came along to spoil the fun by chipping in with: “So you get your cycle infrastructure and you moan about it.”
There’s always one…
New cycle lane has “ruined village” and “made it more dangerous for both drivers and pedestrians”, angry locals say – as lack of clear path markings allegedly lead to cyclists “nearly taking children off their feet”
When it comes to local newspaper reports on active travel infrastructure, I’m not sure there’s a headline more commonly used than the tried and trusted ‘This cycle lane has ruined EVERYTHING!’ trope.
It works for almost anything you could ever imagine a bike lane affecting: Businesses, seafront views, mile-long commutes, and – my personal favourite – Christmas (It’s always those pesky cycle lanes ruining Christmas for the kids!).
So, this morning, we were treated to a classic of the genre in the New Forest village of Dibden Purlieu, where a collection of angry residents – complete with disgruntled group photo for the front page of the local rag – told the Southern Daily Echo that a new bike path has “ruined” the area and made things more dangerous for drivers and pedestrians.
Earlier this year, a new cycle lane and pedestrian crossing was installed by Hampshire County Council on the village’s Beaulieu Road.
However, some residents claim the nine months of work led to gridlock and local businesses “losing huge profits”. And since it’s been finished, they say the bike path is not clearly marked on either side of the road, failing to delineate between the cycling and pedestrian areas, and that the new crossing has been placed between three busy junctions and a petrol station, leading to a number of near misses.
“Hampshire County Council have ruined the village with all these unclear cycle markings,” Dibden Purlieu resident Janice Chalmers told the newspaper.
“When the school kicks out the children take up all the path and cyclists have nearly taken them off their feet.”
“We have seen accidents happen due to the number of junctions, the position of the traffic light, and the cycle lane markings,” noted fellow resident Steph Osborne.
“It’s like the council just threw it all together – prior to that we had a traffic island and that worked really well.”


Meanwhile, local councillor Malcolm Wade added: “I have been a county councillor since 2013 and prior to that a district councillor since 1991 – in all those years I have never had so many complaints as I have about this cycle lane.
“So many people have written to me with their complaints. I have to agree with them: the scheme was poorly planned and badly executed resulting in us being left with a number of issues.”
And “keen cyclist” John Laurence, a member of the Waterside Action Cycling Group, has claimed that “one of our members is so worried of the dangers across this stretch of road he gets off and walks his bike through the area”.
“This scheme has absolutely made it more dangerous for both drivers and pedestrians – our group did make recommendations to HCC before, during and after their consultation,” he said.
Responding to the claims that the cycle lane has ruined everything, a spokesperson for Hampshire County Council said: “The local cycling group and residents have been actively involved throughout the implementation of the cycle lane to ensure the route meets the needs of all users.
“The Beaulieu Road section is part of the Eling to Holbury cycle route improvement scheme. On completion, the entire route will be subject to a post-completion review and monitored to identify any areas where additional improvements may be needed.”
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
38 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
PS re the cyclist ringing a bell (or as a sports cyclist more likely shouting a warning), they would have no reason to: the lady wasn't "approaching the road", she had got to the island in the middle of the road and was standing still, then she stepped out. As far as I can see there was no reason to think anything but that she had seen him and was waiting for him to pass before crossing the lane.
@bensynnock We, and car drivers, must indeed exercise the utmost care for vulnerable road users, but if you take it to the logical extreme the only way you can absolutely guarantee never hitting a vulnerable road user is not to cycle or drive at all under any circumstances. As the Highway Code makes clear, "The hierarchy places those road users most at risk in the event of a collision at the top of the hierarchy. It does not remove the need for everyone to behave responsibly." In a case like this where the pedestrian has made an absolutely suicidal move by stepping onto the roadway into the path of a fast-moving cyclist when they were two metres away you can't say that the cyclist has failed in their duty of care, the cyclist was approaching on a clear straight road in good visibility, the lady was standing still on the island then suddenly stepped out when he was so close that he had no time to make any reaction at all, let alone brake or swerve round her. She, sadly, for unknown reasons, failed in her "need to behave responsibly". Unless duty of care encompasses coming to a complete stop when one sees a pedestrian waiting to cross (when there is no marked crossing) I don't think it was breached here.
@C3a Presumably it's to do with turnover stability while moving. I saw a Tentbox today, just being driven through Garstang. I can certainly see the advantage of these boxes over tents, because I have suffered lifelong from the 'Get orf my land' brigade, and there's a much greater tolerance among them for those 'camping' in vehicles than for those much more worthy real campers in tents. Add to that the convenience of just stopping in any old free spot by the roadside, where there isn't a decent site for a tent, and you can see the attraction.
Most of the cars that I have owned have had a roof-box limit (bars, box and contents) of 70kg. How does a textbox fit with that? Is the limit only applicable when the vehicle is moving?
@Chris RideFar For starters, by being 1,5 m above the ground you are mostly protected from dew. In many countries it also protects you from frost or really low temperatures. You'd be surprised how much of a difference it actually makes. Bugs, ants, spiders etc. are another thing, as is the purely mental feeling of security by being isolated from the ground. You'd be surprised how much that means to some of us and our better halves ;-) Sleeping on the ground also means more mechanical damage to the floor from rocks, hard roots etc., which could make a big difference in some areas and on longer trips, where a ripped tent floor could really break your holiday. I'm not saying a roof tent is the answer to all one's troubles with camping. But these factors definitely to make a difference to many of us.
When was the last time you had a groundsheet with a built in mattress? The point is predictable comfort.
Is it because cars and driving are about convenience (for a price), so there is mileage in selling more (quite expensive) related things that are about convenience?
@FionaJJ that's the crux of the issue i guess. Minority causes can have this where the mainstream has the power to steamroll you (figuratively and literally). There's always "fear of angering the giant" (or alienating the decision makers / majority, where any politician has the temptation to gain attention by criticising this. And business salespeople stand to gain by selling "convenience and status" instead). But ... it's also easy to keep getting "small wins" while losing the main argument. (That would be where rules and public space remain suited to or are further modified to reinforce motor dependency and thus reduce active travel - even if perhaps it's now autonomous vehicles and "they're more efficient / much safer than human drivers").
38 thoughts on “New cycle lane has “ruined village”, made it more dangerous for drivers, and leads to cyclists “nearly taking children off their feet”, angry locals say; “People with penny-farthings need parking too!”; Massive fancy dress helmet + more on the live blog”
“Someone went with inches
“Someone went with inches rather than centimetres”
Easy mistake to make.
That puts things into
That puts things into perspective. Too much f*****g perspective.
Just needs a bit more Dobbly.
Just needs a bit more Dobbly.
None more black!
None more black!
For the benefit of the
For the benefit of the youngsters (it still makes me laugh) https://youtu.be/zg5Ovdu6bOE?si=xEwEADOUWzaPRuB1
Yes, but those cycle stands
Yes, but those cycle stands go up to 11.
This was also the whole
This was also the whole premise behind children’s TV classic Jimbo and the Jetset – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimbo_and_the_Jet-Set
I think they are good. It’s
I think they are good. It’s high enough to rest your bike against and plenty of opportunities for locking. I hate locking my bike to the short stubby things that pass as normal and chip your paint or allow your front wheel to swivel about etc. I’d like to see more taller stands.
I think Tesco has been
I think Tesco has been sourcing it’s stands from Temu for years. Useless things masquerading as Sheffield stands, that fail to support bikes properly.
stewb62 wrote:
Your Tesco has actual knock-off Sheffield stands? Luxury! My local big Tesco has racks of wheelbender/toast-rack things loosely bolted to the ground.
Guardian – More than 50
Guardian – More than 50 people have UK driving licences with at least 30 points on them
Also “10,056 drivers hold a valid licence despite having at least 12 points”.
Tom_77 wrote:
That article calls for a review of the definition of exceptional hardship. I don’t think that is necessary.
What is necessary is to stop projecting the problem of the hardship onto the wider public. If ineligibility to drive creates such an exceptional hardship, there are standards to which the driver must adhere in order to avoid the hardship being invoked. And that’s that.
Yeah… public feeling doesn
Yeah… public feeling doesn’t normally run to “but we understand they felt they had to steal – they’d got a persistent smack habit / a sick pet / kids with expensive cello lessons to pay for – and they only pinched from Waitrose so it’s not really hurting anyone” *.
Perhaps, like expensive whisky – the premium comes from telling a better story?
* OTOH the trope of the hard-done-to / daring / cunning everyman sticking one up at authority / the rich is perennially popular …
I’m curious to know which
I’m curious to know which motor insurers are accepting those drivers and what the premiums are.
And if some of those drivers aren’t able to get insured (ie it is too expensive) with that many points but still cotinue to drive…
mitsky wrote:
Insurance premiums would depend on the specific circumstances, but I found this list of average quotes for drivers with various Drink Driving convictions.
The average car insurance quote is apparently £861, so a drink driver could be paying as much as 5x that.
Not sure if it’s still the
Not sure if it’s still the case but I recall that back in the day some people would get around “mucky” licences by having their partner or spouse take out insurance on a vehicle with an “any driver” policy, i.e. anyone with a valid licence could drive it, usually third party only. Such policies would sometimes have stipulations about the age of other drivers (usually over 21) and how long they had held a licence but not number of points.
Whats funny about this is
Whats funny about this is that insurance is directly related to the likelihood of you being involved in a crash. Its funny how insurance companies take it fantastically seriously and yet society doesn’t. The people who only care about money take it fantastically seriously but the people who are responsible for our safety don’t.
mctrials23 wrote:
Well in the first case it’s their company’s money so has direct bearing on their bonuses. In the second case it’s their country’s money (taxes needing spend fixing up after drivers), so it does not.
Appeal after cyclist
Appeal after cyclist assaulted with vehicle…
https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2024/october/28-10-2024/appeal-for-witnesses-following-assault–newport-pagnell/
That’s got to be the crapest
That’s got to be the crapest police report ever. Its blindingly obvious that plod has zero expectation of it going anywhere. “The car was a white saloon. Swerved towards a cyclist. He fell and hurt his wrist. Didn’t need hospital. Please help us.”
The cost to the tax payer of that report was probably in the thousands.
Weird take on it. IMO the
Weird take on it. IMO the wording is as you would expect for an appeal.
What I thought was quite interesting, is the fact it’s being treated as an assault, rather than a driving offence.
HoarseMann wrote:
Don’t think he means the police appeal but the original report. It’s part of the standard troll pattern to denigrate anything that concerns cyclists – even if, as in this case, it’s an attempted vehicular assault – as “that’s nothing, why did you even report it?” Tiresome.
My buddy Rendal. Wide of the
My buddy Rendel. Wide of the mark as always and high on childish insults. I thought you had to log off your mums computer at tea time?
alexuk (possibly previously
Dear me.
Should there be a new element
Should there be a new element of the driving practical test involving following a sat-nav that has been purposefully setup to give wrong/dangerous directions to see how drivers respond…?
It wouldn’t be possible on public roads, but could be done on a private (DVLA) track.
Or it could be done on a simulator.
Anyone not driving safely by ignoring the wrong/dangerous instructions given should fail.
“Sat-nav companies make changes after fatal crash”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dp40kpvzdo
sadly in invernerss, an
sadly in invernerss, an influx of diversity has introduced unregistered dirtbikes being used on roads, pavements and the canal towpaths – along with private e-scooters and EUC.
what enforcement or prosecutions have there been? answers on a postcard.
“an influx of diversity” –
“an influx of diversity” – care to expand on that?
I think they mean people from
I think they mean people from *shudder* Aberdeen.
spen wrote:
what once was mostly homogenous is now more hetrogenous. duh.
I looked at the Echo site,
I looked at the Echo site, and that picture on the header of the Dibden Purlieu story really is the cycle lane in DP… A pretty standard – if not wider than normal, TBH – cycle lane, separated from the footway by a solid white line.
I bet these people were all previously complaining about cyclists on the roadway…
A “keen cyclist” you say?
A “keen cyclist” you say? Saying that the “scheme has absolutely made it more dangerous for both drivers and pedestrians”?
He’ll be handing his Sidis, lycra and hi-vis back in, I hope?
Oh no no no. He’s not one of
Oh no no no. He’s not one of the lycra clad ones you see
Um, no round up of the
Um, no round up of the weekend racing?
It was only the Euros, after
It was only the Euros, after all – and some epic racing across the categories
Cars ruin villages, not cycle
Cars ruin villages, not cycle lanes.
kingleo wrote:
No, cars also ruin cycle lanes.
“It is difficult for drivers
“It is difficult for drivers to see cyclists in the dark if their headlights are faulty” says Dan Brothwell.
He was very restrained and could have easily added “if they are using their mobile phone, slurping their shit takeway milky coffee-style beverage or chomping on a Greggs breakfast”, as so many drivers seem happy to do while on the move.
And that’s before we consider other common issues such as deficient eyesight, tinted, frozen or misted-up windscreen, illegal or under-inflated tyres and drug/alcohol in a driver’s bloodstream.
So the cycle lane ruined the
So the cycle lane ruined the village, because of the unclear markings and accidents are happening because of the cycle lane markings. Which is it? They’re unclear or they’re causing accidents?