“Obviously designed by a motorist”: New “Kerplunk-style” slalom barriers on cycle path divide opinion; Bizarre Wout van Aert/Tory party crossover; Cyclists blast party’s call for bus lane suspension; Footballers who ride Lime Bikes + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
Weekend roundup (featuring You Know Who)
Warning: Our usual Monday morning roundup of all the weekend’s cycling news may contain a disappointingly necessary reference to a retired, bang average, faux-intellectual professional footballer-turned-scattergun social media shock jock (and no, I still haven’t forgiven him for that sending off at Man City on the last day of the 2011/12 season)…
To be honest, I’m actually surprised it took him that long to turn his attention to cycling. Anyway, here’s the roundup:
> Four cyclists fined as police force shares footage of group ride stopped for ignoring red light
> Shimano is developing AI suspension adjustment
> Green with Enve: Spoon Customs’ head-turning limited edition XCR Izoard with Enve components
Joey who? A footballer/cycling post we can all get behind
Some players go home in a G-Wagon.
Kenny Tete catches a lime bike 😂
📹 TT: Scottish69 pic.twitter.com/Qz6JgSmbbT
— Fulhamish (@FulhamishPod) January 13, 2024
Our Fulham-supporting live blogger and news editor Dan will be particularly pleased with Dutch (what else?) full back Kenny Tete’s latest bid to make our coveted Footballers Who Cycle XI. Not sure he’ll be able to dislodge Lee Dixon though. I’ll have a word with Neil and Roberto in the gaffer’s office…
Bike racing, bike racing everywhere…
It may only be the middle of January, but we seem to have already hit that sweet spot in the calendar, when bike races are coming at you thick and fast from a whole host of disciplines and from all over the world (yes, it’s also that one time of the year when we can empathise with our fellow cycling fans down under).
So, just in case you’re struggling to keep up with the pace – don’t worry, you’ll get used to it by classic season – here’s a quick roundup of all the weekend’s racing action…
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
At the Women’s Tour Down Under, 23-year-old Sarah Gigante put years of illness, crashes, injuries, heart problems, and contract turmoil behind her with an emphatic, cathartic win on her home race’s hallowed ground of Willunga Hill, beating Nienke Vinke, Neve Bradbury, and Amanda Spratt to secure the overall victory, possibly the biggest of her young and turbulent career so far.
What’s more, the AG Insurance-Soudal rider is heading back to Willunga on Saturday to race a time trial against the climb’s retired king Richie Porte, in a bid to break her own Strava QOM – which she set in 2021 – after a strong headwind prevented her from recording a new fastest time during her Tour Down Under-winning ride at the weekend.
“I’m coming back on Saturday, for a new attempt. There’s a Willunga time trial, against Richie. He’s retired but I’m not, so look out,” Gigante said. Talk about setting a marker down.
Dutch 🇳🇱 champion @lucinda_brand @Baloise_Trek #nkveldrijden pic.twitter.com/BoXQqceJr0
— Bart Hazen (@Bartoli84) January 14, 2024
Away from the road and the heat of Australia, and onto the freezing, muddy fields of northern Europe, where Lucinda Brand revealed that a broken nose could be her season’s secret weapon, as she recovered from her horrific crash at last Sunday’s Zonhoven World Cup to beat Puck Pieterse and Annemarie Worst and secure her third Dutch national cyclocross championship title in Hoogeveen.
Meanwhile, in Falkirk, Cameron Mason and Anna Kay put in two supremely dominant performances to blow the field away at the British championships, as Kay secured her maiden national senior title and Mason, riding on home turf, doubled up on his inaugural success last year to nab another 12 months in the British stripes.
(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
And, speaking of British stripes, Josie Knight won the individual pursuit on the final day of the European Track Championships in Apeldoorn, ensuring Team GB ended up at the top of the medal table with six golds and 14 overall – the nation’s best ever performance at a Euros. Which certainly bodes well for a certain rendezvous in Paris later this year…
Are bike path barriers really about keeping pedestrians safe?
Over on the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, Luke has raised an interesting point about the oft-cited argument that cycle path barriers – such as the slalom-style ones installed in Salford – are put in place to keep pedestrians using the route safe:
The argument that they’re good for slowing cyclists down and making pedestrians safer on the route would be more compelling if the only place they were installed wasn’t at the point that cars entered the equation.
— lukebmtb.bsky.social (@LukeB_MTB) January 15, 2024
I regret to inform you that live blog ‘favourite’ Ashley Neal is at it again…
> YouTube driving instructor Ashley Neal visits new CYCLOPS cycling junction… and calls it an “absolutely awful waste of time and money”
Oh, there’s a debate about cycle path barriers, you say? Meanwhile, over on Finland’s extremely barrier-less ‘ice path’…
I wonder if over in Oulu they have frothing social media debates about skiers and skaters putting cyclists and pedestrians in danger on shared-use ice paths? Hmmm…
It’s the one we’ve all really been waiting for – the road.cc Recommends Bargain Buys of the Year!
> Unveiling the ultimate cycling bargains: check out the road.cc Recommends Bargain Buys of the Year 2023/24
Happy Pothole Day! Pothole reporting set to be made “easier than ever” thanks to updated Cycling UK tool
Happy Pothole Day, to all who celebrate the annual reminder that Britain’s roads are crumbling fast and creating an ever-present danger for cyclists and road users around the country.
And to mark the occasion, Cycling UK is relaunching a refreshed version of its pothole reporting tool, Fill That Hole, which first launched way back in the misty realm that was 2007.
According to the cycling charity, around 200,000 potholes have been reported using the app, which sends the reports directly to the relevant highway authority. If the authority fails to take action, these reports can then help others in the future to claim for damage or injury against the local authority if the neglected road defect causes a crash.
“Thanks to reports made by Fill That Hole’s thousands of users over the years, dangerous stretches of our roads have been identified, fixed, and made safe for all road users,” Cycling UK’s chief executive Sarah Mitchell said of Fill That Hole’s update, which was secured through funding and support from law firm Fletchers Cycle SOS.
“It’s important to report road defects when we find them for the safety of us all, and Cycling UK hopes that everyone who cycles will make these reports more easily than ever using Fill That Hole.”
“Bang to rights, I’m afraid”: Surrey Police release fuller version of controversial clip of cyclists fined for ignoring red light
It’s fair to say that yesterday’s story about the group of cyclists who received fines for ignoring a red light sparked something of a controversy online, with many cyclists, including Leigh Day lawyer Rory McCarron, pointing out that Surrey RoadSafe’s oddly truncated footage of the cyclists’ misdemeanour failed, in fact, to actually show the riders passing the stop line while the lights were red.
Why is this video unnecessarily cropped to show the cyclists already passed the stop line and not crossing this when the light is red? Surely more dangerous for them to wait in the junction? HC: “Red means ‘Stop’. Wait behind the stop line on the carriageway”. pic.twitter.com/0O0DMmdrPg
— Rory McCarron (@CyclingLawLDN) January 14, 2024
However, in a bid to quell the backlash, this afternoon the road safety partnership released a much fuller version of the original, “unnecessarily cropped” clip.
“Following on from yesterday’s post, there were a lot of questions raised as to whether the cyclist had travelled over the stop line when the lights were red,” the account wrote.
“As you can see from the downloaded cleartone, the lights were red when they crossed the stop line and then continued.”
Following on from yesterdays post, there were a lot of questions raised as to whether the cyclist had travelled over the stop line when the lights were red.
As you can see from the downloaded cleartone, the lights were red when they crossed the stop line and then continued. https://t.co/ChHvVmOMRU pic.twitter.com/v8UqkXSkkt
— Surrey RoadSafe (@SurreyRS) January 15, 2024
As road.cc reader Rendel Harris noted in the comments of the original article, “bang to rights, I’m afraid”.
Is this the real race? Or is this just road.cc Fantasy Cycling?
The men’s Tour Down Under kicks off tonight/tomorrow (oh, I don’t know), which means only one thing – the road.cc Fantasy Cycling league is back!
And following on from my top 10 result at last year’s Tour de France, your favourite live blogger – no, not Dan – is aiming for some Pogačar-style dominance this season.
So, if you reckon you can beat my world class fantasy cycling tekkers, make sure to pick your team over at fantasy.road.cc before the TDU’s theme tunes starts playing tonight, and I’ll see you in October (when you’ve all invariably thrashed me because I forgot about Tirreno-Adriatico…).
Good luck!
Cycling to work, the key to good mental health
A new study from researchers at the University of Edinburgh has highlighted the beneficial impact on mental health that cycling to work can have, with those who commute by bike less likely to be prescribed antidepressants.
The research, published today in the International Journal of Epidemiology, is the work of Chris Dibben, Laurie Berrie, Zhiqiang Feng, David Rice, Tom Clemens, and Lee Williamson, and is titled: ‘Does cycle commuting reduce the risk of mental ill-health? An instrumental variable analysis using distance to nearest cycle path’.
Linking commuting data from Glasgow and Edinburgh, accessed via the Scottish population census, with mental health prescriptions from the National Health Service Prescribing Information System records, researchers were able to note cycle commuters had a lower level of mental health prescriptions than among other commuter types.
British Cycling joins forces with road user and industry groups as part of ‘Pothole Partnership’ to call for urgent action on Britain’s potholes, as reports of road defects hit five-year high
As new data reveals that almost 630,000 potholes were reported to councils in England, Scotland, and Wales between January and November 2023 (with the total number expected to be much higher due to only half of the local authorities releasing their figures), British Cycling has joined forces with road safety and industry groups to call for urgent action on Britain’s decaying roads.
Coinciding with National Pothole Day, the launch of the new Pothole Partnership – formed by the governing body, along with the AA, the National Motorcyclists Council, IAM RoadSmart, the British Motorcyclists Federation, and manufacturer JCB – includes a five-point plan to government for tackling the issue, with a core focus on guaranteed funding and delivering high-quality repairs which last.
“We know from our members that potholes are a longstanding frustration and concern,” says Caroline Julian, British Cycling’s External Affairs Director.
“They have tragic and fatal consequences that cannot be ignored. If we’re serious about fulfilling our ambitions to get more people cycling, we simply must ensure that our roads are safe and comfortable for them to ride on, and not the crater-filled carriageways they currently face.
“As we begin a General Election year, today’s call sits alongside our work with the Walking and Cycling Alliance to ensure that the interests of our members are heard, understood and represented by parties and candidates ahead of polling day.”
Can the Conservative Party harness the spirit and strength of Wout van Aert ahead of this year’s election? Well, their WVA-obsessed campaign director certainly hopes so…
Now, retired pro cyclists have long dabbled in the dark art of electioneering once they’ve hung up their bikes – Sonny Colbrelli and Claudio Chiappucci’s unsuccessful forays into Italian regional politics two recent notable examples – but here’s one professional cycling/politics crossover I’m sure you never expected to see ahead of this year’s (probable) general election.
According to the Financial Times, Isaac Levido – the man charged with the frankly terrifying and daunting task of steering Rishi Sunak’s faltering Conservatives to a highly unlikely fifth straight election victory – is apparently obsessed with Wout van Aert.
What Wout did to deserve that dubious accolade, I’ll never know.
Blue or red, Wout – which one is it? (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
The FT notes that campaign director Levido is particularly smitten with the Belgian’s ability to swap from world-class leader in the classics to a domestique de luxe at the Tour de France, “half killing himself to protect his leaders and drag the team through the mountains”.
“The Australian political strategist expects similar Tory discipline and graft as he tries to get Sunak over the line,” the FT notes.
Can’t say Sunak is much of a Jonas Vingegaard, mind you.
And, considering Wout’s penchant for second place finishes and their recent head-to-head record on the road and in the ‘cross field, I reckon it would be rather prudent right now of Labour’s campaign director to let it slip that he’s a massive fan of Mathieu van der Poel…
“Yet more proof our politicians only think about people in cars”: Cyclists blast party’s call for bus lanes to be suspended during upcoming transport strike
Over in Northern Ireland – where, as regular live blog readers will know, the track record on active travel isn’t mightily impressive – the prospect of major strike action on Thursday, which will see tens of thousands of public service workers, including bus and train drivers, walk out, has prompted one political party to call for bus lanes to be suspended for one day only.
“Bus lanes should be suspended for the duration to ease any expected congestion from private car usage, which would also bring an environmental benefit from reducing the number of cars idling in traffic,” David Honeyford, the infrastructure spokesperson for the cross-community Alliance Party, the third largest party in Northern Ireland, told the BBC.
“It would be a sensible approach in terms of maximising traffic flows, especially during rush hours, and minimising air pollution, until the industrial action is finished and bus services resume.”
However, Alliance’s call to suspend bus lanes during the strike – to accommodate motorists – has been heavily criticised by cyclists and active travel campaigners on social media, who claim the stance is “yet more proof our politicians only think about people in cars”.
So use a protected space for bikes?? @allianceparty please no
— Stephen Esq. (@IsMiseStiofan) January 14, 2024
“Bad move, Alliance,” Athena said on Twitter. “Protect the bus lanes for cyclists.”
“There will be a lot less traffic in general if schools are closed and lots of healthcare staff on strike. Bus lanes aren’t just for buses. Another own goal by Alliance. I thought you were cycling supporters!” wrote Niall, while the Belfast Urbanist described the statement as “a policy straight out of the Conservative Party playbook”.
“And what about all the cyclists who use the bus lanes to escape the perils of the quite frankly shocking level of general driving here?” asked the Holywood Cyclist account.
“Buses are not the only users. Yet more proof our politicians only think about people in cars.”
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Northern Ireland’s Department for Infrastructure – known for its active travel faux pas over the years – secured a rare PR win in the eyes of cyclists for the government body, telling Alliance that bus lanes, regardless of strike action, encourage people to consider other sustainable travel methods, including walking, cycling, and car sharing.
“Bus lanes will remain operational during the industrial action for cyclists, motorcyclists, permitted taxis, any operating buses, which could include buses provided by health and education authorities, and the emergency services,” the DfI spokesperson said.
“Bus lane enforcement will continue as normal. Maintaining safe spaces for cyclists and motorcyclists, as well as providing ease of access for the emergency services, is always important but even more so when traffic volumes are high.”
“What’s it for? Ferret slalom racing? Because it’s certainly not for cyclists”: New “Kerplunk-style” barriers on cycle path divide opinion
The placement of barriers on cycle paths – and their impact on encouraging cycling, along with accessibility for those with non-standard cycles – has long proved a source of discussion and debate on road.cc and around the wider cycling world.
Last March, delivery cyclist and ultra-cycling legend Steve Abraham criticised Milton Keynes Council’s decision to install a growing number of barriers and bollards on the city’s cycleways and shared use routes, which he claimed prevented them being used by delivery riders with large bike trailers – that were themselves supplied by the council.
And in September, a cyclist in Newcastle sent a legal letter to the city’s council to challenge the lawfulness of barriers on a National Cycle Route which prevent him from accessing the path on his recumbent.
So, it was no surprise then when this attention-grabbing image – of a cycling and walking route in Salford, and its newly-installed barriers – popped up on social media, that it soon divided opinion and left many cyclists scratching their heads.
Apparently RHS Bridgewater are confused as to why no one is cycling there
This is the main route to the garden pic.twitter.com/6t9B1SnYXE
— Walk Ride Central Salford (@WRSalford) January 13, 2024
This, ahem, interesting set of barriers – the design of which seems to have taken inspiration from the marble-dropping kid’s game Kerplunk – are located on the walking and cycling route that connects Boothstown, Walkden, and Worsley to RHS Garden Bridgewater, introduced over the past few weeks to improve traffic-free sustainable travel in Salford.
Not that the path’s layout is encouraging people to ride their bikes to RHS Garden Bridgewater, at least in the eyes of local cyclists.
“Apparently RHS Bridgewater are confused as to why no one is cycling there,” the Walk Ride Central Salford group tweeted at the weekend. “Eight chicanes on one stretch of path. This was not on the design spec.”
“Obviously designed by a motorist,” added Pete, while others called on a similar design to be instead implemented on the road, to slow down motorists.
Noting that the road the path intersects is a “dead-end access road”, Tom asked the rhetorical (but highly likely to have been asked by the planners) question: “Should we do something to slow cars on this tiny dead-end street, or should we do something to slow cycles on the much longer cycle route?”
When a municipality builds a cycle route https://t.co/A3Urf9bOtv pic.twitter.com/5npq3wY2G6
— J’trace (@Jtrace_a_stras) January 14, 2024
Others, meanwhile, saw the funny side in the barriers’ rather tricky placement.
“Are they remaking The Krypton Factor?” asked Gaz, while Sam said he “thought this was an equestrian events ground at first glance”.
“What’s it for? Ferret slalom racing? It’s certainly not for cyclists that’s for sure,” added Russ, and Pauline, oddly, reckoned it “looks like a giant scale eighties leg hair remover device”.
Did they model it on a potato chipper but for humans? 🤷🏻♂️ when will UK local authorities get Active Travel? pic.twitter.com/k50ff7D5m8
— Paul Bower (@paul_bower) January 13, 2024
“I think you’ll find that’s the official cargo trike Olympic slalom course, new event: Minimum two passengers must be carried at all times, so they can lift the trike over any barriers which have are totally impassable at ground level…” wrote road.cc Podcast guest Kate Ball, from disabled cycling charity Wheels for Wellbeing, providing a serious counterpoint to the impracticality of barriers designed purely, it seems, to slow ‘speeding’ cyclists.
“Do those barriers meet equality standards?” asked Dorinda. “I watched the programme on RHS Bridgewater’s construction, and I’m sure part of the agreement from Salford Council investing was that it would be accessible to the community. It should be easily accessible WITHOUT a car.”
However, other social media users – you see where this is going – didn’t seem to have much of a problem with the barriers, believing their job of slowing down cyclists would keep pedestrians using the path safe.
“Imagine having to share it with pedestrians, the utter outrage,” Hilton wrote under Walk Ride Central Salford’s post.
“As a mountain biker can I say WTF …if a cyclist can’t be arsed to go around that then I doubt they will get on a bike for long anyway. It’s not difficult and it’s not hard,” said Rob.
Don’t see what the issue is? Is it to slow bikes down? If the case what is the issue?
— p9798 (@POck9798) January 13, 2024
“If you can’t cycle around them, perhaps you should be on cycle paths or road. They are there for the safety of pedestrians. If you have to slow down, so what,” added Gary.
“Shouldn’t have bikes on public footpaths, well done to the council, people can now walk safely and not have to jump out of the way for unlicensed uninsured untested cyclists!” wrote Si, filling up his anti-cycling bingo card nice and early in the week.
Eh, Joey, is that you?
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
31 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@SVXY Rule 66 of the highway code says you can ride two abreast but to also 'be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in groups.' It does not say you can ride three or four abreast which would not be considerate of the needs of other road users. As the highway code is used by prosecution lawyers as evidence to convict in Road Traffic Act offences cases you certainly could therefore be prosecuted and convicted for careless cycling if cycling three or four abreast
@SVXY This is a curious tactic - rebutting your own argument with your very next sentence.
Affordable? Starting at £6K? You 'having a larf?
@SVXY Ah, so it *is* the "flood the zone with shit" argumentation technique then? Or perhaps ... you are genuinely unclear about the difference between the Highway code and the law (and perhaps the difference between cyclists, drivers and indeed horse riders? And rusty on safe practice? As mdavidford notes you appear to be confusing rule with Rule 66 (for cyclists, which doesn't say anything about not riding x abreast) with Rule 53 (for horse riders which gives guidance not to more than double up - I don't think this is a direct summary of any law since "should" not "must"). Charitably I'm going with "*i* know what it says!" which as I noted many of people feel they do. Anyway away with you, I feel you've had your fill of attention for today.
Road tax was abolished in 1937 by Winston Churchill because, as he said, "road tax makes motorists believe they are the moral owners of our roads." He got that right.
@SVXY None of the magistrates who sentenced him said the CPS should have charged him with dangerous driving. Why should they? He was not speeding, he was not on his phone and he was not drunk or under the influence of drugs either
@SVXY The court does not decide on whether someone was driving carelessly or dangerously, they can only decide on the guilt or otherwise of the defendant on the charge the CPS decides to lay against them. The CPS is notorious for preferring to charge careless rather than dangerous because it's an easier win; this results in entirely unjust sentences such as this one.
@Rendel Harris Wearing sandals may be fine if cycling on tracks over fields or in a quiet residential street with a 20 or 30mph limit. It is not sensible cycling on a 60mph main road
@chrisonabike maybe, but things that used to be banter & jokes in the 1960s/1970s have (thankfully) become socially unacceptable , and this is mostly because enough people spoke up about it. We even managed to make drink-driving a lot less acceptable, by the same means.
@Rendel Harris Yes, he was driving at 55mph in a 60mph road. The court verdict was he was not driving dangerously but carelessly eg he should have had his visor down to keep out the sun so he could monitor the road ahead.
31 thoughts on ““Obviously designed by a motorist”: New “Kerplunk-style” slalom barriers on cycle path divide opinion; Bizarre Wout van Aert/Tory party crossover; Cyclists blast party’s call for bus lane suspension; Footballers who ride Lime Bikes + more on the live blog”
Happy National Pothole Day!!!
Happy National Pothole Day!!!!
It doesnt seem as if those
It doesnt seem as if those Kerplpunk barriers were put there to limit cyclist pedestrian mixing – more to stop run away bikes near the road. When as others have said on a dead end limited use road it seems like over kill. Probably same result could have been achieved with a more winding path…
What’s really needed there is
What’s really needed there is a set of traffic lights. They’re on green by default for cyclists/pedestrians, and red for cars. If a car arrives, the driver has to wind down the window, press a beg button, and wait a minimum of 3 minutes for a green light irrespective of whether there’s anyone using the walking/cycling route.
The cycle paths I used in
The cycle paths I used in Cheltenham were covered in these too. I can appreciate why they’re there in theory (to slow cyclists down for crossings/inclines/blind areas where there might be conflict) but in practice all they do is funnel pedestrians into the same space as cyclists and create way more conflict. My favourite was this gem of a tight slalom (under the trees, you can just see the end of it) which was impassible on a long wheelbase tourer, let alone a trike/recumbant/cargo bike. It’s on a blind incline that forces peds/cyclists travelling in both directions to share the same 50cmx50cm block of path (again, on a blind incline). Absolute chaos, every time I used it.
The “road” is a cul-de-sac to
The “road” is a cul-de-sac to about 12 houses.
Update: Sorry – 24 houses. They are semis.
Hey Ryan, how about a round
Hey Ryan, how about a round-up of the British National Cyclo-cross champs from over the weekend? Or is some rubbish about Van Aert more important?
Or maybe you guys are still recovering from watching British Cycling’s top class coverage…
dubwise wrote:
— dubwiseYou surely mean the dreadful quality, barely watchable/listenable BC coverage? I watched some of Saturday on YT and the sound was so poor I tried BBC iplayer but it was no better. They’ve spent the Shell money on trackies so cyclo-cross – surely the biggest participation BC discipline – can get lost.
I managed to watch some of the French federation’s stream of their nationals on Sunday morning. A world of difference! Clear pictures, good camera angles, excellent sound quality from the commentary pair. Could even hear the on-site announcer (is Daniel Mangeas still going? it sounded like his voice) and it looked far better with lots of adverts etc on the barriers.
The best footage I saw from Falkirk was Giorgio Coppola’s course preview, which also gave a great impression of just how hard it was for mere mortals.
My son and I were on Saturday
My son and I were there on Saturday and had a great day. Only down side was missing the junior men.
Settled down yesterday to watch it back and gave up after 5mins with a thumping headache.
Pitiful garbage from BC.
Big up to all the winners, especially Cam Mason. I think he spent longer with the kids after the race than the race itself.
Also for Cat Ferguson who won by almost 4mins, incredible talent.
On the salford story I’m
On the salford story I’m rather more concerned with the attempts in the comments to label cyclists as sexual offenders. Maybe road.cc you should give not oxygen to certain commentators ?
RE: slalom cycle barriers.
RE: slalom cycle barriers. If your problem* is “dangerously fast cyclists around pedestrians” then any solution which keeps mixing pedestrians and cyclists isn’t a solution.
I think perhaps there is also some “stop the child running / cycling straight out in from of a car” logic here?
(P.S. I agree that this isn’t a solution anyway, but that’s because if there are any significant volume of cyclists OR pedestrians then the solution is each gets their own space to avoid conflict, so they can travel in a way appropriate to that mode and feel safe. And living in Edinburgh I have some experience of cycle slaloms!)
* “Problem” actually is very little real danger but perceived danger and unpleasantness (conflict). I think it’s totally correct to consider that – but I draw rather different conclusions! I think this is still evidence of a belief that “cyclists are either just like smaller, stealthier motorbikes, which in turn are like one-person sports cars, OR they’re like enormous wobbly children on their first bike ride – so obviously they’ll have no problem getting off and walking regularly”.
Isaac Levido has something of
Isaac Levido has something of the night about him.
I believe he was responsible for the Conservative Party dishonestly pretending to be a non-existent organisation called FactCheckUK during the last GE.
I remember that.
I remember that.
I thought it was an amusing political PR stunt, on a feed clearly identified as “CCHQ Press Office”, with hugely embarrassing overreactions.
I think the reaction was
I think the reaction was appropriate.
Deliberately misleading the voting public in order to undermine a political rival is standard practise for the tories, but it should never be accepted.
Given the prominent CCHQ
Given the prominent CCHQ branding I don’t call that one misleading tbh.
But we all have our views.
mattw wrote:
And what does “CCHQ” represent, other an attempt to confuse with GCHQ?
ROOTminus1 wrote:
Given the prominent CCHQ branding I don’t call that one misleading tbh.
But we all have our views.
— ROOTminus1 And what does “CCHQ” represent, other an attempt to confuse with GCHQ?— mattw
Conservative Campaign HQ and it has done for years.
I guess they knew that the average Labour voter was usually of a low enough IQ not to see those things.
There are those of us who can
There are those of us who can see that CCHQ is deliberately as small as possible, and then there are other people.
We may all have our views, but only some are fact-based.
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Northern Ireland’s Department for Infrastructure – known for its active travel faux pas over the years – secured a rare PR win in the eyes of cyclists for the government body, telling Alliance that bus lanes, regardless of strike action, encourage people to consider other sustainable travel methods, including walking, cycling, and car sharing.
“Bus lanes will remain operational during the industrial action for cyclists, motorcyclists, permitted taxis, any operating buses, which could include buses provided by health and education authorities, and the emergency services,” the DfI spokesperson said.
“Bus lane enforcement will continue as normal. Maintaining safe spaces for cyclists and motorcyclists, as well as providing ease of access for the emergency services, is always important but even more so when traffic volumes are high.”
Northern Ireland doing something right? What psychedelic was my morning coffee spiked with?
For some reason I can’t
For some reason I can’t comment on the page itself.
https://road.cc/content/news/road-rage-motorist-arrested-cyclist-incident-306173
So the motorist was arrested in November, with plenty of witnesses and officers on scene seeing his behaviour and has yet NOT been charged?
Those Kerplunk barriers need
Those Kerplunk barriers need a carefully written letter to the Council before they become institutionalised.
The surface also seems to be a problem.
So a theoretical polite and
So a
theoreticalhypothetical polite and reasonable cyclist would approach this, see pedestrians (or other cyclists) coming through and know that there wasn’t room to pass them whilst within this little maze; so they’d wait until the other parties had come through (by which time there would be more coming through).Seems like it’s fine for pedestrians – everyone knows they walk too fast to RHS gardens anyway – but as a cyclist I think I’d be looking into what alternative routes there are.
Hmm – perhaps that was the intention…
New levels of entitlement
New levels of entitlement
And we share the
roadsped/cycle infra with these people1 and 3 clips from the start time
I see that the Surrey Police
I see that the Surrey Police have published the full video clip showing the now-bang-to-rights group of cyclists committing the red light offence.
Fair cop.
https://twitter.com/SurreyRS/status/1746912014071451649
If they had dismounted at the
If they had dismounted at the line, and then got back on and turned right, would that have been legal?
If the study on cycling and
If the study on cycling and anti depressants is correct it could mean a saving of literally billions to the NHS by providing proper cycling infra.
According to a quick google, depression costs the NHS somewhere in the region of £100bn. If 9% instead of 14% of people needed care for health issues caused by depression (the study above only looks at anti depressant prescription but it may well extrapolate to other healthcare costs) thanks to cycling to work that would be a saving of somewhere around £30bn.
They could spend £400 per person in the UK per year on cycling initiatives and infra and save money just on the costs of depression, with all the savings in reduced obesity related illness being on top of that.
Health is a big one! There
Health is a big one! There are other quantifiable benefits also – as well as more subjective “nicer places“. Some analysis suggesting building (good quality) cycle infra gives a decent return on investment from the UK government, Denmark, plus a good collection of such studies and articles here.
Quote:
Something tells me this five point plan doesn’t include taxing heavy vehicles, such as those made by JCB, in proportion to the road wear they cause..
it doesn’t
it doesn’t
Car Delenda Est wrote:
The vast majority of products from JCB are not used on public highways, and subsequently cause very little wear I imagine.
The kerplunk barriers are
The kerplunk barriers are just repeating the victim-blaming mentality of our society at large when applied to roads. The danger comes from drivers, not cyclists, but the only measure to reduce risk is applied to cyclists, not drivers, the exact opposite of all H&S principles.
The Kerplunk barrier on teh
The Kerplunk barrier on teh Route to the RHS Bridgwater site is at
53.511330, -2.396725
which is at
///jumpy.wheels.spices