It looks like it’s a day for divisive internet polls, then.
Because, in direct contravention of the Highway Code, ITV’s ever insightful Good Morning Britain took to X/Twitter early this morning to ask viewers, “Is it drivers’ responsibility to keep cyclists safe on the roads?”
Yep, two years on from the updated Highway Code being published, we’re still being treated to national television programmes coming up with nonsense like this.
> Changes to the Highway Code mean very little if they are not known or followed by motorists
That head scratching poll, and its accompanying segment on the show, was made in response to live blog stalwart and pedalling presenter Jeremy Vine’s backing of an AA campaign, which has just reached its 10th anniversary, to encourage motorists to place “Think Bike” stickers on their wing mirrors to remind them to keep an eye out for people on bikes – after a survey of 12,700 AA members found that 89 per cent agreed with the statement ‘it’s sometimes hard to see cyclists’.
> AA "Think Bikes" awareness campaign admits drivers don't look, suggests wing mirror stickers will remind them
“I’m so pleased to see that the AA is doing this because, if you’re on two wheels, you do feel quite vulnerable,” Vine said.
“And I always think when you’re in a car – I drive too – you don’t always see that that person on the bicycle is a mum, a sister, somebody’s son, someone’s grandfather, maybe even their great-grandfather.”
So, what did GMB do in response to Vine and the AA’s safety-focused recommendations? Launch a Twitter poll, that’s what:
So far, rather unsurprisingly for social media, the Highway Code vulnerability hierarchy-backed option ‘Yes’ is taking a thumping, with over 70 per cent opting for ‘No’.
And some of the responses are as equally unsurprising.
“Everyone has a responsibility!” says Craig. “Cyclists can be just as bad as anyone else in a motor vehicle.”
“If we put a sticker on the mirrors that would impede our vision even more by blocking part of the mirror itself,” Stebe said.
“Can cyclists put a sticker somewhere to remind them what a red light means!!!” exclamation mark-loving Sean the Cabbie wrote.
“It’s everyone responsibility to keep themselves safe,” added Chris. “Cyclists should stick to cycle lanes, and adhere to the rules of the road like cars and follow traffic lights. Likewise cars should not be in cycle lanes or park in them etc. Everyone has a role to play in road safety.”
While John popped up with some anti-cycling bingo classics: “Put the sticker next to the cyclist’s tax, insurance, and registration.”
“Let’s start by getting cyclists to get regular eye checks so they recognise and understand what a red traffic light actually means,” Sally added, securing a full house.
Sigh…
However, not everyone was falling for the GMB social media intern’s trap.
“This isn’t up for debate, it’s in the Highway Code. 72 per cent of the voters are wrong,” noted Marc, while Sam wrote: “Anyone who chose ‘no’ has failed their driving test”.
“The fact that drivers need to be reminded to look out for vulnerable road users tells us everything we need to know about the standard of driving in this country,” added Tom.
Well, all that internet polling ultimately led to a short segment at the very tail end of GMB’s schedule, featuring Stop Killing Cyclists co-founder Donnachadh McCarthy and Manchester taxi driver John Consterdine.
“It’s down to all road users to use the roads safely and sanely,” McCarthy said. “However, it is only drivers who have the power to kill other road users, so the responsibility lies with the driver.
“And something like 70 per cent of drivers close pass, 50 per cent of drivers break the speed limit, and 30 per cent of drivers use mobile phones. I saw two Land Rover drivers on Sunday swanning down a lane on their mobiles. They should be looking for cyclists and the road, not their phones.”
“I agree with Donnachadh to a certain extent,” replied John. “But we should have legislation that if drivers have to drive safely, cyclists should also obey the rules of the road.
“If I hit a cyclist, there’s going to be a serious accident. But if a cyclist hits me, then he just cycles away and I’m left with a damaged vehicle.”
Hmmm… Don’t worry, it gets worse.
“Shouldn’t there be training for cyclists? Or a sticker that says ‘Beware, I’m going to do something crazy’.”
> The Highway Code for cyclists — all the rules you need to know for riding on the road explained
Presenter Kate Garraway, seemingly oblivious to the Highway Code, then jumped in by saying she sees a lot of cyclists “wafting across lanes and going through red lights” in London, and questioned why there was no pressure on cyclists to act safely.
“This red light canard needs to be put to bed,” interjected McCarthy. “99 per cent of people who get killed by people breaking red lights are killed by drivers breaking the red light.
“In Holland, 70 per cent of kids cycle to school and they do it safely. It’s two per cent in Britain. We’re way behind Europe.”
And finally, Labour politician-turned-dancing enthusiast Ed Balls got involved, asking whether cycle lanes and cycling infrastructure makes it safer for motorists, before John threw in a few more chestnuts about pavement riding and e-bike speeds, and Kate asked, rather remarkably, “Is that the answer? Some kind of enforced Highway Code, like a driving test, insurance and responsibility, for cyclists?”
Now, imagine that, actually reading the Highway Code…
Add new comment
84 comments
It's Josh's eye for detail that makes his articles so readable and trustworthy...
Makes you see how the 2016 referendum went the way it did though.
“The barriers to cycling are pretty insane if you have a low budget,”
The main barrier to cycling is the preponderance of large 2+ tonne metal boxes encroaching on our personal space whether on a tesco £40 or top of the range specialized bike.
It's a very weird post from Mark Contador, unless he meant to say "The barriers to cycling (in a cycling club, if you have low self esteem, and be taken very seriously and not worry that someone might take the piss out of you) are pretty insane if you have a low budget."
It would then make more sense, He appears to be one of those mafia lycra wearing, red light jumping, Strava obsessed, car hating cyclists...with low self esteem.
I sold my lovely 30 year old Muddy Fox to someone who wanted a nippy cycle for town use earlier this year. Flat pedals, plastic soft feel grips, no lycra required to use it. It cost me £40 20 years ago, and I sold it for £20. I'd already sold the chunky, shin shredding, Warner pedals for £20.
Yesterday I rode my winter bike on muddy Yorkshire roads. It's a Raleigh Airlite that I bought 17 years ago for about £350. I've added a few bits over the years as stuff wore out. My first set of SKS mudguards wore out after 13 years and I replaced them with a Kinesis set. I could ride that bike all year round. It was my first road bike.
Define entry level bike? people who moan about >1k bikes are usually specing things that are well above entry level
You can easily get a Trek Domane or Spec Allez for alot less than 1k, brand new from decent bike shops.
You don't have to spend a fortune on shoes or clothes or bar tape, you can if you want to and some do, it might make them pretentious if that's how you view it, but there's no barriers to cycling, only those that bored folk on twitter invent.
Why do people so often suggest these two American brands (which are relative newcomers) by default?
I suspect that it is because more recent Trek (est. 1976) and Specialized (est. 1974) bikes are in general better quality than more recent Raleigh (est. 1885) bikes.
They make sense as examples for enthusiast cycling as they make bikes for all levels of enthusiast cyclists, from £600 all the way up way above £10,000. They don't make entry level bikes in the true sense though. Its possible to buy a new bike that will do a great job for city riding and commuting for a quarter to half of the cheapest offerings from the enthusiast brands or a second hand bike for way less than that!
They don't make sense for anyone when you consider that the only thing they've got on the competition is more aggresssive marketing. People have been brainwashed into treating them as the default.
Because they're well known cycling brands & decent bikes.
I could have said Tribans, BTWins or Van Rysal, but met with blank stares by those outside of cycling world.
It's a mistake to look at top-end cycling products and decide that cycling is pretentious or aimed at the affluent. There's lots of different types of cyclist and the expensive stuff is aimed at the racers/enthusiasts, just like with other hobbies.
You wouldn't look at aftermarket racing kit for cars and judge that driving is pretentious, would you?
Knowing the time is pretentious and only for the upper classes because Rolexes cost £10,000.
Walking is pretentious and only for the upper classes because Louboutins cost £700
Is eating crisps pretentious & aimed towards the middle to upper classes?
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/the-world-s-most-expensive-crisps-a7371291.html
Mrs K was trying to buy a cheap duvet for our caravan, and stumbled on a nine grand duvet. Sleeping is pretentious and only for the upper classes.
You can spend several hundred quid on a pair of football boots & 4 grand on a Louis Vuitton football if you so choose.
See that's why fell out of love with the game - the pretentious polyester clad protagonists.
My day to day kit for the bike comprises of a pair of trouser clips and if I misplace those there's always my sock.
Well, get a load of Mr Trouser Clips over here!
*drinks tea with little finger raised*
Road.cc trawling the internet to find someone who said something disparaging about lycra and then relaying it to us to spark outrage.
It is really is low-rent stuff.
When was the last time you left a comment that was anything but a criticism of road.cc and its content? You only seem to come here to moan about it. Free country and whatever lights your candle and all that, but do you not think as it seems to make you so cross and miserable you might be better off not looking at it and finding a site that you actually like and enjoy?
HarrogateSpa trawling road.cc to find something disparaging to say.
As a fifty-five year old who's fond of a pint or two I do stupid things all the time, but at least when I do I accept they're my mistake rather than broadcast them to the world as if I'm a victim! I'd also be pretty ashamed to admit I'd spent £130 on a pair of plimsolls because Rishi Soonout wore them...
And we all believe Josh's story of course
Pages