Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news
Live blog

“Does the UCI really care about safety?” Cycling fans call for sprint rule change after “scandalous, ultra-dangerous” move by lead-out rider tees up teammate’s victory at Tour Down Under + more on the live blog

It’s Wednesday and Ryan Mallon’s back with more cycling news, views, and the occasional rambling anecdote on the midweek live blog
13:34
Are old gear levers-turned-door handles the latest must-have fashion accessory for your bike shed?

You’ve installed the turbo trainer, your n+1 bikes all have their own spot, and the Marco Pantani and ‘Pain Cave’ posters are hung up pride of place. So, what finishing touches could you add to make your new bike shed stand out from all the rest?

Well, road.cc editor Jack’s mate Tom has come up with a novel, groundbreaking door handle design that could – ahem – shift the parameters of shed aesthetics for years to come:

Bike shed lever door handles (Tom)

Tom, who built the new shed – or “bike dungeon”, as he calls it – to host his Ribble cyclocross and Dolan time trial bikes, as well as a few project builds, tools, and indoor training equipment, fashioned the revolutionary door handles from the shifters on his first ever racing bike, a Fausto Coppi replica.

He says he had the bike for 25 years before finally salvaging the levers and repurposing them for his shed. Well, at least they’re still being used, I suppose.

What do you reckon? Has Tom’s unique shed door inspired you to glance at your decades-old rusty winter bike and think, ‘You could be of use again someday’? And has he revolutionised bike shed design with one simple update? Or were you rocking the lever door handle back in the ‘90s?

Or maybe you’re not convinced and believe brifters should remain brifters to the end? Let us know in the comments…

12:38
No wonder Mr Pothole has called it a day: Council claims pothole-laden road “does not require immediate attention” following multiple complaints from cyclists and assertions road had been “fixed”

Last week on the live blog we reported that, on National Pothole Day no less, Mark Morrell – better known to all of us as the hi-vis wearing Mr Pothole – revealed that he was calling it a day and stepping back from his 12-year campaign to fix Britain’s battered roads.

Announcing the decision on Good Morning Britain, Morrell cited family reasons for his decision to halt his campaigning efforts, but also expressed his disenchantment with the governmental apathy that greeted his pothole pleas over the years, admitting: “I’ve lost faith completely in any government or political party really wanting to do something”.

Ford Road potholes, Hinton (Tass Whitby)

And based on a recent council response to road.cc’s very own Tass Whitby, who complained about a particularly hairy, pothole-laden road near Bath, only to be told it didn’t require “immediate attention”, I don’t blame him.

Tass first reported the shockingly bumpy and dangerous Ford Road, just south of Bath, between Wellow and Hinton, to Bath and North East Somerset Council last year – and was told in November that the issues had been “fixed”.

However, while cycling on the road last week, Tass discovered its cratered surface was as bad as ever.

Ford Road potholes, Hinton (Tass Whitby)

“After reporting this to you last year, I had an email from you saying this had been fixed in November. It clearly hasn’t,” Tass wrote in her latest complaint to the council.

“Can you claim back any payment you made to the contractor who said it had been fixed? Or send them back to do it properly... If I damage my car, or fall off my bike because of this, how will that reflect on the council?”

And this morning, after what appeared to be a ‘thorough’ investigation – which I imagine did not take place by bike – the local authority got back to Tass with a bafflingly nonchalant response.

Ford Road potholes, Hinton (Tass Whitby)

“After investigating, we have concluded that your issue does not require immediate attention,” the council said, bizarrely. Are we sure they got the right road?

“However, we have included this issue in our plans for future works. This means that your issue will be resolved during routine works scheduled for the area.”

Ah, perfect. So it’ll be fixed by 2040 then?

12:58
“You took offence, abused your power behind the wheel of that car, and what followed was pure bullying”
09:07
Danny van Poppel blocks Tobias Lund during Tour Down Under sprint, 2025 (Tour Down Under)
“Does the UCI really care about safety?” Cycling fans call for sprint rule change after “scandalous, ultra-dangerous” move by Red Bull-Bora lead-out rider Danny van Poppel tees up teammate Sam Welsford’s second straight victory at Tour Down Under

Sam Welsford’s started 2025 in decent form, hasn’t he?

After nabbing his fourth career stage win at the Tour Down Under on the race’s opening day in Gumeracha, the Australian sprinter made it two from two in Tanuda this morning, continuing his almost perfect start to the year on home roads (with the exception of his DNF at the Aussie road championships, Welsford’s won every race he’s started so far in 2025).

However, the Red Bull-Bora-Hansgrohe had to work for his stage win in the ochre jersey, crashing in the first five kilometres before being distanced on the third steep ascent of Menglers Hill with 25km remaining, prompting a tough, frantic 10km-long chase back to the bunch.

Sam Welsford wins stage two of the 2025 Tour Down Under after crashing (Zac Williams/SWpix.com)

(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)

But, after being dragged to the front by Danny van Poppel (more on him in a minute) and given a sniff of the victory in Tanuda, Welsford didn’t disappoint, easily accelerating clear with 100m to dispatch Arne Marit and Bryan Coquard and take his second consecutive win at the race.

Not that the sprint itself wasn’t without controversy, however.

As Van Poppel – widely regarded as one of the best lead-out riders in the business – pulled off after teeing up Welsford perfectly, the Dutch rider then swiftly and clearly made a sharp move to his right, closing the door on Picnic PostNL’s Tobias Lund Andresen, whose own reaction forced Phil Bauhaus (Bahrain-Victorious) to slam on the brakes to avoid the barriers.

Van Poppel was promptly issued one of the UCI’s new-fangled yellow cards for his dangerous sprinting, and relegated from eighth to 118th on the day.

According to the UCI’s new rules on sanctions, introduced last autumn and made permanent for 2025, if Van Poppel receives another yellow card during the Tour Down Under, he’ll be disqualified from the race and receive a seven-day suspension.

Meanwhile, three yellow cards over a 30-day period will lead to a two-week ban, and six over the course of a season will result in a month-long suspension.

However, the Dutchman’s antics during the hectic run-in in Tanuda – which, at the end of the day, contributed significantly to Welsford’s win – prompted fans on social media to vent their frustrations at the UCI’s current rules on safety during sprints, with some calling on the governing body to introduce measures that would also penalise teams (and the victorious sprinters themselves) for dangerous lead-out practices.

“Danny Van Poppel didn’t even make it subtle and just jumped across the road in front of Lund after finishing his job AND looking behind,” wrote Mihai Simion. “Not cheeky, straight dirty.”

“Tobias Lund could very well have won if Danny van Poppel had not been so creative,” said Danish journalist Mathias Fisker Mundbjerg. “It is clearly a problem that you can make it ‘nice’ for your captain, who then wins without problems.”

Sam Welsford wins stage two of the 2025 Tour Down Under after crashing (Zac Williams/SWpix.com)

(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)

“It's been happening for years, but Van Poppel's movement in today's sprint was deliberate,” argued former British champion and Eurosport commentator Brian Smith. “This will continue if relegation is the only deterrent.”

“Oh, Danny. Not cool. I do wonder if sprinters should be relegated from victory if their lead out so obviously blocks behind. A relegation for Van Poppel and yellow card only does so much,” wrote Dan Deakins, while Thomas described Van Poppel’s move as “clearly intentional and disgusting”.

Duluc Jean-Baptiste added: “Scandalous move by Van Poppel in the sprint... Typically the kind of move that should make his sprinter lose the victory. Really shameful and ultra-dangerous. You have to downgrade the lead-out AND the sprinter in this kind of situation. Otherwise, they will never learn.

“It would be shameful to give the victory to Red Bull-Bora given Van Poppel’s (clearly voluntary) move. If the UCI really wants to care about the safety of sprints, they must stop awarding a victory obtained (in part) illegally and dangerously.”

“Need team penalties for stuff like this. Relegate all of them,” concluded Joe.

> UCI considering use of “rider airbags” and gear restrictions to “enhance safety”

However, not all fans were jumping on the ‘relegate them all’ bandwagon, of course.

One user, All About Bora (which may give you an indication of where their allegiances lie in this debate), said: “Change in the rules is necessary, alright! But relegate all of them? Come on. The Van Poppel move was not okay, but it’s a move we see 10 times a year. No need to hyperventilate…”

Sam Welsford wins stage two of the 2025 Tour Down Under after crashing (Zac Williams/SWpix.com)

(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)

And, after a tough and complicated day in the saddle, I’m not sure the flying Welsford was paying too much attention to yellow cards, UCI rules, or social media debates either, taking time to praise Van Poppel for his excellent, if controversial, work at the finish.

“Bloody hell – it was bike off in the first 5k to the race, and that was less than ideal,” the 29-year-old, jersey and shorts torn to shreds, told reporters in Tanuda. “It was a pretty hard day out there. The break of three came back quite early, and then everyone started getting quite nervous, then last time up the climb I was on my limit.

“I think it's always hard to win again, everyone looks at you even more. The parcours didn't suit us as well as yesterday, but we made it our race. I think it's a really dream start for us here.

“Oh, man, I don’t think I can describe how [Van Poppel] was. He pulled me back on after the climb, and then still managed to do that 20-second lead out at God knows what power. That was amazing. I’m just happy to finish it off for him, and Laurence [Pithie], Ben [Zwiehoff], Ryan [Mullen] – all the guys came back on the climb and tried to help me get back on.”

11:57
It’s the moment you’ve all been waiting for – it’s time to finally crown our road.cc Recommends Bike of the Year

I can’t stand the tension, it’s all too much for me. Anyway, drum roll, please…

roadcc recommends awards 2024-25 - Bike of the Year

> We reveal the road.cc Recommends Bike of the Year 2024/25

11:45
Cue the ‘Gravel bikes are just 1990s mountain bikes’ comments…
11:06
How to get dropped by Mathieu van der Poel

Cycling YouTuber Artem Shcherbyna – the guy who follows pro cyclists around during their Spanish training camps, clinging grimly to their back wheels while shouting nonsense about hairy legs at them – is at it again.

And this time, he’s been busy getting dropped – going both downhill and uphill – by a certain Mathieu van der Poel:

While we can all grumble about his content-creating methods, Shcherbyna’s videos do give some startling insights into the staggering ability and bike handling skills of the best riders in the world, especially in this case the ease with which Van der Poel and his colleagues dropped the Ukrainian amateur on the descent of the Coll de Rates.

And that’s before we get onto the former world champion’s power output during his interval efforts uphill, which to be fair to Shcherbyna, the YouTuber was able to match for a few minutes at least.

I’d be happy just to let him blast by and offer a polite wave, if I’m honest…

10:05
Oi UCI, get the yellow card out again!

These dangerous sprint deviations at the Tour Down Under are getting out of hand – even Skippy’s at it now:

10:37
I’ve seen the future of race bikes… Or have I?

The recently released – and aesthetically divisive – Ridley Noah Fast certainly stands out from other pro bikes with its radical front end... but is that a good thing? Jamie offers his take on the pros and cons:

> Five reasons why we hope this isn’t the future of race bikes (and five reasons we like it)

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
brooksby | 15 min ago
0 likes

Whether Ford Road needs resurfacing or not*, surely the reply ought to be addressing why they told her in the first instance that it had all been fixed rather than announcing that it's all fine and no work needs to be done at present.

It's not good enough for them to say it has all been fixed, someone to point out that 'no it hasn't', and then they simply reply as they have.

 

*It clearly does.

Avatar
Bigfoz | 2 hours ago
0 likes

Is there a formal rule / protocol for pulling off? If not, why not? If everyone was aware that all leadout riders will pull off to the right, for example, then that can be avoided. Though that would n't then stop sprints up the LHS for the pull off to drift across the whole peleton  1 .  If that were the rule, then anyone getting trapped by the pull off has only their own reacecraft to blame.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Bigfoz | 2 hours ago
2 likes

The problem here is not the pull off, which was legitimate, it was the fact that having begun to pull off VP quite deliberately changed course back onto the sprinters' line to block. 

Avatar
rjfrussell replied to Bigfoz | 2 hours ago
0 likes

the embedded clip starts too late to show the real problem.  VP pulls off to the left- he is almost on the white line- but then looks over his right shoulder and veers hard right squeezing the chasing pair.

Avatar
the little onion replied to Bigfoz | 41 min ago
3 likes

Bigfoz wrote:

Is there a formal rule / protocol for pulling off? 

generally not on a first date.

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 3 hours ago
5 likes

It seems obvious common sense that a sprinter should be demoted if their win was clearly assisted by a teammate blocking a rival. It's akin to "crossing" in rugby, if a runner without the ball blocks a defender who could otherwise have made a tackle on the try scorer the try isn't allowed, no matter whether the scoring player did anything wrong themselves. Team sport, team penalties.

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to Rendel Harris | 2 hours ago
2 likes

Exactly. Happens far too often in pro cycling. The team couldn't care less if their sprinter wins and the guys who got them there get a penalty. Just a cost of doing business as they might call it in the banking world. 

The person who breaks the rules should be demoted to the back and the winner should be demoted 10 places or something to make sure there is little benefit to this sort of cheating. 

Latest Comments