Local business owners in Middlesbrough have praised the decision to rip out a controversial cycle lane which has been mired in controversy since plans for it were first introduced over two years ago, and which traders say has been an “absolute disaster” and has negatively affected trade in the area due to customers receiving fines for parking on the seemingly ‘protected’ infrastructure.
Earlier this week, we reported that a four-week consultation period has got underway surrounding plans to reinstate the previous layout on the B1272 Linthorpe Road, a key route into Middlesbrough, which would see the removal of the £1.7 million cycle installed in 2022.
The project, approved by the North Yorkshire town’s former independent mayor Andy Preston, was designed to provide cyclists with a “quick and safe” route into the town centre while also creating a more pedestrian-friendly environment with improved road crossings.
However, before the lane was even installed, traders on the street – somewhat bizarrely – raised concerns that the scheme would provide a “clear getaway” for drug dealers and shoplifters.
And despite the infrastructure increasing the number of cyclists using the road by 70 percent, the low Orca dividers initially introduced to separate the bike lane from traffic through ‘light’ segregation were almost immediately condemned for creating a safety hazard for cyclists and pedestrians while also failing to deter motorists from illegally driving or parking in the cycle lane.
> Cyclist says motorists should be prevented from parking in bike lane “before someone gets killed”
In October 2022, cyclist Paul Harris – who was hospitalised after being hitting one of the Orca separators – claimed that the layout forced people on bikes to “constantly” dodge parked cars, buses, and pedestrians, and that a comprehensive overhaul of the lane was required “before someone gets killed”.
The 50-year-old’s nasty spill came less than two months after a 78-year-old woman was left with a broken wrist, a black eye, and concussion after tripping over one of the bike lane markers on the same road, while a 27-year-old fractured her elbow on a night out while crossing the lane.
Despite the council addressing these safety concerns by replacing the Orcas with wands, and then-mayor Preston scrapping plans for the cycle lane’s extension, the infrastructure has since proved a tense, and sometimes messy, political battleground.
> Under-fire mayor accused of "abysmal failure" to rip out "disastrous" cycle lane insists works will go ahead once council can afford it
Labour’s Chris Cooke, who replaced Preston as Middlesbrough’s mayor in 2023, made the cycle lane’s removal a key part of his election campaign, claiming it had “caused nothing but injury and mayhem” – but quickly came under pressure from residents and political opponents for his “abysmal failure” to immediately rip out the lane, with Cooke claiming that the works would go ahead once the necessary funds were available.
A public spat between Cooke and Tees Valley mayor Ben Houchen (the only Conservative mayor left in England after May’s local elections) ensued earlier this year, with Houchen claiming that “businesses and jobs are at risk because of the Linthorpe Road cycle lane”, before suggesting “others have promised and failed” to get it removed.
However, that political squabbling appears to have been put to bed this week, as Cooke announced that plans to finally rip out the cycle lane will be consulted upon this month.
“We’re all for improving how everyone gets around Teesside, Darlington, and Hartlepool but the Linthorpe Road cycle lane simply hasn’t worked and should never have happened,” the Middlesbrough mayor said.
“It’s been a pain for businesses, hasn’t improved life for cyclists or pedestrians, and it needs to be removed.”
> Political spat between Conservative and Labour mayors finally comes to an end as both reach agreement to remove "unpopular" cycle lane that "simply hasn't worked"
Meanwhile, Houchen – who posed with Cooke in a rare display of cross-party co-operation this week while holding a banner reading ‘Bye-bye Bike Lane’ – said on social media: “During the election I said I would rip out this hated cycle lane in Boro. And when I say something, I make sure I follow through on it.
“This week we take a big step forward to achieving that. Work is set to start this year to remove this hideous thing. It’s not as quick as I’d like but it’s the quickest we can legally do it! I’d like to thank local businesses for their patience, but rest assured, I do what I say, and this is coming out!”
Those aforementioned business owners have responded to the news by expressing their relief that the writing is on the wall for one of the UK’s most contentious cycle lanes.
Speaking to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the owner of Madame Rouge vintage pub and tearooms, Paolo Arceri, described the scheme as an “absolute disaster” and said he was concerned that it cut off less mobile customers from using businesses on the road.
“Taxis can’t drop off because it takes over the lane,” he said. “We have lost elderly customers because of it, without a shadow of a doubt. Where can you drop off? Where can you park?”
Meanwhile, Li Miao Wong, owner of the Li Beauty Nail Salon, who says traffic is a problem on the road and claims to have witnessed several crashes, echoed Arceri’s accessibility concerns.
“I have had lots of customers who have got parking tickets and they stop coming,” she said.
> Cars damaged and abandoned after drivers smash through newly installed protected cycle lane
Janet Housam, of Housams Fireplaces, also claimed that “chaos” ensued if emergency services were required to use the road or when buses were stopped, due to motorists having “nowhere to pull up”.
“That’s always been a problem in the past 40 years but they have made it worse,” Housam said. “It’s so confusing for people – you need a degree to work out the system.”
However, not everyone who works on the street is opposed to the cycle lane, with Ameer Hamza, an employee at Novello Ristorante, arguing that the introduction of more cycling infrastructure is positive for the environment, noting: “I think it’s okay as it is. Lots more people are using cycles.”
According to Mayor Cooke, work will begin to remove the protected wands and Orcas by the end of the year, with major works expected after Christmas.
Add new comment
16 comments
Remind me never to go to Middlesbrough again if I can help it.
Incompetent implementation leads to public animosity to all cycle lanes, wastes £1.7M (so far) of scarce resources and causes injuries. Cycling increased by 70% and will now presumably sink again while the planet burns and the NHS is overwhelmed by obese people in poor health.
The Netherlands solved all these design issues years ago, but will they learn? Utterly depressing.
Again - gotta understand what's going on here. "Incompetent" from a cyclist's point of view. But some of the "incompetence" is by design. There are some things which MOST places simply refuse to do.
It can be simple (many places in Edinburgh where I stay have very wide lanes / 2 lanes which could actually be just one). But in the general case it's pretty complicated. Perhaps other routes need reworking, perhaps we need to look at an area-wide circulation plan (network level)? There may be buses or other large vehicles which need consideration also.
All of which is may be overdue / will improve things long-term but is major "change!"
There are a whole bunch of other "necessary but not sufficient" or "unlocks potential" interventions also e.g. addressing secure and convenient parking at destinations, transport hubs (stations) and also in residential areas.
Of course - once there's that commitment to do "enough" a tipping point can be reached and politicians of all shades / businesses recognise that "more cycling" is a win for them.
71% of adults in Middlesbrough are living with obesity or are overweight. Encouraging ACTIVE travel might help...
Middlesbrough isn't interested in helping people improve their health, reducing pollution or congestion. Several people were not hurt ( one was drunk and another failed to use a nearby crossing).Many Middlesbrough motorists do not care about the law with a high percentage obviously drug and or drink driving, parking full across pavements, driving dangerously and aggresively near cyclists.
Perhaps taxi drivers need to lower their extornate fares.I do not believe a single business against the cycle lane will see an uptick in business if it is ripped out...
"Taxis can't drop off".....
Do me a favour, they stop wherever they want with impunity everywhere else.
most of the UK cycle paths should get removed.... paint and a flexible plastic pole does not make a cycle path, or making two roads too narrow for to HGVs to pass
Currently in Sydney great thick curbs separating traffic
Not to diss Australia, but the UK needs a serious look at its "world-beating" infra when we're left behind by Sydney...
(Actually despite the reported "hostile climate" for cyclists - which isn't just the heat - there are clearly some half-decent bits of cycle infra there e.g. see here.)
Reposting the UK view of the road
TBH with this one those who ask (like me...) "why don't they just fix it?" are missing the point.
Look at what was planned and put in. Just another example of a very familiar routine in the UK:
"We'll chuck some money at cycling - but only on condition that nothing else changes. (Of course we know that if parking or access are remotely changed the locals will be out with pitchforks; we'll just set this up and watch). Oh - and it won't actually make cycling either safer or more convenient - even if people don't park in it / put stuff in it. Because we aren't going to prioritise cyclists at side roads, make proper bus stop bypasses or do anything at all (well ... paint) at junctions".
I guess optimists could argue it's a version of the "folorn hope" - every so often chuck some (relatively cheap) intervention in the direction of active travel. Maybe one day, one of them will stick... and until then "we have done a lot for active travel, we built ..."
Thinking cynically - if you wait a bit you may be able to try to get points from people with short memories for removing "this terrible cycle lane".
Someone gets the benefit of the money (too little, but not nothing) chucked at this - but it ain't "cyclists" or the taxpayer in general.
Amen, brother. This certainly seems to be standard policy.
Middlesbrough is a very neglected post-industrial town in need of considerable regeneration, but sadly that seems to be how the locals like it.
I imagine that Houchen is working out whether he could buy the entire lane for £1 and then charge the local council a lease on it, or something… (sorry - he turns up a lot in Private Eye and it isn't good).
The MO outlined in the Eye would be to sign it over to a couple of Geordies for the promise of future investment of a £1 and then allow them to lease it back with all maintenance the responsibility of the leaseholder.
So the removal consultation period hasn't even started yet, and that has to be followed by the full consultation period, but the only Tory (mayor) in the village is prancing up and down with a specially made "bye bye bike lane" sign (sad) and bragging about how "I do what I say and this is coming out!" (ooh you're so manly...). Not knowing the area I'm quite prepared to accept that maybe this bit of provision is flawed (although one would have thought that fixing it, rather than destroying it, would be a better option), but it doesn't exactly give one confidence that the outcome of the consultation will be properly studied and respected, does it?
The timeframe for the full consultation and the procurement is the same. This suggests that they are not planning to incorporate any outcomes from the consultation into the procurement exercise.
"the quickest we can legally do it" means whilst still giving the impression of having a consultation even though the council will ignore the responses.
In my borough the council Highways Dept. is very well practised in the art of consulting cyclists. Amongst the long list of (mainly motoring) groups they contact, they speak to one cycling group - the local branch of London Cycling Campaign - and then ignore anything they say and do whatever the London taxi drivers etc. say in the name of traffic flow. The LCC doesn't represent even a minority of cyclists, and the roads are not just used by cyclists from the borough, but cyclists from across inner/outer London. What about Cycling UK, British Cycling, hire bike users, and members of the public heaven forbid?