Ask a stupid question… Cyclist’s amusing edit to homemade sign; Could you keep up? Yet more drivers struggle with Highway Code changes; Training with MVP; More considerate drivers? Just tow a coffin-like box; Festive skivehundred + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
Could you keep up? What it's like training with Mathieu van der Poel
Nice cyclo-cross training ride in Winter Wonderland today 😍
Starring @MerlierTim, @mathieuvdpoel and 📹 @GVermeersch pic.twitter.com/GbBmUkUYXB
— Alpecin-Fenix Cycling Team (@AlpecinFenix) December 22, 2021
This is probably just an ‘easy’ spin for the great Dutchman…
Gearing up for his cyclo-cross return at the World Cup round in Dendermonde on Boxing Day, Mathieu van der Poel has been out shredding the trails with Alpecin-Fenix teammates Tim Merlier and Gianni Vermeersch. Based on this footage we reckon we’d sprint to the first corner to stay in contact and then very quickly give a shout of ‘see you at the cafe!’ before being unceremoniously dropped…
To make matters worse this apparently isn’t even Van der Poel in top shape…he’s been recovering from a wound on his knee sustained in a “stupid crash”.
“I wasn’t even training, I was just cruising with a friend through the forest and I just lost my front wheel on a slippery part that I didn’t expect and I hit a gravel section first with my knee, so I was wounded pretty bad. I immediately felt that it wasn’t good,” Van der Poel explained.
The world champ has delayed his cyclo-cross return until this Sunday when he’ll go head to head with Wout van Aert and Tom Pidcock. road.cc Liam has already claimed it’s the biggest event of his week…you sure there’s nothing happening on Saturday, Liam?
“Wout is in really good shape. I expected him to be at the immediately and win, but not in the way he did it,” Van der Poel told reporters ahead of the Boxing Day scrap.
“Maybe [I can race] for the win. The level behind Wout is something I would normally be able to follow. When I came back into cyclo-cross and could see how far he rode away sometimes, I don’t know if I have that kind of legs already to follow him but I should be able to be in the group behind. Hopefully I can surprise myself as well.”
Just another ordinary day...
Just another ordinary day at Robin Hood Island. pic.twitter.com/UNnlvQG0F0
— James Goes Cycling🚴🏻⛵️🇪🇺 (@JamesKPatterson) December 22, 2021
It's not just Mathieu van der Poel laying down the watts
3…2…1… GO 🚀
🎥 @BVP88 pic.twitter.com/y3t2SkqlCp
— Intermarché-Wanty-Gobert (@IntermarcheWG) December 23, 2021
Mathieu van der Poel’s Dutch compatriot Boy van Poppel is also putting in the work this winter. If we thought we’d get dropped on the gravel, we’d definitely get dropped here…enough watts to do your morning toast.
We’d rather take Egan Bernal’s approach…just surround yourself with so many dogs you can’t do anything…
La manada 🐶🖤 pic.twitter.com/AGrEnse4yn
— Egan Arley Bernal (@Eganbernal) December 22, 2021
Are you feeling unfestive? Try the festive skivehundred...
I will not be taking part in the Rapha Festive 500. Even though I’m a RCC member and would probably buy a binbag if it said Rapha on it, I find the whole concept nauseating. Just go for a cold, long ride in January and don’t shout about it. I consider the matter closed. Thank you pic.twitter.com/L9D86JbAhj
— Simon P. (@thepuncheur) December 22, 2021
I won’t be participating either. No moral objections here, I just can’t be asked to get out on my bike eight times in as many days at this time of year…and forget doing it in less than eight rides…maybe I’ll do an ode to Australia and do a June 500 next summer when the weather’s nice…
Major kudos to any of you lot prepping your routes ahead of the start tomorrow. What’s on the menu for day one? An easy opener? A big day to get as many miles out the way early? Or one of eight perfectly even 62.5 kilometre rides? Let us know in the comments…
Want drivers to be more considerate? Just tow a coffin-like box
Hmm, I’m left wondering why drivers seem a bit more respectful and less impatient around this. Maybe I should have just bought or made a more coffin-like shape? pic.twitter.com/vFWqDH3ODt
— CyclingMikey tired of road crime. 🇪🇺🇳🇱🇿🇼 (@MikeyCycling) December 22, 2021
Honestly, I’m more intrigued by what’s in the box? A pig in blanket for every driver Mikey has caught using their phone behind the wheel?
Ask a stupid question... Cyclist's amusing edit to homemade sign
You know what they say about asking a silly question…well, one of our readers spotted this sign in Friston Forest, East Sussex…
Clearly a popular spot for walkers and cyclists, one member of the community decided to politely request cyclists give a little bit of notice that they’re there. You know, maybe a ‘hello’ or some aggressive freewheeling…
What our sign maker certainly didn’t have in mind was this sharp reply. Top marks for comedy value and creativity, although we’re pretty sure we’ve seen this joke before.
These sort of sign battles periodically pop up on our live blog, usually when NIMBY locals take the time to protect their precious village from the barbarians on bikes by creating such masterpieces as this…
“Sorry, Phil. You can’t come through here with that freehub buzzing like that”… “Ah, never mind, the sign says ‘cyclist’. We’re in a group so must be fine…”
> Homemade sign tells cyclists to ‘ride quietly’ through village
Elsewhere in the archives we found this gem…who could forget the “passive-aggressive sign battle” one cyclist had after their NIMBY neighbour put up ‘no cycling’ signs. Cue: cycle path, beware of the kangaroo, beware of the dragon, beware of the troll, mind the gap, think bike and beware farm vehicles signs being strewn across every post on said farmer’s road…pettiness personified, but fantastic entertainment for the rest of us.
Primož Roglič extends Jumbo-Visma stay until at least 2025
Primož Roglič will be wearing Jumbo-Visma yellow until at least 2025 after confirming a new contract with the team. Roglič has been with the team since he joined the WorldTour in 2016, and will have completed a decade by the time his new deal expires.
During that time, the Slovenian superstar has won three Vuelta a España titles in a row, the Olympic Games TT, Liège-Bastogne-Liège and more one-week stage races than you can shake a stick at.
“I have grown with this team since I arrived in 2016,” Roglič said. “We already have quite a history together that I am very proud of. I made my debut in the World Tour peloton at a somewhat later age. It may have looked easy, and the best moments surface the fastest, but it wasn’t always easy.
“Still, things have moved forward rapidly for me and my development. I am not solely responsible for those beautiful moments. I did that together with my teammates and the staff. It is great to be part of this team in the coming years as well.”
Looking ahead to 2022, Roglič didn’t name any races in particular, instead asserting his “goals are independent of results”.
Electric vehicle delivery lane
🚳, its an EV delivery lane pic.twitter.com/pMbpat64ID
— Brum Bike Cam (@TheBrumBikeCam) December 22, 2021
Cambridge news #1: bike thief jailed for six weeks and is not allowed to be in possession of bike unless he notifies police first
35 year old Stephen Neal was caught trying to steal a £900 bike from a Cambridge store, and has now been sentenced after previously pleading guilty to bike theft and criminal damage.
Neal was seen taking a bike on 4 August, and on 6 September was caught using bolt cutters in an attempt to steal a bike in a shop window in Cambridge’ Beehive Shopping Centre.
Neal was given his six week prison sentence on 30 November, and on Tuesday was handed a rather specific two-year Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO). The CBO says Neal must not “be in possession of any pedal cycle part or pedal cycle unless having notified the police within 24 hours of his lawful possession, providing any details of the possession”, or “go to Superdrug, Boots or Go Outdoors stores in Cambridge within the boundary of the M11, A11 and A14.”
Bike theft has become a serious issue in Cambridge, with the city recently being named the UK’s bike theft capital.
PC Kayleigh Rocca ensured fed up residents: “We’re working hard to address cycle crime in Cambridge. This includes reviewing and identifying bike-theft hotspots, catching offenders, recovering stolen bikes with proactive patrols and education.
“All reports of bike theft are taken seriously, and we would encourage people to report offences so we can build up a picture and deploy resources accordingly.”
(More positive) Cambridge news #2: new Chisholm trail opens
The Chisholm Trail is Open! pic.twitter.com/sYmyteFh5X
— Camcycle (@camcycle) December 23, 2021
As some on the people who have commented on the post note, this 26km cycling and walking route (when fully completed) has been a long time in the making… here is an article on the proposed route from 1998!
road.cc readers smashes ten virtual metric centuries in ten days to raise cash for sanitation in poorest parts of the world
Job’s a gooden and I’m knackered. 1026kms in 10 days and over £1500 of sponsorship, thank you so much everyone who’s supported this lunacy, you’re brilliant. Happy Christmas one and all! xxx pic.twitter.com/Upn1AvUeCu
— Rendel Harris (@Rendel_Harris) December 23, 2021
On 14 December Rendel Harris set out to cover 1,026km virtual kilometres, which would be the distance between his house in Peckham and Monte Carlo in Monaco. Ten days later, he completed the challenge and has raised £1,230 at the time of writing for the Toilet Twinning charity, who build toilet facilities in some of the poorest parts of the world for just £60 per toilet.
Rendel told road.cc: “…just want to say a huge thank you to all the generous road.cc riders who chipped in almost a third of the £1500 raised so far, and many thanks indeed to road.cc for letting me publicise it through the forum.”
Well done Rendel! If you want to donate the fundraising page can be found here.
Here we go again... police tweet on Highway Code changes gets mixed response
Changes to the Highway Code are set to be introduced by DfT & will see the introduction of a Hierarchy of Road Users & will give pedestrians & cyclists greater priority over cars at junctions and crossings #DriveSmart #FifeRP
Infohttps://t.co/FKNfGGlilghttps://t.co/NbtzsEGKeR pic.twitter.com/3B26SzqeHL— Road Policing Scotland (@polscotrpu) December 23, 2021
We’ve said it, said it again and then at least once more again, but looking at our inbox and social media it seems some people (drivers of motor vehicles it would seem) can’t get their head around having to actually give way to pedestrians and not close pass cyclists.
Only person at fault here though would be the driver behind you not driving with due care and attention. Negotiating a junction is a considered to be a hazardous manoeuvre and requires additional care and attention.
— Craig (@Malesoun) December 23, 2021
The latest organisation to attempt to prepare the public for the impending changes are Scotland’s Road Policing Unit, with the reaction being a mix of sensible and completely irrelevant points about pavement cycling, and being worried about getting rear-ended when obeying the law and waiting for a pedestrian to cross the road. How about the person in the vehicle behind pays attention? We can only hope…
23 December 2021, 09:06
23 December 2021, 09:06
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
13 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
Except that it doesn't say anything about fire risk, and unassisted bikes can just as easily be ridden in a dangerous manner (in which case, punish the offenders, not everyone else). They don't seem to have given any particular reason* for it, apart from a vague reference to changes in the law. If they'd said "There's a fire risk from dodgy ones and we don't have the capacity to check which are which" then people might not be so annoyed. As it is, it just gives the impression that they've made an arbitrary decision without much thought or reasoning at all. Tim, on the other hand, is just trouble, and deserves to have special measures taken against him. [* Apparently there was a letter to parents that hasn't been posted, but whatever the contents of that, it doesn't seem to have made the reasoning any clearer to them, judging by the social media comments.]
Fair enough - sometimes it's more obvious to them as is writing than them as is reading.
I'm intrigued what the data says for Scotland. Last year in Stirling, I had my bike (plus tailfin setup and camping kit) removed from the station cycle park and left against a rail to see if I noticed it. Thankfully I did and quickly made my way to get my train. I reported it online to PS when I got home, it was left for less than a hour and I mentioned that as a solo female traveller the most unnerving bit, was someone clearly watching me. Despite it being logged and a PS email to arrange a call back, the call back never came. They then had the nerve to text me a response questionnaire on how they'd done.
@mdavidford This is the instagram post. All seems very reasonable to me in view of the fire risk the batteries pose and the possibility of scooters and e-bikes being ridden in a dangerous manner when it's crowded at the start and end of the day. Children are still being encouraged to cycle to school but I'm a bit concerned that they are singling out tim for the lunch ban.
@mdavidford I thought you may have detected a hint of sarcasm there! Seriously though the standard of driving is much higher in London than Marrakesh.
That's terrifying!! I'm pretty sure I'd have ridden (or perhaps fallen or jumped) into the concrete ditch on the right; I wouldn't have even tried to stay on the carriageway. ********** Years ago in Laos I was riding into Vang Vieng at about 15mph when a lorry came straight towards me at full pelt (I was on the correct - right - side of the road). I made the instant decision to ride into the water-filled ditch on my right that ran immediately parallel to the road, having no idea of its depth. The water was only about 10 inches deep and I slowed down covered in muck but still upright. I then went back to see why the driver had chosen my side of the road, as he wasn't overtaking. Turns out there wasn't his side of the road - just a massive hole where it had been...
Whenever I see a near miss like this I can't stop myself thinking of all the excuses, sorry, reasons the police might give for not taking action if it happened in this country. List so far : We are not allowed to judge distances so we don't know how close the lorry was. At this point the lorry driver is going to have to inconvenience somebody. Lorry didn't cross the white line so it was the cyclists fault for not being in the cycle lane. Lorry was established. A close pass is not an offence. Am I getting cynical in my old age? Well done to the cyclist for staying alive.
This short sample of bargains tells the cycling community that retail prices are way too expensive. As fot Giant, they seem unable to get rid of their ageing inventory.
"...the delivery lorry in his lane, attempting to overtake another lorry..." "...the lorry does not decelerate or seek to move back to its own lane..." but "... as the driver narrowly avoids him." Come on @Callum Devereux Do better.
Bath cyclist view. Whilst being a very lovely city to live in, it is at times (and places) a car infested hell-scape which is easy just to accept when you live here. I pretty much walk and cycle within the city, and only get the car out if I have to (miserable at times). With narrow roads, lots of on-street parking, no outer ring road (geography; through traffic), a river splitting the city N/S, plenty of good private/state schools and some pretty steep hills, it's a toxic mix of inconsiderate entitled drivers and rat-runs; for years the traffic problem has been in the council's 'too difficult' box. They may not get it 100% right, but the current Lib Dem council are pushing ahead with new pedestrian crossings, shutting rat-runs, implementing 20mph speed limits, scooter/bike hire scheme and installing cycle lanes; it drives the car-lobby wild and their human right to drive wherever, whenever and however is violated (I include people who live around me in this group; "how will we get around?"). The local Greens seem to just side with the noisy NIMBYs, regardless of whether it's 'green', as it probably helps their election prospects. As a cyclist, you need your wits about you and where to go to avoid toxic traffic; I've felt safer cycling in London. I think this new park route links the cycle route(s) from the centre of town up towards Weston and the hospital reasonably well; bit of uphill in the park (noting that a N route is recommended). The 'antis' point out that there are already 2 parallel cycle routes, the river path and the section of the U Bristol Rd that has dedicated cycle lanes (they're still screaming about that one). The river path feeds cyclists towards the 2-tunnels route S and the Bristol Bath cycle path; tbh, it has a lot of pedestrian traffic and is pretty narrow and bumpy (tree roots) between Windsor Bridge and Locksbrook (apparently will be upgraded). The U Bristol Rd lanes incl floating bus stops etc (wouldn't be cheap to remove), but at the W end they just stop and turf you out onto a pretty busy road. Cyclists travelling from Newbridge may just stick to the U Bristol Rd, and enjoy the respite offered by the cycle lane stretch, or could head down to the river path. I dislike the car zealots so much (one resident group has taken their self-funded LTN complaint to the High Court) that anything that sticks one up their proverbial is fine by me. If I can make an effort to get about the city by means other than a car (I even invested in a ebike to use a bike more; kills off the hill problem), then perhaps they could to.
13 thoughts on “Ask a stupid question… Cyclist’s amusing edit to homemade sign; Could you keep up? Yet more drivers struggle with Highway Code changes; Training with MVP; More considerate drivers? Just tow a coffin-like box; Festive skivehundred + more on the live blog”
Didn’t the police say that
Didn’t the police say that they wanted to hear from people seriously inconvenienced by road blocks?
“Look, mummy – that poor car
“Look, mummy – that poor car tripped up!”
Phew.. 62.5 kms not miles!
Phew.. 62.5 kms not miles!
‘The stopping to give way to
‘The stopping to give way to folk crossing the road you are turning into will potentially have a lot of rear enders.’
Love the fact that the writer hasn’t even acknowledged that this is what the HC already says and that the change is that you now have to give way to people waiting to cross.
I had one the other day. I was already crossing the road when a driver tried to swing off the main road in front of me. I just kept walking, he was already going slowly so stopping wasn’t an issue. Honestly, he looked nervous (like he was worried about holding up other drivers) and confused.
IanMK wrote:
I had one of my drivers ask something along these lines whilst training, “Who has right of way?”. I said ped, but either way you stop. “Even if it’s your right of way?” came the response
“YES! What else are you going to do, run them over??” Saw the lights switch on, also many titters from other drivers present.
Sad but true. People will
Sad but true. People will sensibly look for the biggest / most salient risk – and that’s being hit by another motor vehicle. Probably “getting abuse from another driver” comes next.
Slow down and you risk a rear-end or rage from driver behind – that’s going to be uppermost in your mind.
Also your premiums might go up. Bastards likely aren’t insured / are bigger than you too.
Plow on through – well probably the cyclist / pedestrian will get out of your way. If you “brush” or “skim” them no harm done. If they do throw themselves at your car it’s probably only cosmetic damage to your paintwork.
If only they were properly insured, you’d be able to claim that back too.
Of course an acompanying
Of course an acompanying problem are the dimwits who stop, wrongly flash their lights, and try to let you out. Ignoring the incorrect use of the lights, you should not give away your right of way. Other road users may, quite rightly, not expect it to happen.
If we all stuck to the rules there would be ot accidents. In fact I hate the A word as it implies no fault. Stupidity or ignorance is chosen.
Quote:
Quite right – firstly cyclists don’t have a monopoly on road space and secondly I’d expect them to make way for people who are helping to fight climate change…
That is where I think it is
That is where I think it is slightly wrong.
First the picutre, if the car moving and is ahead of the bike already then the bike should probably slow as would a car have to. To get into the situation shown in the image the car has either been is a queue of traffic or has overtaken the bike very recently and is about to left hook.
This is what will cause the biggest issues and it is understandable. The rules should be clearer and probably include something like.
If turning left or right across a cycle lane or path the cyclist has right of way. Treat a cyclist on the road as any other road user and do not turn left immediately after overtaking or right across the path of an oncoming cycle as you would for any other road vehicle.
People might then actually get what is being asked.
DoomeFrog wrote:
The picture in the tweet shows the (extremely common) left hook doesn’t it? Driver barges half a metre ahead of cyclist in order to immediately turn left, leaving the cyclist with nowhere to go. Looks perplexed and annoyed when cyclist leaves blood all over their precious paintwork.
DoomeFrog wrote:
if the driver is momentarily ahead, it is because they have just overtaken the cyclist even though they know they are about to turn left. EXACTLY what we are trying to stop.
Unless you cycle at 30mph there is no way a bike catches up with a car on an empty road, and of course no cyclist moves into that gapo at that speed.
I’m fed up of trying to
I’m fed up of trying to explain to motorists tht the new changes are an evening up and safety measure and also that they should be doing these actions already. The response is always the same: “I was in the right” is no use when on a tombstone (UK is gravestone or headstone), what about jay-walkers which is not an offence in the UK, and what about the zombie pedestrians, they also throw in the odd comment about pavement cyclists and RLJ’s. Trying to hold a sensible discussion is a waste of time because they refuse to acknowledge any of your comments whilst accusing you of being evasive.
It’s easy to spot who is a cyclist who is also a motorist and who is a motorist who also cycles.
Gus T wrote:
You tell someone about levelling up and run into a wall of scepticism? How very zeitgeisty.