Here at road.cc, we’ve always known that riding a bike can lead to great environmental, health, safety, social, and political benefits – and now a group of academics have helpfully confirmed our long-held suspicions.
A new study titled ‘Orientation towards the common good in cities: The role of individual urban mobility behaviour’, undertaken by psychology researchers at the University of Hagen in Germany and published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, examined the relationships between mobility behaviour – in other words, what method of transport you use – and political participation, social participation in organisations, neighbourhood solidarity, and neighbourly helpfulness, four facets of what the authors describe as “orientation towards the common good”.
According to the study, “a pronounced focus on the common good” is considered an essential component of social cohesion and is associated with the wellbeing of residents across diverse communities and multiple social levels.
However, the researchers point out that little has been previously known about the conditions or factors that promote the common good, or how citizens themselves can create it.
Likewise, while cycling is associated with many positive psychological variables, little is known about how it affects the common good.
> Researcher recommends cycling to work to try and match Amazon tribe’s unparalleled heart health
By analysing surveys between 2014 and 2019 of a representative sample of the German population, the researchers found that, in urban environments, “cycling rather than driving was positively associated with orientation towards the common good in all models” and that riding a bike “was the only variable that was a significant positive predictor for all four facets of orientation towards the common good after controlling for possibly confounding variables (home ownership, personal income, education, sex).”
They argue that while the interactions motorists and car passengers have with their direct environments are “significantly reduced”, cyclists on the other hand “directly experience the breadth of social diversity and cultural heterogeneity that make up urban life and cannot escape these impressions due to sensory density”.
This direct experience of the environment around them, the authors say, “leads to a stronger emotional bond between people and their neighbourhood” and therefore can lead to them participating in civic activities and politics.
In other words, riding a bike – and the interactions and emotional connection you have with the people, communities, societies, and things around you while cycling – can make you a more responsible, engaged citizen and neighbour.
> Academic behind ‘cyclists seen as less human’ study: “If you have a safe and normal cycling culture, how could you see people as anything but human?”
The “relative isolation” of driving, meanwhile, can “reinforce individualistic behaviours and cause drivers to neglect collective actions”.
Thus, the authors concluded that mobility behaviour is indeed “associated with the orientation towards the common good”, findings which they say are “significant for policy and planning because the benefits of cycling over driving are more profound and sustainable than previously thought”.
Quick, someone get Rishi on the phone…
Add new comment
69 comments
If you can run at 20mph (never mind faster, as the quote suggests) then that's a 100 metres time of just over 11 seconds.
Maybe somebody needs to initiate a training programme, to develop this potential talent..
This is Wales we are talking about. So it has to involve rugby or sheep.
Rugby requires a turn of speed (as does the other activity, I hear)
But, Colin Jackson may disagree with you.
Or singing.
Road safety a better take
https://twitter.com/roadtozero/status/1714536795927711963
Those complaining in Wales can come over here to Switzerland where there are numerous 30 zones (p.s. Just don't tell 'em its kmph!) and it's just fine. Pretty sure too that cruise control, speed limiting etc has become more and more common in the Automobile industry so it is, for many, very easy to control speed...
Ah, but what the complainers will tell you is that they too have had 20 zones around e.g. schools for years, and they don't mind that - what they object to is it being rolled out as a default.
What they object to is being forced to comply to them, most 20 zones outside schools,much like the parking restrictions, are roundly ignored and never enforced.
There's something else official completely ignored here in Lancashire: Quiet Lanes, designated by pretty signs, out on the back roads. Audi/ BMW/ white van/ Yummy Mummy SUVs/ tractors/ pickups etc. all tear round them like the Nurburgring
I agree. Having lived in Switzerland the speed limits are widely adhered to. Hell, where I lived a weekday was like a very quiet Sunday in the UK.
Even hardcore Diesel-deviants, Petrosexuals and Assault and Battery powered vehicle drivers have to finally accept that it is time for Carmaggedon to come to an end.
The introduction of 20mph speed limits in Wales is a forward thinking road safety initiative and a great step forward in road safety for a nation.
The bogus petition that can be signed multiple times by the same person will not derail the project in any way shape or form and people will get used to it the same way they did when the seat belt and drink driving laws were introduced,
Whenever someone complains that they can't drive at 20mph and aren't able to concentrate on the road, thank them for evidencing the need for geo-restricted speed limiters on all motor vehicles and the need for reguler re-testing.
Yes, I never get this whinge: ' . . . . while some said the speed limit changes are making them focus too much on their car’s speedometer and not on the road in front of them '
why is it more difficult to focus on 20mph than 30 mph? Ok, perhaps it may take getting accustomed to it but unless you are completely dense, it shouldn't take longer than a day or two.
How many drivers does it take to change the speed limit? CHANGE?!
Exactly as you say. But just goes to show that driving (like every habitual activity) is a largely unconscious activity:
- we just follow what other drivers are doing far more than we think
- we learn what kind of areas mean what kind of speed ("feels like this should be a 30...")
- we learn what and where the speed limits are on our normal routes.
- we do all this "by feel" eg. we also aren't looking at the speedo much, we just know the gear / pedal / sound and vibration feedback we get at a certain speed.
So that all changes and has to be consciously dealt with (and now others are also behaving differently because they're having to do the same).
Somewhere in there are some good points.
It's noticeable here in West Wales, where traffic is very light indeed, that drivers are generally considerate in the "good manners" way but absolutely hopeless at assessing risks that are not everyday but which do occur and, when they do, have drastic consequences.
For example, tailgating is commonplace, with little caravanserais of two or three vehicles going along the otherwise empty-for-miles roads with their bumpers about 10 yards apart, at all speeds. Nor can they overtake without it taking all day. They also go around blind bends far too fast, as, "There was nothing in the way yesterday or for the 100 yesterdays before it". One the day there is and .... PRANG!
Most also seem to think that the speed limit signs are an instruction to go at that speed, or even a bit faster if there was never anyone coming out of one of the numerous gates and driveways for the 100 days before. One day a tractor or a granny going to the shop lurches out and .... PRANG!
**********
Personally I'm bordering on paranoid when driving. The reason for this is that, having a vivid imagination, I can easily envisage a situation where being inattentive and making stupid assumptions via wishful thunks about risks never happening to me personally, I run over someone and kill/maim them. I'd feel very bad indeed about doing such a thing, for them but also myself. It would ruin both our lives henceforth albeit in different ways.
So, no inattentive driving! I'm looking ahead, paying attention to speed and aware of all sorts of potential risks, at all times - a bit like riding a bike. Even so, what about the risks I'm not clever enough to anticipate? No matter the details of any ensuing PRANG! I would still feel guilt and remorse of the kind that does for peace of mind, forever.
But many are adept at shrugging off responsibilities of every kind. It can never be their fault so it must be someone else's. Memories of events are easily altered if you procalim alternatives often enough, to yourself first then to others. (Lies you believe yourself are generally told more convincingly to others than are the lies you don't believe yourself).
Summarised:
Practice makes... habit.
But also: we probably massively overestimate what we consciously control. Even when we're paying attention to things.
Hence the importance of practice, to attain suitable habits.
After that - how much responsibility you take is probably also a (very old) habit. Maybe learned before you really remember!
I'm still waiting on the world to adopt my idea of fag-packet warnings affixed to the binnacle of all motor vehicles - "Driving always involves the risk of serious injury or death - to yourself and others". Or "How would your loved ones feel if you crashed?" or maybe "Think! Do you need to drive this trip?"
Agree with on this one.
Except that a tractor or a granny is there every day, at least somewhere in the country.
For Wales, people killing themselves with their vehicles seems to be a real problem - whether it was those five drunk, drugged up people who took their VW SUV so far off the road the police couldn't find it, or the two teenage tearaways on their Surron that their idiot parents had let them loose on in Ely, Cardiff.
One day whilst wandering about the local Welsh town, waiting for the return of a local craftsperson, the ladywife happened to come across a large graveyard containing (to her) many interesting gravestones and the like. She enjoys a good read of the often strange things written on them.
A very large section of the graveyard was devoted to those who died young, generally in their late teens and early twenties. Further investigation via a quiz of some locals nearby revealed that these were mostly due to car crash.
There does seem to be the same syndrome at work. Many young West Welsh drivers one meets seem oblivious of the risks because they rarely encounter one due to very low traffic levels and the generally open roads .... until the day they do. The inclination of the young to roar about testing their limits is what gets them in to those situations. They had no opportunities to learn via a few near-misses .... but then encounter a risk where a near-miss is not one of the options.
460,000 signatures on the Welsh 20mph limit, but how many of them are actually from Welsh residents?
(I red somewhere that almost all were from outside Wales.)
"If someone is doing 20, you have a proper tailback."
And in rush hour standstill traffic, if someone (ie everyone) is doing 0mph you have a REAL tailback.
How many people have actually worked out that they don't usually hit 30mph for more than a few seconds of their journey without having to slow down for many hazzards, turns, etc?
If only there was a way to see the negligible difference that this new limit will have.
Oh wait. They already worked it out.
Maybe the data/survey info can be published to help?
For those who have trouble sticking to the 20mph limit without constantly looking at the speedometer, do they have the same problem sticking to higher limits on empty roads?
What about sticking to the 70mph limit on motorways, or 40/50mph on dual carriageways?
We've been doing that for years without this issue.
Sure it may be a bit tricky at first, but we will soon get used to it.
"If someone is obeying the law you have a bunch of other people who are forced to obey the law as well." Is a weird argument for changing the law to suit the law breakers...
Sicking to 70mph on motorways or 40/50mph on duals "for years".
Sorry, that's a big LOL from me.
For those who find it difficult to drive at 20mph, I suggest take driving lessons and the test again. Learning to control your speed is probably one of the most basic and important driving skills.
Nice to have a study confirming that cycling = common good. Maybe the fact that the bleeding obvious needs studies explains why over sixty years after climate change was definitely proven, whe have yet to do fuck all?
However, cycling goes much further than simply the common good. Cycling is clearly a much better solution for most people for most journeys due to the health and well-being benefits that aren't usually factored into people's journeys. Just simple enlightened self-interest determines that cycling is a better choice for individuals and meanwhile cars tend to introduce a lot of negatives whilst also needing to be subsidised and to have facilities designed around them to the detriment of other transport modes.
I'd say that's the very definition of common good.
When was the last time you saw a driver enjoying their journey, and smiling because of it?
In a car ad?
I do, a lot of the time, when I drive!
Top down, and I'm not trying to drive in cities.
I see there is an article on the BBC News front page today about "Push bikes" and 20mph limits:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-67064306
Rather than reward the click bait headline I haven't read the article, but BBC Wales do seem a bit obsessed with the new speed limit.
The BBC has been institutionally anti-cycling for a long time. Anything they can post that puts cycling as a negative is on-brand for them and they'd never push anything that might be slightly anti-driver such as suggesting that maybe some people could be cycling instead of driving if it's so much quicker.
Pages