Yep, that's the Tom Pidcock talking about Ineos Grenadiers klaxon going off again. Speaking to Rouleur, the 25-year-old committed to putting "a bit more mental energy towards specifically the road" next season, but insisted his training "won't change".
"It's not like I've been training this year on the mountain bike all the time, I just focused on it because it was the one race I wanted to win this year if I was going to pick any," he said.
"I have more potential on the road. What I said after the Olympics to my girlfriend was that I wanted to try and prove myself there."
Bringing an end to the topic of discussion, Pidcock reportedly gave a wry smile as he commented, "It's been other things fatiguing me mentally this year..."
No prizes for guessing what those other things might be... Pidcock's future one of the most talked about topics in pro cycling during the latter stages of the season. Reports of tensions with the Ineos Grenadiers hierarchy came to a dramatic crescendo at the final Monument of the season Il Lombardia. On the eve of the race Pidcock was deselected by his team despite being "in great shape", cue weeks of speculation about whether he'd be leaving the team this winter.
Geraint Thomas weighed in on the situation, questioning the "people who are around Tom".
"I don't actually know what has gone on, but all I know is, when you're the highest-paid rider in your team, and it's obviously a really c**p situation," he said. "He's not happy, the team's not happy. How has it got to this point? I don't know.
"People who are around Tom, I don't think help. I don't know how… The fact is that he had a great chance of performing today [at Il Lombardia]. I saw that Zak had said it's a management call, it's not a performance call. I certainly don't know anything about that. We're just riders, eh? What do we know about management?
"It's just not good, is it? All the bull**** aside, he's a great talent. He's a good guy, when I'm around him we have a nice time, so it's not good to see that situation. We'll see what happens."
Not long after, an anonymous pro cyclist writing in the Belgian press claimed Tom Pidcock is "a bit of a loner" at Ineos Grenadiers and caused friction. The saga rolled into November, two-time British national champion Brian Smith dubbing Ineos "Team Circus" and sticking up for Steve Cummings (a rider he managed at MTN-Qhubeka back in the mid-2010s) who has left his DS role at Ineos.
"No real surprise to see Steve Cummings leave Team Ineos," Smith wrote. "Must be hard to do your job when gagged for most of the year.
Turning to the Pidcock saga, Smith addressed the rumours linking the rider to the Q36.5 team: "Team Circus continues, after allowing your marquee rider to leave the team while willing to pay 20 per cent of his salary then doing a U-turn to keep him. Not sure this is over. Ivan Glasenberg has invested in Q36.5 and owns Pinarello. A match for Pidcock who was keen on the move.
"These decisions were helped by Team Circus pulling Pidcock from Lombardia. Why you may ask? Had the form, thought he could win but did not want to risk paying the high bonus."
Anyway, after all that Pidcock is still at Ineos Grenadiers and looks set to ride for the team in 2025... something tells me these aren't the last chapters that'll be written on the Tom P x Ineos epic...
Add new comment
11 comments
"Remember when we just rode", well that sort of sounds a chord, having at 6AM gone round to various power outlets unplugging three back lights, three front lights, one front helmet light, one back helmet light, GoPro and the batteries for my electrically-heated gloves...on the other hand I can also remember scrabbling through the drawers desperately trying to find enough batteries to have a working set of lights, and with the state of my hands in middle age (Raynaud's) on a morning like this morning in London (0°) without the electric gloves I wouldn't be riding at all so I find the spaghetti junction of wiring a price worth paying.
RE: Remember when we just rode?
Typically I've got 7 things to charge up:
If we had proper cycling infrastructure (segregated and well signed) I wouldn't need the first 6 of those.
To be fair unless "proper cycling infrastructure" means everyone having a segregated cycle lane directly outside their front door, you would still need lights to reach it, and actually I am finding people riding on segregated cycle lanes without lights on, particularly around Hyde Park, quite a hazard, so I don't think you could/should really dispense with them however good the infra becomes.
Dynamo lights? That can do 2 of those lights (unless you're wanting e.g. particularly fast rides in completely unlit countryside, and/or off-road)?
... and in fact you'd still want those with proper cycling infra.
I don't choose to run the bottom 3 and currently all my bikes have dynamo lighting so I'm a bit closer to "just ride". (Always carry a lock though and make sure I've got my basic tools with so there are still some extras).
Nice articles about these lights here and more here [1] [2] about why a boring "slow and heavy" Dutch-style bike is ideal for mass cycling. Same reason as 99+% of cars people buy are not F1 racers, or jeeps - people just want something they can get on and go, day or night, without spending every evening / weekend on maintenance. And that works at night, keeps you clean, carries things and is secure "out of the box" without needing to buy extra accessories.
The 3 lights are what I have for cycling in daylight - 800 lumens at the front, 300 at the rear, helmet light is 100 front and 100 rear. All of them set to flashing.
I've recently aquired a 4th light for night cycling - 1100 lumens with a dip function.
Perthshire man left with container full of 500 old bicycles in row with environment chiefs
https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/perth-kinross/5128014/bicycles-afri...
Read that article yesterday, the bit that struck me was
He collects bikes from all over Scotland and takes them to UK-based charities, who have their pick.
The remaining bicycles are returned to Nigel, who then offers them to other organisations that distribute them to people in Africa for as little as £3.
So basically the UK charities get to pick off the good stuff and the tat is then offloaded. He has a container full of bike shaped objects that he is sending to Sudan - not 'other organisations'...
Agree that a thief with an angle grinder would probably get through the lock just as quick as removing/replacing the handlebars. But the angle grinder would make much more noise - and while we've seen videos of brazen thieves who don't care, I would have thought plenty would still prefer not to draw attention to themselves. And if a thief would rather just cut the lock anyway (because it would be faster, or because they brought an angle grinder but no allen keys), they still could - so you haven't gained any security by locking the steerer.
Plus if the bike is covered by an insurance policy, if the thief needs to cut the lock then you're covered. If the thief takes the bike without cutting the lock, the claim is likely to be rejected.
So I think I'm with Dan - sure, it's better than nothing and probably fine if you're away for a few minutes, but if you've gone to the trouble of bringing a d-lock with you, it seems dumb not to put it through the frame - it's not exactly any more effort.
Worth it for the pun though...
Agreed. If there was some reason why this was the only/easiest way to lock it I could see it being ok for a few minutes; but surely it would be no harder to lock through the frame.
Maybe they just missed?