The official line from the Slovenian camp may be that Tadej Pogačar – fresh from completing the first Giro-Tour double in 26 years while barely opening his mouth or breaking a sweat – has chosen to skip next week’s Olympic road events in Paris due to “fatigue”.
But over on Cycling Twitter, the blame for the now three-time Tour winner’s absence from Games has been laid squarely on the shoulders of Slovenia’s cycling officials, following their controversial decision earlier this month to omit Urška Žigart, the country’s top-ranked female rider (who just so happens to be Pogačar’s fiancée, in case you weren’t aware), from their road race and time trial squads.
(ASO/Charly Lopez)
Last night, the Slovenia Olympic team confirmed that Pogačar – who was notably coy about his participation in Paris after sealing his Tour win in Nice on Sunday – has withdrawn from this year’s Olympics, where he was due to compete in the road race on 3 August, due to the accumulated fatigue of winning Strade Bianche, the Volta a Catalunya (plus three stages), Liège-Bastogne-Liège, the Giro d’Italia (plus six stages), and the Tour de France (and another six stages) during one of the most remarkably dominant seasons cycling has ever seen.
The 25-year-old’s UAE Team Emirates colleague Doman Novak will replace him in the road race, where he will be joined by Matej Mohorič and Luka Mezgec.
(ASO/Billy Ceusters)
“The men’s cycling team selector unveils the names of the cyclists that will compete in this year’s Olympic Games in Paris,” the team said on social media last night.
“Unfortunately, Tadej Pogačar will not be among them, who cancelled his performance due to being too tired. He will be replaced by national team colleague Domen Novak. We wish Domen all the best and success.
“Once again, congratulations to the Tour de France winner for his third victory in the world’s most prestigious cycling race, and we hope he rests well and prepares for his next races.”
> "No words": Tadej Pogačar "so gutted" for double national champion Urška Žigart missing out on Olympic selection
While tiredness – and the fact that the punchy, Van der Poel-style Paris course doesn’t exactly suit Pogačar (who is targeting cycling’s Triple Crown at the very hilly worlds course in Zurich in September – is certainly understandable, many have pointed to his fiancée Žigart’s omission from Slovenia’s Olympic squad as the real motivating factor behind the Tour winner’s decision to rest up at home.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
The current Slovenian road and time trial champion, Jayco–AlUla rider Žigart was informed earlier this month that she would not be part of her country’s two-woman squad for the Games. Addressing the shock decision on Instagram, Pogačar said he had “no words” and was “so gutted” that the “double national champion and the best WorldTour rider in Slovenia was not selected for the Olympic Games”.
And two weeks later, coincidentally or otherwise, he was out.
“No Urška, no Pogi,” Mihai Simon wrote on Twitter/X after the news was confirmed. “It’s not a route for him indeed, but I think the main reason for skipping it is because his partner, Urška Žigart, was snubbed.
“The Slovenian Federation played with fire and got burned. In the end, smart decision by Tadej, the chances for medals in Paris (too flat routes) were not very high. He can now rest a bit together with Urška and then focus on World Champs and Lombardia.”
“That’s the last time they don’t select her,” added Freddie Evans.
(A.S.O./Charly Lopez)
And that sentiment was shared by plenty of Slovenian fans under the Olympic team’s posts.
“Whoever selected the women’s team needs to be fired immediately,” said one Pogi fan.
“Play stupid games, win stupid prizes!” added another.
“Of course he won’t go alone, if they left Urška out so badly,” said Darja. “He is a principled man and he will not tolerate such injustice. If both selectors were at least a little smart, they would talk a little about the composition of the teams. But if they are council f***s, they would wipe themselves with their nose for a medal.”
“He is riding a bike for himself, not the corrupt Slovenian Olympic committee,” add another Slovenian fan.
> "Never listen to Lance Armstrong about anything": Phil Gaimon hits back at disgraced cheat's "don't give them a reason to doubt you" warning to Tadej Pogačar
Of course, plenty on social media jumped to other conclusions as to why the best bike rider in the world would choose to skip the Olympics, but the lawyers said I can’t quote those on the live blog…
Add new comment
41 comments
we want to deliver the immersive training to as many schools as possible to help embed the skills needed by students to make them more confident, experienced cyclists
Looking at this again, it's even worse than I thought- no doubt technically impressive, but entirely the solution to the wrong problem. The assumption is essentially 'blame the victim': when cyclists are KSI'd it's their own fault and they must be trained to avoid 'accidents'.
“Going forward, we want to deliver the immersive training to as many schools as possible to help embed the skills needed by students to make them more confident, experienced cyclists,”
All well and good, but in my experience, it isn't the cyclists that need the training, it's the drivers, so how about getting them to use the immersive cycling experience to find out what it's like on a bike and modify their behaviour accordingly. Since it's almost impossible to get drivers to ride a bike, this project could be a useful way for drivers to find out what it feels like to be close passed, left hooked, looking-but-not-seeing etc, etc.
Woh! Cyclist convicted of murdering driver who hit bike.
Ahmed Chakile Gonladieu, 25, stabbed Alexandros Josephs, 29, through his open car window in Ladywell, south-east London, on 10 May 2023.
Why is the murderer's mode of transport relevant?
I wondering if the media would use the same language if the murderer was using a motor vehicle.
"Driver convicted of murdering driver ..."
If not, presumably it is discrimination.
Well, if, for example, someone driving a car shot someone it would be described as a drive-by shooting, so the mode of transport would be explicit.
It's relevant because 9 times out of 10 when there's a confrontation between a motorist and a cyclist it's the latter who comes off worse--as it was in this case. Until it wasn't.
Full sugar orangina and an asterix comic, nice...
I use the new cycleway along the south shields coast at least once a week. The reworked layout is much better and safer for all and I applaud south Tyneside council for it
Dooring has always been a serious risk with the old layout which has been there for a long time. and cars park up and doors just get flung open.
Moving the quicker cyclists away from the parking is a sensible design choice. Pedestrians don't suffer the same risk as they're much slower.
The design also allows the cycleway to go behind bus stops which again is safer.
The centre divider is no higher than a strip if fresh road paint and is bevelled so there is no sharp edges to trip over.
Mrs Sharpe claims it is dangerous having tht pedestrian side next to the road. That's like almost every other road and footway in the country.
She's just upset that she can't walk next to the grass so fido can be emptied and have a good sniff..
So the extent of Ms Sharpe's argument is that cyclists should be endangered, not her?
I would counter that, no pedestrian has been seriously injured by a dooring incident. The biggest risk is not cars leaving the carriageway onto the pavement/cyclelane.
Pretty sure like so many UK infra "bright ideas" this one's a turkey, if not a dog.
Short - if the problem is dooring, the problem is you're allowing car parking too close to the cyclists / pedestrians.
I haven't checked whatever terrible mess they've started from / nonsense they're trying to join up though...
I am aware that some of the Manchester stuff (some Cyclops junction designs) makes a virtue of swapping positions of cycle infra and footway right at the junction. I'm a bit hazy but IIRC the idea is that pedestrians need to cross the cycle path in any case and this somehow facilitates shorter distances for pedestrians to cross (?). Not entirely convinced but I guess we'll see eventually - if many get built...
On my commute I have cycle paths on both sides. The conclusion I have come to is that no matter where you put the cycle path the pedestrians will walk on it.
Are those cycle paths a distinct colour from the pedestrian paths?
Well yes. And people still walked on the roads like they always had after cars became a thing. Until there were sufficient drivers going fast enough that it felt unpleasant and unsafe. And bad experiences of getting abuse off said drivers were a common trope. And people - well, often children - not returning home...
I'm not campaigning for more cyclist close-passes on people walking in cycle infra! Just noting that a) in the UK the number of people walking vastly outnumber those cycling / using mobility scooters etc. b) our beloved authorities are still often lumping cyclists and pedestrians together in the same space because "our streets are too narrow" - once we've allowed for a couple of ample lanes, maybe parking on both sides that is...
"So the extent of Ms Sharpe's argument is that cyclists should be endangered, not her?"
If it were, it would be a quite reasonable argument. Any danger is due the speed of the cyclists. So it's the cyclists who should bear that danger.
FTFY
Apparently our work filter considers dots to be 'Suspicious Content'.
['Timesucking Content' I could understand...]
If you have never made it to a continental crit in August I do recommend! I was lucky enough to be on holiday near Quillan in South-west France last year and had a lovely afternoon with a couple of beers watching locals pretend to race Peter Sagan before he left them for dead in the last half lap.
Safe to say the juniors race before the main event was definitely not a procession with real aggression, elbows and crashes (nobody badly injured - just some road rash).
Each student at the session was given a tablet to experience a 360-degree view of different road-based cycling scenarios
I wonder if this includes the likely scenario of being close-passed from behind by a b*****d in a BMW or Audi, submitting a good quality video and having it NFA'd by the police because 'there is no legal limit to how close a vehicle must pass and it's not possible to tell how close the vehicle came or how fast the driver was travelling so there's nothing we can do' followed by a load of lying drivel about how 'we appreciate this is not the result you want' etc.? That would be telling them how it's going to be!
It should also include the 'immersive' sound of a rattly diesel engine revving impatiently close behind and of course, the loud beep.
"Friendly toot" surely?
>“This transformation is more than just a name change,” Beicio Cymru says. “It symbolises that in all we do moving forward, we will inspire, empower and act with integrity for our cycling community."
Er ... What?
I think, to be fair to them, they're talking about the new strategy there, rather than the name change. Although it does beg the question - what were they doing before, if not all that stuff?
"Our previous strategy of discouraging, dismissing, and lying to people didn't seem to be working..."
Yup. It's another version of the principle of nonsensical inversion (IIRC coined by Simon Hoggart). Take a soundbite from some press release / political utterance and reverse the sense. If that sounds completely stupid, the original phrase was probably just a platitude.
Still it's absolutely normal to effectively emphasise that you're going to cover the basics, and somehow this is a) totally novel and b) going to make all the difference.
Some non-lawyer-bothering wild speculation about Pogačar skipping the Olympics - maybe he's having a little rethink about not riding the Vuelta...
I hope so.
He said he has his eyes on the World Champs. So I think he's skipping the Vuelta to peak for WC.
That's what he said. That was before he had two in the bag, though.
I posted this on one of the Grimsby PSPO stories, but I'll put it here too (my emphasis):
https://metro.co.uk/2024/07/23/grimsby-inspired-north-korea-speaker-blar...
FFS. Are there any actual stats on the nature and types of this "anti-social" behaviour?
Or is this random residents and councillors just screaming wont somebody think of the children?
Pages