Pedal Me slam drivers who say parents road riding with kids are ‘irresponsible’; Council to dish out fines for bike lane parking; New lockdown rule confusion; New Manchester infra not what it seems; Ronaldo and family go cycling + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
Cycling UK announce 'Back on your bike' package for new and returning cyclists
To coincide with Bike Week between 6th-14th June, ‘Back on your bike’ is a six month package which includes £10m third-party insurance, legal assistance and one month’s cycle insurance, as well as expert cycling advice. There are also discounts to be had from the likes of Halfords, Raleigh and Cotswold Outdoor.
Cycling UK say: “With lockdown restrictions easing and workplaces and schools reopening, the government is advising people to get on their bikes for essential journeys. The ‘Back on your bike’ package offers advice and practical assistance for new cycle commuters as well as those who have taken up recreational cycling.”
The ‘Back on your bike’ package priced at £15, more info here.
Transport for Greater Manchester accused of sharing misleading pics to promote new cycling 'infrastructure'
I love that the council are using the photo on the left to talk about their new cycling infra, but let’s zoom out a bit shall we 😂 pic.twitter.com/2jwEBkcyAw
— Dan Hett (@danhett) May 28, 2020
Posted side-by-side by artist and tech expert Dan Hett, the image on the left shows an image frequently used by Transport for Greater Manchester to promote new cycling infrastructure in the city… and on the right is what this cycle lane actually is, a short stretch of green paint in the Deansgate area of the city that appears to serve little purpose.
@lostinmanc Hi there. Greater Manchester local authorities have launched the Safe Streets Save Lives campaign. This will see new measures implemented to give pedestrians & cyclists more space to keep them safe when travelling. More info can be found here: https://t.co/N7jEwUZ3TA
— TfGM #StaySafeSaveLives (@OfficialTfGM) May 28, 2020
On their Twitter account, TfGM have been replying to some of the negative comments by claiming that their Safe Streets Saves Lives campaign “will see new measures implemented to give pedestrians & cyclists more space to keep them safe when travelling” – which begs the question, why are they using an example that will arguably do little to improve safety?
They’re leading the way, more to follow 👏👏 https://t.co/QV5hUptvJ7
— Chris Boardman (@Chris_Boardman) May 28, 2020
Manchester’s Walking and Cycling Commissioner Chris Boardman has been instrumental in implementing the good parts of Manchester’s new cycling infrastructure, including the design of the extensive Bee Network and pushing for temporary cycle lanes during the pandemic. He said of the Safe Streets Saves Lives campaign: “Like any successful response to a crisis, people must be the priority. And fortunately, the data is unambiguous; during lockdown more and more residents across Greater Manchester are turning to walking and cycling for essential journeys and exercise. So, in order give people the space they need to keep safe, the only real question was ‘how soon can we act?’
“If we don’t take steps to enable people to keep travelling actively, we risk a huge spike in car use as measures are eased. Not only is it the right thing to do to protect people now, but it’s vital to meet our clean air goals and protect our NHS long term.”
A slogan that will definitely save lives
#SlowDownSaveLives pic.twitter.com/XqK7w3RNcS
— Chapman Crispfield (@isersmalone) May 29, 2020
"Very silly, but fun and exciting": cyclists charging a Tesla
Here are nine cyclists on Finnish TV putting 2km of charge into a Tesla Model X, a record apparently. Who needs actual chargers?
Police appeal in Scotland as cyclist is stabbed in 'unprovoked' attack
.jpg)
Police Scotland are appealing for witnesses after two cyclists were attacked, with one stabbed, in what appeared to be an unprovoked attack.
Renfrewshire24 report that on the 27th May two men on bikes were approached by eight other men, resulting in an altercation. A 37-year-old man suffered a number of ‘serious injuries’ including stab wounds, while a 29-year-old suffered facial injuries.
Detective Inspector Ian Ross of Renfrewshire CID commented: “This attack appears to have been unprovoked and we are carrying out extensive enquiries to identify those responsible.
“Anyone who was in the area on Wednesday evening and may have seen or heard a disturbance or who has any other information is urged to come forward.
“Anyone who can help our enquiries can call 101, quoting incident 4285 of 27 May, or call Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.”
Will you be organising a group ride when the new rules kick in?
From 1st June, residents of England will be allowed to meet up to five others outside while observing social distancing – which means that technically, it would appear that socially distanced group rides are permissible (though as has become customary, we’re not exactly sure yet). In Scotland riding in a group could be possible if that group is made up of two households, with eight allowed to meet outside at once. In Wales things are more restricted still, with two households allowed to meet but only within a five mile radius of their homes. British Cycling are yet to provide clarity in light of the new rules, with their latest guidance updated on the 27th May still recommending no organised activity.
As it’s widely thought that a safe distance to keep from other cyclists during the pandemic is far greater than two metres, do you think group riding is a good idea or not in this phase of the lockdown? Take part in our poll.
James Golding, the man who beat cancer twice and survived getting hit by a truck, subject of new documentary
Red Bull have released a short documentary on Golding, an ultra-endurance cyclist who has survived two bouts of cancer and being hit by a truck at 70mph.
He’s now training for Race Across America and aiming to be the first British winner, having overcome extraordinary adversity along the way. 10 years ago and weighing six stone, he was given less than a 5% chance of surviving emergency cancer surgery: “I’m 28 years old and I’ve got my mum wiping my arse. It’s not what anybody wants to be dreaming of”, Golding says.
While attempting an ultra ride from L.A to Miami in 2010, Golding was hit by a truck in New Orleans, but recovered and did the full journey again in 24 days. His cancer then returned and he suffered from severe depression, but after recovering again he went on to break the Guinness World Record for the most distance cycled in seven days in 2017, at 2,830km (1,760 miles). COVID-19 cancelled his plans for RAAM in 2020, but Golding plans to complete his own cycling challenges before taking it on in 2021.
Definitely worth 15 mins or so of your latest Friday WFH lunchbreak.
Are you a 'Steve'? An all-too-true drawing for the person who thinks they know everything about bikes
From informing us the brakes are set up wrong to passing an obscure judgement on hub bearings, we all probably know a lot of Steve’s, or are guilty of occasionally doing a Steve ourselves.
Fabio Jakobsen has a few minor bike details missing this Quick-Step plug
It’s all in the details, right? @QuickStepFloor
Signature painted oak white (SIG 4753), laminate flooring https://t.co/gtvaUXHGBA pic.twitter.com/jowFJuvfJy— Fabio Jakobsen (@FabioJakobsen) May 29, 2020
It looks like the Dutchman has landed himself some light PR work flogging floors for his team’s title sponsor… we’ll assume the brakes and various other oily things are missing from this pic because young Fabio doesn’t want to damage the shiny new laminate, as he won’t get very far just on the bits we can see…
Why do cyclists ride on the pavement?
Group of teenagers on bikes. Dual carriageway. No dedicated safe space for them, so they use the pavement.
A wide cycle lane would let them be two-abreast, have a chat, be safe and leave pavements free for pedestrians. pic.twitter.com/DUA3h42Vta
— Just Another Cyclist (@justacwab) May 29, 2020
Because there aren’t any cycle lanes… and if there are, a lot of them aren’t very good as outlined in our feature on the matter.
William Fotheringham's slippery encounter from latest bike ride
Not every day you meet one of these on your bike. Thought it was a discarded inner tube in middle of road from a distance then rapidly figured out it wasn’t pic.twitter.com/hiPRv5xbaj
— William Fotheringham (@willfoth) May 28, 2020
We’re sure author and journalist Mr Fotheringham will have encountered quite a few snakes during his career, having covered professional cycling for The Guardian since 1989…
Continuing confusion for cyclists over latest lockdown rules, as British Cycling and Cycling UK still deciding on best advice
And besides, 2m social distancing on a group ride? Impossible.
— Dave Dee (@dodgyd) May 29, 2020
Debate is continuing among cyclists over whether the new lockdown rules in England – which state you can meet outdoors with up to five others from different households – mean that they now have the green light to organise group rides. On our social channels many have come to the conclusion that it still isn’t responsible, as keeping a group at a two metre distance from one another (which is still perhaps too close as we’ve outlined before) will be very difficult to manage while dealing with motor traffic and various other considerations when riding on the road.
British Cycling and Cycling UK have now responded to road.cc, saying that they are both in the process of updating their guidance based on last night’s announcements – Cycling UK saying their advice will cover England only. It appears that once again the government’s new rules aren’t completely clear, as cyclists are left confused over what they should and shouldn’t be doing.
Lockdown rules latest: Cycling UK say latest guidance still means exercise only permitted with one person outside of the household
We’ve just had this back from Duncan Dollimore – Cycling UK’s head of campaigns – who says that based on the government’s latest guidance update published on the 29th June, it would appear that the new rules coming in on the 1st June DON’T apply to exercising. Here’s the statement in full:
“An announcement was made to the nation on Thursday 28, May 2020 by Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, saying from Monday 01 June in England up to six people are allowed to meet outside, provided those from different households continue strictly to observe social distancing rules by staying two metres apart.
“Government guidance published mid-morning on Friday, 29 May has not reflected this change with current guidance on exercise in England still maintaining for purposes of exercise you are still allowed to meet with one person who is not a member of your household, provided social distancing is maintained.
“Cycling UK will continue to monitor developments and currently advises in England exercise is only taken alone, with members of your household or with one person who is not a member of your household, provided social distancing is maintained.”
So unlike previously – where a ban on sitting in public places wasn’t allowed but exercise was for individuals and families from the same household – it seems we could now be in a position where up to six people from different households can meet socially but not for exercise, unless further clarifications are made on or before 1st June. Our take? Probably best hold off on the group rides for now…
Ronaldo latest footballer to catch the cycling bug
Family Bike Ride 🚴🏼👌🏼❤️ pic.twitter.com/mYrnDpEChQ
— Cristiano Ronaldo (@Cristiano) May 28, 2020
Mo Salah impressed us with his taste as he was spotted riding a Vitus Razor with tan wall tyres recently; and now it’s Ronaldo plus family taking to two wheels. Not too sure about that cap and lid combo though…
Council parking officials will be able to ticket cars parked in cycle lanes from 22nd June using cameras
BREAKING NEWS: From 22nd June mandatory cycle lanes can be enforced by council parking officers – previously it was just the police who could issue tickets.https://t.co/X5DLSqnDzX
Thanks to @asdutton for spotting this.
— APPGCW (@allpartycycling) May 29, 2020
From 22nd June mandatory cycle lanes around England can be enforced by council using cameras.https://t.co/X5DLSq62Ip
Thanks to @asdutton for spotting this.
— APPGCW (@allpartycycling) May 29, 2020
This could potentially be very welcome news for anyone who has got fed up of having to move out of a cycle lane because of parked cars – spotted by Alex Dutton according to the All Party Cycling Group, the new regulations effective as of 22nd June mean that in England, council parking officials will now have the powers to ticket cars parked in mandatory cycle lanes (the ones with solid white lines) using cameras, whereas previously only the police had the power to issue tickets.
While this could go a long way towards deterring drivers who are guilty of parking in cycle lanes, it still doesn’t address a legal loophole described as “an absolute mess” by Cycling UK, that does allow drivers to park in mandatory cycle lanes introduced after 2016. This is due to a 2016 update to the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions. To give an example of the confusion, our news editor Simon had no idea if the mandatory lane in the photo above was introduced before or after the 2016 legislation.
Could we have a situation where drivers could contest a ticket citing this strange loophole? Hopefully a Highway Code update will follow this news…
Pedal Me hit back at drivers who say parents riding with children on roads are 'irresponsible'
We’ve seen a bit of drivers accusing parents of being irresponsible for riding with their kids on the roads.
Let’s be clear, if you can’t be trusted to drive on the road with kids in a civilised manner, then with all due respect – you’re not fit to drive, so don’t.
— Pedal Me (@pedalmeapp) May 29, 2020
The London-based cargo bike delivery and taxi service say that drivers who cannot negotiate the roads while children are cycling on it are “not fit to drive”. It’s in response to alleged criticism of parents who cycle on the roads with their children, with Pedal Me continuing in the Twitter thread: “In particular, given the associations between air pollution and bad Covid19 outcomes, and the fact that cycling is in the open air and therefore minimises the chances of making those you’re travelling with sick – it’s one of the most responsible ways to travel.
“If it’s at all possible – please do not drive. Bikes work for the vast majority of trips, please get one.”
Recently, Pedal Me said they were prepared to compete with the likes of Amazon who want to move into the cycle courier space: “We have the training tools, the kit, the tech to support cycle logistics. We stand ready to assist those bigger players genuinely committed to reducing the harm they’re doing in cities.
“If not, we’ll just set up competitor products and outcompete companies insisting on using outdated motor-based logistics, as we have done in same day and on demand city logistics.”
29 May 2020, 08:51
29 May 2020, 08:51
Has cycle space popped up in your neck of the woods yet?
Emergency cycle funding by region – how much is available in your area?
Transport Secretary says he has cut ‘red tape’ – but will funding result in long-term improvements?
29 May 2020, 08:51
Our full story on what the latest lockdown rules means for cyclists
What do the new lockdown ‘groups of 6’ rules mean for cyclists?
No-one knows. Yet. Here's why…
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
24 Comments
Latest Comments
@robgodd The poor guy himself suffered a traumatic brain injury and his skull was so badly shattered a significant portion of it had to be removed - do me a favour, have a look around cycling helmet manufacturers and see if any of them claim the foam hats they produce will protect against or even mitigate that level of injury. I'll wait if you like, but I can save us both the time and tell you what you'll find: none of them. Not a single one of them will. Because they don't, and they *can't* based on simple physics. Once the point of failure in a material is reached all(or as near as makes no odds) of the additional force beyond that necessary threshhold transfers through to the object beneath. Since bicycle helmets are rated for forces roughly equivalent to being dropped straight down from a stationary start 1.5m above a hard surface. Now, I'm not an expert in vehicle crash investigation, but I'm *fairly* sure that any impact or series of impacts powerful enough to render a quarder of your skull into gravel, put you in a weeks-long coma, give you massive amnesia, and leave you with ongoing symptoms of traumatic brain injury are a little bit, a teeny-weeny amount, a little smidgeon-widgeon more than what bike helmets are rated for. That's why none of the companies that make them claim they will help in such circumstances: because they know it would be a lie, and that unlike uninformed punters, carbrained journalists, or "medical professionals" who think wearing a helmet would save you from a broken arm(an actual scenario encountered by a mate, who's nurse at the A&E tutted and harrumphed her way through his whole treatment due to his lack of helmet despite his bonce having come through *being hit by a car* - another scenario bike helmets are worthless in - completely unscathed), the lawyers for those companies know their business and understand that if you lie in advertising you will get sued into the ground.
The Battle of Ypres April 1915. The German infantry division advanced using das Brumptstadt Fahrarden. The slow speed kept them behind the cloud of chlorine gas as it drifted towards the Commonwealth trenches. The offensive cleaved a two mile gap in the Western Front. The use of cycles was copied by the Japanese as they invaded Singapore and Burmah. By then war technology had embraced wider low pressure tyres, carbon frames and hydration gels. The German forces decided not to incorporate cycling as part of Operation Session, as bike theft in London and the South East was rife and would have caused huge casualties. Ironically superior advancement of tyre technology led to a British victory at El Alamein. This technology played a key part in the US Marines victory at Iwo Jima.
The appropriate response to Google pissing on your cereal is not a fancy new sugar that removes the taste of urine. Stop using Google products where you can. Firefox browser and DuckDuckGo search engine have had noticeable upticks in market share by explicitly NOT pushing AI.
my thoughts exactly...I wonder how that approach is working, with motor vehicle drivers...🤔
I do not wish to diminish the personal tragedy, but one never hear calls for pedestrians or even hikers to wear clothing with integrated lightening rods.
RE Andy Burnam / Heidi Alexander - this is the best thing in many ways - set an example (even if currently it leads to lots of online name-calling). And imagine some of the political alternatives! The folks in the apparently second-placed party seem incredibly unlikely to be doing so. And even the current "new Greens" seem less interested in ... y'know, environmental things. OTOH I wish Heidi could be bolder. And I fear that like anyone ambitious enough to get to the top (exception B Johnson - well, I guess there was the Corbyn bicycle...) Burnam will be trimming his transport policy sails to fit the wind (should that be "bunker-fuel-burning engines"?)
@mattsccm Bull bars aren't banned, they just have to conform to regulations so they are deformable or have plates that allow crumple give on contact, rather than rigid steel bars that can smash into pedestrians and cyclists with no give at all, catch them and drag them under the wheels. If you think that's a problem, do one. Why should who is responsible for a collision remove the responsibility of people driving a tonne of machinery on the road from having safety features to at least mitigate some of the effects of a collision?
I'd be willing to bet that's lazy use of stock photography rather than deliberate misinformation, but the result is still the same.
@smallbeer You obviously don't realise how many bulls there are wandering around Chelsea, in and out of the china shops, that he needs to protect his Range Rover from.
I agree, it's bloody 'elf and safety overreach, can't help some people, I put some meat, sorry, neat decoration on the front of mine and the polis were round poking their noses in like that (mind you, that was a mistake...) (etc)
24 thoughts on “Pedal Me slam drivers who say parents road riding with kids are ‘irresponsible’; Council to dish out fines for bike lane parking; New lockdown rule confusion; New Manchester infra not what it seems; Ronaldo and family go cycling + more on the live blog”
There used to be a 9am
There used to be a 9am Saturday chain gang ride from Darlington to Barnard Castle and back. When/if it resumes, I imagine there’ll be a few people out “testing their eyesight”.
RE the charging of the tesla.
RE the charging of the tesla.
If out on the road the cyclists would have travelled 72kms+ assuming 24kph (even though it was likely to be a lot more given the cyclists they had on there)
Yet another pro bicycle
Yet another pro bicycle article from the hate filled Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/29/hero-bikes-free-bicycles-transforming-lives-scotland-key-workers-coronavirus
ktache wrote:
That article show a disgusting lack of respect for the bikes. There’s one laying on the ground when there’s a perfectly good post box to put it against.
Don’t even get me started on people parking bikes up trees…
hawkinspeter wrote:
Why not? We all know, thanks to your posts, that squirrels ride bicycles.
eburtthebike wrote:
Yeah, but they don’t ride them in the trees.
“No, I’ll stick to riding
“No, I’ll stick to riding alone…
…because that’s what I did before the virus, so why would I change now?”
Good offer that from Cycling
Good offer that from Cycling UK. Finally, finally joined after years of prevaricating, mainly for the insurance.
Don’t most have htat package
Don’t most have htat package anyway from existing insurance policies?
Potentially from house
Potentially from house insurance, yes. But I’d rather be certain and have cycling-specific cover due to recent cases. I chop and change house insurers every year and so it would be easy to accidentally end up not being covered
Believe me as someone who has
Believe me as someone who has been stung by an Ambulance chasing lawyer after a pedestrian vs bike accident, you don’t want to be relying on your house insurance company who will fold like a cheap suit, and leave you with higher house insurance premiums.
hirsute wrote:
If you’re making a claim against someone – or they are against you – then solicitors who are very experienced in working for cyclists would be the ideal.
I have been a CUK member for 11 years, joined partly for the 3rd party thing but also so I’m part of the body loudly defending the rights of all cyclists. A bit like I’d expect being in a union if you ever end up at an employment tribunal.
Despite Boardman’s influence, Breeze & ThisGirlCan etc, BC’s mission (and roots) really isn’t in campaigning. But to have two bodies working for us isn’t going to hurt.
how do you stay socially
how do you stay socially distant on a bike when you need to keep 2m apart side by side and at least 15m apart when in a line?
is this really a good poll to be promoting?
how do you stay socially
how do you stay socially distant on a bike when you need to keep 2m apart side by side and at least 15m apart when in a line?
is this really a good poll to be promoting?
how do you stay socially
how do you stay socially distant on a bike when you need to keep 2m apart side by side and at least 15m apart when in a line?
is this really a good poll to be promoting?
Please post the links to the
Please post the links to the peer reviewed research and studies that clearly demonstrate the need for cycling 15m behind another cyclist with respect to Covid-19. Please ensure that the studies have measured viral load as part of their research. I won’t wait…
I think you need to take that
I think you need to take that up with road.cc
https://road.cc/content/news/experts-set-out-distance-leave-riders-ahead-272619
A note for ‘instachaaz’,
A note for ‘instachaaz’, Steve calls wheels ‘hoops’ a bike a ‘steed’ and the seat a ‘perch’.
Round here Steve calls wheels
Round here Steve calls wheels ‘rims’ as in ‘what rims you riding?” .
Lukas wrote:
I’ve several times had to query adverts selling rims, when the pic showed a wheel.
“While this could go a long
“While this could go a long way towards deterring drivers who are guilty of parking in cycle lanes, it still doesn’t address a legal loophole described as “an absolute mess” by Cycling UK, that does allow drivers to park in mandatory cycle lanes introduced after 2016.”
I know, let’s have a thorough review of road laws and tidy everything up. Just like the one we didn’t have all those years ago.
Quote:
Except that the advice also still says that you can only sit in public places with one person from another household. So more likely it just hasn’t been updated to the new guidance at all, and when it is the ‘up to six people’ provision will apply whether you’re exercising, picnicking, or whatever.
Why do cyclists ride on the
Why do cyclists ride on the pavement? We all know the answer and for those cyclists who appear to be children, it’s likely to be more appropriate.
There’s not so much reason on that particular stretch of road though – it’s not really a dual carriageway and just over the brow of the hill it ends at a T junction. It’s more a short urban road with lanes (between Holyrood Park and the Royal Commonwealth Pool in Edinburgh), and not a patch on the Belfast classic featured here recently.
So whilst I agree with the point being made, more apposite photos are needed.
I wonder if someone could
I wonder if someone could clarify something for me.
My understanding was that the Tsrgd is a statutory instrument governing what signs and markings could be placed alongside and on a carriageway. As such it does not regulate what can and cannot be done on a highway, which is governed by the RTA, RTRA,HA etc.
The Road Traffic Regulation Act is cited in the highway code as the relevant legislation for parking in cycle lanes, which would require an order from the highway authority and the offence would be contravening that order.
So how can a change in a SI on how a line should be drawn on a road change a regulation order made under the RTRA, which hasn’t been changed, if the order excludes vehicles, it excludes vehicles.