Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Safe cycling distance – experts reinforce minimum distance you should leave to people cycling ahead of you

10 metres if cycling slowly, 20 metres if riding fast, say researchers from universities in Belgium and the Netherlands

Our article from a couple of weeks ago, How much distance should you leave the cyclist ahead in a time of pandemic has been widely shared on social media – and now, an academic white paper has been published that reinforces the same point we made, namely that when riding your bike, you need to keep further back than the 2 metres social distancing the UK government stipulates.

And while our article was meant as a rough guide to the minimum distances you should keep between yourself and a rider further up the road, researchers from the Belgian university KU Leuven and Dutch colleagues at TU Eindhoven recommend even greater distance – and as trained engineers and aerodynamicists, their opinion carries rather more weight than ours does.

Looking at walking, jogging and cycling, still permitted in many countries during the coronavirus pandemic, they highlighted the importance of keeping out of other people’s slipstreams, to avoid going through the crowd of droplets formed by the person in front of you breathing, coughing or sneezing.

They used simulation models that usually are employed to help elite athletes understand where best to position themselves in someone else’s slipstream, but turned that concept on its head to look at how to stay out of the slipstream altogether to minimise the risk of contracting coronavirus.

The results have been displayed in a series of animations and visual depictions, which you can find in the white paper, entitled Social Distancing v2.0: During Walking, Running and Cycling.

Professor Bert Blocken, who led the research, said: “People who sneeze or cough spread droplets with a bigger force, but also people who just breathe will leave particles behind. But when running through that cloud they still can land on your clothing.”

According to the research, social distancing is less of an issue regarding two people running or walking next to each other in a low wind environment, because the droplets land behind them. The greatest risk, by contrast, comes when one person is just behind another, in their slipstream.

Professor Blocken’s advice is for people walking to leave at least 4 to 5 metres to the person in front, and 10 metres when running or cycling slowly. When cycling quickly, he recommended leaving a full 20 metres at a minimum.

“If you want to overtake someone, it is also recommended to start ‘pre‐ sorting’ into a staggered arrangement from a fairly long distance – 20 metres with bicycles, for example, so that you can overtake carefully and at a proper distance by moving in a straight line,” he added.

He likened the situation to overtaking another vehicle in a car – it’s not a manoeuvre that should be started at the last second.

In a note to the white paper, Professor Blocken, whose specialisations are urban physics, wind engineering and sports aerodynamics, explained that its publication broke usual conventions surrounding academic research due to the unprecedented situation created by the coronavirus pandemic.

“Because of the urgency of the situation and the world‐wide crisis, we exceptionally have turned things upside down,” he said.

“First research results and communication to the public, only today I submitted the research proposal for funding, later we will submit the peer‐reviewed article.

“We thought carefully about this reversed order. Given the situation, we decided it would be unethical to keep the results confidential and keep the public waiting months for the peer review process to be completed.”

He added that the white paper is “just a short description of the main results. The details of the scientific study including all CFD models, computational settings and parameters will appear on the following days as a LinkedIn article.”

In the UK, government rules man that you should stay at home, the only exceptions being essential reasons including travelling to work, shopping for food or medicine, and undertaking one form of exercise a day, including cycling, provided it is done alone or with members of your household.

As we pointed out in our previous piece on social distancing, our advice is certainly not aimed at encouraging people to ride in groups that would breach those government guidelines – but with more people cycling now, whether for exercise, commuting or shopping, inevitably you will find yourself sharing the road with others, and we’d urge everyone to ride responsibly.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
Kendo | 3 years ago
1 like
Avatar
ktache replied to Kendo | 3 years ago
0 likes

Good article.

"it’s likely low unless you are engaging in activities as part of a large crowd (such as a protest)."

Nice...

Avatar
crazy-legs | 3 years ago
4 likes

Please don't give this "study" the oxygen of publicity, it's basically just a theory and some hypothesised modelling from authors who admit that they have no experience in epidemiology but it's now being used by mainstream media as yet another anti-cycling weapon.

Don't promote dubious / unverified "science". It's as bad as that one debunked "study" about MMR/autism. What hope do we have if even cycling websites are promoting this kind of shit? Try publishing this instead:

https://www.bicycling.com/news/a32097735/coronavirus-viral-simulation/

Avatar
Alankk | 3 years ago
1 like

The study about cyclist spreading coronavirus is not actually a study. 

www.vice.com/en_us/article/v74az9/the-viral-study-about-runners-spreadin...

Avatar
mdavidford | 3 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

the droplets land behind them.

Aren't they mostly going to land on their own faces / chests?

Avatar
PRSboy | 3 years ago
2 likes

I did wonder about moving out a reasonable distance behind before overtaking, but isn't that assuming that any droplets in a slipstream stay in a relatively tight band and don't fan out?

I tried holding my breath when overtaking, but this has proved difficult!

Avatar
Sriracha replied to PRSboy | 3 years ago
0 likes

Need to have a vaper ride in front to be able to see how the exhaled breath spreads out!

Latest Comments