With his debut Tour de France on the horizon this July, and expectations high for a heavyweight GC battle with Jonas Vingegaard and Tadej Pogačar, it’s fair to say that Remco Evenepoel’s start to 2024 couldn’t have gone much better.
After a trademark 55km solo victory Figueira Champions Classic, the world time trial champion demonstrated why he’s currently the best in the world against the clock, blowing away the likes of Magnus Sheffield, Stefan Küng, Filippo Ganna, and a rather sluggish Wout van Aert to dominate the ultimately decisive 22km time trial at the Volta ao Algarve on Saturday.
Despite two defeats to a rapid Dani Martínez on the Volta’s two summit finishes (the second of which we’ll get on to in a minute), and a flurry of attacks on yesterday’s final stage, that heavy TT win – courtesy of a monster 62-tooth front ring – proved enough for Evenepoel to secure his third overall victory of his career at the Portuguese stage race.
But, as ever, the always entertainingly divisive 24-year-old has attracted some controversy on social media – not for his domineering performances on the bike, but for his comments in front of a microphone off it, after the Belgian blamed his second successive summit defeat to Martínez on being forced to ride the notoriously steep slopes of the Alto do Malhão in the big ring following a late mechanical.
“I had to do it in my 54 chainring. I had a mechanical problem and couldn’t shift into my small gear anymore,” Evenepoel said after finishing second on yesterday’s iconic Volta ao Algarve stage.
“That was a pity because doing a climb that goes close to 20 per cent was pretty difficult. It killed my legs a bit.
“In my head, I stayed quite calm. I said it to the car ‘my gears weren’t working anymore’. It’s a shame because I’m a guy who likes to ride on a high cadence. In the first part, it really killed my legs and it was just a bit less in the end because of a lot of loss of power, due to the gear mechanical. That’s life. There are worse things.”
Now, we’ve all been there. For instance, I’ve lost track of the number of times I blamed an subpar performance on a shipped chain, a slow puncture, a bee sting, a weird tree distracting me when the decisive move went up the road… I could go on.
And while those (mostly) fabricated excuses always elicited a raised eyebrow and a smirk from my teammates, this is Remco, after all, so the reaction is a touch more severe online.
“God bless him!” wrote popular cycling account Mihai Simion after hearing of Remco’s mechanical troubles on the Alto do Malhão.
“He loves an excuse,” said Tony.
“I knew he was gonna give an excuse. Sometimes you have to give kudos the winner,” added Sharif, while Joe wrote: “He has an excuse every time he gets beaten. Tired of that.”
“Need to add that one to the book of excuses,” wrote Christopher.
“2024 and same old Mr Excuse,” added another Twitter user (you can see where this is going).
Rigo couldn’t [change gear] too back om stage nine of the 2017 Tour de France and was still able to win the stage,” pointed out Lalo, presumably a massive Rigoberto Urán fan.
“Come on Remco, you don’t need that bro,” said Cobrax.
“Definitely could’ve won if it was ITT,” wrote Mooiplas. “He must learn to give credit to his opponents.”
Others, meanwhile, leapt to Remco’s defence quicker than a Mikel Landa turn on the front.
“Strange reactions here. Try climbing on the big ring yourself and see how good you do,” said AmBiorix.
“Valid ‘excuse’ in my opinion. He’s just respectfully stating what happened. Gave Kudos to Martinez and WVA in his interview for Sporza too, so what do you want?”
“I don’t know if he would have won, but I think he’s telling the truth. He was pulling a big gear on the last climb and on the images I’ve seen again, he’s on the large chainring in the difficult parts,” argued Yume.
“People immediately talking about excuses, but whether he would have won without it or not, it did look like he was stuck in the big ring, and that would indeed have had a measurable impact,” added Michael.
> Remco Evenepoel splits opinion after refusing to sign kid's jersey thrown at him by dad
Meanwhile, Miyamoto wrote: “I’m team Remco on this, simply stating a fact, suspect it’s often barely contained chaos behind the scenes, he made the best of a bad situation, I like that he reveals what’s going on behind the scenes...”
“I love that even though the haters get mad every time he opens his mouth, Remco still says what he thinks,” says Flower Flower.
And Janis concluded: “Never change Remco, keep those haters hating for just speaking your mind.”
Well, I’ll tell you one thing for sure, Remco’s never not interesting, is he?
Add new comment
17 comments
Strangely incomplete Telegraph story, under a "killer cyclist" headline. Has anyone seen many "killer driver" headlines there?
Fails to mention that the cyclist could potentially be charged with involuntary manslaughter.
Nor how many involved in such accidents have gone to prison in recent years.
"Cougar attacks five cyclists in US". I misunderstood that headline for a second.
It seems hard to believe that the friends and family of someone killed in a collision would want a cyclist who causes a pedestrian's death to "be treated in the same way as any other road accident.'' Do they not know how many motorists who kill pedestrians or cyclists walk away with little punishment? Do they not realize how few collisions, almost none in fact, are "accidents?'' There is invariably human error or inattention or both involved, and way too often the killers walk because, well, the "sun was in their eyes.''
Does not RE remind you of another Belgian wunderkind? VDB.
With regards to Evenepoel, will this BS be called out whenever someone blames missing out on a win due to a mechanical?
He's not the first and certainly won't be the last.
“My turban saved my life,”.....
Oh dear, is this going to start a trend, like all the "helmet saved my life" stories, despite being patently untrue.
"The impact probably wasn't life-threatening, but my headgear partially reduced the harm received" doesn't quite have the same ring to it
I thought of you while reading the "police say mountain bikers 100% saved friend's life in cougar attack" story burt
But were they wearing helmets?
Every preventable loss of life is tragic, but sadly the grieving family of Mr Douglas need to understand that they are not alone in their negligent treatment by Police and CPS. Significantly more bereaved relatives of pedestrians and cyclists killed at the hands of motorists are left wanting for justice.
In relation to that article Mr Briggs needs to get a reality check if he thinks a "cycling lobby" has any sway over this government. His vitriol towards cyclists is misguided as the narcissistic behaviour of Charlie Alliston suggests he'd be equally contemptuous if he'd killed someone with his bike or a car
In regards to the 'brompton vs the ncn' pic, I like to keep an eye on windy.com's soil moisture map (found under the drought moisturing layer) to get an idea of when to brave the bridleways again after winter. If it's solid blue like it is now then it's a no go for me.
The cycle path which goes along the side of the River Avon from Bristol toward Pill can become pretty difficult if it has rained at any time in the preceding week or so, as water drains down out of the woods toward the river.
If his gearing actually failed that's a pretty reasonable reason for not performing at the highest possible level of sports.
Do these people think they put the little ring on pro's road bikes for fun and its actually not needed?
"Oh his crank snapped? Why didn't he just pedal one legged and still win, always making excuses!"
I'm afraid a lot of road cycling fans are a bit thick - and/or ultra conservative and it's not the done thing to blame equipment. 'Eddy wouldnt have done it'.....
Who gives a flying **** what Eddy thinks......
He wasn't even moaning that much anyway. He was just pointing out a mechanical had scuppered his chance of a win he obviously wanted. Perfectly reasonable I'd say.
I'm not anti-Remco although he's not one of my top favourites, but for goodness sake, what are people talking about? Why would he lie about having a mechanical when he's got the world's cameras on him at all times and someone would be bound to be able to show that he used the smaller chain ring if he did, and if it is true why should he not mention it? Is he supposed to get to the end and just say "I was rubbish today" even though there was a sound mechanical reason he didn't compete? I know in a way he has brought some of this on himself with his brattish behaviour in the early part of his career but he has shown plenty of signs recently of becoming more mature and respectful of other riders, so let's give him a break and not jump on him for everything he says.
I didn't particularly like him earlier in his career. But I'm warming to him now. I don't get the treatment of him here - if other riders said they had a mechanical like that, media would report a hard luck story.