Johannes Staune-Mittet’s preparations for the 2026 road season haven’t gone quite to plan so far, after the Norwegian pro revealed this week that he was issued a €100 fine by police while training in Alicante – for using earphones during his ride.
In the United Kingdom, there is currently no law prohibiting cyclists from wearing headphones while on their bike. However, that is not the case in Spain and the Canary Islands, where riding with earphones is not permitted and could result in a costly €200 fine.
And with professionals from across Europe flocking to the Costa Blanca this month for their teams’ annual pre-Christmas training camps, it’s perhaps no surprise that one or two of them, bopping along to their favourite techno track as they finish off one last interval, would be unaware of Spain’s stringent earphone legislation.
At least that was the case for Staune-Mittet, after the 23-year-old Decathlon rider was issued a €100 penalty by Spain’s traffic police on Monday, for riding with a pair of Apple AirPods.
The Norwegian, tipped as one of the sport’s most exciting climbing and stage racing prospects since his win at the 2023 Giro Next Gen, was stopped by police during a 73km ride around Calpe, in Spain’s Alicante province.
The 23-year-old is currently preparing for his second season at French WorldTour squad Decathlon CMA CGM, who he joined at the start of 2025 in a surprise move after four seasons with Visma-Lease a Bike’s development and senior teams, making his grand tour debut at the Vuelta a España in August, finishing 42nd overall.
In a Strava post detailing Monday’s training ride, Staune-Mittet shared a short clip of him holding the penalty notice issued to him by the Spanish authorities for “driving while using headphones or earphones connected to devices that receive or play sound”.
Failing to abide by this rule, which applies to both motorists and cyclists, could result in a €200 fine, according to Spain’s Reglamento General de Circulacion, though by paying early Staune-Mittet was able to avoid this higher penalty, instead coughing up €100.
Interestingly, while the notice handed to Staune-Mittet takes note of the bike he was riding, a Van Rysel, under ‘vehicle class’ it is simply designated as ‘other’.
“Guess it is better to buy a pair of those ugly out-of-ear headphones than to get fined for AirPods every day,” the 23-year-old joked in his Strava caption.
> Wearing earphones while cycling — is it allowed? What does the Highway Code say?
The debate surrounding the use of earphones while cycling is a long running one, especially in the UK, where the practice is still legally permitted.
Two years ago, the discussion was reignited by, naturally, Jeremy Vine, after the broadcaster posted a video on social media of a crash caused by a submerged pothole as he cycled through London. The pedalling presenter lost an earphone in the fall, returning to pick it up off the ground shortly after, the footage sparking numerous replies questioning the safety of cycling with earphones in.

A 2018 Dutch study, published in the Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, also found that using headphones “negatively affects perception of sounds crucial for safe cycling”.
“However, taking into account the influence of confounding variables, no relationship was found between the frequency of listening to music or talking on the phone and the frequency of incidents among teenage cyclists,” the research concluded.
And wider public opinion appears to be in favour of prohibiting cyclists from wearing earphones while cycling, a 2014 BBC survey finding that nine in ten support a ban, the E-Survey of Road Users’ Attitudes (ESRA) putting that figure at two thirds in a more recent survey.
Staune-Mittet will be relieved, however, to avoid the hefty €400 penalty dished out last year to a student in France, where cycling with earphones is also banned. The 23-year-old student also found out about his substantial fine the hard way – by having the money blocked in his bank account, despite never receiving any notice of a fine from the police.
Martin, a student in La Rochelle, was riding his bike in August 2023 when he was stopped by the police. He told France Bleu last year that he wasn’t aware of the law and thought he was being pulled over for something else.
“I didn’t understand at all why I was getting stopped as I didn’t know the law. I asked them: ‘Am I going too fast?’,” he said.
Martin told the officers that he was unaware of the law, introduced in 2015, and took off his headphones immediately. He didn’t think much of it, until seven months later when he found out that €400 — which he pointed out is equivalent to two months rent at his university accommodation — had been blocked in his bank account by the La Rochelle fines office.
So count yourself lucky there, Johannes.

22 thoughts on “Pro cyclist fined €100 by Spanish police for riding with earphones”
It’s a dumb rule. We regulate
It’s a dumb rule. We regulate things based on how much harm said thing is likely to cause if used improperly. This is like fining someone for improper use of a butter knife. Do they fine deaf cyclists for riding a bike at all?
I don’t think it merits a 100
I don’t think it merits a 100 euro fine but headphones can definitely distract from being 100% focused on riding safely. I imagine on quiet mountain roads around Calpe, for a pro rider listening to music it’s less of an issue compared to busy urban streets where you see road users (on bikes and in cars) definitely distracted when they’re on the phone, excepting correlation is not causation and they might just have poor road skills.
The law is the law. It
The law is the law. It applies equally to all road users, be they on 2 or 4 wheels. It makes even more sense to respect the traffic rules when cycling in a foreign country.
Talking of the Costa Blanca, locals are fed up with large, unorganised (3 abreast, no kidding) cycling groups that block the roads during rush hours, jump traffic lights and deny the right of way upon engaging a round-about. Pins start to grow on the road surface.
MaxiMinimalist wrote:
Is that you, Nige? It certainly sounds like his pathetic, fictional anti-cycling bullshit. Off you fuck now, there’s a good chap.
MaxiMinimalist wrote:
Does it really? Are drivers banned from wearing headphones too then? ?
Velo-drone wrote:
In Spain, yes: anyone controlling any vehicle on the public roads is banned from wearing headphones.
Boopop wrote:
This always comes up and it’s always nonsensical. Deaf people don’t have a choice about not being able to hear the traffic around them. Hearing people do. There are only two senses that help one to identify and avoid hazards when riding in traffic, it’s beyond me why anyone would make the choice voluntarily to relinquish one of them.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Sight, and the pricking of the thumbs.
Smell, perception and the
Smell, perception and the feeling of a full stomach.
We have somewhere between 20 and 22 senses, depending how we define them. Read a very interesting book about them, from the library, naturally. I can only really remember a bit about a study that if you raise kittens in an environment with no verticle lines, they cannot “see” them when they become cats. Or horizontal, one of the two, maybe both. Fascinating and cruel…
On reading a book on a
On reading a book on a similar topic I was surprised to find that as well as on the tongue taste buds are also found in the anus!
Samtheeagle wrote:
Under certain circumstances into which it’s best not to enquire…
Well, almost all animals
Well, almost all animals start out as essentially bags which form into tubes – perhaps the cellular machinery just ensures that the entries to said tubes are provided with suitable sensors and there’s never been the need to unwire that?
OTOH sea cucumbers apparently “chose” to breathe through their anus (given their metamorphosis and multiple remodellings their lineage had undergone “bottom” is almost certainly entirely incorrect). So perhaps at some point there was a need…
ktache wrote:
Add “remote touch” to the list too: https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2025/science-and-engineering/se/research-first-to-show-humans-have-remote-touch-seventh-sense-like-sandpipers.html
hawkinspeter wrote:
That’s only recently evolved, too – since the invention of the television.
I bet they can still manage
I bet they can still manage to sit on something that you will need to use in the next few minutes though – I believe that’s innately encoded.
ktache wrote:
Probably this one: https://www.nature.com/articles/241467a0
As I understand it, it’s not just cats that would behave like that, but it’s common to (mammalian?) eyes as we have neurons in the visual cortex that fire when we see specific orientations of lines e.g. we’ll have ones for vertical lines, horizontal, diagonal and probably lots of other specific things that got trained into the developing brain.
I meant periception! Damned
I meant periception! Damned autocorrect…
Johannes Staune-Mittet wrote:
Um, as far as I can see, that would still be “headphones or earphones connected to devices that receive or play sound”, and therefore illegal. And probably more likely to be noticed and get you fined.
How is this even news?
How is this even news?
Someone breaks a law in a different country and has to pay a fine?
What next?
In fairness, that last one
In fairness, that last one would be news if it was in the UK.
Interestingly, even bone
Interestingly, even bone-conducting headphones are illegal in France…
Meanwhile in Britain, you can
Meanwhile in Britain, you can be driving with headphones on, mow down a group of cyclists in single file coming the other way killing one of them, and it’s all fine.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15357139/amp/Accountancy-hit-cyclist-car-country-road-late-childrens-nanny-cleared-death-dangerous-driving.html