At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Likely comes from different budgets of money
And?
Cyclists wouldn't need cycling infrastructure if drivers adhered to the highway code and drove within the speed limits, drivers moan like little...
Thanks, that's probably a good point about all the different profiles - I hadn't thought of that. Interesting Unior tool, thanks for the link.
Having basic DIY skills for anthing, including bikes, is a great help when you do need to go to the professionals.
Wera Hex-Plus work very well for me.
I have just seen the Tour of the Algarve finish on BBC news....
no, because it's cyclists who want to take us back to the Stone Age
All canyons I've seen in the last year had problems out of the box .4 customers had no brakes at all...
The chart you shared exhibits a complete failure to understand vehicle dynamics, and road safety. It is an embarrassment to its author, and to...