The parents of an eight-year-old boy who was struck and killed by a pick-up driver on a pedestrian crossing in Co. Cork, after the motorist ignored a red light, have called for better enforcement on the roads, while also criticising the “undue leniency” of sentences handed out to dangerous drivers who kill.
André Castro Ladeiro was on a family bike ride with his parents and younger brother on 12 August 2023, when he was hit by a Ford Ranger Wildtrack pick-up truck driven by John Moynihan at a crossing located just after a roundabout on Cork Road in Carrigaline, Co. Cork.
According to the eight-year-old’s parents, André “waited for the green man” and checked “no cars were coming” before crossing the road – which connects a cycling and walking path to the town’s schools – when Moynihan “came flying out of nowhere, ignoring his surroundings, disrespecting the red light in a pedestrian crossing and running over our son”.
Following the “catastrophic” crash, André was taken to hospital and later transferred to Children’s Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, where he was treated for five days before dying from his injuries.
Earlier this week, 62-year-old Moynihan was sentenced to two years in prison, with one additional year suspended, for dangerous driving causing the young cyclist’s death. He was also disqualified from driving for six years.
Judge Dermot Sheehan told Cork Criminal Court that a custodial sentence was warranted in order to serve as a “deterrent to other motorists”.
“For him, my son was only a leaf”
However, in a victim impact statement, and in later interviews with Irish media, André’s parents César Ladeiro and Filipa Castro criticised what they believe to be the lack of justice involved in this week’s sentencing, while expressing their anger at the number of rule-breaking drivers on the road.
Reflecting on the trauma they have experienced since witnessing the fatal collision, César and Filipa said in their victim impact statement, read in court: “Every day has been a challenge between anger, sadness, depression, despair, fear, dark days, disbelief. All those words became part of our life since that driver killed our son. Also, panic attacks, nightmares, sleep deprivation, anxiety, fear, stress.
“You have no idea what is to see people around driving without due care. The sound of the impact of the car hitting our son and the image of our son lying down on the road are constantly present.”

Cork Road, Carrigaline, Co. Cork (Google Maps)
They continued: “Facts are that during a family bike ride André was crossing a road on a pedestrian crossing that connects a walking and cycle path to schools in the middle of Carrigaline and that crossing has traffic lights. André waited for the green man. Before crossing André and myself checked no cars were coming.
“That driver came flying out of nowhere, ignoring his surroundings, disrespecting the red light in a pedestrian crossing and running over our son.
“As a nurse who worked in a paediatric ICU for twelve years, André’s mum realised from the first minute how catastrophic the situation was, while André’s dad just had hope… Tomás, André’s brother, was there, alone, inside the trailer, staring at André without saying a word.
“André spent five days fighting to live, five devastating days that ended with his parents at his side for his last breath.
“It is still impossible for us to believe or accept this. Every day, we wait to see him walk through the door, to give us again the most earthly hug only he could give, his sounding kisses, to see his captivating smile. But no, the only thing we find is pictures and videos, memories.”
Expanding on the moments leading up to the crash in an interview with RTÉ’s Liveline, Mr Ladeiro said that he had just started to cross the road with his other son Tomás in a trailer behind him, with André in front, when Moynihan drove through the red light.
“The traffic light gets red for the cars, and I’m seeing the traffic light because I’m behind, and Andre is in front of me, facing the signal or facing the crossing. I stayed behind him, because the track there is not wide enough for us to be like the two bikes,” he said.
“I was starting to cross, and I never saw it coming. I never heard it coming. There were no sounds, no marks, nothing. André was breathing, so I had hope.”
When asked if Moynihan had apologised for killing his son, Mr Ladeiro said: “To us directly? Never. Towards our solicitors? Never.
“There was no explanation given. And I think that anyone with the perfect conscience of what he was doing when driving, even if you didn’t see anything, if you hear the loudest bang in front of you – just press the brakes. Emergency brake.
“They teach you that when you get your licence. And did that happen? No. Could that have had a different result? We don’t know.
“No, [he didn’t brake] anytime. So, as I said in court, for him my son was only a leaf, and probably he just stopped because his tyre got deflated. I’m not sure. I never heard his voice.”
“The value of my child, killed by dangerous driving, is a two-year sentence”
In their victim impact statement, César and Filipa – despite thanking Judge Sheehan for explaining the reasoning behind the sentencing – argued that the three-year prison sentence, with the last year suspended, was too lenient.
“Does this outcome take in account all the suffering it caused?” they asked. “Is this what people want for justice on the 21st century in the Republic of Ireland? Is this outcome anyway proportional to the life of a child that had so much to live, so much to share?”
In his interview on Liveline, César noted that, under Irish law, Moynihan faced a maximum sentence of ten years for causing death by dangerous driving.
“That’s the right phrase, that you can get prison sentence of ‘up to’ 10 years,” he said on the programme. “These two key words: ‘up to’. So you can drive dangerously, kill, and you can have ‘up to’.
“It’s not ‘from’. It’s ‘up to’. So in the end, the judge did what was in the law, and according to his judgment, and according to the law.
“So I cannot say anything else for André’s case. But the value of my child, for the state of Ireland in this case, killed by dangerous driving, is a two-year sentence.
“I hope that if [Moynihan] has any religion, that he continues to suffer after his days are done.”
He also argued that the justice system did not provide enough support for his family during the sentencing process.
“The other victims are still here, and they are not taken into account during all this process,” he said. “We were asked if we wanted to do a victim impact statement, that’s really it.”
Mr Ladeiro added that his family still regularly cross the road where André was fatally struck and are constantly angered by the continued presence of rule-breaking drivers.
“Any simple thing that we see on the road that is against the rules just make us mad,” he said. “You cannot imagine how we boil from the inside seeing someone not stopping at a red light.
“The problem is not only there, it is a reminder of everything else. It happens. And again there is no conviction, because Garda cannot be everywhere, it is not their duty to be everywhere. We are in the 21st century. Enforcement needs to happen, somehow.
“For us, my son Tomás, when he sees someone crossing at traffic lights, he just gets ‘that man is being bad crossing on a red light’. He will know that his brother crossed on the green man and he had the result that he had.”

André Castro Ladeiro
In their victim impact statement in court this week, César and Filipa said they are determined to use every bit of their “strength and resilience” to make things better for Tomás, who will turn seven this year, and say they want to have “hope for the future” and to “laugh and make dreams come true.”
The couple said that André, born in December 2014, filled their lives “with all the most wonderful feelings.”
“A dream came true and it was an incredible journey with happiness, smiles, energy, gratitude, bravery, resilience, pride and so much more. In 2019, we chose Ireland to live in and give more time together to us as a family. A huge step for us,” they said.
“André’s ability to settle here, without knowing nearly any English was remarkable. But this was as he was: full of good feelings! He made so many friends, his age and grownups, he loved the schools he went to. He was always ready to take part in community activities, fundraisings and always helping who needed help, a hand, a laugh.
“His smile was contagious, as contagious was his character. He was also involved in different sports, such as gymnastics, swimming, GAA and taekwondo. He spread joy and kindness! He was so happy, we were so happy.”

55 thoughts on “Driver came “flying out of nowhere” through red light and killed boy on bike at crossing, “treating him like a leaf”, as parents criticise “unduly lenient” two-year sentence and call for better enforcement on roads”
Ireland, where the car is
Ireland, where the car is king and road deaths are an epidemic. Politicians dont rate it as an issue
Just like the UK, where the
Just like the UK, where the popular hyper-junk press fed belief is that the REAL road traffic problem is errant cyclists.
And, for illustrative
And, for illustrative purposes, a Ford Ranger Wildtrak, weighing in at over 2, 100 kg
Surely this is an
Surely this is an exacerbating factor that warrants a longer sentence – owning a vehicle that is way more dangerous to other road users than a ‘normal’ car
brooksby wrote:
The people who drive those things are announcing to all and sundry that they really are insecure, selfish, arrogant people with no regard for anyone else.
Citation needed! Oh … wait
Citation needed! Oh … wait – someone’s done some digging and found out that in fact such people were identified as the market for light trucks in the early days?
Thanks for posting the link
Thanks for posting the link to that video, which was both fascinating and terrifying.
chrisonabike wrote:
FYI, the source of that video is not reliable. 95% of that channel’s content is fabricated nonsense.
Also, per the US NHTSA, in the home of light trucks, those light trucks contribute fewer pedestrian and cyclist deaths and injuries than cars do — both per-mile and per-vehicle.
In other words, it is simply incorrect to state that light trucks are more dangerous than cars — at least in the United States, where they are most common.
Spreading such misinformation about the false danger of light trucks does no one any good, and is in fact deleterious to road user safety, as it detracts from the actual problem, which is driver behavior.
In the UK the speed limit for
In the UK the speed limit for this vehicle is lower that that for cars, on many roads. If this was more widely publicised and enforced I think we’d see sales drop off pretty quickly.
That’s interesting, did not
That’s interesting, did not know that. Prepared to bet most police don’t know that either or if they do don’t act on it.
Have a look here for
Have a look here for clarification.
https://professionalpickup.com/pickup-truck-speed-limits/
You’re in good company Rendel, the article suggests that even the DfT are unaware of the laws (or at least the current weight of pick ups) and the law is not being enforced.
The irony is that the single cab Ranger is under 2t but because it’s single cab is automatically a LCV whilst the double cab is caught by going over the 2.04t limit.
Same for vans though. Very
Same for vans though. Very few obey the limits on a dual carriageway.
I read of one Amazon driver on the A12 getting done for going 70.
Just not enough traffic police.
https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/crime/20701742.driver-blamed-amazon-training-13-speeding-offences-suffolk/
Amazon training, eh?
Amazon training, eh?
Ignorance obviously not a
Ignorance obviously not a defence, but I admit I have driven hire vans oblivious to this in the past.
FFS, how do you even see out
FFS, how do you even see out of that ridiculous wankpanzer?
how do you even see out of
how do you even see out of that ridiculous wankpanzer?
They think they don’t need to!- where we’re going we don’t need roads!
Eton Rifle wrote:
You don’t need to: if you can’t see it, it doesn’t matter and anyway, you can drive over it.
The ford site says it has 360
The ford site says it has 360 camera displaying on the dashboard. I doubt you could easily look at that whilst going 30+ mph.
Here’s a blind spot image of various wankpanzers.
Hirsute wrote:
The chart you shared exhibits a complete failure to understand vehicle dynamics, and road safety. It is an embarrassment to its author, and to anyone suggesting that it has meaning in terms of road safety.
All of those alleged blind spots are around 10 to 20% of the optimistic stopping distance from 30 mph. In other words, it profoundly does not matter if the driver can see an object that is 8 feet from their bumper — no human being will even start applying the brakes soon enough to stop before hitting it.
And, on the contrary, an elevated seating position allows the driver to see further down the road in all directions — which is enormously beneficial, if the driver actually takes advantage and pays the required attention to the task.
The critical area of driver vision is many vehicle-lengths down the road, not 8 feet from the bumper, because objects in that distant area can still be avoided. This is why looking down the road is an essential skill taught at all levels of safe and/or performance driver education, and why staring down your hoodline will flunk you out of any such class you might attend. Staring down your hood is no more useful than looking behind you.
If you wish to appear to have the slightest clue about the topic at-hand, forget you ever found that ridiculous chart.
Don’t feed it!
Don’t feed it!
Rendel Harris wrote:
Thank you for illustrating that my comment is inarguably-correct by being forced to resort to a pathetic attempt at an ad hominem attack.
If otherwise, please go ahead and explain exactly what you think you can do, while driving down a road and spotting an object 8 feet in front of your bumper.
Do you have any views on bike
Do you have any views on bike frame materials?
mark1a wrote:
Do you really think that’s appropriate here, where we are discussing attempts to keep little 8 year-old boys alive?
Grow up — like he didn’t get a chance to.
mark1a wrote:
Next time ask them about cycle infra!
I mean, the idea is that you
I mean, the idea is that you don’t really need to because you are likely safe in there and fuck everyone else. Other peoples safety is their problem.
I have occassionally been a
I have occassionally been a passenger in crew cab pickups on various work sites. They are unrefined, uncomfortable and cramped for their size and weight. Anyone who chooses to drive one privately iif they do not have a real compelling reason is an utter moron.
crew cab pickups on various
crew cab pickups on various work sites. They are unrefined, uncomfortable and cramped for their size and weight
They’re also a favourite vehicle for crims and MOT and VED-evaders. This one was driven around for 6 months without MOT, with a badly failed MOT for 6 months, failed the next MOT badly again and was no doubt driven around for the next 6 weeks until it finally passed
If you can take the caustic
If you can take the caustic comments there NJB’s video on these suggests that “compelling reason” for having one (as opposed to the makers *selling them*) – even for workers – still generally falls into either:
a) perhaps saving tax (because such a thing falls into a “work vehicle” category)?
b) same as non-workers – mostly for “social” reasons.
For almost every purpose (even work) they’re less efficient or useful than vans or trucks. Even as a “flatbed” they often tend to be unhelpfully high (and have far less usable room that older models). And of course with open-topped models whatever you threw in there is exposed to the elements, can fall out or be pinched…
“The only guy who shows up at the job site in the shiny new F-150 Raptor Supercrew is the owner’s son, who’s cosplaying as a blue-collar labourer”. Ouch!
jamesha100 wrote:
Unfortunately in the UK (don’t know if this is the case in Ireland) they did have a compelling reason (loophole being closed from April 6th 2025, from whence they’ll be treated as company cars), which is that the purchase price was 100% tax deductible. This means around London you’ll see hundreds of spotless Rangers etc with flatbeds that have clearly never seen anything more than a Waitrose bag being driven by the bosses of building/landscaping etc firms whilst their employees are conveyed in the back of ratty old Transits. Still utter morons of course.
Indeed – it’s almost like the
Indeed – it’s almost like the motor trade had initially figured out a way to upsell things AND save themselves money (in the US), and then managed to work the magic in other countries…
Whoever started the ball rolling deserves far more than their weight in gold (annually) from the car and fuel people … and a place in hell on behalf of almost everyone else.
(I used to be somewhat relaxed about these things, but NJB and others did such an effective job of spelling out just what a trap for humanity these are. Now I wonder if they’re anywhere near “cigarettes” levels of harm.)
Thanks for the weight info.
Thanks for the weight info. Do you know the bumper height? I am thinking of buying a truck and want something much higher and heavier (with even more expensive tyres) to keep my family safe in collisions.
About 4 metres?
About 4 metres?
You’ll need 6 of those tyres, which should keep it nice and pricey. You will however be able to carry your house (and perhaps garden) which should keep everyone safe.
Is this supposed to be an
Is this supposed to be an attempt at satire ?
Are you going to answer?
Are you going to answer?
Not sure if you are asking
Not sure if you are asking yourself to reply to yourself, or if you are asking me to reply.
What do you think?
Having read the tragic, wasteful story and watched chrisonabike’s video about SUV marketing strategy, I think there are two ways of responding ( both have their merits) :
1) Express disgust at the driver’s selfishness and idiocy.
2) Mock the “me first” thought process of the driver and many SUV drivers.
Who knows, maybe some drivers will read this website and one of these approaches may touch a nerve and cause a change to their driving and attitude.
I suggest a Toyota Tundra. I
I suggest a Toyota Tundra. I have seen one of those on the road the other day and just couldn’t believe how huge that thing was.
Looks wicked. I would opt for
Looks wicked. I would opt for the 22 inch wheel option. It ticks so many boxes :
– Impresses the chicks (I think),
– Four figure tyre price,
– Single figure mpg,
– No need to slow down for speed bumps,
– Huge number of cup holders (including one large enough to hold a KFC bargain bucket),
– Tinted windows, to allow good mobile phone screen visibility on a sunny day.
This is a really touching
This is a really touching story, and absolutely heartbreaking to read. And yet again it shows how society places a higher value on someone’s freedom to drive than on a child’s life. Why causing death by dangerous driving doesn’t result in an outright and permanent driving ban as well as a heavy custodial sentence, I will never understand. This makes me genuinely angry.
My thoughts are very much
My thoughts are very much with the family and friends of André.
To have to relive those moments over and over, to resee it constantly, and the sounds…
And to have to watch other
And to have to watch other cunts drive in the same way every day out on the roads without a care for anyone else. Its a life sentence for that entire extended family and the scum that did this gets 2 years.
“Judge Dermot Sheehan told
“Judge Dermot Sheehan told Cork Criminal Court that a custodial sentence was warranted in order to serve as a “deterrent to other motorists”.”
Two years for killing an 8 year old child? Not much of a bloody deterrent.
The poor kid and his poor family.
The victim impact statement
The victim impact statement should be read to every driver every day before they get in their car.
Condolences to the family, and respect for their bravery.
Words fail me. Conflicting
Words fail me. Conflicting emotions. Those of pure sadness for the family and friends who will never forget this, or stop seeing it. Anger and hatred towards the driver and the law setters.
I personally would hunt the driver down if I was in a similar situation. Absolutely appalling.
Given the lack of apology
Given the lack of apology from the driver I assume it feels no remorse.
Regardless, the description of it’s driving is an example of where any sentence is not enough and they should lose their libido and taste buds.
Only in the face of serious consequences will some people reconsider their actions.
mitsky wrote:
One report says that he did apologise and was remorseful.
Thoughts are with André’s
Thoughts are with André’s family and friends, simply cannot imagine what they have gone through since that terrible, terrible day.
This is heartbreaking. It is
This is heartbreaking. It is the leniency of the driving ban that really grates with me. Anyone who can drive a vehicle of such size and weight through a pedestrian crossing whilst ignoring red lights then killing a child who was obeying all the rules should have a lifetime driving ban.
So sad for the family – one selfish idiot has devastated their lives.
And some wonder why drivers
And some wonder why drivers pay so little attention to their driving. Is there any other homicide that would result in a two-year sentence? The sentence here is indicative of a judge treating this as an “accident” rather than what it was – the illegal misuse of a dangerous weapon.
I don’t think drivers pay so
I don’t think drivers pay so little attention because they think “well, it’s only 2 years if I kill someone” – they don’t want to kill someone, and they don’t want any prison sentence at all; they just don’t think it’s going to happen to them. The lenient sentencing is just added insult when it does happen.
Very typical sentence from an
Very typical sentence from an Irish judge. Was driving behind a car tonight and the driver was watching vids on their phone which was mounted on the windshield
Did you report it?
Did you report it?
There are no fixed traffic
There are no fixed traffic radar traps in Ireland. They do have big mobile van that has a radar in it, but it also has a big warning on it that it is a radar trap, and there are only a few for the entire country. Living in England I have been going on holiday to Donegal every year since I was a child. It seems as though every time we go there there is an accident that kills 3 or 4 teenagers. Every year now, for 60 years, it is the same conversation with my cousins: “Everyone drives too fast.” “The roads are terribly dangerous” “Something should be done” Well I can tell you now, 60 years later, absolutely nothing has been done in North Donegal. The roads are the same, there are no speed traps, the people drive the same, the horrific accidents are the same and the conversations I have my cousins are the same. Well I’m pretty sure I will not live to see any change, hopefully my grand-children will be able to tell you if anything changes over the next 60 years.
Along with the presumption of
Along with the presumption of liability there should also be, in the cases of death of other road users a charge of manslaughter.
Dunno about Ireland, but in
Dunno about Ireland, but in the UK we already have “causing death by dangerous driving” – brought in IIRC because the courts wouldn’t charge or convict murder or manslaughter in these cases.
So without a total legal upheaval AND a massive popular opinion shift, that wouldn’t help. ( As I understand it manslaughter is not currently easy to prove in court either).
I’d say what we need is less reluctance to charge “death by dangerous driving” (rather than “careless”, the lesser charge) – coupled with a change to apply sentencing towards the higher end of tariffs *. Even that would still require some rule and organisational changes plus a major shift in popular opinion!
* Anything other than running over policewomen with a tank while speeding, drunk and smoking crack – oh and with previous – seems to get the lower end).
BikingBud wrote:
The trouble with that, desirable as it would appear, is that manslaughter has a pretty high bar; the defendant has to be proven to have been “grossly negligent given the risk of death” – this would be very difficult to prove in cases, for example (an example given by the CPS), when a driver had been momentarily distracted by changing channels on their radio and lost control leading to them hitting a cyclist or pedestrian. This falls right into the remit of causing death by careless driving but might well not be sufficient in the eyes of a jury to uphold a manslaughter charge. It would be good if deaths caused by illegal driving were charged with manslaughter because they would fall into the category provided by the CPS of “Conduct taking the form of an unlawful act involving a danger of some harm that resulted in death”, so drink/drug driving, mobile phone driving, speeding et cetera that caused death would have a good chance of success as a manslaughter charge, but if all deaths of other road users were automatically charged as manslaughter then we’d probably see more people being found not guilty than we would stiffer sentences.