Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Cycling dos and don'ts in a time of pandemic – how to be a responsible cyclist

What you should and shouldn't do when out riding your bike based on the (quite vague) law and the (not so vague) best current advice...

With England now in a third national lockdown and restrictions tight in the rest of the UK, recreational cycling outside for health is still allowed throughout Britain. The current guidelines are that during the lockdown you can exercise outside once a day, and cycling is permitted. Cycling to work is also very definitely still allowed, and has the extra benefit over public transport of built-in social distancing.

“Stay local” – What the latest lockdown laws and guidance mean for you and cycling

In this fifth update of our guide to cycling responsibly during the ongoing pandemic, we've tried to pull together all the latest information on the rules laid down by government, and the best practice for applying them drawn from our own expertise, and what is being advised by cycling's main governing bodies. We've tried to make this as clear as possible and address some misconceptions around the current rules on cycling and exercise generally. 

Since the first March lockdown, exercise has been listed as one of the exceptions to the emergency laws enacted in the original regulations that state: “During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.”

While originally exercise was only allowed "either alone or with other members of their household", the legislation now says you can exercise:

By yourself, with the people you live with, with your support bubble (if you are legally permitted to form one), in a childcare bubble where providing childcare or, when on your own, with 1 person from another household.

That’s it. When it comes to exercise – as with everything else they cover – the emergency powers are vague and leave plenty of room for the Government to interpret them and re-interpret them in any way that suits the situation.

It is worth noting that the vagueness of the act means that some things the public and police forces are interpreting as the law are not actually covered by it. Oddly, given that it's been a central part of the Government's message when it comes to limits on exercise, there is still no limit in the act to the number of times a day you can exercise (there is in the Government's Guidance that accompanies the act), or the amount of time an individual spends exercising outdoors every day; nor is there any specific ban on driving somewhere to take exercise, despite the guidance telling us to "stay local".

For example, after the BBC reported that two women were fined by police for travelling to exercise, human rights barrister Adam Wagner said this on his Twitter account: "It [a limit on travelling for exercise] is not enforceable in law. No explicit limit on how far you can travel for exercise or for how long in the law. There will come a point where you travel so far that the journey becomes the reason not the exercise but driving a few miles should not breach the regulations."

The Government FAQs on social distancing simply emphasises that exercise is permitted once a day (with exceptions for people with certain health conditions) and summarises it as this: "You can continue to exercise alone, with one other person or with your household or support bubble. This should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area." 

As mentioned before, some police forces are still doing their best to enforce the Government’s wishes rather than the letter of the law, something that caused huge confusion in the first lockdown after a certain Cabinet Office minister said that half an hour was enough when it came to exercising outside.  

So, what should and shouldn't you do to be a socially responsible cyclist during the current crisis? 

Do try ride on your own (or socially distanced with one other person), stay on your own, go home on your own and keep social interactions down to the absolute minimum. If you do meet people along the way then observe the guidance on social distancing.

Don’t go out for a recreational/training ride on your bike more than once a day. The Government advice is explicit about this, even if the law is not. While there are no rules about how long, or how far you should ride, the advice on how often you should go outdoors to take exercise is very clear. Once.

Do stay local – stick to routes you know well and ride within your limits.

Do keep a safe distance from other cyclists in as safe a manner as possible, and remember that your speed dictates how safe a distance you need to be behind someone before you pull out to pass – inevitably it is going to be much more than the two metres prescribed for pedestrians. Read our guide to How much distance you should leave the cyclist ahead in a time of pandemic.

Do make sure that you're self-sufficient and that you can fix your bike, and make it home without help from anyone else. 

Don’t share bikes or equipment – this is pretty easy if you’re riding on your own. Only use your own bike, and your own equipment. 

Don’t drive somewhere to ride if possible. The Government's Covid-19 Travel Guidance is clear that only essential travel is allowed, and it deems these things as essential:

- Work, where you cannot reasonably work from home
- Accessing education and for caring responsibilities
- Visiting those in your support bubble – or your childcare bubble for childcare
- Visiting hospital, GP and other medical appointments or visits where you have had an accident or are concerned about your health
- Buying goods or services that you need, but this should be within your local area wherever possible
- Outdoor exercise – this should be done locally wherever possible, but you can travel a short distance within your area to do so if necessary (for example, to access an open space)
- Attending the care and exercise of an animal, or veterinary services
- Attending communal worship and life events, including weddings and funerals

Some would argue that while driving to exercise is legal, it probably isn't a very sensible or desirable thing for people to do. So if you can ride your bike from your front door on deserted roads, we'd argue that's still the most socially responsible way to do it.

Why do we need to ride responsibly?

First, because of the ethical and moral considerations placed upon us all to do our bit to slow the spread of the coronavirus, which can safeguard the health and lives of our fellow citizens and the health workers striving to keep us all well. During the first lockdown there was a genuine concern that cycling could be banned if cyclists don't ride responsibly; and although that's very unlikely to happen, we all have to do our bit to ensure cycling outside continues to be viewed as a socially responsible way to get some daily exercise during the lockdown. 

Anything else?

Cycling/exercising indoors
You could consider doing some or all of your exercise at home either just generally keeping fit and doing some core and flexibility work with Joe Wicks (or the like) or if you’ve got one by doing your cycling on a turbo trainer or smart trainer. Or you could cut down the frequency of your outdoor rides by swapping some for indoor exercise or the turbo. 

> A Zwift setup for every budget

Training 
If you're training and trying to keep your fitness through this, then it's probably a good time to ask yourself how important that training really is. 

A pandemic probably isn't the time to be pushing your limits, and doing things you wouldn't normally do. If your usual training regime is pretty strenuous then it should be fine to continue doing that; however in its latest update to its Covid-19 FAQs section, British Cycling advises you to "ride well within your ability and ensure that you are self-sufficient."

Distance V Distancing
Last year, there was much discussion within the cycling community about how far it is acceptable to ride during the current emergency. The key point here would seem to be that distance ridden is a lot less important than the distance maintained between you and other people while out riding. From a virus-spreading perspective, a short ride on a relatively crowded route where it is hard to maintain proper social distancing is a lot more hazardous for you and the people you meet compared to a much longer jaunt on quiet roads. All that said, going for much longer rides than you normally would clearly goes against the spirit of the law.

> Turbo training tips — get the most from your home trainer

If you have the equipment to allow you to train indoors, then that is the place for more intense training sessions. An online training app is a great way –and really the only way – to ride as a group now, too. Even if you’re going hard in the comfort of your own home, you might still want to pause and think about whether now is really the time – you may be stressing your immune system just when you really don’t want to be, and when an over-stretched NHS doesn’t want you to either. That applies just as much if you’re recovering from Covid-19 (or any other virus) too. 

Some of us don’t have an indoor trainer though, and getting out on our bike is about more than boosting our physical health. It also helps de-stress and maintain mental well being, not only for us cyclists, but also for the people that have to live with us. And of course, it cannot be stressed too firmly that cycling is still being positively encouraged so long as it's done responsibly. 

Cycling UK coronavirus infographic - via Cycling UK

Both British Cycling and Cycling UK have already issued updated guidance. Cycling UK has recently updated a Q+A on cycling guidance during the pandemic, and its current basic advice is as follows:

Where riding is allowed, cyclists should still observe good hygiene, and Cycling UK advises leaving plenty of space when passing others, and to avoid pulling in rapidly after overtaking another cyclist, causing them to end up in your slipstream.

Cycling UK's advice remains that it is advisable for people to cycle for their health, fitness and well-being. 

The guidance for avoiding contamination remains unchanged, keeping at least two metres away from anyone else where possible, regularly washing your hands and catching coughs and sneezes in tissues and disposing of them appropriately as soon as possible. For further advice, please refer to the NHS website

We will continue to evaluate the latest advice from government and update our guidance accordingly. As the threat level reduces, our guidance is likely to be along these lines but this will depend on factors such as local levels of infection, national guidance and so on.

Failing to ride in a socially responsible way could have negative consequences for communities, individuals, and the health service. Stay safe, take heed of the latest government advice and enjoy cycling responsibly! 

Updated: 8th January 2021, 17th April, 2nd April, 30th March (twice), 23rd March. First published 22nd March 2020. 

road.cc's founder and first editor, nowadays to be found riding a spreadsheet. Tony's journey in cycling media started in 1997 as production editor and then deputy editor of Total Bike, acting editor of Total Mountain Bike and then seven years as editor of Cycling Plus. He launched his first cycling website - the Cycling Plus Forum at the turn of the century. In 2006 he left C+ to head up the launch team for Bike Radar which he edited until 2008, when he co-launched the multi-award winning road.cc - finally handing on the reins in 2021 to Jack Sexty. His favourite ride is his ‘commute’ - which he does most days inc weekends and he’s been cycle-commuting since 1994. His favourite bikes are titanium and have disc brakes, though he'd like to own a carbon bike one day.

Add new comment

116 comments

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
5 likes

Northern Ireland have released new regulations.

https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/health/Cor...

Not particularly relevant for the rest of the UK, but

Section 5, 1 states-

During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.

I just find the term "reasonable excuse" to be an interesting choice of words, excuse stinks of dodgyness, dog ate my homework sort of thing, wouldn't "genuine reason" have been a little bit better?

Avatar
Richard D replied to ktache | 4 years ago
2 likes

"Reasonable excuse" is a concept that appears time and time again in the law.  There's nothing dodgy about it.  If you try to tell the Court that your dog made you go out on your bike, it would regard that as an UNREASONABLE excuse.

Avatar
Rapha Nadal replied to Richard D | 4 years ago
0 likes

What if the dog was The Son of Sam?

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Richard D | 3 years ago
0 likes

Reasonable excuse is dodgy because it is so vague.

Yes, you can come up with a ridiculous 'dog ate my homework' type example where it is v unlikely to be a reasonable excuse.

That doesn't mean that there aren't millions of other scenarios where what is reasonable is totally subjective.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

Reasonable excuse is dodgy because it is so vague.

At least so far as taking exercise is concerned the "reasonable" bit is quite straight forward.

The law does not ask whether the exercise is reasonable. Ten miles backwards on a unicycle? I don't suppose many people would say that was reasonable. But is it exercise? And is it reasonably necessary to be outdoors to do it? That is all the law requires.

The two women taking their café latté stroll, I think that could more easily fail the test - is it even exercise? Or just a coffee morning outdoors?

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Sriracha | 3 years ago
3 likes

If people aren't allowed to go to that reservoir by car for a walk, close the car park.

But it isn't closed, it's open. And National Trust grounds and gardens are open too.

Also, aren't we forgetting the main purpose of all this? To stop the transmission of Covid. What contribution does criminalising people walking at a reservoir make to stopping transmission? None at all.

It shouldn't just be about making all our lives more miserable to no purpose.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes

Don't disagree. I'm only trying to be clear on what the law says, not defending its wisdom. And since the official guidance in any case opens up the discussion on travel, I know it's a lost cause!

I pity the police, who have to steer a path through it all (although issuing a FPN does not criminalise anyone).

There has ready been a suggestion here about why the police stopped the pair of women out for a coffee morning by the reservoir - something to do with experience over the summer lockdown with hoards descending on the place. Obviously some locations are especially popular, and that creates its own problems not conducive to reducing covid transmission - which is what it's all about.

Avatar
matthewn5 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Update Sunday 11am:

https://twitter.com/KeejayOV2/status/1244190718622683136

"Major PSA on exercise, as many haven’t found the government guidance clear: @michaelgove says:

- 30 minutes for a run
- Upto an hour for a walk
- Cycle ride of between 30-60 minutes

Caveat of ‘depending on fitness, for most people’

#Marr #Covid_19

Avatar
Hirsute replied to matthewn5 | 4 years ago
11 likes

Would this be the same Michael Gove who told us we'd had enough of experts ?

Avatar
lindow_man replied to matthewn5 | 4 years ago
9 likes

Yes but Michael Gove comes out with a lot of things on the spur of the moment that are complete bollocks though innit.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to lindow_man | 4 years ago
8 likes

lindow_man wrote:

Yes but Michael Gove comes out with a lot of things on the spur of the moment that are complete bollocks though innit.

Not just the spur of the moment.  Remember the spat with Boris the Liar a couple of years ago when Cameron ran away?  The one which allowed Boris the Liar to withdraw his nomination as leader, because they both wanted to avoid the shitstorm they'd caused.  They are a pair of lying, cheating, money-loving hypocrites.

Avatar
brooksby | 4 years ago
4 likes

Can I add this one: if you need to blow your nose while riding do not - repeat DO NOT - blow a f-ing snot rocket at the present time!  (like the bloke I passed Monday evening who stopped, cleared his nose onto the grass verge, then fiddled with his phone).

And he was dressed in lycra and on a road bike, so he must have been A Real Cyclist (TM).

Avatar
RobertMW | 4 years ago
4 likes

I"m a pensioner and a club cyclist living in Spain. We've been completely locked down for 11 days now. No cycling or even walking allowed. 600-30,000€ fine for breaking the curfew. Look at it from the healthcare workers point of view. Worst case scenario. If you have an accident out on your bike then you may need hospital treatment. You could take up a valuable bed and the services of Doctors and Nurses. At a time of National emergency that would be regarded as totally irresponsible. Get the turbo out or just hang it up and do other exercises at home. No, it's not the same, but this isn't a normal situation is it? Us Brits abroad are horrified at the way the UK government (which I support, by the way) has dragged it's heels. A £30 fine? Put another two zero's on it and it may sink in. Get a grip over there and take this seriously. We have no queues at the supermarkets. People are acting responsibly, like proper adults. Some items can be in short supply, but they are soon made available. Use your imagination and exercise at home. Only go out if you're a key worker or need essential supplies or medicines. Get some discipline as this is going to get a lot worse before it gets better. Yours sincerely, Con Cerned.

Avatar
Simon E replied to RobertMW | 4 years ago
16 likes

RobertMW wrote:

Worst case scenario. If you have an accident out on your bike then you may need hospital treatment. You could take up a valuable bed and the services of Doctors and Nurses. At a time of National emergency that would be regarded as totally irresponsible.

So are drivers, who cause vastly more deaths and injuries, not allowed out on the roads either?

DIY shops are still open in the UK but falling off ladders, stairs, getting out of the bath or electrocuting yourself with power tools are all dangerous.

Booze is flying off the supermarket shelves because the lemmings think it's a great laugh but alcohol is a contributory factor in the majority of A&E admissions. People should stop drinking so much alcohol. If they did then every town centre would be a nicer place to be in the evening or after a football match.

Lots of people are not heeding the vital social distancing advice. That's far worse than going for a solo bike ride so why don't you give them hard time?

100% respect to anyone who stays at home and gets on the turbo or does some yoga / aerobics / weights / whatever to stay fit and sane but until I'm ordered otherwise I will continue cycling to work, social distancing, washing my hands (and surfaces) and doing my job.

Avatar
jigr69 replied to RobertMW | 4 years ago
4 likes

A friend who works in an A&E unit in the midlands states that the number of people coming through the doors has dwindld but they are seeing more at home accidents, namely DIY induced.

So, if you really want to reduce the burden, close all DIY shops, tell people not to do any DIY on their house since it could lead them to A&E, stop selling alcohol and stop everyone from driving.

Then watch the amount of mental health issues go through the roof.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to jigr69 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Or instead of banning going out on a bike, ban staying at home. Make bike rides compulsory  3

Avatar
ianrparsons | 4 years ago
2 likes

Careful what you post on social media, had some flack as according to the illiterate I am only allowed an hour of exercise!  Perhaps they should read the guidance that says one FORM once per day.  So as I have to go to work on Friday (teaching/supervising children of keyworkers) how do I get home since I am allowed to go to work but only one lot of exercise? 

Avatar
Awavey replied to ianrparsons | 4 years ago
2 likes

Ive seen the 1hr limit thing several times today, to the point I went and rechecked the guidance to make sure I hadnt missed it buried in the official text, doesnt help some people have then been sharing fake news stuff like the latest government press conference sent a mobile text message saying no exercise now etc etc.

Avatar
jigr69 replied to Awavey | 4 years ago
3 likes

Interestingly enough, as citizens we are prohibited from doing things as laid down in law, if it isn't explicitly mentioned or covered, then it is lawful. The emergency bill which passed last Thursday in the house of commons, makes no mention about how many times you can go out and exercise, as noted above in this article. The government however, can only act upon things they lay down in law and nothing else.

I'd love to see the outcome of the first case where someone has walked their dog twice in one day or gone for a two hour bike ride.

Avatar
Innerlube | 4 years ago
6 likes

NHS worker denied my 90 minutes of daily commute by very sensible work from home approach. Got up at 6 this morning and did a hard hour in Epping Forest instead. Just me, some woodpeckers a muntjac and two separate dog walkers. Oh, and lots of mud still !!
So would vote for early morning solo ride as way to get your fix....

Avatar
PRSboy | 4 years ago
11 likes

I find people endlessly weird.  Why would you even want to go out riding as a group, in the knowledge that you are riding straight through the wash of the rider in front of you??

At a time when all conversation seems to revolve around CV19, two hours solitary riding, no news, just the woosh of the tyres and passing birdsong was absolute bliss.  

Avatar
ktache replied to PRSboy | 4 years ago
1 like

There are dry lines forming very quickly out there, and it's properly spring.

Still managed to find some shockingly deep mud though, maybe it was my choice of trails, but it was relatively quiet today, even with the gorgeous weather.  Not many more than on a normal afternoon.  Maybe it's only the weekends that will see the crowded countryside that we saw recently.

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to PRSboy | 4 years ago
4 likes

I was out on my own early on Saturday, it was lovely. Cold and bloody windy but lovely all the same. The natural world are carrying on as normal, which lifts the soul. The birds are nesting in my garden, singing their hearts out. The hedgehogs have come out of hibernation and are coming to the feeding station every night, and there's frogspawn in the pond. It is easy to shut out the madness by turning the TV off, and walking outside to listen to the sounds of spring. 

When you go outside, just look up. It is bizarre. No vapour trails. Not since 9/11 have I seen such empty skies. 

Avatar
Deveron53 replied to Rik Mayals underpants | 4 years ago
0 likes

Did you forget about that other, more violent bit of mother nature: Eyjafjallajökull? In 2010 she unleashed something bigger than a tiny virus. She likes to let us know who's boss!😉

Avatar
davkt | 4 years ago
3 likes

You forgot to mention don't crash! The NHS has bigger things than self inflicted cycling injuries to worry about.

Avatar
Kendalred replied to davkt | 4 years ago
10 likes

davkt wrote:

You forgot to mention don't crash! The NHS has bigger things than self inflicted cycling injuries to worry about.

And just how many cycling injuries are actually self-inflicted do you think? I suspect the vast majority are as a result of outside influences, ie other road users, or the condition of the road itself. You can just imagine the hospitalisation of a cyclist being used as another stick to beat us with, even if that hospitalisation was caused by reckless driving.

Plus you have to weigh it up against the benefits. A regular exercise regime is a good way to boost the immune system, as well as boosting mental wellbeing. 

Anyway, all moot points as lockdown cannot be far away - unless by some miracle the idiots spoiling for eveyone else come to their senses, and I can't see that happening.

Avatar
milkman replied to Kendalred | 4 years ago
4 likes

Kendalred wrote:

You can just imagine the hospitalisation of a cyclist being used as another stick to beat us with, even if that hospitalisation was caused by reckless driving.

Exactly so I'd say pedal it conservatively and take the hit as far as your normal riding style goes. Don't give them the metaphorical stick. Not a conflict for me as I can mostly manage only a pootle at the best of times!

Avatar
RobertMW replied to Kendalred | 4 years ago
1 like

It's irrelevant who knocks you off. You decide to ride then you take the risks and the responsibility. Who wants to be in hospital at the moment? In Spain you would be regarded as irresponsible and fined a fortune between 600-30,000€. Put your bike away and train at home. This is not an ordinary situation so don't rely on the government to make the decisions. Use your own mind and consider the consequences of your actions.

Avatar
essexian replied to RobertMW | 4 years ago
6 likes

In the 12 years I have been riding since my return to the sport aged 46, I have ended up in hospital once after an incident while out with my bike.... a van driver decided to punch me for no reason as I walked back to my bike after getting some food. I have fallen off five times or so, all ending up with road rash and some soreness but not much else. 

The risk of injury requiring hospital treatment is, IMHO very low so really one additional body per period is not going to cause much of an issue for the NHS, especially given that most (I am guessing here but from my experience) visits are to A&E only. 

Indeed, I am much more likely to need hospital treatment for a stroke (Dad and sister at 45) or heart attack (Mum 48) or early death (brother 49) from sitting on the sofa doing bugger all. 

Nah, I am going to ride my bike, ride it sensibly and enjoy my life while I still have one. I am not going to take risks like being inactive. 

 

 

Avatar
Municipal Waste | 4 years ago
4 likes

In the local park/woods there is a tea room which the owner has closed apart from serving teas through the window (people still need to eat) with a sign asking people to keep apart in the queue and not to use the seating area outside. Most of the time people are bunching together and those that aren't all just go and sit together on the grass opposite haha! We're doomed!

Pages

Latest Comments