With England now in a third national lockdown and restrictions tight in the rest of the UK, recreational cycling outside for health is still allowed throughout Britain. The current guidelines are that during the lockdown you can exercise outside once a day, and cycling is permitted. Cycling to work is also very definitely still allowed, and has the extra benefit over public transport of built-in social distancing.
“Stay local” – What the latest lockdown laws and guidance mean for you and cycling
In this fifth update of our guide to cycling responsibly during the ongoing pandemic, we’ve tried to pull together all the latest information on the rules laid down by government, and the best practice for applying them drawn from our own expertise, and what is being advised by cycling’s main governing bodies. We’ve tried to make this as clear as possible and address some misconceptions around the current rules on cycling and exercise generally.
Since the first March lockdown, exercise has been listed as one of the exceptions to the emergency laws enacted in the original regulations that state: “During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.”
While originally exercise was only allowed “either alone or with other members of their household”, the legislation now says you can exercise:
By yourself, with the people you live with, with your support bubble (if you are legally permitted to form one), in a childcare bubble where providing childcare or, when on your own, with 1 person from another household.
That’s it. When it comes to exercise – as with everything else they cover – the emergency powers are vague and leave plenty of room for the Government to interpret them and re-interpret them in any way that suits the situation.
It is worth noting that the vagueness of the act means that some things the public and police forces are interpreting as the law are not actually covered by it. Oddly, given that it’s been a central part of the Government’s message when it comes to limits on exercise, there is still no limit in the act to the number of times a day you can exercise (there is in the Government’s Guidance that accompanies the act), or the amount of time an individual spends exercising outdoors every day; nor is there any specific ban on driving somewhere to take exercise, despite the guidance telling us to “stay local”.
For example, after the BBC reported that two women were fined by police for travelling to exercise, human rights barrister Adam Wagner said this on his Twitter account: “It [a limit on travelling for exercise] is not enforceable in law. No explicit limit on how far you can travel for exercise or for how long in the law. There will come a point where you travel so far that the journey becomes the reason not the exercise but driving a few miles should not breach the regulations.”
The Government FAQs on social distancing simply emphasises that exercise is permitted once a day (with exceptions for people with certain health conditions) and summarises it as this: “You can continue to exercise alone, with one other person or with your household or support bubble. This should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area.”
As mentioned before, some police forces are still doing their best to enforce the Government’s wishes rather than the letter of the law, something that caused huge confusion in the first lockdown after a certain Cabinet Office minister said that half an hour was enough when it came to exercising outside.
So, what should and shouldn’t you do to be a socially responsible cyclist during the current crisis?
Do try ride on your own (or socially distanced with one other person), stay on your own, go home on your own and keep social interactions down to the absolute minimum. If you do meet people along the way then observe the guidance on social distancing.
Don’t go out for a recreational/training ride on your bike more than once a day. The Government advice is explicit about this, even if the law is not. While there are no rules about how long, or how far you should ride, the advice on how often you should go outdoors to take exercise is very clear. Once.
Do stay local – stick to routes you know well and ride within your limits.
Do keep a safe distance from other cyclists in as safe a manner as possible, and remember that your speed dictates how safe a distance you need to be behind someone before you pull out to pass – inevitably it is going to be much more than the two metres prescribed for pedestrians. Read our guide to How much distance you should leave the cyclist ahead in a time of pandemic.
Do make sure that you’re self-sufficient and that you can fix your bike, and make it home without help from anyone else.
Don’t share bikes or equipment – this is pretty easy if you’re riding on your own. Only use your own bike, and your own equipment.
Don’t drive somewhere to ride if possible. The Government’s Covid-19 Travel Guidance is clear that only essential travel is allowed, and it deems these things as essential:
– Work, where you cannot reasonably work from home
– Accessing education and for caring responsibilities
– Visiting those in your support bubble – or your childcare bubble for childcare
– Visiting hospital, GP and other medical appointments or visits where you have had an accident or are concerned about your health
– Buying goods or services that you need, but this should be within your local area wherever possible
– Outdoor exercise – this should be done locally wherever possible, but you can travel a short distance within your area to do so if necessary (for example, to access an open space)
– Attending the care and exercise of an animal, or veterinary services
– Attending communal worship and life events, including weddings and funerals
Some would argue that while driving to exercise is legal, it probably isn’t a very sensible or desirable thing for people to do. So if you can ride your bike from your front door on deserted roads, we’d argue that’s still the most socially responsible way to do it.
Why do we need to ride responsibly?
First, because of the ethical and moral considerations placed upon us all to do our bit to slow the spread of the coronavirus, which can safeguard the health and lives of our fellow citizens and the health workers striving to keep us all well. During the first lockdown there was a genuine concern that cycling could be banned if cyclists don’t ride responsibly; and although that’s very unlikely to happen, we all have to do our bit to ensure cycling outside continues to be viewed as a socially responsible way to get some daily exercise during the lockdown.
Anything else?
Cycling/exercising indoors
You could consider doing some or all of your exercise at home either just generally keeping fit and doing some core and flexibility work with Joe Wicks (or the like) or if you’ve got one by doing your cycling on a turbo trainer or smart trainer. Or you could cut down the frequency of your outdoor rides by swapping some for indoor exercise or the turbo.
> A Zwift setup for every budget
Training
If you’re training and trying to keep your fitness through this, then it’s probably a good time to ask yourself how important that training really is.
A pandemic probably isn’t the time to be pushing your limits, and doing things you wouldn’t normally do. If your usual training regime is pretty strenuous then it should be fine to continue doing that; however in its latest update to its Covid-19 FAQs section, British Cycling advises you to “ride well within your ability and ensure that you are self-sufficient.”
Distance V Distancing
Last year, there was much discussion within the cycling community about how far it is acceptable to ride during the current emergency. The key point here would seem to be that distance ridden is a lot less important than the distance maintained between you and other people while out riding. From a virus-spreading perspective, a short ride on a relatively crowded route where it is hard to maintain proper social distancing is a lot more hazardous for you and the people you meet compared to a much longer jaunt on quiet roads. All that said, going for much longer rides than you normally would clearly goes against the spirit of the law.
> Turbo training tips — get the most from your home trainer
If you have the equipment to allow you to train indoors, then that is the place for more intense training sessions. An online training app is a great way –and really the only way – to ride as a group now, too. Even if you’re going hard in the comfort of your own home, you might still want to pause and think about whether now is really the time – you may be stressing your immune system just when you really don’t want to be, and when an over-stretched NHS doesn’t want you to either. That applies just as much if you’re recovering from Covid-19 (or any other virus) too.
Some of us don’t have an indoor trainer though, and getting out on our bike is about more than boosting our physical health. It also helps de-stress and maintain mental well being, not only for us cyclists, but also for the people that have to live with us. And of course, it cannot be stressed too firmly that cycling is still being positively encouraged so long as it’s done responsibly.

Both British Cycling and Cycling UK have already issued updated guidance. Cycling UK has recently updated a Q+A on cycling guidance during the pandemic, and its current basic advice is as follows:
Where riding is allowed, cyclists should still observe good hygiene, and Cycling UK advises leaving plenty of space when passing others, and to avoid pulling in rapidly after overtaking another cyclist, causing them to end up in your slipstream.
Cycling UK’s advice remains that it is advisable for people to cycle for their health, fitness and well-being.
The guidance for avoiding contamination remains unchanged, keeping at least two metres away from anyone else where possible, regularly washing your hands and catching coughs and sneezes in tissues and disposing of them appropriately as soon as possible. For further advice, please refer to the NHS website.
We will continue to evaluate the latest advice from government and update our guidance accordingly. As the threat level reduces, our guidance is likely to be along these lines but this will depend on factors such as local levels of infection, national guidance and so on.
Failing to ride in a socially responsible way could have negative consequences for communities, individuals, and the health service. Stay safe, take heed of the latest government advice and enjoy cycling responsibly!
Updated: 8th January 2021, 17th April, 2nd April, 30th March (twice), 23rd March. First published 22nd March 2020.





















116 thoughts on “Cycling dos and don’ts in a time of pandemic – how to be a responsible cyclist”
Hmm, what about the large
Hmm, what about the large groups of people walking around the Mersey/water parks in S. Manchester yesterday? It is nice to see so many people interested in getting outdoors, but where were you last weekend? I thought I would get some quiet exercise in away from cars and people, but no. At this rate I can see all leisure activity being banned (not sure how it can be enforced anyway,) just keep an eye on Italy.
I hear where you’re coming
I hear where you’re coming from and agree with your conclusion, the problem right now is that this is not a time in which ‘whataboutery’ cuts much ice, we all have to take personal responsiblity for our own actions – whether others are doing the same or not. As cyclists that want to keep cycling for as long as we can we should all know what we have to do, and what we have to stop doing – outdoors anyway.
The National Trust closed all its properties to the public as of today, France closed parks and banned recreational cycling on Friday, in Spain it was banned a week ago, and Italy two weeks ago – if we don’t flatten the curve it’ll be banned here too. Set against people’s health and lives that doesn’t matter so much, but for a lot of us regular cycling plays a big part in maintaining our physical and mental well being, and for some it’s a big part of our livelihoods too – losing it won’t be a huge loss relative to what some people are losing, but it will still be a loss.
Thank you for saying it “this
Thank you for saying it “this is not a time for whataboutery.” Whataboutery the badge of honour or weapon of choice of every social media know it all used to argue the unarguable. The straw man fallacy.
Does not matter what others
Does not matter what others are doing, it’s about doing the right thing.
Good, clear points in the article.
I have just checked my
I have just checked my library account, everything has been extended to August, Reading Bourough Council are expecting this is going on for the long haul.
I went out yesterday, riding my usual bridlewayish route, on my own. A few other cyclists, stuff is starting to dry out, drier than before christmas, many on slightly unsuitable bikes and tyres. Many walkers, the good weather is going to cost us. Some groups that would be multiple families. What is it with the dividing onto both sides of the track, ah well, seems mostly to be the dads. I try and keep my distance, and hate having to go down the middle, even on off roads you can fit a large 4×4 down.
And remember, we’re cyclists, it’s always worse when we do anything.
I know the weather is lovely
I know the weather is lovely and it’s difficult to not want to get out and enjoy it, but I might brave the chilly and get out when it gets dark, maybe more midnight riding. The trails will not be crowded then.
Of course I will obey any restrictions. Though I’m hoping to be riding to and from worthwhile molecular biological/immunological work soon. My new job is meant to be starting, and I have volunteed to do anything with a virologist academic I know.
There is always being a delivery rider, my bikes are a bit too precious for that though.
ktache wrote:
Good luck with your new job – looks like we really need more medical workers for the forseeable future.
I don’t see solo riding as being problematic and it’s got to be the safest way of commuting except for personal cars which bring their own problems. With the covid-19 disease seeming to be a lot more dangerous in areas of air pollution, I believe more cycle commuting can help others whilst also improving your own respiratory health.
I’m now mainly working from home though I did get the train in on Friday (had to setup some new hardware) and then cycled home against a horrible headwind. As commuting is my main type of cycling, I’m now thinking of when I can fit in some solo rides.
A lot of people are just
A lot of people are just treating this like a big extended bank holiday that started on Friday with a massive piss-up in every pub and club around the country before they were forced to close.
It carried on on Saturday with a mass raid of every supermarket going followed by an excursion out to the local park for some more collective drinking.
I’m off out for a (lone) road ride becasue i’m willing to bet that as of middle of the week, it’ll be banned altogether.
One place you’ll be welcomed
One place you’ll be welcomed on a bicycle is a supermarket. Because it is difficult to panic buy if you have to carry it back home in a saddle bag or backpack. But supermarkets themselves do rather make a mockery of social distancing, as from what I can see they’ve never been more jam-packed with people. Not necessarily because of hoarders, although doubtless there are some who’re filling up their car boots with multiple trips through the checkouts, but the sheer number of people no longer in offices 9-5 buying what they can before the stock runs out each day. Shopping online would be better, but all delivery slots are booked up. Before the government bans solo cycling, and many other things, they should do something about that. I don’t know what, as I lack knowledge of retail logistics, but the shops merely setting limits on numbers of the same item isn’t sufficient, as NHS staff coming off shifts in the evenings and finding empty shelves can attest.
maybe, but then you will be
maybe, but then you will be making 3 trips instead of one, so increasing risk again.
The safest way for everyone to operate is to go out to the supermarket once per week, and not go anywhere else. If you catch it there, you will know before you go back, so preventing onward tranmission.
Of course because of the hoarding that has gone pon it is now very difficult to get a normal weekly shop that would have been possible before.
Cycling UK have advised
Cycling UK have advised everyone to cycle solo (unless it’s with someone from your own household). I think that this a much clearer message and it would be better if as a cycling community we discouraged all kinds of group riding (even in pairs). The risk/reward ratio of doing anything else is just not there at the moment. Maybe this article should be tweaked to make it clear that only solo riding is endorsed by the national cycling bodies?
Happy to tweak it, but do you
Happy to tweak it, but do you have a link cos the CUK advice page on the top of their homepage – which the article currently links to – doesn’t mention that. I agree that would be much simpler and clearer advice for everyone.
These articles were in the
These articles were in the latest CUK email I received on Friday and might be helpful:
https://www.cyclinguk.org/blog/why-we-had-no-choice-advise-against-group-rides-0
https://www.cyclinguk.org/article/coronavirus-qa-it-safe-cycle
https://www.cyclinguk.org/news/what-does-coronavirus-covid-19-outbreak-mean-cycling
I almost always ride solo and will continue to commute to my workplace. Most of my colleagues are at home but we need someone there to handle calls and do stuff that requires a body on the premises.
https://www.cyclinguk.org
https://www.cyclinguk.org/blog/why-we-had-no-choice-advise-against-group-rides-0
Went out this morning for a
Went out this morning for a solo ride and saw a number of small groups riding together.
A lot of people just aren’t listening to the advice which means a ban will surely follow. Massive shame for those of us who are using time on the bike to get through this difficult time.
Out for about 80km round the
Out for about 80km round the lanes of southern Hampshie today. Lots of cyclists out enjoying the spring sunshine. Happy to say that I saw no groups of cyclists larger than 2.
However the number of groups of walkers of more than 2….
please people only go on solo
please people only go on solo rides.
The PM practically said today that measures as seen in other europen countries will have to be brought in if people cannot excercise seperately as requested.
Isn’t it better to be able to ride your bike outside when the weather permits for the next 3 months rather than getting in one or two more group rides.
Don’t mess this up for all of us. Remember groups of cyclists are extremely visable due the the amound of ground we cover.
Went for a 3 hour ride yesterday (no stop) saw severl groups of 4 riding in close formation, this is not social distancing. The sooner we can stop this thing circulating the sooner we can all have something resembling a normall life.
Everyone who has passed on the virus thought they didn’t have it, no one willingly gave it to their friends. Countries that have carried out mass testing found that 50% of positive tests were asymptomatic.
Its getting extremely
Its getting extremely depressing reading social media and my own cycle clubs whatsapp groups over whether solo rides are acceptable or not.
Basically people are full on ranting about the risks associated with solo riding and the burden this will put on the nhs if you fall off. Of course, they don’t say a word about the gargantuan death and injury toll from law and highway code breaking drivers, nor the huge, huge amount of injuries caused by home diy and so on people will do while self isolating. It’s horrible the victim blaming going on by “our own”.
So much hypocrisy out there. Makes me want to go out for a ride to de stress while at the same time it makes me feel guilty for doing it.
People are dicks.
EddyBerckx wrote:
Neither do they mention the problems brought on by not exercising, mental health, depression, loneliness. There will be a significant spike in suicides fairly soon. My analysis is that it’s better to get out and get some fresh air and sunlight, while maintaining distance from others, than to cower indoors.
I’d genuinely love to know
I’d genuinely love to know the percentage of cycling accidents that actually end up with a rider needing medical treatment. I have suffered a couple of “self-inflicted” offs over the last few years (one due to a broken seatpost – thank you Specialized). Painful and took a few weeks to fully heal in both cases, but neither involved any medical treatment beyond the first aid kit, rest and the loving care and attention (and mocking) of my long-suffering wife.
I was out a fair bit doing
I was out a fair bit doing deliveries today in and around the New Forest. Quite a few cyclists about but probably less than I’d expect given it was glorious weather. None ridiing in groups of more than two so all good.
However, by the afternoon the Forest was absolutely heaving with cars and walkers. I’ve lived here ten years and never seen anything like it, even on an August Bank Holiday (or Boxing Day, which is busy because of point-to-point races). All the car parks I saw were full and there was so much parking on verges – which is illegal – the verges are SSSIs in many places. I’m sure it was confirmation bias but most numberplates weren’t local – plenty of London plates of course but also ones from Lincolnshire/Derby/Staffs/Lancs. And loads of camper vans (big ones, not Trannies), just as it has been in other National Parks. Given it’s still out of season there was a noticeable increase in camper traffic last week too, and the second-homers will have been down no doubt.
I think once these reports get back to Westminster we’ll see a lockdown in the next couple of days, it’s unacceptable behaviour. Even if you keep your distance in the Forest (it’s a big place) I guarantee you’re going to need to stop at a motorway services somewhere on the way back…
Same story in North Wales, I
Same story in North Wales, I’m afraid.
Snowdon was the busiest they had ever seen it, worse than a summer bank holiday. The National Park are so worried that they threatening to close the trails because people are so irresponsible and some of the mountain rescue teams are medics and already somewhat busy.
All of them had arrived there by car, of course.
Malham yesterday was the
Malham yesterday was the busiest I have ever seen it. People falling off the pavements, bumping into each other, all laughing in the sun. The worst part of my solo ride on quiet lanes. I really did think it would be quiet, especially as it was only just mid morning. Some of those people should be up for a Darwen award.
And inconsiderate parking by
And inconsiderate parking by visitors on the way into the village blocked an ambulance getting in earlier this week.
I cannot believe that the
I cannot believe that the crazy parking is tolerated. It is a victim of it’s own success. I only go there now to cycle through. The madness of the village is worth putting up with for the glorious solitude of the road from Malham to Langcliffe. Until the fuckwits discover that way in.
biker phil wrote:
I know they’re being selfish, but sending them to Lancashire is way too harsh!
Ha ha ha! Darwin! Damn
Ha ha ha! Darwin! Damn predictive texting!
kil0ran wrote:
Darwinism; nature’s way of weeding out the idiots, but we’ll all suffer.
Out for a solo ride today and
Out for a solo ride today and never seen it busier. Groups of teen, family’s, oldies having a stroll, partners with rats on strings and frenchies.
All those people would not have been out in the country this weekend, some, but not as many. Closing shops, pubs, cinemas has just displaced many people. It might be hypocritical for me to say I am annoyed by this, however, I was going to be there anyway, but the five people stopped in the middle of the road taking a selfie of their big corona outing weren’t. I can really see a situation coming where leisure cycling is banned but people will be out walking about just the same.
I saw a group of cyclists
I saw a group of cyclists today pass my house, all cycling close together. Fuckwits like them will spoil it for everyone. I always ride on my own now, going out early and sticking to quiet back lanes. We have to do our best to be responsible.
It’s not just cyclists. If
It’s not just cyclists. If you look at the data on this page of the FT you can see that London drivers are still out and about like nothing has changed, unlike most other cities:
https://www.ft.com/content/d184fa0a-6904-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3
The weather is going to be
The weather is going to be good at least for another week. It will cost us. We could be Italy quicker than is predicted even in the worst case scenarios.
If only it had stayed very wet, cold and grey.
If school taught me one thing
If school taught me one thing, it was that if those in authority say they’ll clamp down unless everyone behaves, then they will clamp down, because someone will misbehave. And those in authority know that, which is why they say it, because it is much easier for them to apply a blanket rule than pick out the ones they know are causing the trouble.
And if employment has taught me one thing, it is that adults are just children with bills to pay. Unless there are immediate financial consequences, then those who lacked impulse control when they were under 18 will have little to no extra reserves of it now that they’re in their twenties, thirties or forties.
Exactly that – if the nation
Exactly that – if the nation collectively acts like children, we’ll be treated as such. The Govt has effectively given us our last warning, and if ‘we’ ignore it we’ll be sent to our rooms. Literally.
Jesus, sometimes I dispair of my fuckwitted fellow citizens (pretty much since 2016 really!)
It’s society I’m afriad. If
It’s society I’m afriad. If the virus doesn’t finish us off, the fuckwittery of the ‘me me me’ brigade will.
Ideal opportunity to get off
Ideal opportunity to get off the roads – much less likely to see people on trails on or gravel rides. Obvs need to have access to those facilities. Going out at 6am now that it’s light is a good option too.
Sadly not the case around
Sadly not the case around hear. The canal and Mersey waterparks were heaving with people ambling in groups. I will have to be more selective where I go next weekend if there is not a lockdown. Might have to ride earlier as you suggest. The irony being I can imagine biking being banned whilst people are out because they ‘have to’ walk their dog (in a park at 3pm, not around the block at 8pm.)
There’s a week of lighter
There’s a week of lighter mornings before the clock change kicks in and sets dawn forward an hour for a couple of weeks. There’s definitely less traffic with no school run and less commuting so it’s an ideal time to get out – and if you’ve got kids it’s a good way of switching them on for the “school” day. Hope they don’t ban it but fear that they will
I encountered more sheep on
I encountered more sheep on my ride today,and there werent many sheep, than Ive seen people all week whilst out cycling recreationally by myself, yet it will be banned no doubt before the end of the week.
By which time Ill probably have run out food, stocks of gels and protein bars dont really count do they, and be forced to enter the melee of several hundred people all crammed together in the confined space of a supermarket milling around,dilly dallying and queuing to get the last toilet roll whilst all the shelves are stripped clean.
you tell me which activity puts me at more risk of catching or passing on the virus.
I live in rural France, and
I live in rural France, and the ban has little to do with risk of passing on the virus. Along with the ban on garden fires, walking in remote areas, and unnecessary driving, it is about reducing risk of accident, thereby reducing strain on an already overworked health service. (Everyone here is staying at home catching up on the diy jobs they never got round to doing, eg standing on ladders operating power tools)
Griff500 wrote:
And, as every road.cc reader will know, that is riskier than cycling.
Accidents in the home,often
Accidents in the home,often through diy, were already I believe one of the highest causes of A&E admissions, what are they going to do next,close B&Q and Screwfix ?
Awavey wrote:
People living in the UK still don’t get it do they! DIY stores in France all closed 9 days ago.
No some of us get this, get
No some of us get this, get this massively, but are just highlighting how badly everyone assess or understands the actual risks. But it seems like only cyclists feel the need to have an almighty existential crisis about it.
Griff500 wrote:
And electrocuting themselves by cutting through the cable !
Awavey wrote:
Dunno – you playing out on your bike all week and not getting any food or supplies in so you have to add to the melee ?
Even if I sit at home in
Even if I sit at home in glorious self isolation all week doing nothing…at some point I’ll have to shop for food if I want to eat,which means I’ll be putting myself in the midst of all those groups of people you saw shopping on the tv yesterday.
That feels more risky to me in terms of this virus spreading, than me riding my bike by myself where I might be exceedingly unlucky to encounter just another person.
Awavey wrote:
Only because (a) the UK gov have given wooly guidelines instead of a proper lockdown, and (b) because people in the UK in particular seem to be behaving like idiots. My local supermarkets in France have no shortages because nobody is panic buying. Access to the shops is controlled to limit numbers inside, and ensure NO queues at checkouts. The only queues are occasionally in the car park, maybe a 5 minute wait, to get into the shop, where people sensibly stand 2m apart. Smaller shops such as my butcher and baker allow only one customer in the shop, and aqain, others wait outside, well spaced. I must admit queuing for 5 minutes to get into a shop in our Provençal weather is more pleasant than it would be in the UK, but as all other activity has stopped, the fact that shopping takes a little longer than usual is no real hardship.
As Boris has so far resisted at every opportunity, and then ramped up every stage a week later than mainland Europe, I suspect all this is coming your way.
Sure – but you could try and
Sure – but you could try and get food from places that don’t pack people in, or at a time when there aren’t so many people (and it does honestly sound like you have the time for that) – you aren’t forced into interacting unsafely at all.
I almost thought our small
I almost thought our small town had become Dutch overnight given the number of people on bikes I saw out and about.
They did seem to be household groups, mainly parents trying to get their kids some exercise and taking advantage of the quieter roads and glorious sunshine.
If anything good comes out of all this, I do hope that people realise how nice it is having less motorised traffic in our towns and cities. That perhaps, the government will reconsider spending all that cash on HS2 and the road network, and put it towards projects that enhance our environment and improve our health.
HoarseMann wrote:
If anything good comes out of
If anything good comes out of this, it’s that we are fucking the world over, by flying jet propelled flying machines through the atmosphere by the million or so, day in, day out. I can’t help but think that the settled weather of the last few days has been helped by the atmosphere being much cleaner.
I’m going to work today for
I’m going to work today for you.
It’s simple. If you’re leaving the house, STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM PEOPLE.
as the wind is due to subside
as the wind is due to subside about wednesday thats will be the day we will be banned from going out, Sunday was a glorious but windy day on the back roads of suffolk with lots of solo riders, the no chain ganging rule should be applied all year round for me !
Same for me on the lest-used
Same for me on the lest-used single track roads of Mid-Essex. Lots of single riders and runners. All passed with a wide berth, with cheery ‘Good Mornings’ exchanged. Bliss.
Morning ride report. Mix of
Morning ride report. Mix of roads and gravel (well, mud). Plenty of runners and dog walkers and a handful of cyclists, all doing a good job at maintaining distances. Much less traffic than normal and absolutely zero close passes, which is a first. Just to show how out of my routine I am though I managed to ride off without a helmet, that’s the first time in 7 years I haven’t worn one. Only realised half way round. Oops.
In the local park/woods there
In the local park/woods there is a tea room which the owner has closed apart from serving teas through the window (people still need to eat) with a sign asking people to keep apart in the queue and not to use the seating area outside. Most of the time people are bunching together and those that aren’t all just go and sit together on the grass opposite haha! We’re doomed!
You forgot to mention don’t
You forgot to mention don’t crash! The NHS has bigger things than self inflicted cycling injuries to worry about.
davkt wrote:
And just how many cycling injuries are actually self-inflicted do you think? I suspect the vast majority are as a result of outside influences, ie other road users, or the condition of the road itself. You can just imagine the hospitalisation of a cyclist being used as another stick to beat us with, even if that hospitalisation was caused by reckless driving.
Plus you have to weigh it up against the benefits. A regular exercise regime is a good way to boost the immune system, as well as boosting mental wellbeing.
Anyway, all moot points as lockdown cannot be far away – unless by some miracle the idiots spoiling for eveyone else come to their senses, and I can’t see that happening.
Kendalred wrote:
Exactly so I’d say pedal it conservatively and take the hit as far as your normal riding style goes. Don’t give them the metaphorical stick. Not a conflict for me as I can mostly manage only a pootle at the best of times!
It’s irrelevant who knocks
It’s irrelevant who knocks you off. You decide to ride then you take the risks and the responsibility. Who wants to be in hospital at the moment? In Spain you would be regarded as irresponsible and fined a fortune between 600-30,000€. Put your bike away and train at home. This is not an ordinary situation so don’t rely on the government to make the decisions. Use your own mind and consider the consequences of your actions.
In the 12 years I have been
In the 12 years I have been riding since my return to the sport aged 46, I have ended up in hospital once after an incident while out with my bike…. a van driver decided to punch me for no reason as I walked back to my bike after getting some food. I have fallen off five times or so, all ending up with road rash and some soreness but not much else.
The risk of injury requiring hospital treatment is, IMHO very low so really one additional body per period is not going to cause much of an issue for the NHS, especially given that most (I am guessing here but from my experience) visits are to A&E only.
Indeed, I am much more likely to need hospital treatment for a stroke (Dad and sister at 45) or heart attack (Mum 48) or early death (brother 49) from sitting on the sofa doing bugger all.
Nah, I am going to ride my bike, ride it sensibly and enjoy my life while I still have one. I am not going to take risks like being inactive.
I find people endlessly weird
I find people endlessly weird. Why would you even want to go out riding as a group, in the knowledge that you are riding straight through the wash of the rider in front of you??
At a time when all conversation seems to revolve around CV19, two hours solitary riding, no news, just the woosh of the tyres and passing birdsong was absolute bliss.
There are dry lines forming
There are dry lines forming very quickly out there, and it’s properly spring.
Still managed to find some shockingly deep mud though, maybe it was my choice of trails, but it was relatively quiet today, even with the gorgeous weather. Not many more than on a normal afternoon. Maybe it’s only the weekends that will see the crowded countryside that we saw recently.
I was out on my own early on
I was out on my own early on Saturday, it was lovely. Cold and bloody windy but lovely all the same. The natural world are carrying on as normal, which lifts the soul. The birds are nesting in my garden, singing their hearts out. The hedgehogs have come out of hibernation and are coming to the feeding station every night, and there’s frogspawn in the pond. It is easy to shut out the madness by turning the TV off, and walking outside to listen to the sounds of spring.
When you go outside, just look up. It is bizarre. No vapour trails. Not since 9/11 have I seen such empty skies.
Did you forget about that
Did you forget about that other, more violent bit of mother nature: Eyjafjallajökull? In 2010 she unleashed something bigger than a tiny virus. She likes to let us know who’s boss!?
NHS worker denied my 90
NHS worker denied my 90 minutes of daily commute by very sensible work from home approach. Got up at 6 this morning and did a hard hour in Epping Forest instead. Just me, some woodpeckers a muntjac and two separate dog walkers. Oh, and lots of mud still !!
So would vote for early morning solo ride as way to get your fix….
Careful what you post on
Careful what you post on social media, had some flack as according to the illiterate I am only allowed an hour of exercise! Perhaps they should read the guidance that says one FORM once per day. So as I have to go to work on Friday (teaching/supervising children of keyworkers) how do I get home since I am allowed to go to work but only one lot of exercise?
Ive seen the 1hr limit thing
Ive seen the 1hr limit thing several times today, to the point I went and rechecked the guidance to make sure I hadnt missed it buried in the official text, doesnt help some people have then been sharing fake news stuff like the latest government press conference sent a mobile text message saying no exercise now etc etc.
Interestingly enough, as
Interestingly enough, as citizens we are prohibited from doing things as laid down in law, if it isn’t explicitly mentioned or covered, then it is lawful. The emergency bill which passed last Thursday in the house of commons, makes no mention about how many times you can go out and exercise, as noted above in this article. The government however, can only act upon things they lay down in law and nothing else.
I’d love to see the outcome of the first case where someone has walked their dog twice in one day or gone for a two hour bike ride.
I”m a pensioner and a club
I”m a pensioner and a club cyclist living in Spain. We’ve been completely locked down for 11 days now. No cycling or even walking allowed. 600-30,000€ fine for breaking the curfew. Look at it from the healthcare workers point of view. Worst case scenario. If you have an accident out on your bike then you may need hospital treatment. You could take up a valuable bed and the services of Doctors and Nurses. At a time of National emergency that would be regarded as totally irresponsible. Get the turbo out or just hang it up and do other exercises at home. No, it’s not the same, but this isn’t a normal situation is it? Us Brits abroad are horrified at the way the UK government (which I support, by the way) has dragged it’s heels. A £30 fine? Put another two zero’s on it and it may sink in. Get a grip over there and take this seriously. We have no queues at the supermarkets. People are acting responsibly, like proper adults. Some items can be in short supply, but they are soon made available. Use your imagination and exercise at home. Only go out if you’re a key worker or need essential supplies or medicines. Get some discipline as this is going to get a lot worse before it gets better. Yours sincerely, Con Cerned.
RobertMW wrote:
So are drivers, who cause vastly more deaths and injuries, not allowed out on the roads either?
DIY shops are still open in the UK but falling off ladders, stairs, getting out of the bath or electrocuting yourself with power tools are all dangerous.
Booze is flying off the supermarket shelves because the lemmings think it’s a great laugh but alcohol is a contributory factor in the majority of A&E admissions. People should stop drinking so much alcohol. If they did then every town centre would be a nicer place to be in the evening or after a football match.
Lots of people are not heeding the vital social distancing advice. That’s far worse than going for a solo bike ride so why don’t you give them hard time?
100% respect to anyone who stays at home and gets on the turbo or does some yoga / aerobics / weights / whatever to stay fit and sane but until I’m ordered otherwise I will continue cycling to work, social distancing, washing my hands (and surfaces) and doing my job.
A friend who works in an A&E
A friend who works in an A&E unit in the midlands states that the number of people coming through the doors has dwindld but they are seeing more at home accidents, namely DIY induced.
So, if you really want to reduce the burden, close all DIY shops, tell people not to do any DIY on their house since it could lead them to A&E, stop selling alcohol and stop everyone from driving.
Then watch the amount of mental health issues go through the roof.
Or instead of banning going
Or instead of banning going out on a bike, ban staying at home. Make bike rides compulsory 😉
Can I add this one: if you
Can I add this one: if you need to blow your nose while riding do not – repeat DO NOT – blow a f-ing snot rocket at the present time! (like the bloke I passed Monday evening who stopped, cleared his nose onto the grass verge, then fiddled with his phone).
And he was dressed in lycra and on a road bike, so he must have been A Real Cyclist (TM).
Update Sunday 11am:
Update Sunday 11am:
https://twitter.com/KeejayOV2/status/1244190718622683136
“Major PSA on exercise, as many haven’t found the government guidance clear: @michaelgove says:
– 30 minutes for a run
– Upto an hour for a walk
– Cycle ride of between 30-60 minutes
Caveat of ‘depending on fitness, for most people’
#Marr #Covid_19
Would this be hte same
Would this be the same Michael Gove who told us we’d had enough of experts ?
Yes but Michael Gove comes
Yes but Michael Gove comes out with a lot of things on the spur of the moment that are complete bollocks though innit.
lindow_man wrote:
Not just the spur of the moment. Remember the spat with Boris the Liar a couple of years ago when Cameron ran away? The one which allowed Boris the Liar to withdraw his nomination as leader, because they both wanted to avoid the shitstorm they’d caused. They are a pair of lying, cheating, money-loving hypocrites.
Northern Ireland have
Northern Ireland have released new regulations.
https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/health/Coronavirus-Restrictiions-Regs-2020.pdf
Not particularly relevant for the rest of the UK, but
Section 5, 1 states-
During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.
I just find the term “reasonable excuse” to be an interesting choice of words, excuse stinks of dodgyness, dog ate my homework sort of thing, wouldn’t “genuine reason” have been a little bit better?
“Reasonable excuse” is a
“Reasonable excuse” is a concept that appears time and time again in the law. There’s nothing dodgy about it. If you try to tell the Court that your dog made you go out on your bike, it would regard that as an UNREASONABLE excuse.
What if the dog was The Son
What if the dog was The Son of Sam?
Reasonable excuse is dodgy
Reasonable excuse is dodgy because it is so vague.
Yes, you can come up with a ridiculous ‘dog ate my homework’ type example where it is v unlikely to be a reasonable excuse.
That doesn’t mean that there aren’t millions of other scenarios where what is reasonable is totally subjective.
HarrogateSpa wrote:
At least so far as taking exercise is concerned the “reasonable” bit is quite straight forward.
The law does not ask whether the exercise is reasonable. Ten miles backwards on a unicycle? I don’t suppose many people would say that was reasonable. But is it exercise? And is it reasonably necessary to be outdoors to do it? That is all the law requires.
The two women taking their café latté stroll, I think that could more easily fail the test – is it even exercise? Or just a coffee morning outdoors?
If people aren’t allowed to
If people aren’t allowed to go to that reservoir by car for a walk, close the car park.
But it isn’t closed, it’s open. And National Trust grounds and gardens are open too.
Also, aren’t we forgetting the main purpose of all this? To stop the transmission of Covid. What contribution does criminalising people walking at a reservoir make to stopping transmission? None at all.
It shouldn’t just be about making all our lives more miserable to no purpose.
Don’t disagree. I’m only
Don’t disagree. I’m only trying to be clear on what the law says, not defending its wisdom. And since the official guidance in any case opens up the discussion on travel, I know it’s a lost cause!
I pity the police, who have to steer a path through it all (although issuing a FPN does not criminalise anyone).
There has ready been a suggestion here about why the police stopped the pair of women out for a coffee morning by the reservoir – something to do with experience over the summer lockdown with hoards descending on the place. Obviously some locations are especially popular, and that creates its own problems not conducive to reducing covid transmission – which is what it’s all about.
Typo: ‘When it comes to
Typo: ‘When it comes to excercise’
.. then ‘as with most
.. then ‘as with most everything ele they cover’
On the point about exercise
On the point about exercise and the immune system please see this thread by Ross Tucker https://twitter.com/Scienceofsport/status/1250312403423596544?s=19
“It [a limit on travelling
“It [a limit on travelling for exercise] is not enforceable in law. No explicit limit on how far you can travel for exercise or for how long in the law. There will come a point where you travel so far that the journey becomes the reason not the exercise but driving a few miles should not breach the regulations.”
I disagree. It is an offence to leave one’s home “without a reasonable excuse”. Exercise is one of the potential reasonable excuses, but whether that was the purpose of someone leaving their home – and whether it was reasonable – is NOT a decision for the individual, but is likely to be determined as a question of fact by a court. What might be exercise in one situation might not be in another, and what is reasonable in one situation might not be reasonable in another.
For example, I would not regard a 2-mile bike ride as being exercise. I’m not even warmed up at hat point. For my wife, it might be a very different matter. In my view, it’s probably not reasonable to drive 100 miles because you fancied a walk in the Peak District. But if your exercise had to be of a specific type (such as hydrotherapy after a bad accident) then it might well be reasonable to travel the same 100 miles.
The barrister is correct to say that there is no stated limit. But that doesn’t mean that your personal view of what is reasonable will trump that of the court. It won’t.
I think I’m allowed to
I think I’m allowed to disagree with him BTW. He’s no better trained than I am, and I have the advantage of having done it for a fair bit longer than he has.
Of course, there is a way to tell which of us is right. I’d not recommend it though.
no, but then we are left in a
no, but then we are left in a dilemma, as various police forces around the country are now “vowing” to issue more fines and interpret the guidance more strictly and have started writing in local newspapers, issuing tweets etc warning you amongst other things not to travel to beauty spots to exercise, sticking rigidly to stay in your local area only whilst not defining what that means, and even some claiming theyll be randomly stopping people outside to determine if they are compliant with the rules and fining them if they arent, all while the government are already again leaking hints even stricter rules will be in place by Monday if Im reading the runes correctly.
so what do you do? carry on riding as per I think the vast majority of people have been doing in a sensible responsible way all through this, or just say the actual higher risk now is encountering a bored copper on a power trip and shut away the outside world until some semblance of sanity is restored.
The Regulations definitely
The Regulations definitely don’t mention distance from home.
I understand the argument you make, based on “reasonable excuse”, but it is tenuous. If applied in the way you suggest, the rules become so vague that in many situations it’s impossible for people to know whether they’re committing an offence or not. According to your interpretation, it’s up to the court to decide afterwards, and that’s not good.
Where I live the roads are nearly as busy as normal. Even if they decided to “enforce”, the police couldn’t stop more than a tiny fraction of drivers.
Another aspect is that it’s pretty pointless criminalising people for going for a walk outdoors at a reservoir. They are not at risk of getting or transmitting Covid, so fining them is petty and bloody-minded.
I’ve heard North Yorks police say they are focusing on indoor gatherings, which makes far more sense.
Aren’t we conflating 2 ideas.
Aren’t we conflating 2 ideas. The definition of exercise and whether it was reasonable to travel to take that exercise. Not helped by the ambiguous guidance on travel. As you say both of these ideas are specific to the individual. I think the mistake the Derbyshire Police force is they targeted popular touristy car parks and made no judgement about whether a stroll with a mate was really exercise, whether it was reasonable to travel the distance in question or even if it was your one and only exercise that day. It’s not helped by the fact one of the women brought in the question of the benefit of meeting up with her mate on her mental health. That’s another topic entirely. Looking at the roads this morning I think they would have been better off setting up road blocks and interviewing all road users. If it is not ‘reasonable’ to drive to a park that is further away than your nearest park then it cannot be necessary to drive past a Tesco’s to get to an Asda. I personally will be starting all exercise from my front door and keep my riding distances down. Not difficult in this weather.
I should add that my local
I should add that my local park continues to offer free parking and has its own coffee shop open for takeaway. I have pointed out that this seems to be facilitating breaches of the guidance.
Peple are allowed to visit
Peple are allowed to visit open spaces. Car parks are allowed to be open, take away food and drink is allowed.
Which item did you leave out that causes you concern ?
I wasn’t trying to make a
Tbf, I’m just trying to get my own thoughts on the subject in order. I am disappointed by the levels of traffic about this morning. I wasn’t trying to make a judgement. That’s down to individual circumstance. I was suggesting that if the police are going to make a judgement they should target all road users not just those taking a walk. As was already stated the legality/interpretation is down to the courts if anybody wants to take it that far. With regard parks being open and free to cars. My local councillors advertised (on Facebook) that my local park, which is technically in the next village and therefore not strictly ‘local’, remained open to cars and that the cafe was open for takeaway, I pointed out that they were telling me to stay home and facilitating non locals to visit at the same time. We have plenty of open space in the town albeit not as scenic and potentially muddier than the park so for the vast majority they don’t need to drive to the park to take exercise and it’s easily accessible to joggers regardless.
I think many have forgotten
I think many have forgotten the basic requirement which is to stay at home. There seems to be too much of ‘what can I do next?’.
Some of the travel is due to more shops being open, click and collect, takeaway food.
Why do garden centres need to be open in January? How many people are actually only buying seeds and bulbs as opposed to sale tat ?
Thank you hirsuite. I think
Thank you hirsute. I think this clarifies my thinking. My gut reaction was that Derbyshire Police were totally wrong but I thought my reaction was about issuing fines where no law was clearly breached. My real issue is that they targeted a low risk activity that has little economic value. They didn’t stake out shopping centres and garden centres to check that people were only buying necessities. Worse still those that went to a garden centre to have a stroll round and didn’t buy anything. This doesn’t feel like an apolitical choice.
‘What can I do, without
‘What can I do, without breaching the rules and without creating a risk of transmitting Covid?’ is a fair question in my opinion, and it’s natural people will ask it.
I understand, it’s a bad situation we’re in. But we’ve all put our lives on hold for nearly a year now, and not all of us want to go further than necessary.
Indeed, but do you think that
Indeed, but do you think that is the question people are actually asking themselves?
The law does not specify a
The law does not specify a distance limit for travel because the law does not say anything about travel. People have simply inserted the travel element themselves, probably because they are incapable of imagining things any other way, such is the hold that car culture has over them. Going out for some physical exercise? Sure, how far shall we drive?
How far can I fly to take my exercise? The law does not specify a limit. Put it that way and it seems ridiculous. But travel by car is assumed unless specifically excluded.
Yet the law [i]does [/i]actually exclude it. It starts with a blanket ban – don’t leave home (so that includes travel) – and then fails to re-admit travel, so far as taking exercise is concerned.
Yet still people just assume car travel is a given, a universal default, it’s simply held as self-evident. So the only question now troubling them is, “how far?”
So what about going to the supermarket or doctors? Indeed the law does not tell you how to get there, but it does say that you can be there. At that point it must be true that you are allowed to go from home to venue, and it does not restrict your choice of transport.
But that argument does not apply to exercise. Because the law only says that it is an excuse to be outside if it is reasonably necessary to be outside to take exercise. So if you are apprehended by the law whilst outside, your defence can be that for the exercise you are engaged in it is reasonably necessary to be outside. You can’t say that if you are in a car.
Quote:
It doesn’t re-admit exercise per se either. What it re-admits is being outside for the purposes of exercise, insofar as that is reasonably necessary. So exercising outside is legal if it is reasonably necessary both for you to exercise, and to do so outside. Travelling in order to exercise is legal if it is reasonably necessary for you to exercise, to do so outside, and to do so in a location that requires you to travel to it.
It’s a defensible position that it’s never reasonably necessary to travel to another location in order to exercise, but it’s a matter of subjective judgement that others are likely to disagree with.
I know we’ve argued over this
I know we’ve argued over this already, but I still fail to see where you get travel from. The law asks only, [b]why you are outside?[/b] It offers a drop-down menu of allowable responses. One of them is, “to take exercise for which it is reasonably necessary to be outside”. And that’s it. It’s not asking whether the exercise reasonably requires you to travel, that’s not on the menu.
And to be clear on some of your other points, the law does not ask whether, nor require that, the exercise be reasonable or necessary, nor that it is reasonably necessary to take outdoors exercise.
Because the travel is for the
Because the travel is for the purposes of exercise.
It doesn’t ask whether you are exercising; it asks whether you are outside for the purpose of exercising. That doesn’t just mean doing the exercise itself; it means anything you need to do in order to do the exercise. In the same way that if you are travelling to a shop to buy essentials, you are outside for the purpose of purchasing essentials, even though you’re not actually purchasing them at the time.
If you are, then it asks whether that was reasonably necessary, which is where you could argue that there are no cases where it’s reasonably necessary to travel in order to exercise. But it also means that others could argue that there are no cases where it’s reasonably necessary to be outside to exercise at all (“I mean, there’s that there Joe Wicks, isn’t there?”) or that it’s reasonably necessary to drive 50 miles to the coast (“It’s vital for my mental health to see the sea regularly”).
I think you’re in the realms
I think you’re in the realms of fantasy here, Corporal Jones.
Nonsense.
Nonsense.
Any medic who is getting air
Any medic who is getting air time is very worried about how people are behaving and the govn is now saying to people ‘act like they have got Covid’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55598918
If you go for a long ride please may sure you are self sufficient for food, water, clothing, repairs and in extremis can be recovered by a household member.
For anyone wondering about
For anyone wondering about the restrictions relating to distances for exercise the National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) has now issued guidance that there is no distance limit to travel for exercise.
Derbyshire Police have issued a press release after receiving critisism about issuing fines for people going for a walk 5 miles from home.
https://www.derbyshire.police.uk/news/derbyshire/news/news/forcewide/2021/january/force-welcomes-new-guidance-from-npcc-around-about-travelling-during-lockdown/
There does not need to be any
As regards exercise, there does not need to be any “travel” distance limit specified. They just need to stipulate that you must travel under your own power. Then the distance will be self-regulating. People could call it exercise if they wished.
In fact, that is pretty much how it is in the legislation. Then they muddied the water with loosely worded unenforceable “guidance”, and left the police to deal with the mess.
The guidelines for Scotland
The guidelines for Scotland regarding distance are much clearer:
Seems like a lot of confusion could have been avoided if a specific distance was stated in the English guidelines.
Agreed. Even if it is
Agreed. Even if it is necessarily arbitrary, just set clear rules – job done.
Reading the news this week
Reading the news this week meant I was a bit paranoid about going out for my first ride of 2021 this morning. Thought there was would be police out looking to question people. The lanes were very quiet and I didn’t see a single police officer. I didn’t come into contact with anyone other than a few other lone cyclists.
When I passed the nearest national trust site it was rammed and loads of folks going for a walk. I’m not making a judgement on them but I deem my exercise to be safer even though it might have contraviened what some may define as staying local.
Boris Johnson has just made
Boris Johnson has just made it clear that you can cycle up to seven miles with your security detail.
And made it clear he’s happy
And made it clear he’s happy to judge what the whole country are doing & consider making new laws about it, just by riding around near a shopping centre.
You’ve not been clear that
You’ve not been clear that “ride alone” is the law in Wales, it is not, as it is in England, a recommendation. The entire article takes the English laws/guidance as a base but then generalises for the whole of the UK.
Also more than once a day is fine in Wales.
Stay Local is not part of the advice in Wales – start and finish at home is the guidance, with cyclists urged to ride within themselves e.g. if you find a 50 miler a breeze then this is fine.
So I’d add 2 more suggestions
1 – don’t read an English centric publication for UK wide cycling advice
2 – don’t pompously add unhelpful and gloating “turbo trainer for me, its the only safe option…” posts to these discussions. If that works for you then lovely.