Don’t mention the brakes!
I think it’s fair to say that the whole rim brake vs disc brake debate is still able to stir up the emotions after all these years, judging by the reaction to today’s main blog story.
“It’s not about the bike,” as one much less controversial cycling character once said, along with quite a few on social media, outraged by any derisory comment aimed towards disc brakes – even in obvious jest – today.
“I was on The Struggle yesterday, there was a fantastic atmosphere, a real celebration of a particular kind of cycling,” road.cc reader Miller wrote in the comments.
“I feel it’s a shame in a way that the article above focuses on Andrew Feather’s bike. The real story is his better than 7 watts/kilo for nearly 12 minutes and taking about 40 seconds off the pre-existing hill record, and the same effort expended to not quite so ProTour effect by all the competitors. It’s not about the bikes, interesting though they are!”
Hear, hear.
The source of all this internet angst…
Other similar comments were made on social media, with Tom writing that “it was the rider that won the race, not the bike!”
“Who cares? The most important point is that Andrew Feather absolutely SMASHED it,” says David, presumably shouting “SMASHED” while typing in his office.
“Illi could win riding a wheelbarrow with a flat tyre to be fair,” added Holly, praising Gardner’s dominance on the hill climb scene.
Others were perplexed by the mention of brakes at all.
“Most used feature on a rural climb, brakes,” said Rob, while Phill was scathing, writing: “Stupid statement… don’t need brakes going uphill.”
Yes, Gaz, Rob, and Phil (and basically everyone on Facebook), that’s right – but the weight of your braking system, one of the lingering arguments made against the use of disc brakes, could perhaps come into play on a really steep hill where something like, I don’t know, weight may prove important?
Especially in a subsection of the sport where riders go to great lengths – including chopping off their drops or stripping off their bar tape – to achieve those sweet, sweet marginal weight gains?
Just putting it out there that nobody was actually talking about the ability to stop on a 20 percent gradient, in case that went over anyone’s heads…
Meanwhile, some were angry it was even being discussed.
“Please don’t sink to the level of the shameful politicians. Don’t be divisive,” said Morgan, while simultaneously ducking as the joke grazed their hair on the way past.
For those at the back – the whole disc debate is a bit of light fun, an interesting tidbit and talking point from a day of sporting excellence, not something to get angry on the internet about, you know? It’s only the live blog (and cycling) after all.
And, anyway, we all have a common enemy we should be united against…
Again, it’s a joke!
Add new comment
21 comments
been trying to let this go, but didn't succeed:
the pics of Pog are taken on a padel court (not the same as tennis!)
We really need a stage in a World Tour race ridden on city-bikes. Granny-biking could be the next big thing. Matthieu and Wout battling out mano-a-mano on 25kg+ steel steeds. Bring it on!
You have hit on a wunnerful notion. Scrap the whole go-faster bike tech approach and return to the beginings of such bicycle races, with all riding the same single speed clunkers (we'll allow an alternative sprocket on the other side of the rear wheel for the hills) that have to be fixed by the rider if they go awry.
And why clutter up the public highways & pavements with vast crowds of rubbish spewing hooligans who have created vast clouds of heat-the-weather gas and kill-kid particles of doom in getting there? Races on remote forest graveltrack, which can only be walked to or cycled to, with a monitor at the entry gates confiscating the excessive grog, especially from hooligans in orange.
No televising of the events either. If you want to watch them, you must do so in that old-fashioned reality place. All entry fees payable to a secret cadre of evil-motorist apprehenders who will go about at night letting down their tyres and putting a potato in the exhaust pipe (or a short-it wire on the battery).
*****
I've gone too far with that.
A vote for simplicity.
Road.cc as usual has you covered.
Why stop at 25kg?
There's already a league!
https://www.facebook.com/cargobikeracingUK/
...and of course it has its "monuments" e.g. Svajerløbet
Thank you Danny the Bike Man.
You made me cry, in a good way.
Met him last week, I donated a bike, he's just a mile down the road from me. Lovely fellow.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/30/e-scooters-stuck-in-legi...
Those bike stand things are just weird... Does the designer think a bike is like a horse, and you just have to tie it up so it doesn't wander off?
Well in the Netherlands a "bicycle garage" is apparently "fietsstalling" - stabling for bicycles. So maybe they were just trying to "go Dutch"?
UK "not invented here" seemingly has the power to tap into untold resources of creativity. Functionally incompetent creativity, true...
I was on The Struggle yesterday, there was a fantastic atmosphere, a real celebration of a particular kind of cycling. I have lots of great video and, now, a huge video editing job. I feel it's a shame in a way that the road.cc article above focuses on Andrew Feather's bike. The real story is his better than 7 watts/kilo for nearly 12 minutes and taking about 40 seconds off the pre-existing hill record, and the same effort expended to not quite so Protour effect by all the competitors. It's not about the bikes, interesting though they are! I had a quick chat with AF after the finish and he is very honed for competition.
I've just watched both videos, they are superb. Great edits IMHO. Thanks.
I really wish they would have televised the National Hill Climb..
Feathers' 11:48 time is mind blowing considering the previous time was 20/30 seconds more.. he must have been on the 'best day' of his life.
I feel really bad for Ed Laverack he did everything right and also had a 'best day'.. it just was 18 seconds not quite enough.. must be gutting.
I was walking my dog leaving the shared use path to go up onto the field on Saturday morning, and two cyclists came down the cycle path near my village - https://maps.app.goo.gl/aLS6ipXUiKSvR2Vt8
One of them really really wanted to ride gravel, so he rode down the hill in the loose drainage gravel on the right of the path instead of on the tarmac...
(PS - that is not me on the streetview!)
That drainage path was probably the only dry bit on the whole of the Pill path.
This was over Watch House Hill. The Pill Path along the riverside is, in my experience, almost unusable if it's rained any time in the last week or so...
Surely not? After all, isn't it part of the National Cycle Network....?
Ah, that's so sweet that you think that...
Honest question: what makes that so special that you posted this?
Unless you are in a serious hurry, why not ride the part of the road/path that is most fun? For gravel riders, nothing gives a better feeling than the soft sound of tires rolling over the gravel.
Just wondering what warrants the emoji.
That path is more mud than gravel. If you start from the Ashton Gate end, it looks quite reasonable with a few puddles, but near Pill it turns into a bit of a swamp. Also, the path is fairly narrow so you don't get much choice about which part to ride.