Imagine being the greatest living cyclist (arguably), and having what was the greatest single season in the history of cycling (arguably), but still deemed not good enough to even qualify for the BBC’s ‘Sports Personality of the Year - World Sports Star’ shortlist.
While I’d assume three-time Tour de France winner Tadej Pogačar isn't losing any sleep over the snub, cycling fans have been quite vocal about it, passing pretty damning judgements on the decision and implying that the British broadcaster has failed to recognise cycling and one of sports’ greatest achievements in recent years.
> Was Tadej Pogačar’s staggeringly dominant 2024 the perfect season? We rank cycling’s greatest individual years, from Burton and Coppi to Vos and Pogačar
The people shortlisted for the award include the world’s most decorated gymnast, Simone Biles, the number one pick in Women’s National Basketball Association who broke several records as a rookie this year, Caitlin Clark, five-time world champion wheelchair racer Catherine Debrunner, arguably the greatest pole vaulter of all time, Armand Duplantis, super middle- and long-distance runner Sifan Hassan, and global swimming superstar and heir apparent to Michael Phelps, Leon Marchand.
Notice any connections between the six? Almost all of them — the only exception being Clark — set the Paris Olympic Games alight with their dazzling performances and took home multiple medals. And given the importance Olympic performance can play in deciding the winner of such awards, many fans on social media have speculated that the committee overlooking Pogačar could very well come down to the Slovenian deciding to skip Paris — a decision that was talked about a lot due to Urška Žigart, the Slovenian national champion and Pogi's partner, not making the national squad selection.
Cycling's power couple: Tadej Pogačar with Urška Žigart at 2024 Tour de France (A.S.O./Charly Lopez)
“Seems fully Olympics related, plus Caitlin Clark randomly. No Pogačar, no Sinner, laughable,” wrote one fan on social media, alluding to tennis's top-ranked male player Janik Sinner, the 23-year-old himself having a commendable season, winning the Australian and the US Open, the ATP Finals, three Masters 1000s, and two ATP 500s, and also leading Italy to the Davis Cup win (and of course, having a good old doping case in the midst of it all).
However, there were others who strongly suggested that this could very come down to the BBC simply not giving professional cycling enough importance as a sport. The last time a cyclist won the award was all the way back in 1963, when Jacques Anquetil was named the overseas Sports Personality of the Year, for victories in the Tour de France, Vuelta a España, Paris-Nice, and the Critérium du Dauphiné that year (Lance Armstrong was subsequently stripped of the title after being awarded in 2003).
“You have to remember that no one at the BBC watches cycling.”
“Britain is not a cycling country — exhibit 3567.”
“The BBC are probably pissed off with him for snubbing their beloved Olympic Games. They are not serious people!”
“Typical. Cycling goes to the bottom. Behind darts.”
“Could argue for Remco as well, since no real British challengers in the Grand Tours, the BBC has completely forgotten about cycling and reporting on it — I’d also include Katie Ledecky instead of Biles or Clarke, a very short-sighted shortlist.”
> Is Tadej Pogačar the greatest cyclist who’s ever lived? Plus we ask: What’s going on with cycling media in 2024?
Tadej Pogačar on the 2024 Tour de France podium
Meanwhile, some people claimed that it could be due to the fact that it’s voted by those watching the BBC, making it tricky for stars from sports which the BBC doesn’t hold broadcasting right to, to make the cut.
“BBC would likely be more interested in Remco as he had Olympic success which the BBC broadcast, I'd wager most nominees are in sports they hold broadcast rights to.”
“It is defined as the BBC World Sports Star. The BBC does not cover world cycling events, except for the Olympics. The people on this list had outstanding performances at the Olympics. BBC viewers will have to vote for the winner, and sadly, most of them will not have followed cycling.”
And as with most online discussions, there were people who seemed content with the shortlist. One person said: “Is it? It’s an Olympic year and Remco won that. I don’t hate this list.”
> “I live the reality of the danger of cycling in traffic almost every day”: Tadej Pogačar joins international road safety campaign urging drivers to respect cyclists by not texting or drinking – while calling for cyclists to wear helmets
Pogačar, meanwhile, has announced he was joining the United Nations’ global road safety campaign yesterday, aiming to promote road safety by recruiting celebrities and sportspeople to deliver messages “focusing on reducing risk factors” such as drink driving, texting at the wheel, and not wearing a bike helmet.
The Tour de France winner and world champion, said: “As a professional cyclist the open road is my workplace, and I live the reality of the danger of cycling in traffic almost every day.
“I am not alone, as millions of people around the world ride their bikes to work, school or just for leisure. The ability for people to ride their bikes safely is something we need to protect.
“I am happy to support this campaign and believe that together we can help to make the roads safer for everyone, cyclists and motorists alike.”
What do you think? Should the BBC have included Pogačar in the list? If yes, what’s your take on why he wasn’t? Let us know in the comments…
Add new comment
68 comments
Agreed. It seems a pretty rubbishy 'award'. My view is that Pogacar, Vingegaard and Evenepoel are clean astounding athletes, the carbon monoxide thing is a red herring, and vigorous anti-doping activity is working
Yes. I agree on doping. I think that a majority of pro cyclists are clean. In grand tours, there are far more GC neutral days because it is no longer possible to contend every stage. The fear of being caught out by retrospective testing is a strong one.
Not that I think he's doping, but Pogacar blew the rest of the peloton away on stage after stage of the Giro and Tour.
I didn't notice all that many GC neutral days except the sprint stages.
Breakaway stages?
I'd say it's a nice award to win, but anyone who has done enough in their actual sport to get on the short-list and be well known and popular enough to then get enough votes to win it is unlikely to be especially impressed by actually winning. Those people chase prizes that are not for popularity. If they are also big sports fans and follow sports other than their own then getting on the short-list, or even an invite, is going to be more special. But even Andy Murray, who is a massive fanboy of other athletes usually made his excuses and attended via satellite link from the side of a swimming pool in Miami.
On the other hand, their agents and sponsors will be delighted. Not that any winners are not happy to win - even the most dour or merit-focused athletes will be happy to know they are also popular.
One of the worst things about SPOTY is that every year there are fans of minority sports that don't realise they are fans of minority sports that can't understand why the three-time world champion in welly-throwing isn't in on the short-list and get angry about it. Not saying that cycling is a minority sport, but there are lots of different sorts of cycling and not taking part in the Olympics in an Olympic year is going to count against you. A bit like the honours system, people like it when athletes want to represent their country and aren't just chasing the trophies with the biggest prize money.
Big LOL to the idea that Sinner should have been on the list.
Worse, there are some who still don't realise there are two main meanings of the word personality, and can't understand why the winner isn't the athelte with their idea of the best personality.
I don't think pogacar will be too gutted at missing out on the BBC spoty overseas award. They whole thing is meaningless. It has been hijacked by celebrity and woke agendas. Given the choice of winning paris-roubaix or spoty, which do you think he will choose?
I was with you until you used the word "woke". Do you have something against treating people with respect and dignity even though they may not be the same colour/sex/gender/age/privilege/nationality as yourself?
No I am all for it. I think recognition for sporting achievements should be applied fairly and evenly irrespective of any differences. I feel that the BBC are deeply patronising at times. An example is their general non- critical coverage of the women's hundred cricket and women's tennis. It does the players a disservice, treats viewers like fools and does not encourage improvement.
Pages