Like this site? Help us to make it better.

More criticism for proposed Manchester cycle routes

‘Do less, but better’ is advice from campaign group

Plans to create 37 miles of cycle routes in Greater Manchester have come in for strong criticism from local campaign group, Love Your Bike, reports the Manchester Evening News. Cheetham Hill plans have been described as ‘diabolical’ while dangers have also been highlighted on the Prestwich route.

Four cycle paths have been proposed around Manchester Airport, Prestwich, Wilmslow Road and Cheetham Hill with three more planned for Salford, Stockport, and the Bridgewater and Ashton Canals. Pete Abel from Love Your Bike reserved his strongest criticism for the Cheetham Hill route.

“The Cheetham Hill plans are diabolical, it’s not a route – it’s just green lines in two places. That is poor.

“We do not feel this meets any of the criteria outlined in the Cycle City bid. It’s not ambitious. We don’t understand the rationale for the route – it’s like they are trying to stretch too far – what we are saying is you could do less but better.”

A council spokesman defended the plans, however.

“The Cheetham Hill Road proposal aims to make the best use of available highway infrastructure to start forming a link between north Manchester and the city centre.

“We have worked closely with cycling groups throughout the process of design on all of the Better By Cycle routes and will be continuing to ask cyclists and other members of the public for their input on these and other proposals to develop and improve our cycling network.”

Abel also said that a stretch of the Prestwich route around Queens Road and Oldham Road would be dangerous, as would a section from Brooks Drive to Floats Road on the airport route. “The whole point was to produce safe, protected routes for people to encourage more people to cycle and some parts of these plans don’t do that.”

Manchester will benefit from the next wave of Cycle City funding, but the city’s largest cycling club, Manchester Wheelers, has said that if past history is anything to go by, this investment could actually make the city less safe for cyclists.

Greater Manchester's bid document said facilities would be built “in accordance with the core Vélocity 2025 objective of providing largely segregated cycle facilities to cater for the full range of cyclists" but Greater Manchester Cycling Campaign (GMCC) is unhappy at the use of the funding for shared-space schemes and has described the level of ambition as ‘low’.

Sustrans are yet another group to have weighed in, saying that the Bridgewater and Ashton canal routes feature pinch points and other weaknesses. They feel the plans lack aspiration.

Abel is critical of how projects were funded, pointing to the fact that money was allocated before plans were drawn up.

“If the government were serious they would say ‘work up a scheme and tell us how much you need’. It’s like this process builds in failure. It’s good the money is there – it just needs to be done better because we want to see the best possible scheme.

“People we talk to say we love to cycle but we don’t feel safe around Manchester. So if you want people to cycle, that’s what you have to deliver.”

Love Your Bike’s detailed response to the Velocity 2025 plans for the Prestwich and airport routes can be found here. The organisation feels that both routes are stretching too far and reiterates that it would like to see designs that deliver less, better.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment


jpj84 | 9 years ago

I would actually prefer the money to be spent removing a lot of the existing "cycle lanes", which actively make life more dangerous for cyclists. The one that always stood out for me when I used to live in town me was on the Pendlebury roundabout (technically in Salford I know) . I hope and pray no cyclist ever uses that, particularly to turn right on the roundabout.

davefb replied to jpj84 | 9 years ago

Yeah.. I even did the 'stop' thing once, so much traffic you couldn't get across and then a street cleaner van came round, which had to stop for me, blocking the view and meaning cars still were going round it.. It was "better" to go into the traffic.
There is a nice underpass.. but of course it's covered with bike stopping gates which mean unclipping and getting off. Not sure what will happen with the new bus-lane on the 580. Maybe they'll do 'something' but not holding my breath...
I think the next roundabout is worse, you get directed into one way traffic the other way but on a footpath, then into the underpass, where you have to get off again.. Then a bit of safety from traffic, but not that safe if its dark as its unlit, through an estate..
sort of here...,-2.2924729,3a,75y,128.87h,75.14t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sdn_6hDwQbK2wflExWHAB-A!2e0?hl=en

Used ncn6 across salford a few times as well.. Its the epitome of money spent, distance ticked but total uselessness as a commuting method, part of it is great but most either gets in your way or puts you at risk more..

Ivorcader replied to jpj84 | 9 years ago

I use this roundabout twice a day - yes it's terrible but using the underpasses usually dump you somewhere where you don't want to be plus who wants to use a dark underpass in these parts....The only tactic for the roundabout is to behave like a car (occupy centre of the lane), pedal like hell and have bright lights. The Manchester cycling money would be better spent fixing potholes and have more traffic police about to enforce the law (against motorists and cyclists)

Accessibility f... | 9 years ago

People not from manchester: Google Street view the a56 between prestwich and Sedgley Park and tell me there isn't loads of space for a segregated cycle lane on each side of the road.

Some Fella | 9 years ago

“We have worked closely with cycling groups throughout the process of design on all of the Better By Cycle routes and will be continuing to ask cyclists and other members of the public for their input on these and other proposals to develop and improve our cycling network.”

Translation - we designed a dogs dinner like we normally do, put it out for 'consultation', everyone said it was a dogs dinner, we ignored that and carried on regardless with the dogs dinner.

Latest Comments