Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclists who jumped red light in front of police stopped and fined, as force shares footage with "red means stop" warning

Surrey Police officers spotted the riders "ignoring a red light" and issued a fixed penalty notice...

Footage has been widely shared on Facebook showing the moment two cyclists riding metres in front of a Surrey Police vehicle were spotted jumping a red light, before being stopped and issued a fixed penalty notice.

The incident happened in Epsom, Surrey Police later uploading the footage to social media, the video having been viewed more than 600,000 times over the weekend. Two cyclists are seen riding away from the town centre on the A24 Dorking Road when the pedestrian crossing traffic lights change from green to red as another person, also riding a bicycle, waits to cross.

In the footage, which has attracted almost 800 comments, the two riders are seen freewheeling for a second before continuing through the red light.

Surrey Police reported its officers saw the incident unfold and the two riders were stopped and fined. Sharing the news with the message "#RedMeansStop", the Surrey RoadSafe page wrote: "Our #SPCasualtyReduction (Surrey Police) officers witnessed two cyclists ignoring a red light at a Pelican Crossing where a person was waiting to cross. They were both stopped and issued a fixed penalty notice."

It's not the first time this year that the Surrey RoadSafe account has shared footage of cyclists fined for riding through red lights. In January, a video was shared showing a group ride of four cyclists at a junction in Esher, the footage being widely shared on social media and online.

As the riders made the right turn a police vehicle was being driven just behind, the driver rolling up to the stop line as the group turned across the junction, the police following moments before the group was stopped and issued fixed penalty notices.

> Should cyclists be allowed to ride through red lights? Campaigners split on safety benefits

Some, including a lawyer from Leigh Day law firm, questioned why the video was "unnecessarily cropped to show the cyclists already passed the stop line and not crossing this when the light is red?"

"I don't in any way dispute some cyclists contravene traffic signals and I don't endorse that in any way. If you are law enforcement posting offences for public awareness — make sure you show the actual offence being committed. This doesn't," Rory McCarron said.

In response to the questions, Surrey Police released the full unedited footage a day later, lawyer McCarron commenting: "Thank you for showing the whole video. Justified FPN, no excuse. A lesson learned to the cyclists (and maybe the poster of the original video). Whilst this isn't fatal 5, your work generally is applauded."

Surrey Police video of cyclists stopped for ignoring red light (@SurreyRS)

Surrey Police also confirmed that all four had been issued with a £50 fixed penalty ticket for 'contravention of a red traffic light' and were "given suitable safety advice for the future".

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 35 min ago
0 likes

Not making excuses for them, they broke the law and so deserved what they got. However it does seem from the video that the rider in black makes a thumbs up gesture towards the person waiting to cross (another cyclist); I wonder if that person had said go ahead lads, I'll follow you or something similar. As I say, not an excuse but possibly an explanation. Certainly nowhere near as egregious or dangerous as the countless incidents of cyclists and drivers running reds I see every single day in London, but still, if you don't want to get fined there's this one weird trick you can use...

Avatar
Mr Anderson | 2 hours ago
1 like

Did Road.cc miss this news item?

Putney fatal collision 2 November 2024.

 

Avatar
bensynnock | 2 hours ago
2 likes

Can somebody tell motorists. To them red means 'get away with it if you can', like every other rule.

Avatar
Car Delenda Est | 4 hours ago
0 likes

I saw a creative maneuver recently: a cyclist wanted to cross a junction with a red light so they made a left turn, a u-turn and finally another left turn, genius

Avatar
espressodan replied to Car Delenda Est | 2 hours ago
1 like

In Qld, Oz you can ride of the pavement. Nothing illegal about leaving the road via the drop kerb, rolling across the adjacent crossing then rejoining. Left on green if possible, or leave the road and re-enter your original lane from the drop kerb.

Avatar
Mr Blackbird | 4 hours ago
3 likes

Inexcusable. Allows people like Iain Duncan-Smith and other Daily Telegraph buffers to tar all cyclists with the same brush.

Avatar
the little onion replied to Mr Blackbird | 3 hours ago
1 like

I don't condone what the cyclist did. However, we are on a hiding to nothing if we give in to the Iain Duncan-Smiths of this world - with their logic, it just requires one naughty cyclist to justify their worldview. A battle that cyclists can never win. Far better is to push back against the entire logic of collective culpability. After all, it is pretty insane for anyone to claim collective culpability for drivers - that the bad behaviour of one somehow justifies punishment of all drivers.

Avatar
Mr Blackbird replied to the little onion | 1 hour ago
0 likes

I'm not suggesting that anybody give in to the IDSs of the world. But why give them ammunition, if it can easily be avoided.? Avoiding breaking the law is not giving in.
I believe that a senior cabinet minister once described IDS as being a bit dim ( even for an ex guardsman) - logical analytical thinking may not be his forte, but grabbing an easy, simplified argument will be.

Avatar
wtjs replied to Mr Blackbird | 3 hours ago
2 likes

Inexcusable. Allows people like Iain Duncan-Smith and other Daily Telegraph buffers to tar all cyclists with the same brush

This 'tarring' isn't applied to motorists, and an entire police force, Lancashire Constabulary, has decided that the offence is so common ('everybody does it') it won't take any action against motorists who are firmly convinced that 'red means stop' doesn't apply to them- all of these were reported and all of the reports were ignored by the most hopelessly ineffectual and dodgy police force in the UK

https://upride.cc/incident/a15tjv_bmwm4_redlightpass/

https://upride.cc/incident/jo55chb_kiasportage_redlightpass/

https://upride.cc/incident/kl04ndo_vw_redlightpass/

https://upride.cc/incident/da21sww_leon_redlightpass/

https://upride.cc/incident/pl68tev_polo_redlightpass/

https://upride.cc/incident/de56ztv_discovery_redlightpass/

https://upride.cc/incident/ma08opb_crv_redlightpass/

https://upride.cc/incident/fh16vfa_rrover_redlightcross/

The PCC describes these 'no action' decisions as 'operational decisions by the police' which are nothing to do with the PCC

 

Avatar
Another_MAMIL replied to Mr Blackbird | 3 hours ago
2 likes

Mr Blackbird wrote:

Inexcusable. Allows people like Iain Duncan-Smith and other Daily Telegraph buffers to tar all cyclists with the same brush.

Indeed. 

"What about lawbreaking car drivers?" comments don't help. Two wrongs don't make a right.

Avatar
Clem Fandango | 4 hours ago
6 likes

I live locally to this - sad to see & a dumb move at the best of times, let alone in front of the polis.  Fair play to them for actually taking action.   Though had they not been wearing hi-viz the cyclists would have been invisible & would have got away it  3 

That said, Surrey Police (in my experience) are growing ever worse at dealing with close passes & potential driving offences when you submit footage online - I've had several recently where I've been close passed (often either unecessarily, or more likely because the move is made into oncoming traffic or on a blind bend) by a matter of inches whilst out riding - yet always NFA.  A year or so ago, footage of incidents involving passes less close/egregious were yielding positive results.     I'm beginning to wonder if I need to actually be struck by a vehicle before it counts as a close pass in Surrey now? 

Avatar
mctrials23 | 4 hours ago
2 likes

Phwoar, imagine all the raging hard ons the motorists got from that one. Cyclists being held accountable for their awful behaviour for once. If only the police were there all the time to catch these nasty cyclists like they are when people fly through red lights in their 2 tonne lumps of metal.

Avatar
ubercurmudgeon | 4 hours ago
2 likes

Quote:

In the footage, which has attracted almost 800 comments

I can well imagine...

"See, this shows that ALL cyclists are law-breakers."

"OK, that's two instances to stack up against thousands of videos shot by cyclists of motorists doing far worse."

"How DARE people invade OUR privacy and cause us to LOOSE our GOD-GIVEN driving licences."

Latest Comments