World cycling’s governing body, the UCI, has today revealed details of its anti-doping programme for the 2011 season, the main thrust of which will be increased controls of “riders whose [biological passport] profiles may indicate illegal behaviour.”
The approach to be adopted next year was approved in Paris yesterday by the UCI’s Foundation Board, chaired by Pat McQuaid, and the Funding Committee of the Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation (CADF), chaired by Daniel Baal respectively, met yesterday in Paris.
According to a statement from the UCI, it is focusing on riders with suspect profiles because it believes “It must be these riders who are the priority targets rather than riders with completely regular profiles who make up the majority of the peloton.”
The statement continues: “This improved targeting has been made possible by the biological passport. The very large number of controls conducted since the introduction of the biological passport (nearly 25,500) has allowed reliable profiles to be drawn up for the riders concerned.
“In terms of physiological data, the UCI thus now has a knowledge of these athletes that is without par in the world of sport. Moreover, top-performing athletes as well as newcomers to the peloton will be subject to improved targeting.”
As well as more focused targeting, the UCI is also determined to focus on stamping out doping at lower levels of the sport, saying that “sanctioning cheats is necessary, but it is even more essential to prevent young riders from resorting to illegal practices.”
The UCI explains that it will be providing “a substantial amount of information on this subject during 2011,” with the campaign being co-ordinated in partnership with national federations and “other relevant organisations.”
The governing body insists that its announcement of its plans for 2011 “represents a further step forward” in the fight against doping.
However, the sport is of course overshadowed at the moment by the uncertainty surrounding what sanction, if any, will be imposed on Tour de France winner Alberto Contador following his positive test for clenbuterol during this year’s race, and the ongoing investigation in the United States into doping in pro cycling, centred around Lance Armstrong and other former members of the US Postal Service team.
How can anybody reject the beauty of that? It's a wonderful mix of modern tech yet absolutely functional.
I know he's been famously arrogant and litigious, but surely even he doesn't have the gall to attempt to patent that?
Now I don't do any of this InstaTok business, so I could well be wrong, but it looks to me like he's only outed himself as a follower of someone...
Not unless theVED is made eye wateringly expensive....
My mum always told me I'd inherited her 'hobbit feet', though as far as I'm aware we don't have any family in New Zealand.
Hyponatremia is a real risk even for an amateur cyclist or runner in hot weather. I've bonked from it before, and I was drinking Gatorade the whole...
in the UK we have policing which to a greater or lesser extent relies on assistance from members of the public......
So...don't cycle on it. Lots of other routes around that area. Source: I used to work there.
My photochromic specs have just turned up in the post today
Downhill Alpe d'Huez TT would be _awesome_. And someone should organise one for real!...