Residents in Lambeth are being left with impossibly long waiting lists for secure bicycle storage that is leaving them vulnerable to their bikes being stolen, a Freedom of Information (FOI) request has revealed.
Lambeth Council has 828 on-street bike hangars each of which can store six bicycles, making the borough’s provision the fourth highest in London. But the borough has the second highest concentration of bicycle ownership, after Islington, and has a reported 13,989 people on the waiting list, SW Londoner reports. This means the waiting list is roughly treble the council’s total bike storage capacity.
Lambeth Council does not directly manage the applications and maintenance of the hangars, which are owned by both Cyclehoop and LockIt Safe. The council does however set an annual rent of £30 a year, subsidising Cyclehoop’s standard £72 fee.
SW Londoner also submitted FOI requests to several other local authorities in London and found Camden and Haringey had the next longest waiting lists – around 7,500 each -, as well as substantially fewer bike hangars – 370 and 419 respectively.
In response to the findings, Cycling UK said they were disappointed by the findings.
“Hangar space is really important. People might not appreciate it if they live in a house with somewhere to store their bike, but it’s difficult to carry a bike up two flights of stairs to a flat.” Campaigns Manager Sophie Gordon said.
“Cycle theft is also quite an off-putting factor for many people who want to cycle, especially if you’re on a low income you’re more likely to worry about being able to afford to replace a bike.”
Lambeth also has some of the highest rates of bike theft in the city, more than twice as high as the London average. Data from the Met Police shows 102 bikes were reported stolen in May, a 24 percent increase on the same time last year.
Residents have also reported being frustrated by having bikes stolen whilst waiting to be allocated a bike storage space. One resident said said he would not replace his stolen bike, saying the theft, “really reframed my experience of that area and London more generally. I’m a lot more cautious these days, and more scared of strangers. Another said he “felt like crying” after he had two bikes stolen in a six month window.
“Councils always reference installing bike lanes to make cycling more appealing, which is great. But these waiting lists are so, so long. As long as you can’t get a space in a hangar, you’re not going to be inspired to buy a bike.”
Lambeth Council has been Labour-governed since 2006. However, in last month’s local elections the Green Party won the most seats and subsequently formed a minority administration with the support of the Liberal Democrats. When contacted for comment, Lambeth Council said, “The waiting lists for hangars reflect the very high demand for cycling parking in Lambeth, and the financial constraints affecting the delivery of bike hangars to meet this.
“The council historically has not done enough to get those lists down, and reducing the number of people waiting for a bike hangar will now be a priority going forwards.”
The council has previously pledged to ensure every resident lives within 100 metres of a secure bike hangar by 2030, as part of the borough’s Kerbside Strategy “to transform 25 percent of kerbside space into places for people, and not just cars.” Published in 2023, the strategy’s other measures also include installing electric vehicle charging points and tree planting.

13 thoughts on “14,000 on cycle storage waiting list as bike theft rockets and cyclists complain: “If you can’t get a space, you’re not going to be inspired to buy a bike””
Good to hear that people are keen and they won’t be doing the Lambeth Walk if they can help it.
Now, can we have a rule that new buildings (that the government wants more of built) have to include decent cycle storage space? Like in NL?
(Of course not – that would be insanity as nobody cycles, and anyway Nige and Kemi and anyone else will be shouting “nanny state” and “government overreach”. And frankly the planning process is a giant hot mess as it is and we’re already worried about being slated for missing housing targets …)
Presumably there is some ideal city where everything is within cycling distance but there’s also lots of space to store bikes. Hmm. I wonder if some of those car spots that occupy the same space as 10 bikes (or more) could be utilised?
@Aluminium can this argument isn’t entirely spurious, what with over a century of literally rebuilding places / relative position of accommodation and amenities around motor vehicles.
OTOH IIRC the majority of driven journeys are still of cyclable distance (although perhaps people are currently driving many such per day).
Certainly cycle hangers are available as quick fixes in the home / work side (and / or Sheffield stands). They lack security though and are susceptible to motor vehicles driving into them.
However to compete with the car in your garage * or in the multistory car park we ultimately need a rules change to encourage *suitable* cycle storage built in to new build, and ultimately decent cycle parking garages at transit hubs / in town (ideally manned).
For existing housing provision perhaps something like the Dutch “bike parking ‘shop’ ” eg. Conversion of existing property into a cycle garage?
(Bicycle Dutch has a couple of good articles / videos on this topic, search “home bicycle parking”)
* who actually uses their garage to store mirror vehicles…?
Ours has a wardrobe in it – I guess that could have a mirror attached.
I think you should take a look at yourself.
There’s a waiting list for the cycle storage units in my street. Why my neighbours bagged places in them makes no sense, given that they have a cellar with nothing in it.
Do they also have a garage in which they don’t keep their car(s)? It would be in keeping…
@chrisonabike We live in terraced houses, so no garage.
@OldRidgeback
Not sure I would claim a storage space when I had a cellar, but I would say quick access to a bike is very convenient. Our normal route is cellar (tight door access with a bike), back door, through garden and out the back gate. For weekday commuting 1-2 bikes live in the hall; bit messy and looks like a student flat but more convenient than the cellar. Back in the cellar at weekends though.
@Shades They have a 5 bedroom house for the 4of them (2 parents, 2 children). Admittedly, the hall isn’t wide but it’s not as if they’re short of space. I keep 2 of my bikes in the cellar.
We have a few of these in my area but I haven’t applied for a space. After a l couple of incidents where they have been broken into and most bikes taken, I decided to continue keeping mine at the back of our place. I’m lucky to have that possibility.
Having a space is important but I feel that security is not the best argument for installing more hangars.
How about if we arrange for bike thieves to fear arrest?
I presume the main sticking point is the cost, and assuming budgets remain tight, perhaps the level of subsidies needs to be reviewed. At £42 subsidy per person per year, and assuming six per hanger, that’s over £200k for the existing provision.
I’d argue that’s excellent value for money when you factor in the benefits to society of a healthier population that comes with more cycling, but being mindful it’s not all about me, and that councils are struggling to fund their basic and pressing statutory requirements, it may be they need to reduce the per person subsidy, or restrict the subsidy to particular groups, freeing up budget for more units.
But I’d also argue that maintenance costs to Bikehanger reduce as more units are installed in one area, so there may be an opportunity to negotiate a better deal for subsequent units.
There’s usually a fair amount of on-line venom spewed when one of these appears in our neighbourhood; heaven forbid they might be popular!