Finally proof of a Low Traffic Neighbourhood delaying emergency services from attending an urgent call-out, but not really because the bollard — designed to be easily removed using a key in such instances — was damaged by vandals.
Despite the London Fire Brigade last year confirming it had not seen any impact on response times as a result of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) being rolled out, it is one of the most frequently heard arguments from critics and inevitably pops up every time a council proposes bringing the low traffic schemes to their area.
In Oxford this week, however, it was not an LTN, but instead the handy work of vandals, which delayed firefighters from attending an incident.
Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service had to cut out a bollard in Clive Road on Tuesday after they were unable to use the key-activated mechanism which easily removes the obstacle in an emergency.
The BBC reported that Oxfordshire County Council said the vandalism had "affected the mechanism which would allow it to normally be removed using a key" before adding the startling news that "costs for damage to bollards and planters has now topped £12,000 since the measures were launched on 20 May."
A consultation on the schemes is running until November and the cut-out bollard will be replaced, but vandalism is overshadowing the roll-out of the project.
Bollards in east Oxford were removed and planters vandalised less than 24 hours after a six-month trial was launched last month.
A couple of weeks later, in the face of repeated vandalism, 'human bollards' including Liberal Democrat councillor Andrew Gant stepped in to replace a bollard which had been vandalised "six or seven times".
> Low Traffic Neighbourhood 'human bollards' step in following repeated vandalism
One of the 'human bollards' said they were "pleased" they had "reminded drivers that it is illegal to pass through whether there is a bollard or not" and did "the job that Oxfordshire County Council and Thames Valley Police should have done".
What does the evidence say?
Last September, Cycling UK said the "clear evidence" does not support the often-pedalled claim that LTNs delay emergency services' response times and compared the line to "flat earther" views.
Following a Freedom of Information request from the same charity, not one of ten ambulance trusts operating in England, Scotland and Wales said they were against new cycling and walking facilities, with a third expressing strong support because of their public health and road safety benefits.
> London Fire Brigade says low traffic neighbourhoods have had no impact on response times
In the same year, the London Fire Brigade said: "We haven't yet noticed any impact on our attendance times due to the LTN schemes established in 2020; however, we will continue to monitor their impact at a local level."
What in the name of seitan is that?
British Cycling are far more concerned about the culture wars than cycling. Well past their sell-by date.
I've just reviewed my old commute route to the station - it's less distance than the road using the Redways. In addition I get to cycle past...
No doubt, being Bath, the charges will relate to damaging a UNESCO site and nothing to do with motor offences.
Before the internet they wrote letters to local newspapers (RIP), I understand that green ink was compulsory.
Aye! It's tough for drivers oop in t'North. In Lancashire, even the MOT testing garages can't afford MOTs!
Slow news day?
Maybe they'll employ some sniffer dogs? Note - it's the City of London rather than being London, the city which would be much better.
I would definitely recommend looking at the hase pino, they do a kit to put kid sized pedals on the front so your child can participate. But unlike...
The TQ HPR50 motor is so small that is must be rattling around inside that huge bottom bracket area. I suppose it is some kind of inflection point...