Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

“It can’t just be about medals”: British Cycling under fire for “disgraceful, sexist” failure to send elite women’s squad – including national champion Xan Crees – to cyclocross world champs, but governing body says omitted riders failed to meet criteria

No British riders will represent Great Britain in the elite women’s and men’s U23 categories in Liévin, France, sparking a debate about inclusivity and representation

British Cycling’s decision to not select any riders in the elite women’s and men’s U23 categories, including recently crowned women’s national champion Xan Crees, for next weekend’s UCI cyclocross world championships in France has led to scathing criticism of the governing body, as fans and ex-riders branded the omissions “short-sighted” and “sexist”.

Crees’ team Spectra Racing have said they are “heartbroken” by the decision to leave the 24-year-old British champion – who beat Cat Ferguson and Imogen Wolff (both selected for the U23 event) to win the national title earlier this month – and Proximus-Cyclis rival Anna Kay out of the 11-rider squad for the sport’s flagship event in Liévin, arguing both riders “deserved to go”.

However, British Cycling has responded to the criticism by claiming that the “rigorous and independent selection process” followed by the governing body for each event “ensures that we select riders who have the best chance of performing at world championship level or gaining valuable and positive development experience”.

In this case, British Cycling said, in the elite women’s and men’s U23 categories “there were no riders who met these objectives strongly enough to be selected” for this year’s world cyclocross championships.

Cameron Mason wins 2025 British cyclocross championships (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)

(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)

Earlier this week, British Cycling announced the 11 riders selected to race for Great Britain at the 2025 cyclocross worlds in the northern French town of Liévin between 31 January and 2 February.

Three-time national champion Cameron Mason, who’s secured three top ten placing in this season’s UCI World Cup series, will line up alongside Thomas Mein – hoping to emulate his World Cup career-best sixth place in Besançon last month – in the elite men’s race.

Back-to-back national champion Oscar Amey and silver medallist Milo Willis will take part in the junior men’s race, while Arabella Blackburn, Zoe Roche, and Ellie Mitchinson make up the junior women’s team.

Zoe Bäckstedt, 2024 Dublin Cyclocross World Cup (SRAM) 2

The majority of GB’s medal hopes, however, will be pinned on the U23 women’s squad, fronted by defending champion Zoe Bäckstedt, fresh from a superb season of ever-present top ten places in the elite ranks.

The 20-year-old will be supported by two other hotly tipped stars of the future, Movistar’s multidisciplinary world champion Cat Ferguson and Visma-Lease a Bike’s Imogen Wolff, along with mountain bike and ‘cross prospect Ella Maclean-Howell.

However, notable by their absence were any riders from the U23 men’s or elite women’s categories, including cyclocross stalwart Anna Kay and newly crowned British champion Xan Crees.

Xan Crees wins 2025 British cyclocross championships (Olly Hassell/SWpix.com)

(Olly Hassell/SWpix.com)

24-year-old Crees soloed to an emotional maiden British elite title on a wintery course in Gravesend earlier this month, breaking clear alongside Ferguson early on before dispatching the Movistar teenager on the third lap, beating her in the end by five seconds as Imogen Wolff finished third.

Ranked 40th in the UCI rankings, Crees’ national championships win marked a breakthrough moment for the Spectra Racing rider, whose best placings this winter have included 18th at the World Cup in Dendermonde, 17th at the GP Sven Nys, and 13th at the Urban Cross in Kortrijk.

Kay, meanwhile, has been a consistent presence near the front of cyclocross races on the continent for the past six years, securing several top ten placings in big events, and overcoming a tough start to this season to finish sixth at both the GP Sven Nys and the Exact Cross in Loenhout, as well as 20th at last weekend’s World Cup round in Benidorm.

The Proximus-Cyclis-AlphaMotorhomes rider’s two previous world championships results at elite level have been 17th and 18th, and she finished third at the U23 worlds in 2020.

Anna Kay, 2024 cyclocross world championships (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)

Kay at last year’s cyclocross worlds in Tabor, where she finished 17th (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)

Both Crees and Kay’s omissions from the British team for Liévin were criticised in a statement posted on social media by the national champion’s Spectra Racing squad.

“We are incredibly heartbroken to publicly see the news that our Xan Crees (the new national cyclocross champion) was not selected for the World Championships. We also feel the same for Anna Kay. Both deserved to go!” Spectra said.

“Regardless of selection criteria, and whether either Xan or Anna met said criteria, which most cyclocross criteria is often times vague and elusive, the point and what should have been a factor in selection is *representation* in all age categories. Not just the elite women but also the U23 men.

“The UK’s proximity to these World Championships (being in France) should have provided a perfect opportunity to really fly the GB flag with more than two riders in each men’s race and only three in the junior women’s.

“Where it is incredible to see the U23 women squad be the biggest, and there certainly is some incredible talent in that age category, we shouldn’t have *just* 11 riders representing GB when we have some great talent!

“It should be more than just medals, it should be about providing lifetime opportunities because unless BC are going to invest Olympic medal funding into cyclocross, the criteria can’t just be about medals.”

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Xan Crees ✨ (@xancrees)

Meanwhile, Crees herself posted on Instagram: “After my best season yet I would have loved for the chance to represent Great Britain at the World Championships, not just for myself but for the team, everyone who’s supported me, all those volunteers who make cycling and cyclocross in the UK possible, and for all those young athletes like me to show them what's possible if you believe.

“Unfortunately it wasn’t to be this year and I just hope I can continue to inspire our young riders in my other events!

“On a positive, there are still a few races left to go this season, to show off the stripes, and a whole 12 months to get stronger and do the jersey proud. Thank you everyone for the support so far and hopefully this is just the beginning!

“Best of luck to all those going! I can’t wait to watch you all race your heart out.”

“Don’t even mention budget. Send our national champion”

While Crees’ take on her omission was surprisingly positive, the controversial selection has been widely condemned by fans and pundits.

Posting on X, former British road race champion Brian Smith said: “I know the sacrifices to become a national champion... I think it’s a very poor decision by British Cycling not to allow newly crowned national women’s elite champion Xan Crees to test herself against the best at the upcoming world championships.”

Tagging British Cycling’s performance director Stephen Park in the post, Smith continued: “Don’t even mention budget. Send our national champion.”

Xan Crees and Cat Ferguson, 2025 British cyclocross championships (Olly Hassell/SWpix.com)

Cat Ferguson and Xan Crees battle it out at the 2025 British national cyclocross championships (Olly Hassell/SWpix.com)

Meanwhile, in comments under the governing body’s Facebook post announcing the squad, some accused British Cycling of implementing a “sexist” selection policy lacking inclusion and focused solely on securing medals.

“Sexist selection policy alive and kicking at BC,” wrote Emma Pulsford. “What is the selection policy? Yes, Cam had that good result at Hulst and Mein at Besancon – but when you look at the seasons overall Kay and Crees have had compared to the two men, there’s not much difference.

“Kay in particular has been very consistent especially during the Christmas block. Riders that she’s consistently beaten will be selected by Belgium, France, Italy etc.”

“Congratulations British Cycling, inclusion is alive and kicking with you lot. Not!” added Adey Dent. “No elite women? Really! New national champion should have automatic selection, Anna Kay ridden at the highest level all season, top six in Super Prestige, top 20 in World Cups, yet no place.

“Every weekend hundreds of riders in all regions line up and race ‘cross, paying a fortune fees – where is the incentive now? Race hard, commit to being the best you can be, self-fund all over Europe all winter, then when they come to you once a year to race for their country, you ignore them! Guess you gave the excuse of ‘you won't podium, so there’s no point’. Top effort!”

Melanie Tracey also said: “Disappointing to see no elite women. If all the countries thought like this, only the Dutch would be racing.”

“Taking no elite women is a shocking omission!” agreed Andrew Edmond. “Very short sighted. We need representation at the highest level, not least to inspire the next generation of talent and create interest to get more people into the sport.”

Xan Crees wins 2025 British cyclocross championships (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)

(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)

Reflecting on some claims that the decision was budget-based, John Davidson, branding the selection an “absolute disgrace”, said: “It costs BC £0, as essential riders fund themselves by ways of transport. It may cost BC two extra hotel bills, but in the long term it will cost them the loss of outraged membership.

“Whoever made this decision not to send any elite women simply must go, they are completely incompetent.”

“BC don’t care at all about anything other than track and road at a push,” added Paul Stewart.

“It’s been the same story for many years now. BC has no interest in CX,” noted Pete Hodgson. “The amount of riders racing on the continent has never been higher and this is the time to push it.

“20 years ago, if a British rider was top 50 in a World Cup event it was a good ride. Now we are seeing it constantly but still these riders are left to fund themselves or rely on funding from charity or parents.”

Responding to this criticism, British Cycling said in a statement: “GBCT will not be sending an elite women’s squad, or under-23 men’s squad to the 2025 UCI Cyclo-cross World Championships.

“For all major event selections, we follow a rigorous and independent selection process in line with that specific event’s objectives. This ensures that we select riders who have the best chance of performing at world championship level or gaining valuable and positive development experience.

“In this case, in the elite women and under-23 men’s categories, there were no riders who met these objectives strongly enough to be selected for a major world championships.”

> “How is the sport meant to grow if we can’t watch it?” British Cycling slammed for “farcical” lack of TV coverage for national cyclocross championships – as fans forced to rely on teenager’s livestream from side of course

Ironically, Crees’ British championships win in Gravesend earlier this month also saw British Cycling come in for criticism for its failure to provide live coverage of the event – as fans were forced to rely on a YouTube stream courtesy of a teenage spectator.

While previous British cyclocross championships have been available to watch on the BBC iPlayer, this year’s event was only accessible to those at home through live text updates and the occasional short clip on British Cycling’s social media page.

Cameron Mason wins 2025 British cyclocross championships (Olly Hassell/SWpix.com)

 (Olly Hassell/SWpix.com)

This lack of coverage was questioned in the lead-up to the events, with one fan asking under a cyclocross-themed British Cycling Instagram post: “Is the British National Championships being televised/streamed live anywhere?”

“You have to livestream it manually by going to Gravesend,” another sarcastically replied.

And that, bizarrely, was how it turned out, after a young teenage ‘cross fan named Kirstie filmed the races from the side of the course as part of a YouTube livestream, attracting thousands of viewers in the process.

“BC have really dropped the ball on this,” wrote cycling writer Katy Madgwick during the races, while another fan said: ““Well done Kirstie, all kudos to you. Farcical by BC though. Not sure how the sport is meant to ignite fires and grow if there’s no live coverage anywhere.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

50 comments

Avatar
ragtag | 1 week ago
4 likes

I'll look forward to road.cc coverage from all the National Trophy Cyclo-cross races next season. I'm sure you can send a reporter and photographer to cover all races, over both days with in-depth coverage, interviews and analysis. It didn't cost much.

Why wouldn't you go? Surely the British series deserves respect and the promotion of young talent. Or perhaps your just a cheap tabloid outlet that only covers cyclocross when something funny or salacious comes up on your radar so you can get clicks and comments on Facebook with inaccurate headlines about being sexist.

Checking your history of articles, you seemed to have published nothing. Not even this year's nats results. Just advertorials for bike tools and lube. Which just about sums you up.

Avatar
Veganpotter replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
1 like

The only coverage they deserve is criticism until they can meet the bare minimum of basic fairness.

Avatar
ragtag replied to Veganpotter | 1 week ago
1 like

You haven't got a clue what you are talking about

Avatar
dubwise replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
3 likes

road.cc like british cycling doesn't give two hoots about CX unless, as you say it is either funny or salacious.

It is the same with coverage of women's racing. One former regular poster highlighted this constantly, I guess she got fed up and hasn't posted for quite some time now.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to dubwise | 1 week ago
3 likes
dubwise wrote:

road.cc like british cycling doesn't give two hoots about CX

The clue there might be in the name...

Avatar
mark1a replied to mdavidford | 1 week ago
4 likes
mdavidford wrote:
dubwise wrote:

road.cc like british cycling doesn't give two hoots about CX

The clue there might be in the name...

Wait a minute, I wonder if there's an associate site that's more focused on off-road topics, including CX...

Aha!

https://off.road.cc/content/feature/2025-uci-cyclo-cross-world-champions...
 

Avatar
ragtag replied to mdavidford | 1 week ago
1 like

But they can "write" this post? Eh? When it suits them - clicks

Avatar
mdavidford replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
1 like

I think you need to get straight what your complaint is. One minute it's that there's not enough coverage; the next it's that there shouldn't be the coverage that there is.

As for 'clicks', well, yes - that's kind of what websites are all about. If they're not getting clicks, then what are they for? And it's far from the most gratuitous form of click-seeking you'll see around here.

Avatar
ragtag replied to mdavidford | 1 week ago
0 likes

I never said that. I said that if road.cc want to do something they are can. They publish stories moaning about lack of coverage yet but do nothing themselves. Stop it with the "clue is in the name" if they post about cx here. If they can publish this story they can cover others, including races in the UK. 

The reason BC seem to have dropped it is that there were not enough viewers, the cost was high and the quality was lacking. But everyone wants to shout, "Why don't you do an expensive thing that few people will watch?" Meanwhile media orgs do nothing.

Off-road has never covered any UK race. It essentially reposts press releases. It publishes an annual, "Everything you need to know about cyclo-cross" and sometimes a story about MVDP winning a race because it's MVDP. 
 

Avatar
mdavidford replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
4 likes
ragtag wrote:

They publish stories moaning about lack of coverage

No - they published a story about other people 'moaning' about lack of coverage.

ragbag wrote:

If they can publish this story they can cover others, including races in the UK.

That doesn't follow at all. Reading a few news feeds and reshaping that into a story for the website requires considerably less resource than it would to provide race reports. Particularly if the governing body doesn't make any coverage or information available to base it on.

Avatar
Simon E replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
2 likes
ragtag wrote:

But they can "write" this post? Eh? When it suits them - clicks

perhaps write something yourself while you're here, whinger.

Avatar
ragtag replied to Simon E | 1 week ago
1 like

I see you want it both ways and resort to abuse. 

Avatar
Simon E replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
3 likes

This site is called road.cc and the mix of news covers many aspects of cycling. Try cyclingnews or PCS if you just want to see results.

And BTW in-depth reporting done properly does in fact cost quite a lot of money.

Avatar
ragtag replied to Simon E | 1 week ago
0 likes

Thanks for confirming the issue. Road.cc decided to cover this story but do nothing to cover the races. The whingers are those complaining about the lack of streaming by BC. Why doesn't a media company pick it up? The rights are sold. That's how this usually works

Avatar
Simon E replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
3 likes

Why is this road.cc's responsibility? It's an independent media outlet that can choose what to report on (within its budget). It's not a branch of BCF or a sponsor/partner.

Every media outlet reports on things, it's why they're called the media. They are not obliged to bring camera crews and stream/broadcast every race they wish to mention.

Were there any rights to sell/buy? Would you be willing to pay to watch it?

Yours is not a constructive argument; as far I can tell it's not even based on any facts. It's merely a pointless whinge.

Avatar
Huw Watkins replied to ragtag | 6 days ago
2 likes

Your criticism is specious.  Road.cc has never purported to be a site that covers racing of any sort in any detail.  They leave it to other sites.

The criticism of BC is valid.  They do nothing to promote or support grass roots racing and their excuse for not taking any elite women is poor.  What are these strict selection criteria?  I haven't seen them stated anywhere.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avatar
Gbjbanjs | 1 week ago
0 likes

British Cycling seem to be completely blind to the sport of cycling and what it means.

Avatar
ragtag replied to Gbjbanjs | 1 week ago
0 likes

Do enlighten us to your achivements and promotion of cycling in the UK

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
3 likes
ragtag wrote:

Do enlighten us to your achivements and promotion of cycling in the UK

Do enlighten us with yours. If you think that refusing to take the British national women's champion to compete in the class in which she is champion in the world championships is in some way promoting and encouraging women's cycling then you are, to paraphrase David Attenborough, either mad or an employee of British Cycling. I cannot think of a single other sport in this country where winning your national championship and satisfying the qualifying criteria would not be sufficient to allow you to represent your country at the world championships. For all your silly whining and attacks on road.cc, you have not produced a single rational argument for why it is not a disgrace for Crees to be blocked from taking a place - a place to which she is entitled by the UCI criteria, let us not forget – at the championships.

Avatar
ragtag replied to Rendel Harris | 1 week ago
0 likes

They obviously didn't satisfy the criteria.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
0 likes
ragtag wrote:

They obviously didn't satisfy the criteria.

BC stated that they want to pick "riders who have the best chance of performing at world championship level or gaining valuable and positive development experience." Crees is national champion, has placed top 20 in three international elite races this year already and is only 24. She clearly has the ability to perform well at WC level and it would obviously be a valuable and positive development experience for her. It's hard to imagine anyone who could be a much better fit for the criteria.

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 1 week ago
1 like

It isn't the first time BC has avoided sending riders to events, even when there have been riders with potential. 

Avatar
ragtag replied to OldRidgeback | 1 week ago
1 like

Do you think BC have a bottomless bag of money? Do you think that CX may have to operate within a predefined budget?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
1 like
ragtag wrote:

Do you think BC have a bottomless bag of money? Do you think that CX may have to operate within a predefined budget?

They could have taken up the places available and told the riders/teams that if they wanted to participate they had to meet their own expenses, couldn't they?

Avatar
ragtag replied to Rendel Harris | 1 week ago
0 likes

IDK why. USA do a funded and a partially-funded place. The issue is that when someone cannot afford it. Do you keep passing it down to people that can? Then it becomes pay to play (if it isn't already). That then opens up more complaints. 

But when it comes down to it this was decided on performance for the year, not for one race. Does budget impact the ability to offer more places? Possibly if not probably. Any organisation has to operate within a buget allocation, to widen that budget you need to justify it with a business case. 

Also, you cannot always take the Nat Champ. You get years in all disciplines when many elite riders will not show up. You can have odd situations where a much lower ranked rider would take a place from a senior elite if you make it certain the national champ goes. It could also spur on more elites to ride nats.

Avatar
Veganpotter replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
3 likes

They have money for 6 figure track bikes and to replace them when they break in accidents. If they can't afford to send a national champion to worlds, it's due to poor spending decisions.

Avatar
ragtag replied to Veganpotter | 1 week ago
0 likes

Lottery funding is for Olymipic medals. Nothing else. 

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to ragtag | 1 week ago
3 likes
ragtag wrote:

Do you think BC have a bottomless bag of money? Do you think that CX may have to operate within a predefined budget?

I'm thinking of the Brazil Olympics. Tre Whyte had financial backing to ride for the UK and didn't need BC to support him. He'd ridden in the international series. But BC blocked him from competing. Why?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to OldRidgeback | 1 week ago
4 likes

And as for "bottomless bags of money" British cycling has an income in excess of £30 million a year, if they can't manage that sufficiently well to afford to pay for our national champion to appear at the world championships when they are taking place less than 80 miles from our shores it's a pretty poor lookout.

Avatar
ktache replied to Rendel Harris | 1 week ago
3 likes

Doesn't the Shell thing give them money to burn?...

Pages

Latest Comments