Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“Mickey Mouse” wiggly cycle lane branded “Balamory from hell” set to be removed next month – to be replaced by loading bays, car parking, and vehicle access

Works are due to commence after the council admitted it “got it wrong” over the controversial seafront cycling scheme, where the two-way cycle lane will now be replaced by a narrower contraflow lane

One of the more controversial active travel schemes of recent years is finally wobbling to its inevitable, costly conclusion, with work set to begin next month to reverse a much-derided seafront cycle lane and “wiggly” road layout which campaigners claimed made the town the “laughingstock of the nation”.

Throughout 2023, North Somerset Council’s changes to Clevedon’s seafront made national headlines, after the area’s sea-facing car parking and two lanes for motorists were removed to make way for two-way cycling infrastructure and a one-way system for drivers which featured an unusual, wavy design, described as one of the UK’s “most bizarre new road schemes” by the RAC.

Despite an initial consultation finding that a majority of residents supported the council’s redevelopment plans, the layout also caused uproar from certain sections of the seaside town, prompting campaigners to hold multiple headline-grabbing protests over what they deemed to be a “Mickey Mouse” design, which had turned Clevedon into “Balamory from hell”.

Soon after the scheme’s unveiling in January 2023, the ‘Save Our Seafront’ campaign – which led a high-profile campaign against the redevelopment and penned a petition to the council attracting over 6,000 signatures – organised a conga line protest demanding action, while a “flash mob” to block the bike lane with cars followed in April.

Faced with constant complaints about the “crazy” design, wavy lines, two-way cycle lane, and loss of parking, along with the protests and national media coverage, the council agreed to hold an independent review into the scheme, which reportedly cost over £1.3 million.

> Controversial wiggly cycle lane with "Mickey Mouse" layout recommended to be ripped out following independent review

The local authority had originally suggested the scheme would improve safety, encourage active travel, and reduce unwanted parking in the town. However, in November 2023, council leader Mike Bell apologised and admitted the project was a “big mistake”.

During the review, infrastructure consulting firm AECOM heard the views of thousands of people, concluding in its recommendations that the two-way cycle lane should be removed and replaced with a contraflow lane on the eastern side of The Beach, the town’s seafront road.

And now, the council has confirmed that this work will take place in mid-February, and is expected to last 12 weeks.

Along with removing the road’s controversial wavy markings and reducing the two-way cycle path to a one-way contraflow design, the work will also restore the previous sea-facing parking, and introduce a coach pick-up and drop-off point, loading bays, and vehicle access to the promenade for boats and food vans.

Clevedon cycle lane protest (Image credit: Justine Willington/Twitter)

However, the one-way system for drivers and 20mph zone will be retained, and the council says pedestrian crossings will be improved and planters repositioned.

The roundabout installed at the junction of Alexandra Road and The Beach will also be adjusted to a standard mini roundabout, after it also attracted complaints for merely comprising a hollow circle.

The council says new road markings and signage will be installed to prevent drivers “falling foul” of the two-year-old one-way system.

“The updates taking place are in line with public feedback gathered over the last two years,” Hannah Young, North Somerset Council’s executive member for highways, said in a statement announcing the layout reversal, which is expected to cost a further £425,000.

Speaking following the review, council leader Bell said the local authority had “got it wrong” on the scheme, and admitted it was a “big mistake”.

“We’ll have to try to find the money, it’s not going to be easy, but we will try to do that,” he said in November 2023. “The big mistake was that we implemented a scheme that wasn’t supported by the community and I’m really sorry that happened.

“We didn’t get the consultation and engagement right, it took place during the Covid pandemic and, as a result, we’ve delivered a scheme that didn’t work for people. We’re under immense financial pressure, as are all councils. I would not wish to be in this position if we could have avoided it.

“But the right thing to do is to try to deliver some changes and deliver a scheme that works for the people of Clevedon and that’s what we’re going to try to do.”

> Senior RAC figure hails "common sense has prevailed" as "bizarre" wiggly cycle lane to be removed

Meanwhile, in the wake of the council’s decision to reverse the controversial road layout, the RAC’s Simon Williams said common sense had “prevailed over the bizarre Clevedon seafront road scheme” and that “locals will now be celebrating that more people will be able to park and enjoy looking at the seas and the historic pier as well as visiting hospitality businesses”.

“Many will also be thinking how so much tax-payers money could have been spent on such a simple scheme, let alone one which turned out to be so deeply unpopular,” Williams told GB News.

“There are also surely questions to be answered as to how this was ever classed as an ‘active travel’ scheme considering how short the cycle lane is. For this reason, we struggle to see how this would ever help to get people out of their cars, which was one of the stated aims of the project.”

However, one local cyclist explained at the time how the row had seen the town become “very anti-cyclist”, while another said the campaigners were “disproportionately vocal” and that their protest was “completely misplaced because people can’t see what the future could be”.

“It’s the car lobby that is ruling the roost and I think that’s wrong,” Howard Parker said. “They have to recognise that if they want parking they’re going to have to park round the corner and that’s not such a big imposition.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
Jerm14 | 5 days ago
3 likes

I quite liked the changes. I liked parking parallel to the road as I have a camper van so could sit with the side door open to the sea. 

On a more serious note, because everyone parked nose to the sea so they could look out, they had no visibility when reversing out of spaces into the path of traffic. I had a couple of near misses when cycling past. 

Avatar
qwerty360 | 6 days ago
1 like

"There are also surely questions to be answered as to how this was ever classed as an ‘active travel’ scheme considering how short the cycle lane is."

Well if we block any small changes on this basis then it becomes impossible to make any changes because noone is going to allow them to rip up the entire towns road network to install cycle lanes everywhere in one go...

Avatar
Bungle_52 replied to qwerty360 | 6 days ago
2 likes

This was the final part of the pier to pier cycle route linking Weston and Clevedon.

https://n-somerset.gov.uk/my-services/parking-travel-roads/transport-tra...

If you look at the map this section is supposed to be traffic free but with the changes that won't be the case any longer if I have understood correctly.

Avatar
HollisJ | 1 week ago
5 likes

Weird. I went there a few weeks ago and all I saw was a cycle lane and plenty of free parking provision next to it, no keeerrraazy wiggly lines. Looks like both cyclists and drivists are bring catered to adequately so i dont understand why changes need to be made and huge sums of money spent.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 1 week ago
2 likes

Silly mistake from the council getting lost in their own bullshit.  Its bad enough trying to reclaim road space from car culture without adding total fripperies like wavey lines which completely distract from the core point.

Avatar
Mr Anderson | 1 week ago
1 like

Looking at the second picture, the silver [Renault] appears to be parked over the new cycle lane.  Did they abandon the new cycle lane and allow parking over it?

Avatar
brooksby replied to Mr Anderson | 1 week ago
2 likes

Maybe that photo is from one of the occasions when Concerned Locals (TM) parked all across it to protest and demonstrate why a cycle lane wasn't needed?

Avatar
brooksby | 1 week ago
3 likes

Quote:

“There are also surely questions to be answered as to how this was ever classed as an ‘active travel’ scheme considering how short the cycle lane is. For this reason, we struggle to see how this would ever help to get people out of their cars, which was one of the stated aims of the project.”

Whilst his first point is actually valid ("how this was ever classed as an ‘active travel’ scheme considering how short the cycle lane is") I think he is wrong on his second point.

By reducing parking spaces on the seafront and stopping people driving there just to sit facing the sea and eating their fish'n'chips* or whatever (as some of the protestors bemoaned being unable to do since the changes) I think that the council meant to make people have a think about how they were travelling and for what purposes.  If you care about the environment then simply "going for a drive" or just driving precisely so you can sit on the seafront and eat fish'n'chips isn't really a good use of your ICE vehicle. IMO.  YMMV.

 

*There isn't a fish and chip shop on Clevedon seafront, as far as I know.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to brooksby | 1 week ago
7 likes

brooksby wrote:

There isn't a fish and chip shop on Clevedon seafront, as far as I know.

Well that's exactly why the parking's needed - how else are they going to get from the chippie to the seafront if they can't drive there?

Avatar
slc replied to mdavidford | 6 days ago
2 likes

mdavidford wrote:

brooksby wrote:

There isn't a fish and chip shop on Clevedon seafront, as far as I know.

Well that's exactly why the parking's needed - how else are they going to get from the chippie to the seafront if they can't drive there?

There is one on the seafront - but you always had to walk to it (from the car park 3 mins walk away...)

Avatar
David9694 | 1 week ago
2 likes

From the council that claims it is struggling to make ends meet in 2024/25.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to David9694 | 1 week ago
4 likes

Perhaps they should offer to become a US state?  If they're building lots more car infra, they're showing willing at least.  They just need to remove all those woke communist rules like speed limits, parking spaces (I'll park where I damn like) and one-way systems - oh, and perhaps throw the place open to robotaxi firms.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to chrisonabike | 1 week ago
2 likes

And report anyone trying to encourage cycling.

Latest Comments