With the jampacked nature of the cyclocross calendar coming under increasing scrutiny in recent week, especially following UCI president David Lappartient’s recent controversial criticism of certain riders skipping World Cup events, it was only a matter of time before one of the men’s sport’s big three weighed in on the debate.
And despite delaying the start of his own cyclocross season until just before Christmas – instead preferring to get the winter miles in on sunny Spanish roads – five-time world ‘cross champion, and current world road race champ, Mathieu van der Poel believes that the current calendar is fine as it is, and shouldn’t be adapted to suit the sport’s multidisciplinary talents.
“I don't think it should be adapted to us,” the Alpecin–Deceuninck rider told Sporza today. “Cross is a separate discipline. We have to adapt to the calendar if we want to cross, not the other way around. I think the current calendar can continue to exist, I have no problem with it.”
> Lance Armstrong’s former boss Johan Bruyneel brands David Lappartient a “dictator” after UCI president threatens to ban cyclo-cross riders who skip World Cup events from world championships
When asked about Lappartient’s threat to ban riders who miss World Cup events from the world championships, Van der Poel, who initially insisted he had “no opinion” on the matter, said: “Anyone can ride the world championships, even if you ride zero races. That’s your right. You don’t have to ride crosses to do that.
“I understand that it is not that fun for [the UCI], but they have somewhat contributed to it themselves. I am not really concerned about it,” he added, echoing Lucinda Brand’s assertion to road.cc that the UCI’s own rules enable multidiscipline riders who don’t commit to a full season of cyclocross to ride the worlds.
(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
The 2023 Paris-Roubaix and Milan-Sanremo winner, notably, also praised rival Eli Iserbyt, the current leader of the World Cup standings, because the Belgian “rides everything and doesn’t really complain”.
> road.cc Podcast: Lucinda Brand and Eli Iserbyt on the future of cyclocross
Meanwhile, when asked whether he was “itching” to get back on the ‘cross bike, the 28-year-old superstar laughed: “I’ve been doing it a little too long for that, and maybe I’m also enjoying it a little too much here in Spain.
“Last week I returned to Belgium for a few days and did one cross training. Today I trained on the beach for the second time here in Spain. My form on the road is good, but that is not always a reference for the cross.
“I will definitely have to be in my best shape at the world championships, whether Wout van Aert and Tom Pidcock are participating or not. I have to be 100 percent.”
Van der Poel also asserted that, despite occasionally hankering for a “quiet winter” in Spain, he will continue to race cyclocross for the foreseeable future, with his eyes firmly set on matching and surpassing Erik De Vlaeminck’s record of seven world championship victories.
Van der Poel outsprints eternal rival Wout van Aert to win the 2023 cyclocross world title, the fifth of his career (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
“It’s one of the reasons why I keep racing,” he says of the record. “Other than that I don’t have many goals in the field. That record is a big challenge, but so is becoming world champion.”
Asked if he has any intention of returning fully to cyclocross in the twilight years of his career, the Dutchman, again laughing, said: “Someday, maybe in the distant future. But it’s certainly not in my mind right now. It’s possible one day, if I can call it venturing out, with some MTB riding in the summer. I still like to do it, but it must continue to be useful.
“If the team thinks that I can reach a better level without ‘cross, then that is something to think about. A quiet winter in Spain would also be nice.
“But I have had my best road season with a ‘cross winter. That's why I’m still doing it. I don’t believe it has a negative effect, certainly not for me. I can always use competition, although it does take energy of course.”
Add new comment
32 comments
Watchdogs 2 (2016) by the way.
Don't know what it was about today, maybe the banks of mist, but I received several weeks of close passes in one day.
Great news about the Reading Station underpass, as I understand it the built it with the ceiling too low for cyclists, but was also too low for pedestrians too. But to ban them would have seemed like madness...
Thing is, whenever I pushed my bike through it, I was the only one. The no cycling roundall has disappeared from the Reading side, still there on the Caversham side though. Be nice if/when they they reinstate the amphitheatre steps on the Reading side.
Given Lapierre have been binned as a supplier and they are based in Dijon does that mean that their bikes no longer cut the mustard at WT level?
👏👏👏👏👏
Gordon in his little chain ring halfway down the block and tagging manufacturers in to his post - what a bell
Do you reckon you could do the Hawaii Ironman triathlon in under 15 hours at the age of 47? Ramsey did, which I think says rather more about his credentials than the fact that you've spotted him in the small chain ring (when you have no idea what he's just ridden up before stopping). He presumably will have tagged the manufacturers because he will have been loaned or comped the bike in return for a few mentions on social media. I'm neither a fan nor a detractor of Mr Ramsey, but why be nasty just for the sake of it?
Because the internet.
Jeremy Vine's apology, at least as sincere and heartfelt as those of Boris, in response to all the people pointing out that he was at fault, not the driver, is well made, and I hope he's learned from it. In any altercation between a cyclist and a driver, the rules of the road are suspended, and it's always the cyclist's fault.
OK, tongue out of cheek, the real question is do those people actually believe that Vine was wrong? If so, should we remove their licence to drive as they clearly aren't intelligent enough to be in charge of a machine that can kill in public.
I looked forward to the new default 20mph limit being brought into Wales, and still support it, but alas I fear it has had the complete opposite of the desired effect for far too many drivers. Instead of everyone slowing down a bit in built up areas, and roads being safer for pedestrians and cyclists, we now instead have SOME drivers slowing down, and many more simply ignoring the 20 limits. I have no data to back it up, but I honestly feel that if anything, a lot of those drivers now go even faster! The new limits have instead turned Wales into a nation of speeders. Already it seems most are now used to ignoring the 20 limit, and have come to the conclusion that if they are speeding anyway, they may as well speed properly! In my area there were some 20 zones, which I always respected and quite a lot of drivers did, but now the 20 zone signs have gone, people are often driving faster through them than they used to. For now at least there simply isn’t any enforcement either, so it relies entirely on the driver to ‘do the right thing’, but we all know how that usually works out.
That's a ridiculous claim. Are you a headline writer for Wales Online?
Have you checked vehicle speeds in lots of towns and cities around Wales since the new limits were introduced or is this just based on some local streets where you live?
The places I've experienced it have all felt safer after its introduction. Most drivers I've seen are driving slower, though are a minority who don't give a shit and will drive like selfish bastards anyway, just as they did before.
Enforcement would be great but that costs money and, along with a lot of other things, central government doesn't seem to want councils and police forces to do.
I drive through Glaslyn regularly and there is no legal reason for drivers to slow down as it's pretty straight with good sight lines and a 60 mph limit. There have been homemade 'slow down' signs at either end of the village for over a year [street view] but I doubt they make any difference. Nearby Pentrefoelas has a 40 mph limit and there has been a dummy in a hi-viz jacket propped up against a pole for a number of years in an attempt to get drivers to slow down.
Bonus info - not that this changes "but this is what I see on my journeys" or "it feels much worse!":
BBC has an article covering the initial review after a week and some data (only two locations) a month on - both showing a reduction and specifically a reduction of the fastest speed group. (Here's a document on the original research carried out just after the change).
If people didn't check them already the Senedd had a couple of articles reviewing the situation pre-changes for good background, plus various articles tackling queries (e.g. here one addressing "but journey times will massively increase!").
The immutable law of cycle infrastructure is that any new facility will always be described by the anti-cycling mob as 'a death trap' or 'an accident waiting to happen'.
This is faux concern for the safety of people on bikes, and used as a smokescreen for opposing all cycle improvements.
They do not want better designs, they want no cycle infrastructure at all.
What they fail to understand is that sharing busy roads with motor vehicles is 'a death trap' and 'an accident waiting to happen'.
Indeed. If not unexpected concern for those cycling then it's sudden interest in the welfare of those with disabilities, visual impairments, the old, the children, emergency services... Strangely such considerations don't generate any noise when we're failing to provide adequate footways or crossings. Or for failures to get on top of businesses using the footway / cycle way to store stuff, or pavement parking / blocking non-motorised access ...
It's selective concern.
I live over here in Colchester. That line is truly awful. Its contraflow against the bus lane. The difficulty is road with this set by the railway bridge. You will have noted CCC's Will Bramil wasn't particularly pro it either.
I did go past it last night. Couldn't really tell what it will be like, but I'd only use it for going south.
Be interested to see the ease of joining if you come from mile end road.
That bus layby in Colchester has always been a dogs breakfast, even as a pedestrian crossing the road there it's clunky, I doubt adding the cycle bit makes it any worse than it already is.
But its what you get if you build a major out of town retail park, next to the main train station, hooked off the main northern approach road off the A12 into Colchester, just invites traffic chaos and wont ever be a pleasant or safe area to cycle.
We are talking about a village that is less than 1km long. Slowing down to a reasonable village speed (20mph) from an illegal 70mph would cost drivers about a minute.
Ask any reasonable human whether they would rather be 1 minute late or risk killing a child?
Asking a reasonable human is not the same as asking a car driver.
Car drivers aren't the problem - unreasonable people are ( let's not slip into the same tribal thoughts as others do)
Although it's easy to ignore an unreasonable pedestrian (or unreasonable cyclists), an unreasonable driver can cause a lot of harm.
It's not the reasonable ones who are the problem
Ask the reasonable ones, tell the unreasonable ones through peoper enforcement.
After retirement I had a short time as a lollipop man, most drivers were OK but every day some would ignore me as I stood in the road with the 'stop' sign and drive through, on one occasion hitting a child a glancing blow.
Plus there was the one who used the pavement to pass standing traffic forcing children to jump out of the way.
The lollypop pole should have a knurled steel ball on the bottom, and it should be 100% legal for a lollypop man or woman to scratch the precious paintwork of naughty drivers.
We could start making part of the Royal Marines Commandoes and SAS retirement and repatriation program being a lollypop man for a while. Allows them to reintegrate into civilian life in a way that makes them super conneted with the society they spent their lives protecting and makes sure nobody, ever, fucks with a lollypop man.
"Bollard man", maybe?
FTFY
<Gandalf> You shall not pass!</Gandalf>
A couple of things bothered me about this story.
On a single carrageway road I think it will be the national speed limit sign. For vans with a laden weight of more than 2.05t that would be 50mph - many of the large crew cabbed trucks are actually already over 2.05t before loading so automatically fall in to this category (not that you would ever know if you see them on the road).
In Scotland goods vehicles over 7.5t would be limited to 40mph. I'm surprised that Wales have not adopted this.
Can the Welsh government really be responsible for the signs (serious question)? In England it would be National Highways and I would assume they work to rules regarding the placement of signs prescribed by the DfT & therefore UK government. Have Wales changed this?
In circumstances like this, I can't see why the local council cant place a chicane at the limits of the village. Add in a speed bump and that should slow drivers down sufficiently. There are dozens of roads I see like this all over where some drivers will just plough on without slowing for the few moments it takes to pass through with zero regard for locals. This type of infrastructure is cheap and easy to implement. Even a few large planters with a 30 limit on them would be something.
Pages