With the jampacked nature of the cyclocross calendar coming under increasing scrutiny in recent week, especially following UCI president David Lappartient’s recent controversial criticism of certain riders skipping World Cup events, it was only a matter of time before one of the men’s sport’s big three weighed in on the debate.
And despite delaying the start of his own cyclocross season until just before Christmas – instead preferring to get the winter miles in on sunny Spanish roads – five-time world ‘cross champion, and current world road race champ, Mathieu van der Poel believes that the current calendar is fine as it is, and shouldn’t be adapted to suit the sport’s multidisciplinary talents.
“I don't think it should be adapted to us,” the Alpecin–Deceuninck rider told Sporza today. “Cross is a separate discipline. We have to adapt to the calendar if we want to cross, not the other way around. I think the current calendar can continue to exist, I have no problem with it.”
> Lance Armstrong’s former boss Johan Bruyneel brands David Lappartient a “dictator” after UCI president threatens to ban cyclo-cross riders who skip World Cup events from world championships
When asked about Lappartient’s threat to ban riders who miss World Cup events from the world championships, Van der Poel, who initially insisted he had “no opinion” on the matter, said: “Anyone can ride the world championships, even if you ride zero races. That’s your right. You don’t have to ride crosses to do that.
“I understand that it is not that fun for [the UCI], but they have somewhat contributed to it themselves. I am not really concerned about it,” he added, echoing Lucinda Brand’s assertion to road.cc that the UCI’s own rules enable multidiscipline riders who don’t commit to a full season of cyclocross to ride the worlds.
(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
The 2023 Paris-Roubaix and Milan-Sanremo winner, notably, also praised rival Eli Iserbyt, the current leader of the World Cup standings, because the Belgian “rides everything and doesn’t really complain”.
> road.cc Podcast: Lucinda Brand and Eli Iserbyt on the future of cyclocross
Meanwhile, when asked whether he was “itching” to get back on the ‘cross bike, the 28-year-old superstar laughed: “I’ve been doing it a little too long for that, and maybe I’m also enjoying it a little too much here in Spain.
“Last week I returned to Belgium for a few days and did one cross training. Today I trained on the beach for the second time here in Spain. My form on the road is good, but that is not always a reference for the cross.
“I will definitely have to be in my best shape at the world championships, whether Wout van Aert and Tom Pidcock are participating or not. I have to be 100 percent.”
Van der Poel also asserted that, despite occasionally hankering for a “quiet winter” in Spain, he will continue to race cyclocross for the foreseeable future, with his eyes firmly set on matching and surpassing Erik De Vlaeminck’s record of seven world championship victories.
Van der Poel outsprints eternal rival Wout van Aert to win the 2023 cyclocross world title, the fifth of his career (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
“It’s one of the reasons why I keep racing,” he says of the record. “Other than that I don’t have many goals in the field. That record is a big challenge, but so is becoming world champion.”
Asked if he has any intention of returning fully to cyclocross in the twilight years of his career, the Dutchman, again laughing, said: “Someday, maybe in the distant future. But it’s certainly not in my mind right now. It’s possible one day, if I can call it venturing out, with some MTB riding in the summer. I still like to do it, but it must continue to be useful.
“If the team thinks that I can reach a better level without ‘cross, then that is something to think about. A quiet winter in Spain would also be nice.
“But I have had my best road season with a ‘cross winter. That's why I’m still doing it. I don’t believe it has a negative effect, certainly not for me. I can always use competition, although it does take energy of course.”
Add new comment
32 comments
My village has a speed table thing - full width of the road - and that does slow down motorists a bit.
But someone thought to double up by putting two speed humps (one in the middle of each lane) and those are so small that even a normal car (not an SUV) can be driven happily over them with a wheel track on each side, so no need to slow down …
On their own and like the ones you mention do nothing. Thats why I suggest a chicane. One with a priority in one particular direction over the other. A speed bump that means you need to properly slow down, will do something. I dount any form of road calming will stop everyone but enough to reduce the volume has to be considered.
I personally would stick up speed cameras. The way they are used should be changed. If they are just a money making thing so what? let them, so long as its invested in repairs or improvements. You get a fine and points, that your fault - not the cameras.
Pages