Just like that grim early spring in the late 2000s, when my 17-year-old self would play 90 minutes every Saturday, before pinning a number on my back and racing my bike the following day, football and cycling have come into conflict in Cardiff, where a park pitch has been temporarily removed for eight months to make way for construction work on a new bike path.
But this time, it’s the councillors and local residents doing the screaming, and not my poor, battered legs.
Work began this week on the first phase of Cardiff’s Roath Park cycleway, which will see the installation of a new segregated bike path around the recreational ground, along with improved cycle crossings, footpaths, junctions, and bus stops. Cardiff Council says the work constitutes the first phase of its wider plans to improve cycle and pedestrian accessibility in the area and create a city-wide bike network.
“This scheme is a significant investment into cycling and walking routes in this part of the city, providing better facilities for recreational cyclists, as well as those that want to go shopping, go to work, or go to school,” the local authority’s Cabinet Member for Strategic Planning and Transport Dan De’Ath said in a statement.
“The council is committed to improving cycling and walking routes across the city and this scheme is a further step towards developing a city-wide, segregated cycle network, that will interconnect with public transport routes, to provide a credible alternative to travelling by private car.”
However, the news that the construction of the cycleway – which is expected to last eight months – will lead to the temporary loss of one of Roath Park’s four sports pitches hasn’t gone down too well with some locals.
Cardiff Council has said that all matches that currently take place in Roath Park can be accommodated on the remaining three pitches, which have already been reconfigured, while football league secretaries were informed in September that one pitch would be removed, before being reinstated once the work is complete.
Not that that explanation has appeased the usual suspects, however, who claim they were “blindsided” by the brief removal of a solitary football pitch (despite the council noting the plans to reduce the number of playing fields – albeit without clarifying whether the move would be permanent – in a July 2023 consultation report).
“At the very least, the council has badly handled the communications around this... The information has come out in a very haphazard manner,” Penylan councillor Rodney Berman told WalesOnline, after the local authority confirmed that the fourth pitch would, in fact, be reinstated.
> Footballers who cycle XI — the Premier League stars who love life on two wheels
Berman added that a “confusing reason” had been provided for reducing the pitches, claiming that the consultation report “suggested it was to move the [cycle route and footpath further into the playing field] away from the trees on the roadside, but now we’re being told that it’s about facilitating the construction phase.”
Meanwhile, Penylan resident Jeremy Sparkes said: “It seems that the council is prepared to sacrifice our public open space, doing the bare minimum legally in terms of notice and consultation.
“I think Covid has shown us more than anything how important open space is to communities and I think it’s really damaging that the council has not taken that on board.”
Meanwhile, over on the always-balanced debating space of Twitter, Rich Lewis wrote: “Surely it would have been better to schedule these works over the winter months, not with the spring and summer forthcoming when the Rec is at its busiest and used for several different sports?”
> Cycling group's "real concern" over "minor lake" and huge puddles on city cycle lanes
Although Louis provided a pretty foolproof explanation as to why the cycleway works should start as soon as possible: “Looking forward to a safe route down Ninian Road. Scary place to cycle.”
“I’m personally looking forward to this expansion of the cycling network. Long overdue,” added another Twitter user.
But, but, but, what about the football pitch that’s not actually needed and will be back in October, anyway? Won’t anyone think of the fourth superfluous football pitch?
Add new comment
21 comments
Whatever the UAE is 'sports washing' it is nothing compared to the crimes Israel has committed in the past 5 months and the past 7 decades. And before anyone mentions the hostages consider the thousands of Palestinian hostages held in Israel (and the tens of thousands held over the past 5 decades) - why do politicians never agitate for their release? https://www.btselem.org/topic/administrative_detention
Interesting article from Bloomberg esp. if you're in the metropolis
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-23/london-bike-boom-risks-becoming-a-victim-of-its-own-success
Thanks - it's not nothing and for sure there will be bikelash. It's also possible it's less reducing car trips and more people changing mode from from walking / public transport.
However early in the article this is all put into perspective:
They also note that while it's not just white MAMILs it's still more men. I think in more advanced cycling cities the proportions get closer to equal (in NL I believe more journeys on bike are made by women than by men).
By Laura Laker.
Re the cycle access to pedestrianised zone. WHen will petty councils get over the idea that all cyclists are red light jumping axe murderers, and car drivers fluffy kittens? A quick look at the Killed / Injured stats would indicate that the mayhem and slaughter is done TO pedestrians and cyclists. By fluffy kitten car drivers.
You're correct, but probably preaching to the converted.
the mayhem and slaughter is done TO pedestrians and cyclists. By fluffy kitten car drivers
It's not quite that- the police (and councils etc.) believe that drivers are hard-working, hard-pressed, otherwise law abiding (because all the other offences they have committed have retained the staus of 'alleged offences' as far as the legal system is concerned because they didn't actually get to a court, so the police can report 'no previous offences) people just trying to make a living- whereas cyclists are (as you say) trouble-making, red-light jumping layabouts who cause pollution and traffic jams who should get a job and buy a proper respectable mode of transport if they don't like the present road environment
Let me just take you out with my rear carrier that I forgot I had.
Pretend cyclist vs actual cyclist.
The worst of both worlds.
Rock strike to blame for De Gendt's blowout.
A rock strike would snake bite an inner tube, and on a hooked tubeless setup may or may not have any air loss at all. Even if it did, in all instances, the hook would most likely retain the bead for long enough for the rider to maintain control, get safely out of the way of everyone else and pull to the side. Somehow, I don't think that the tyre/wheel system was completely absolvent.
Supple road tyres stretch too much to not require extra security on the bead interface. The new ETRTO standard 4mm rule was also in breach even if the older standards were originally met. Perhaps the ETRTO rules need to go further on tolerances and anything that doesn't pass the new system can't be verified as safe for a hookless system.
If that means thousands of wheels are no longer compliant so be it.
Conservative county councillors Donna Ford and Michael Waine, however, have urged the council to hold a full consultation before beginning a trial.
Knowing full well that the consultation would 90% against. But they don't want the scheme because it's for cyclists, so want to scupper it before the trial which will probably show that it works well.
Can we have a full consultation before building any more roads? Did we have a full consultation before the utter fiasco of HS2? No, the tories only want them on cycle schemes.
It reminds me of the Simple Sabotage Field Manual (See https://www.openculture.com/2022/01/read-the-cias-simple-sabotage-field-manual.html for a discussion and the manual is available here: https://www.hsdl.org/c/abstract/?docid=750070) where one of the best techniques is to keep questioning and asking for more meetings and reviews to completely stall any progress without it looking like you oppose the organisation.
e.g.
“If the scheme goes ahead I do not believe that the county council would be able to safeguard pedestrians”
Given that logic, surely all plans for roads should be shelved as authorities would not (going by historical experience) be able to safeguard pedestrians FROM DRIVERS.
I'll hold my breath.
"Raging Arnaud De Lie blames race organiser’s car for causing crash..."
should be
"Raging Arnaud De Lie blames race organiser’s driver for causing crash..."
http://rc-rg.com
Approximate guide to how much public open space has been closed off in Cardif in relation to the other open space available. Can't wait for this cycleway to be complete.
Arnaud not doing himself any favours there.
"In 2020, the Government consulted on options to tackle #PavementParking. We still haven't had a response. Clear pavements need clear laws! Help keep the pressure on by signing this petition"
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/642947
Signed it.
Thanks for the link which I've also sent to my local councillor who I have complained to in the past with no change evident yet.
I watched this live yesterday on Eurosport. He just fell off his bike, no one touched him or was anywhere nearer to him than could be expected in a race. After a bike change following a mechanical/crash, he was faffing around with his garmin just before the corner and then fell off. We didn't see how his first mechanical/crash happend, only the aftermath, so it's possible that the first mechanical/crash is where he felt the organiser's car was a problem.
I agree, if he is referring to the second crash then saying "stealing a victory from me" shows a spectacular lack of self-awareness and over-confidence that I can't even comprehend.
Absolutely no one's fault except his own but sure...why not blame everyone else for it.