The road racing season may only be underway, but it seems like every new week ushers in another piece of bad news for the domestic British domestic scene.
Because, while hope remains for the swift return of the Tours of Britain this year (especially after a four-day women’s stage race popped up on the UCI calendar last week) below that elite level races are continuing to struggle in the face of some pretty desperate financial and logistical headwinds.
> Four-day Women’s WorldTour stage race appears on UCI calendar after British Cycling commits to planning event
Yesterday, Cardiff Ajax CC announced that its well-respected early season National B race, the Betty Pharoah Memorial – which for 2024 was hoping to feature its inaugural women’s race – has been cancelled, after entries closed on Sunday with fewer than half of the spaces for both events filled.
“It’s with deep disappointment that I’ve had to make the decision to cancel this year’s race,” Rob Warren, organiser of the Cowbridge-based race (won by a certain Geraint Thomas as a junior way back in 2004), wrote on social media yesterday.
“It’s a difficult decision and not one that any event organiser wants to make. I’ve had conversation with BC race officials, NEG, and Reg Pharoah, whose late wife the race is in memory of. Sadly we’re all in agreement that this is the right call.
“A lot of time and energy has already gone in to organising this year’s race from me personally and other stakeholders, but that’s not been enough.”
He continued: “The reasons that lead to this decision are numerous but the main two are entries and costs. We don’t even have half a field in either of the races. The anticipated costs of staging the event are around £5k. With current entries we’re not even covering half of that.
“If we ignore the finances we simply don’t have enough entries to make the race viable as a sporting challenge or to ensure the safety of riders.
“We’ll strive to find an answer to this big downturn in entry. A few years ago at this time I was sending the dreaded declined entry email to over 150 riders. If we can make changes to make the race viable, e.g. date, format, or another element, we will, and we’ll try again.”
In the wake of the Betty Pharoah Memorial’s cancellation, local racing site the British Continental tweeted that another race organiser had told them that changes to British Cycling’s entry system – namely the need for riders to pay up front for a spot, and only receiving a refund if their entry is declined due to the race being oversubscribed – have led to entries dropping across the country.
“Payment leaving the riders bank the day they enter and getting a refund if they don’t get in rather than the money leaving if they get selected,” the organiser reportedly told the site, who noted that the change “means that riders are forced to enter races late as they cannot afford to enter multiple races in advance, which in turn creates huge uncertainty and worry for organisers”.
However, Cardiff Ajax CC replied to British Cycling, writing: “That is one factor for sure but I’m told that’s due to financial regulations and not BC’s choice.”
> "Unfortunately you can't control every idiot on the road": Road race organiser frustrated as cyclists almost hit by "inconsiderate" Uber driver
So, how do we solve a problem like early payments putting riders off entering races? While some have speculated that racers could simply register an interest in an event, or put down a deposit, before paying in full closer to the time, others noted that any lack of financial commitment will do little to give organisers – already buckling under an increasing monetary strain – the necessary reassurance that their race can go ahead safely.
Meanwhile, two weeks ago Team Spectra Racing general manager Gina Ball noted on Twitter that the rising entry fees of National A races – with some hitting £50 plus admin fees – were hindering cycling’s accessibility in the UK.
Last week, road.cc spoke with British Cycling, who told us that rising fees were a necessary, and unfortunate, consequence of the increasing difficulties of holding a bike race in the UK, and that the governing body was working on making racing affordable for both organisers and competitors.
We’re hoping to have a more in-depth discussion with British Cycling over the coming days on the future of the domestic scene, along with Britain’s national tours, so stay tuned for that…
Add new comment
34 comments
If you think cycling entry fees are steep, look at tri fees....
That doesn't help much I know.
Perhaps you could talk to a couple of event managers and see what the costs are to stage an event of different sizes. Have a semi formal untimed group event, a smaller event, perhaps a TT. and a larger one that requires timer, timing systems, officials and the lot. Plus advertising for the event.
In the US many larger events have to have police presence. (Cops aren't cheap.) Take away a lane of traffic for a period of time and the costs go up. Event insurance, even with signed disclaimers adda to to the cost. Any fees for national organizations for sponsorship. A brief accounting of the costs might help.
I don't know the practice in England but many events also have some kind of goody bag from sponsors and many times a commemerative t-shirt. Also adding to the cost.
Whilst WMP have gone in a positive direction it seems that the Met police have gone the other way.
I used to have about 75% or more of my reports actioned with an NIP.
That was prior to 2022.
Since then, for identically comparable incidents I'd be lucky to get 10% of them actioned.
The MET police used to be good (ish). I agree, now they just send a standard, noncommittal reply and if you chase it up they either ignore it or get snarky.
But would you want to open that can of coke, given the state of British roads?
Save it for the Tour podium
No need to watch Le Semyn now, saved me a couple of hours, cheers guys!
I organise a Regional A races, have done for about 8 years. Both our races were oversubscribed, but in the last 2 or 3 years, the numbers have been falling away.
I tihnk this is partly due to compression in Categories, with decent 4th Cats struggling to get points and 3rd Cat being a parking place for very handy riders, so even younger, newly promoted riders are hitting a wall, getting tired of their legs being ripped off and buggering off to go gravel riding.
More likely, is the sheer cost. We charge £27, and for that, I need at least 70 riders just to cover the costs. NEG are fantastic, they barely charge us, but once we add in Accredited Marshalls, which can be £500 in mileage, British Cycling Levies, first aid, hall hire, prize money and misc we are reaching £1,500.
I also find that even if the race is launched 4 months prior, it seems that we limp towards 25 riders, with the rest piling in during the week before. That's a big stress, because I have to make a judgement call as to whether to go ahead and lose money, or cancel and yet another long standing, well regarded race hits the skids.
I have had push back at the £27 charged, and that has only just increased from the £25 we charged for several years.
Firstly, let me thank you for your efforts in promoting races, without people like you we would have no events to enter.
Although you are trying to hold down prices I remember paying £5 to enter an event when I first started racing and that is 45 years ago, general prices have gone up much more than race prices over that period and with the recent high inflation over the last couple of years it would seem to me that £50 is more like an equivalent price to when I started. Riders will always complain about the price but they need to recognise that they are not professional yet and need to pay for their sport. When I started out a decent race bike including custom built frame could be had for around £250, how many of today's racers are using bikes worth less than £2500, that shows what inflation is doing to prices and racers should realize this.
I think you get a lot more bike for £2500 now than you would have got for £250 though. I too can remember when you enter a race for a £5, and £50 seems a huge amount to me.
A quick run with an inflation calculator (see BoE's for a good example) suggests that £5 45 years ago would only be ~£20 today. So it seems likely that the cost of running races has significantly outstripped general inflation. I guess H&S/Marshalls/mileage etc have all gone up a lot in addition to the general increase in staffing required to keep even a rolling road-block functional with traffic nowadays.
If £250 really got you a custom built frame, you were quids in back then! You can barely by any frames for less than £7-800 nowadays because OEM only want to sell full bikes!
An RPI comparison between Feb 1979 and Feb 2024 shows an increase of over 7 times, not quite my 10 times but it would still support a race price of £35 and that is without considering the extra features that are expected today, we rarely had motorcycle outriders to block junctions and even changing rooms/showers were rare.
The Reynolds 531DB frame was £100, and the extra £150 got you a lot of quality components including Campag record hubs, Mavic rims, Sun tour superbe gears, TTT bars and stem. All in all it was much closer to what the pro riders used at that time than most today. Standard way to get a race bike in those days was to get a frame from a builder you liked and build it yourself with components you wanted/could afford, I would love to still be able to do that today but as you say frames are priced ridiculously compared with a full build.
Could pricing entry at £30 with early entry discount at £25 help to get riders to commit and reduce complaints?
Aaaahh. Cycling is again problematic. Because cars.
Standard (Liege).
"..This formula is a hit in Australia and Scandinavia because it is the expression of freedom, fun, and safety.”
what freedom is there ? Freedom is getting on your bike and riding it. It's not freedom to have to travel somewhere so you can ride a bike because as sure as sh*t stinks and God made little green apples, there isn't going to be a gravel track within easy reach of most peoples neighbourhoods.
Fun - if your idea of fun is driving somewhere so you can ride your bike.
Safety ? for whom - ah - the cyclists of course. It's cheaper to corral them than it is to educate, train, monitor and enforce safety rules on all those nice car drivers.
Certainly a prime example of the Peter Principle if Tom Van Damme really is the chair of Belgian Cycling..
You think God made apples? That's so cute
Whilst I'm sad for Sicily, I'm glad (hopefully) for Abruzzo...
Abruzzo, like Le Marche, (just north) are relatively 'undiscovered' parts of Italy. Italy, apart from the Po valley is very rocky and mountainous - so the scenery is spectacular even 100s of kilometres from the Alps.
It would be interesting to see if the were a correlation between the rise in platforms like Zwift and the decline in participation in non-elite level races. I have no idea where I'd find the numbers though.
Possibly there is. I do see a clear zwift effect in some ways. I live near an outdoor velodrome that runs evening road bike sessions in winter. Attendance is well down on what it used to be.
On the other hand I know anecdotally (friends of friends) of a couple of people who were fairly casual cyclists before they got Zwift and enjoyed the racing on there so much that they joined clubs and now race TTs (as well as still racing on Zwift).
Exactly. It's never clear cut. I much prefer riding outside when possible, even in prolonged rain (the right kit makes it more than bearable) but there are times when (especially with the state of UK roads) that it's no longer safe. So many rural roads are flooding more than ever, the pothole epidemic seems to be worsening all the time, and overnight conditions always leave the thinnest layer of frost and ice that can cause unrideable conditions.
Also modern life is so time crunching the faff of putting on winter kit to ride outdoors and making sure you leave enough time to wash your bike down afterwards leaves little time for a meaningful ride.
For me, if I want a hour ride of an evening, but by the time I've put the kids to bed, done stuff around the house and what not it's already 9pm and if I try to go outdoors in wet conditions, it will be at least 9:20 by the time I even head out the door. Then am I really going to want to start washing my bike at 10:30 when I get back? Whereas I can be on the trainer in less than 10 minutes, and a quick flannel wash afterwards means I'm in bed by that time.
So aTV screen over fresh air l I thought cycling was to take you outside away from the TV or whatever you want to call that screen
During the first lockdown, I got used to racing on Zwift, cos there were no races, really fell in love with it. All my outdoor riding was just that, again I loved it. Just nice bike rides. A reminder of why I started cycling all those years ago. Now I race all through winter on Zwift (Sept - May), in team events (WTRL ZRL), the solo Zwift monthly racing series and solo time trials. In the summer I just enjoy riding my bike. It's brilliant. I look back on my racing and think what a waste of time and money it all was. All that getting up early, driving for a few hours to race for 40 mins in a crit race, 25 minutes in a 10TT or a couple of hours in a road race. When the race was over, I was tired, often cold, wet, miserable and miles away from home. With Zwift there's none of that. When the race is over, you're already at home, 30 seconds away from a cup of tea and a hot shower. It's win win with Zwift. All my racing for 130 quid a year, no bad weather, no travelling and the whole summer to just ride my bike.
I can definitely see the attraction. I spent enough years getting up at stupid o'clock at the weekends, travelling somewhere far away, then sitting in the cold/wind/rain waiting for a race to start, racing, hoping that I might be able to find somewhere to get changed into something warm, more standing about in the cold/wind/rain waiting for everyone else to finish and then travelling back home. You could almost waste a whole weekend on one short race.
The BC fees and costs of putting on an amateur race are just too high for event organizers. Combine that with the amount of red tape around organizing races these days and it makes it very prohibitive.
5 years ago there were road races every week during the season - now there are just a handful a season.
What races are left are on purpose-built courses which gets a bit dull.
There are however increasing amounts of races that use alternative organisations to British cycling.
Petrol snorting BC not looking after Grassroots cycling? Say it aint so?
Sportives cost even more, looks like £50+ is the going rate now. I'm not necessarily saying that's a rip-off, more just a sign of the times.
Is it just me or is BC facing an identity crisis? The success of delivering the super world champs last year, with good results from its athletes, a promising year ahead with a focus on the Olympic events. But at the same time, below international level elite racing, there is growing discontent, with increasing costs and seemingly less in return for the money.
I can't find any figures, but it would interesting to know how membership numbers are changing year on year. My instinctual guess would be static, maybe slightly rising commuter level membership but much greater losses in lower level racing membership.
Edit: Thanks folks, so the increase in everyday people getting out on bikes is increasing cycling UK's base level membership numbers and BC must be losing subscriptions hand over fist across the board
I think they're down across the piece, for two reasons.
Firstly they don't shout loudly about how great the numbers of members are anymore.
Secondly the whole declining membership revenues thing was what pushed them down the path to Shell sponsorship, which ended up costing them even more members.
Massively down at the commuter level coz they dont give a shit about us, and are sponsored by Shell unlike say Cycling UK....
Plus the "dont ride on queens funeral" debacle.
Pages