“Can’t you all stop driving in such large groups?”: Cyclists blast Royal Parks for advising them to “not ride in large groups”; Power Rangers-esque “ball bike” fails to impress cyclists; Pidcock shows off MTB skills on road bike + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
“Take it on the road and hit a godforsaken pothole, and tell me how it works”: Power Rangers-esque omnidirectional “ball bike” fails to impress cyclists
The quote sums it all up pretty perfectly doesn’t it?
James Bruton, an IT worker and toy maker turned “robotics expert from Hampshire who builds “stuff” in a secret location, has come up with a bike that looks like it was inspired by not movies like Tron, Blade Runner or Minority Report, but the Power Rangers show.
His goal? To “make videos that people want to click on”.
This engineer designed an omnidirectional ball motorcycle that balances laterally like a Segway and moves in any direction.pic.twitter.com/2fN60dEvDB
— The Figen (@TheFigen_) February 20, 2025
Judging by the millions his videos have garnered on YouTube and Twitter/X, it’d be safe to say that he has succeeded with his latest creation — the ‘ball bike’.
To begin with, its wheels are balls. Giant, red balls. Oh, and they come off the bike if you increase the speed. (Wait, is this all part of Royal Parks’ masterplan?)
“We’ve got some balls which are about 2ft (60cm) in diameter, and they’re driven by omni wheels,” Bruton told the BBC. “I had to order the balls, which took a few months to arrive from the Netherlands, and the motors came from the USA, but if I had the parts in one go, I could probably make the bike again in two to three weeks.”
“Something like this is not a practical form of transport in any way, but it’s had eight million views on YouTube, so it’s done rather well,” he said.
Cyclists on the internet, who in 2025 are rather used to these bizarre innovations popping up after every few months, didn’t seem too impressed by it. One person replied: “Looks cool with fresh ‘wheels’ on a smooth surface indoor floor. Take it on the road and hit a god forsaken pot hole and tell me how well it works.”
The balls do remind me of the red spherical bollards I used to see around Cardiff University campus in my uni days… Perhaps, he could have asked for a few instead of ordering them from the Netherlands?
Tom Pidcock shows off crazy bike handling skills with “a trick only he would attempt on a road bike”
Come on now Tadej — to claim the title of the ‘best cyclist ever’, you need to show us that you can do this too…
Pidcock, having some fun after securing a podium at La Flèche Wallone, showed off his skills by bunny hopping a Scott road bike over a bench, amidst fearful calls of “Please don’t break the bike!”
“How many other riders in the road peloton could do this? This is why we love Tom. Multi-talented,” wrote one person in the Instagram comments. We couldn’t agree more…
Cyclists who kill pedestrians could face life sentences under proposed new ‘dangerous cycling’ law
> Cyclists who kill pedestrians could face life sentences under proposed new ‘dangerous cycling’ law
“Real ciclismo”: Thymen Arensman replies to Twitter post after Tour of the Alps stage win
This young generation of cyclists, hmph, always on their mobile phones!
With Tadej Pogačar setting the precedent of being terminally online and replying to memes on Twitter 15 minutes before the Tour of Flanders in 2023, Thymen Arensman has tried to match up to him, replying on the social media platform after he won the fourth stage of Tour of the Alps.
The 25-year-old Ineos Grenadiers’ rider, who now has an 11 second lead against Michael Storer, thanks to his monstrous performance yesterday, which saw him beat Derek Gee by over a minute.
A Nairo Quintana fan account on Twitter described the events as: “Arensman and Gee were just having a time trial off for 80 kilometres, absolutely brutal,” under which Arensman left the following reply: “Real ciclismo.”
I concur.
Three-quarter drivers feel “some frustration” when driving near cyclists, even more still believe cyclists “must use bike lanes”, reveals survey
More than three years after the Highway Code was updated to improve protections for cyclists, a new survey has revealed that most UK drivers still don’t know the rules – and many continue to hold misconceptions that put vulnerable road users at risk.
The poll of 2,000 motorists by Scrap Car Comparison found that the majority incorrectly believe cyclists must ride single file, stick to the kerb, and use cycle lanes if available. In fact, the Highway Code changes introduced in January 2022 clarified that cyclists are allowed to ride two abreast, can take the centre of the lane on quiet roads or when approaching junctions, and are not required to use a cycle lane.
Despite these updates, 77 per cent of drivers still believe cyclists must use dedicated lanes, 65 per cent think they must ride as far left as possible, and more than half believe single-file riding is mandatory. Only 34 per cent correctly recognised that cyclists are allowed to take up a full lane.
The confusion appears to go hand-in-hand with negative attitudes. Nearly three-quarters of drivers said they feel at least some frustration when driving near cyclists, rising to 81 per cent among 17 to 24-year-olds.
Even among those who identify as both drivers and cyclists, 64 per cent admitted to feeling annoyed when they come across someone riding a bike. Nervousness is also widespread, particularly among younger drivers and women, with three-quarters of respondents saying they sometimes or often feel uneasy when driving near cyclists.
While 96 per cent of drivers claimed they give cyclists the recommended 1.5-metre passing distance, 47 per cent admitted to having experienced a near miss – suggesting many may overestimate their road awareness or misjudge safe passing distances.
The survey also highlighted a deeper issue around entitlement to road space. One in three drivers said they didn’t believe cyclists should have equal rights on the road, despite the Highway Code’s clear hierarchy that prioritises those most at risk.
Scrap Car Comparison used the results to rank the UK’s least bike-friendly cities, based on frustration levels, overtaking behaviour, and knowledge gaps. Sheffield topped the table, followed by Newcastle and Leeds. Belfast was ranked the most cycle-friendly, despite long-running concerns about its cycling infrastructure.
Interestingly, the survey also found that drivers of certain car brands – including Mazda, Mercedes-Benz and Seat – were more likely to express negative views about cyclists and scored lowest on Highway Code knowledge.
Massive influx of responses from residents forces council to extend consultation for major bus and cycle lane plans
Leeds City Council has extended the deadline for public feedback on plans to overhaul a key city junction featuring cycle lanes, after receiving a huge response from residents.
The consultation on improvements to the A58 Roundhay Road and Barrack Road junctions – an area known locally as the ‘Bayswater Triangle’ – was due to close on April 20. However, with more than 670 responses received, the council has now extended the consultation until the end of April to give more people the chance to have their say.
The proposed plans aim to tackle serious safety concerns at the junctions with Bayswater Road, Spencer Place, Roseville Road and Gledhow Road. Upgrades include new segregated bus and cycle lanes along the route, as well as improved pedestrian crossings, in an effort to make the area safer for everyone.
Councillor Jonathan Pryor previously highlighted the urgency of the project, pointing out that 35 per cent of casualties along the corridor over the last seven years involved people walking or cycling. In total, 71 collisions were recorded, resulting in 90 casualties, including one fatality and 14 serious injuries. Pryor said the proposals are designed to enhance safety for all road users while easing congestion and improving bus services, and stressed the importance of public input in shaping the final designs.
The £4.5 million scheme is set to be funded by the West Yorkshire-plus Transport Fund’s Corridor Improvement Programme, subject to final approvals. It is being delivered in partnership with the West Yorkshire Combined Authority and forms part of Leeds City Council’s broader Vision Zero 2040 initiative, which aims to eliminate road deaths and serious injuries across the city by 2040.
The consultation remains open until April 30, with feedback continuing to shape the future of one of Leeds’ most dangerous junctions.
Witness me! Mad Max-style “Apocalyptic” bike (filled with non-perishable groceries)
Kudos to Sam and Willow, makers of this sick build. Just as Immortan Joe (from an alternate bike universe) would say: “Once again, I send off my War Rig to bring back from CO2 canisters from Gas Town.”
Michael Storer snatches GC victory from Thymen Arensman, as Decathlon-AG2R La Mondiale secure 1-2 stage finish with Nicolas Prodhomme and Paul Seixas
Tudor Pro Cycling’s Michael Storer delivered a decisive performance on the final day of the Tour of the Alps, reclaiming the green jersey from Ineos Grenadiers’ Thymen Arensman to secure overall victory in Lienz.
In front of the GC battle, Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale teammates Nicolas Prodhomme and Paul Seixas, both part of the day’s breakaway, capitalised on their advantage. The duo crossed the line together, with Prodhomme taking the stage win and Seixas finishing second.
Starting the day 11 seconds behind Arensman — the Dutchman establishing the slender lead after winning yesterday’s stage — Storer launched a well-timed attack 34km from the finish on the penultimate climb.
With strong support from teammate Lukas Eriksson, who had been part of the early breakaway, Storer built a significant lead. Arensman attempted to respond but was unable to match the pace, ultimately conceding over a minute by the finish.
“F*cking unbelievable!” 🤝
Veel respect van een verslagen Thymen Arensman voor een ijzersterke Michael Storer.
Het is een tweede plek voor de Nederlander in de Tour of the Alps; samen met Storer geeft hij zijn visitekaartje af voor de Giro!#TOTA @Tourof_TheAlps @WielerFlits pic.twitter.com/G13A1sKLxt
— Nɪᴄᴋ Dᴏᴜᴘ (@Nick_Doup) April 25, 2025
The top two even shared a nice moment after the race, Arensman going over to greet Storer and letting him know what he thought of that performance: “F****** unbelievable.”
“Thanks man,” replied a shimmery-eyed Storer.
“No plans” to save free-to-air Tour de France coverage, as fan behind dismissed petition asks: “Does the government truly care about growing cycling?”
Philippe Gilbert joins Remco Evenepoel on Liège–Bastogne–Liège recon ride
“Join the swarm”: Team Visma-Lease a Bike’s special Tour de France jersey is out — and you can be a part of it too
The Tour de France kits season has been kicked off by Visma-Lease a Bike — and it’s an interesting one.
Dubbed The Swarm, the new look sticks to the team’s familiar yellow and black but freshens things up with two big changes. First is the presence of sponsor Skil on the sleeves, the US-based tool brand making a return to the peloton.
Second, the team has gone for a barrage of text in extremely tiny front, that is supposed to be made up of names of fans — yes, you have the chance to get your name on the Visma-Lease a Bike jersey, eventually worn by the likes of Marianne Vos, Wout van Aert, and Jonas Vingegaard during the Tour.
“Why did the BBC publish 22 negative articles on 300m of bike lane in Somerset?” asks Laura Laker in latest Substack
Journalist specialising in cycling and urban transport, with bylines in The Guardian and your very own road.cc, Laura Laker has recently published an article on her Substack, titled: “Why did the BBC publish 22 negative articles on 300m of bike lane in Somerset?”
The piece focuses on how the BBC published a number of negative articles about a small, 300-metre bike lane on Clevedon’s seafront over a three-year period. She points out that the media coverage — which heavily leaned into opposition voices and often framed the cycle lane as “controversial” — helped fuel public anger and ultimately contributed to the lane being ripped out.
Laker highlights how the BBC coverage often parroted local complaints without providing wider context, such as the lane’s role in the broader 13-mile Pier to Pier Way between Clevedon and Weston-super-Mare, or the proven public support for cycling infrastructure generally.
She draws on Ian Walker’s research on pluralistic ignorance, the idea that people often wrongly believe they are in the minority when they support progressive causes like cycling and climate action, and argues that media narratives can reinforce this misunderstanding.
A BBC Spokesperson, in response, told Laker: “This was a complex story with multiple elements to report on, including the controversial design of the bike lane itself, council overspending on the project, and its independent review. We consistently consulted with several different voices and opinions in our reporting and included the council’s position supporting the scheme in each article.”
“Can’t you all stop driving in such large groups?”: Cyclists blast Royal Parks’ campaign advising them to “respect park visitors” by “refraining from riding in large groups”
Yesterday, the charity responsible for running London’s Royal Parks launched a campaign urging cyclists using the capital’s green spaces to be “more considerate” and to adhere to the parks’ speed limits, with 86 per cent of respondents of a survey saying that the 20mph speed limit in the centre of the capital should also apply to bikes.
It also included a new code of conduct and “best-practice guidance” for all cyclists entering the parks, advising them to “control their speed”, “respect all park visitors”, and ride in “small groups” — the charity stating that “navigating around large, quick groups can create dangerous situations”.
Cyclists are not holding back on their criticism, not just rebuking the calls for 20mph speed limits, but also the bizarre call to not ride with a large group of riders — one perhaps made as a consequence of Richmond Park and Regent’s Park being popular with the capital’s cyclists and attracting a large number of two-wheeled visitors, including several club riders.
James Lyon wrote on Facebook: “I like that they’re asking cyclists to ‘refrain from riding in large groups’. Apparently this doesn’t apply to drivers when they’re nose-to-tail queuing out of Richmond Park on a Sunday morning. Can’t you all stop driving in such large groups?!”
Muddy Ford also commented on road.cc’s news post: “In that second picture of the long queues of drivers, does that constitute ‘going around in large groups’, or does this rule only apply if you are a cyclist?
They added: “If I’m riding around the park at 20mph and approach other cyclists doing 19mph, will I have to reduce my speed to 19mph to avoid forming a group trying to overtake at just 1mph faster? Do the cyclists following me then have to tuck in behind similarly but also keeping a big distance so as not to form a large group? Can I expect drivers not to overtake me if I am riding at 20mph?”
Besides the call to refrain from riding in large groups, cyclists also took to social media to condemn the other guidelines proposed by the charity, which also state that cycling outside of the “clearly marked cycle paths” is not permitted.
“Can’t win! Damned if you speed, damned if you’re slow,” wrote Matthew. Meanwhile, the view that all drivers accessing London’s Royal Parks was challenged by some.
“If I go into Richmond Park, I’m never almost killed by a cyclist; cars many many times… I’ve even been driven at on purpose by a car (twice), but yes, ‘cyclists are the problem’!” commented Dave Hignett. “Oh, and the assumption that cars stick to the speed limit is a joke! And “enforcement” on vans is even worse!”
Seb Mansfield said: “I was literally following a police car doing over 30 there a few weeks back.”
Paul Cowley seemed to sum up the situation the best: “We seem a long way from the feel-good factor of 2012 when the Olympic road race went through the park and the duathlons and time trials were supported.”
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
32 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
Another rival at a similar price point is the Ridgeback Panorama which comes with a front rack and a dynamo lighting system.
Wouldn’t happen to a French rider. French judge.
FACT I got my bikes rear wheel to 115kmh by putting it upside down and spinning the cranks by hand. It doesn't have a motor. The bike could probably go even faster if flung off a tall building. Hashtag science.
"One of the least mentioned is that in the event of a dinged or buckled rim, you can still ride, at least to a degree." What about if the disc gets buckled e.g. when the bike has been transported in a bag? How easy is it to straighten out a disc? Can the bike still be ridden?
I'm reminded of Hincapie's handlebar/steerer tube misfortune at the 2006 Paris-Roubaix, and the wonder I felt that durability priority had sunk that far. And I'll always feel better about a high-speed blowout on my tubs than anything else.
Yes, I don't disagree with you. I wasn't meaning to advocate for her in the role, just observing. Although the ambition was nice to hear, for a change. Unless I've missed something, as of 23:30 the Transport Secretary still hasn't been announced? Doesn't say a lot for that as a priority, but I get there are other things to announce first. I'm more interested in the appointment of Lucy Powell and "changing the education system". Will wait and see, I suppose.
Doesn't sound good. On the other hand if you read the papers (particularly Private Eye - recommend their recent podcasts) you'll see it's not at all unusual for the poachers of business (consultancy, accounting, tech, gambling...) to become the gamekeepers of the public purse / data - or at least advisors on the same. Who better to know exactly the sharp practices of industry players we should be wary of giving contracts to? And if we head in the direction of how it works in the US (as some of the politicians seem keen) I can assure you this kind of thing will increase in a way that will make anyone paying attention wish for the innocent days of such minor peccadillos!
He hasn't got away with it. He will eventually be caught, most likely when he commits further offences. When this happens he will also be charged with non-appearance.
Much as Louise Haig seemed to start out on the right track as transport secretary (a) she hardly got going and (b) if the issue was she hadn't revealed a fraud then and was outed, I don't think "now everyone knows so it's fine, can I come back?" should apply. Of course others might say that - given the small size of the actual offense and the not mentioning thereof - she's far below the standard level of shamelessness. Indeed isn't the usual way to say it's none of anyone's business / she shouldn't need to declare anything etc.?
@DJameson Actually in the USA it's common to charge murder with a "lesser included" manslaughter alternative, so the jury can still convict of manslaughter if they're not convinced of the murder evidence. In the UK a judge can offer the jury the option and say if you're not convinced it's murder you can still convict of manslaughter.
32 thoughts on ““Can’t you all stop driving in such large groups?”: Cyclists blast Royal Parks for advising them to “not ride in large groups”; Power Rangers-esque “ball bike” fails to impress cyclists; Pidcock shows off MTB skills on road bike + more on the live blog”
I’m sure I saw that ball bike
I’m sure I saw that ball bike in a 1980s SF film…
Looks more like it a tandem
Looks more like a tandem for (computer) mice to me.
Ref Cyclists who kill could
Ref Cyclists who kill could face life imprisonment:
BBC report quote: “The government estimates that of 1,600 deaths on UK roads last year, four were caused by cyclists.”
So, of the (estimated)1,596 other non-cycling offenses, how many did jail time and of them, how many were sentenced to longer than 2 years for what I would be the most serious offence of causing death by dangerous driving?
Smoggysteve wrote:
it is also a false statement- 4 pedestrian deaths INVOLVED cyclists, not necessarily caused by cyclists.
the little onion wrote:
Don’t you read the papers? If a cyclist was involved then it MUST have been their fault! 😉
Especially if it’s the BBC
Especially if it’s the BBC reporting it 😔
If the authorities treat
If the authorities treat dangerous cycling as seriously as they do dangerous driving, then dangerous cyclists will not have much to worry about
I wonder what percentage of
I wonder what percentage of motorists are aware of (1) ‘pedestrians crossing a side road have priority’ and (2) ‘don’t left hook a cyclist going straight on, on the road’?
I’ve been pedestrianising a lot lately and the proportion aware of (1) seems to tend toward zero…
Well – what does the surface
Well – what does the surface look like? It looks like the rest of the motor vehicle carriageway, right? And what happens to the footway? It stops at that point, there is a kerb (vertical displacement), then you are on “road surface” with “road markings” – until you get to another kerb (step up) and are back to “footway”.
Clearly the middle bit is “for motorists”!
I don’t think this rule change has much of a chance of being widely respected without some additional help for drivers and pedestrians.
Here’s how to do it. And if the “side road” actually sees significant traffic (e.g. it’s a through route) then “don’t expect drivers to stop without e.g. a formal pedestrian crossing” would be my bet.
Nothing new there. I got
Nothing new there. I got arrested for kicking a car driven by an aspirant murderer under option (1) circumstances. But that was in London of course (good ol’ “the law’s what I say it is son” Met), presumably wouldn’t happen anywhere else…
Tadej can do tricks on a
Pog v Pid: Tadej can do tricks on a unicycle. Just saying.
Probably on a 20% gradient
Probably on a 20% gradient whilst dropping all the other riders!
But going down one would be a
But going down one would be a fine thing to watch.
Danny MacAskill does a good
Danny MacAskill does a good impression of riding a unicycle downhill round corners – front wheelie basically down steep moorland roads. Impressive.
It’s nice to see a new (old)
It’s nice to see a new (old) sponsor in professional cycling, however Skil – SRAM doesn’t quite have the same ring about it.
Quote:
Of course, a responsible publication would never do that kind of thing, eh road.cc?
At the in laws and
At the in laws and experiencing the wonderful cycle infrastructure. Join a path at 90 Deg, path runs out, not even a cycle box. Road humps that don’t have a gap at the edge. Stuck behind cars because they are too bloody wide to fit through the gap!
Definitely a Roy Kent school of motoring trip and not an Ogmious one.
So apparantly setting speed
So apparantly setting speed limits work….. with all the drivers going over 20 in a 20 limit……. yeah well since its only code of conduct its not enforceable, also their basically telling people not to ride in a group putting them more at risk from dangerous drivers yeah great, i thought we was supposed to be encouraging cycling not trying to make up your own rules which cant be governed by law
Also i cant see how a 20kg bike is a danger compared to a 1.5t hunk of metal being driven by absolute morons who dont realise its a weapon
Hope you have an ebike !
Hope you have an ebike !
Accessory wise, you are going
Accessory wise, you are going to want a ball bike bar bag…
He had a fair slot on this evening south today. He seems to like two “wheeled” objects, and in an unexpected bit of honesty, is doing it purely for the clicks.
ktache wrote:
…in beige?
Rendel Harris wrote:
A big one.
Ball bike bar bag. Is that a
Ball bike bar bag. Is that a ball-bag?
“Why did the BBC publish 22
“Why did the BBC publish 22 negative articles on 300m of bike lane in Somerset?”
A BBC Spokesperson, in response, told Laker: “We consistently consulted with several different voices and opinions in our reporting and included the council’s position supporting the scheme in each article.”
Or, in plain English “We consulted with the people opposing it and no-one else.”
The BBC is institutionally anti-cyclist, as has been demonstrated beyond doubt ever since I started campaigning, so that’s forty plus years: at least.
If you are referring to
If you are referring to Clevedon, probably because of the enormous waste of tax payers money putting it in, changing it twice and then putting it back to how it was.
But the only reason it was
But the only reason it was torn apart is because of local motons complaining and the usual suspect local politicians jumping on the (motorised) bandwagon…? Not because it didn’t work.
They have to ride in large
They have to ride in large groups as 25of them put together have just about the same brain power as 1 pedestrian
Well hello again Wheely,
Well hello again Wheely, thought you’d been taken out by a cyclist for the nth time.
Although others have taken up your torch – so perhaps give yourself another posting holiday. If you’re bored, Wheels for Wellbeing or Wheels for All could use some help no doubt.
Or an actual holiday e.g. over here – then pop back and join the lobby for the same level of accessibility.
Wheelywheelygood wrote:
Evidence? Or are you just being remarkably rude?
It’s their standard trolling.
It’s their standard trolling. Quite why the mods haven’t banned them is a mystery.
Is it – to mangle Tom Waits –
Is it – to mangle Tom Waits – “Don’t you know there ain’t no divvy, that’s just mod when he’s drunk”?
chrisonabike wrote:
Mod’s away, mod’s away, mod’s away on business…