I thought I’d kick off today’s live blog with a bit of a recap of the final weekend of everyone’s third favourite grand tour: the Jumbo-Visma Company Picnic and Bike Ride – sorry, I mean Vuelta a España!
And before we get onto the obligatory Sepp Kuss love-in, let’s turn our attentions quickly to that absolute stonker of a stage 21 through the streets and dead turns of Madrid – because whoever said that final grand tour stages in national capitals are always dull processions with five minutes of racing at the end?
Well, if anyone mentioned that long-held cycling truism on the outskirts of Madrid yesterday afternoon, Remco Evenepoel certainly wasn’t paying attention.
The polka dot-clad (in too much polka dots if you ask me… those shorts) Belgian ripped up the script, tearing off the front with none other than Filippo Ganna and green jersey Kaden Groves – the two favourites for the stage in a sprint, remember – in his wheel with over 35km left to go.
(Tommaso Pelagalli/SprintCyclingAgency)
After bridging up to the earlier move featuring Nico Denz, Lennard Kämna, and Rui Costa, Remco and his mates proceeded in turning the final few laps around the Spanish capital into a pulsating pursuit match.
After as delicately poised a final 30km as you would ever dream of witnessing, during which no-one (apart from the all-knowing Carlton Kirby on comms) would dare to predict how it would pan out, a brief moment of hesitation with just one kilometre to go amongst the hitherto committed attackers seemed to spell the end of their romantic escape.
However, with 500m to go, just as the ragged peloton finally latched onto the break, Evenepoel – who else – thought ‘sod this’ and drilled it at the front. The Belgian’s acceleration, though doomed from the start, nonetheless perfectly teed up his breakaway companion Groves (who only slipped into the break initially to keep an eye on the marauding Evenepoel for the green jersey competition) to take an exhilarating, unpredictable third stage win of the race.
On paper, with Ganna again taking second behind Groves, yesterday’s final stage of the Vuelta resembled a typical bunch sprint. On the road, it was anything but.
While Mark Cavendish’s win in Rome on the final day of this year’s Giro d’Italia carried with it a sense of fate and history-making, yesterday’s thriller in Madrid certainly must go down as one of the best non-TT final grand tour stages in modern cycling history.
In fact, it’s been a while since we’ve had such a pulsating road stage on the last day of a three-week race. Back in 2005, Alexander Vinokourov attacked – was there any other way for Vino? – to win solo on the Champs-Élysées at the Tour de France, repeating the feat of Bernard Hinault, who broke clear (in the yellow jersey no less) alongside GC rival Joop Zoetemelk to upset the sprinters on the famous Parisian boulevard in 1979.
It’s been 18 long, long years since we last saw an attacker win on the Champs – but with Remco set to turn his attention to the Tour over the coming years (he’ll have to wait until 2025, of course, thanks to next year’s Nice finale), that long champagne-sipping, processional drought could soon come to an end.
Come on Remco, we’re all banking on you…
Add new comment
38 comments
I don't know about others, but if I encountered a bunch of cars travelling at 2mph (which is a common occurrence in Bristol congestion), then I just filter/overtake them. I'd rather they weren't there, but it's not something that would enrage me.
Despite all the projecting & strawmen in that piece, it does confirm that all of the "frustration" directed at cyclists is basically coming from one place - ie "they cause me to have to slow down (and drive to the conditions) a bit on occasion & not drive at or above the prevailing speed limit". A frustration which, being entirely controllable by the frustratee (?), is, as my daughter would say "a you problem".
Yes - "hold me up" in my "legitimate journey to somewhere" and I'll be apoplectic at the delay because I just can't waste a second. Solution: slow down & add time to my journey - ha! that'll learn 'em!
The Herald used to be a decent local paper for the Glasgow area but these last 10 years it has been turning increasingly right wing populist, including the vilification of cyclists. It seems determined to give drivers reason to assault me as I go about my cycling on Glasgow’s streets.
I cannot forgive the Herald for the attached 2018 article after which I immediately cancelled my subscription. Read it and weep.
"Some of my friends are cyclists" .. hmm. Hopefully not after reading this putrid piece of crap.
Looks like my commute is going to be even easier now, thanks to this ... "person".
Meh. Can't be arsed to wade through it all and the format's ubiquitous - grab attention by picking a fight in the first paragraph. Let 'em wonder if you're going to keep it up, then double-down.
Normally they throw in the odd "you and I..." and references to stuff they can't afford for added chumminess. Ageing bar-room edgelord in print, basically. Just how much hyperbolic nonsense they think the editor will bear varies of course. In this case both writer and editor appear to have been at the cherry brandy. Or maybe it was written and edited while both were concentrating on more taxing matters like driving their progeny to cello lessons or angling for event tickets.
Feels like I've been reading pretty much the same article (adapted to fit different topics) for years now. I can't even guess if this guy actually believes any of it.
Thought at first this was a typo - "after 76-year-old Chris Horner beat Vincenzo Nibali at the 2013" - but then realized it must be a joke about just how ancient Horner was when he won his first and only grand tour.
I say we find out where this McKenna bloke has his boat, and all get in front of him in pedalos. Who's with me?
Not looking forward to my cycle home (not from work - obviously) - I will have to compete with rage filled motorists driving at 2mph (and to support their mental health I won't pass them) and swooping magpies (or do they only swoop at cyclists in Austrailia?)
They are different magpies.
Only issue I've had over here with magpies was almost losing control when I took my hand off the bars to salute one.
Oh come on. With all the recent "debate" about 20mph speed limits I think we all know that driving at 2mph would be impossible given the superhuman powers of concentration that are needed to stay at 20....
Happy 20mph day! My first experience of it yesterday - being overtaken downhill by a white van (when I was already doing 20mph, and in what has long been a 20mph zone anyway) who then immediately had to brake in front of me because the car in front was sticking to the speed limit. I shouldn't have, but I continued my momentum, overtook again and slotted back in where I was.
I had to drive into and out of Kingston in south west London twice last week, where a 20mph speed limit operates. Hardly any vehicle even got close to sticking to that. One in front of me, probably reached 40 before braking hard for a vehicle only doing 30 before it turned off and the speed went straight back up to 40ish.
If the Streets Were on Fire review – hope on show as BikeStormz riders fight knife crime
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/sep/18/if-the-streets-were-on-fire...
“Thus, you transfer your pulsing rage directly on to them. You need only do this for about three minutes. But it will lead to better mental health outcomes, knowing that you’ve given these insidious and sanctimonious weapons a taste of their own medicine.”
Throbbing rage surely, Kevin?
This latest iteration of bizarre, dangerous, anti-cycling rhetoric is showing that things are getting worse, and we need some form of protection from these deluded psychopaths. It's pretty clear that Kevin is worried about his mental health, with good reason: he's a psychopath.
I wasn't sure if psychopaths was the right word, so I looked up the meaning:
"A person who is manipulative, dishonest, narcissistic, unremorseful, non-empathetic, and exploitative may be a psychopath. Criminality, promiscuity, and lack of responsibility are also common traits associated with psychopathy."
That pretty much describes every anti-cyclist media "star" I've seen.
Isn't it hate speech?
iirc the anti hate speech law only applies to the groups that parliament has selected for protection
"... and bus DRIVER crashing into shop ... "?
The biggest single purpose of car trips is leisure. Next comes shopping.
The idea that people in cars are on vital economic missions, without which Britain will go bankrupt, is false.
Where is this taken from?
It comes from this article, and the original source is the National Travel Survey.
Thank you, HS
(BTW I agree...) But but but those leisure trips ARE important for the economy! Recall all those people driving
to out-of-town shopping centresinto towns who keep the high street alive! Think of all our tourist attractions (like the Maccy D's drive-thru) which require a car to access. And we need people to keep driving and buying fuel (supporting ournative oil industrypetrol stations / all the electricity we'll producevery expensively via nuclearthrough ten times as many windmillssomehow), wearing out the roads (to keep our roadmenders in business) etc.As the more extreme examples of motordom from the US illustrate, organising housing and ameneties around an extremely space-inefficient mode of transport is a good way to bankrupt your council, never mind make terrible "places" which then require motor vehicles to traverse.
I think the overlap between leisure, shopping and commuting is a fruitful spot to look at - because cycling and walking seem to lend themselves more to "place" than the motor vehicle. Pick up some shopping on the cycle home from work, or meet some friends in a local centre after walking the kids to school (collecting sundries en-route).
One for whoever's succeeding Mary Portas I guess. I always thought politicians tend to sound rather contradictory on "high streets" and "place" vs. "economic growth" / "business" / "globally competitive"...
That's a very sensible comment - facts are, cars facilitate the economy and without them we would be a lot further backward in all aspect of our lives.
Other facts are that economics as practiced has trashed the global biosphere and delivered social injustice on an unprecidented scale.
LifL and his ilk often come out with the "cars are convenient/useful" trope, neglecting to notice the enormous deleterious effects of this technogy and many, many others. Even when the deleterious effects rise up to swamp their own ground floors in a rotting slime, they continue their "techno-is-wunnerful" bleat, often offering up their habitual prayer that further technological "innovations" will solve all the problems wreaked by the previous technological innovations.
Alas, not even the bicycle will save us. Various loons about the planet will continue to develop and use technologies that can blast billions of cyclists away to nowt, along with everything else. No matter how many "nice" techs are found, there'll be more than enough nasty ones to continue the ongoing work of human self-destruction. And more than enough power-crazed loons to use them.
But LifL will hope he is able to enjoy his frequent car rides to Junk-R-Us shops right up to the end! By then, it'll also be legal to run over cyclists as they will have become "enemies of the people", a eumphemism for "not sufficiently supportive of the mad swivel-eyed loon in charge of the wrecking crews".
try reading that again
Could Kevin McKenna face legal/criminal consequences for promoting terrorism/incitement to violence?
He'd just claim that it was 'bantz' or some other way to avoid taking responsibility for his nonsensical rantings.
For those of you who wish to make an IPSO complaint about that article, note that it's "HeraldScotland" in the drop down box as opposed to "The Herald".
https://www.ipso.co.uk/complain/
2mph in a car is no different to just stop oil gluing themselves to the road, surely the police will arrest him?
LOL
Good point.
Pages