It’s been a tough year for Franck Bonnamour, the 29-year-old French rider who’s been involved in a long-running saga with the UCI over “unexplained abnormalities” in his biological passport, first being provisionally suspended by the UCI in February and then subsequently being dropped by his team Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale.
Bonnamour, who has continually denied any wrongdoings since then, has now announced that he cannot afford to continue scuffling with the UCI, claiming that it’s “too costly” and that he has accepted that he’s never going to race again.
Speaking to Ouest-France, he said: “It’s too costly in financial terms so I’m stopping. We had to start proceedings before the UCI tribunal before going to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
“If we had been successful, the UCI would have appealed, which would have pushed back the deadline by a year-and-a-half, increasing the costs. I can’t afford to lose everything and that's holding me back financially.”
Bonnamour won the most combative award at the 2021 Tour de France while riding for B&B Hotels, following a series of attacking displays. His abnormal profile has been traced back to 2016, when he had just turned pro after becoming the junior European champion, after a test showed high haemoglobin levels.
> Franck Bonnamour sacked by Decathlon AG2R over biological passport anomalies – but French rider denies doping
He added that he’s been forced to sell off his apartment to fund his battle against the UCI and has spent thousands of Euros hiring experts and lawyers, including €4,000 to a biologist who carried out an analysis “which clearly explained there was a possibility of a defence.”
"He could explain my atypical variations and profile. Before signing his report, he contacted me and my lawyer, telling me that he wouldn't be going any further because some of his research was funded by WADA. He gave up on us.
"It's been difficult for the last six months and I didn't want it to go on like this for two or three years. My priority is keeping my family together.”
Bonnamour remains on the UCI's list of provisional suspensions, with the reason being 'Use of prohibited methods and/or prohibited substances' and faces a four-year ban from the sport.
His lawyer is negotiating the length of his final sanction and eventual fine, but Bonnamour accepts that he won't race again.
"My career is over. I've been through everything," he said. "There have been difficult moments, morale-wise, but I have the support of my family and I'm also receiving counselling.
"I'm afraid of the future, but I know what I have and haven't done."
At the time of his provisional suspension, Samuel Meraffi, doctor at the B&B Hotels squad he raced with in 2021 and 2022, said: “I have never noticed anything abnormal in his monitoring.”
According to Pascal Chanteur, president of the French Riders’ Union, Bonnamour’s case is based on a test taken during the penultimate stage of the 2022 Tour de France – when Bonnamour is claimed to have been suffering COVID-19 symptoms and dehydration – and an out-of-competition test from October 2018.
“What interest would he have had in doing that?” Chanteur asked Ouest-France in June. “It’s a total and flagrant injustice. I don't understand why no value is attached to the tests carried out in 2016, which showed an atypical profile. I don't understand why a year went by between this test at the end of the 2022 Tour de France and the UCI's notification.”
Add new comment
30 comments
Just noticed sjs cycles have reduced prices on winter tyres, although I'm too far south to make use of them.
https://www.sjscycles.co.uk/winter-tyres/
It's a bit ironic that those of us who have already disembarked the sewage supertanker that is Twitter (up yours Musk, no I will not call it X) can't read your reason for (partially) doing the same. Somewhat intrigued by your saying that your reasons might be different to those of others, so it would be nice if you could share them here too.
As a Twitter non-user, I'd guess that it's something to do with them wanting money for official accounts.
I've totally blocked Twitter in my browser (along with FaceBook and Instagram), so I get a lot of missing images in the Live Blog.
Too long to summarise but mentions random posts that are irrelevant to the topic.
This reply sums up why so many are ditching twitter.
"Your use of the term disinformation makes me believe your real reasoning behind smearing X and pumping blue sky is politically motivated. Congrats. You're on your way to losing 60% of your readers and followers."
Musk's ai identified him as the worst spreader of disinformation.
Thanks – I hope road.cc never acts against random posts that are irrelevant to the topic on these message boards, it would become a ghost town! I know what they mean though, from my memories of having a Twitter account it could go from me posting a video of a close pass to me being accused of supporting Chairman Mao's purges of the intelligentsia within a few minutes.
Well, I can't recall any time that you've explicitly spoken out against any of Chairman Mao's policies
Damn you, you're right and now I have to report myself to the police for hate speech by omission.
There you go, you had a chance to correct your tacit support for the cultural revolution (and you've been silent on the burning of the Library of Alexandria too, coincidence?) ... but you passed on it. Tells us all we need to know - plus your judgement of the speed and closeness of passing vehicles therefore cannot be trusted!
Given recent news, I thought it might have been a cartoon from the other topic Dave covers.
Incredible
https://www.gazetteherald.co.uk/news/24725382.specsavers-donate-hi-vis-v...
Wow...
What's next - helmets for battered domestic partners?
Not the first of this kind of thing however, by any means. Volvo gave it a try.
And what about radio tags for cyclists, to let drivers know where they are?
Meanwhile, in the Netherlands ... someone flipped the idea on its head and proposed that cars should have external airbags to protect cyclists in collisions (Original in Dutch / Google Translate version). (Not that I'm entirely convinced this is a great idea but just shows thinking which isn't blaming the victim).
In other news, Specsavers didn't donate 50 pairs of glasses to a load of shite drivers who had failed to see vulnerable road users.
What I find most amazing is that they didn't use this an opportunity to encourage drivers to check their vision and get an eye test. I was waiting for the article to mention this very obvious bit of marketing which they seem to have totally missed in favour of victim blaming.
They also need to understand the difference between looking and seeing:
Motorist: "D E F P O T E C"
Also, motorist: "Empty road"
Anyone ever seen them in the same place at the same time?
"A man who deliberately knocked a Metropolitan Police officer off his motorcycle, leaving him with life-changing injuries, has been jailed for five and a half years.
At his sentencing on Thursday he was also disqualified from driving for 81 months."
While I welcome the relatively strong sentence, though I think it isn't enough given the severity of the crimes...
Why is this punishment greater than the many times that cyclists are hurt or killed?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/ce3ykgqkdxeo
"Policeman" always helps encourage the legal system.
Motonormativity in practice:
My teenage daughter's boyfriend has just passed his driving test and his parents (of course) bought him a car for his birthday.
Whereas before, he would walk to school, he now drives "because I've passed my test".
Whereas before, they would walk to a nearby supermarket at lunchtime (maybe ten minutes, tops), they now drive there "because he's passed his [edited, spelling] test".
And so on…
I find it very frustrating, and alien, and my wife and daughter can't understand why.
To be fair, not sure if that's motormativity or it's just new toy syndrome. When I'd just passed my test (roughly around the time that Pontious was pilating) I wanted to drive everywhere I could.
Maybe. I think I'm just different because I didn't pass my test until I was in my early thirties - my wife expecting our son was the final (er...) driver to get me to finish driving lessons.
While I agree that driving relatively short distances is wastefull and unneccessary, I drove to 6th form daily for 6 months after I passed my driving test.
(A decent distance to justify it, given the door to door bus journey was a good hour.)
It was invaluable and I have always recommended it (doing the same journey repeatedly) to hone driving skills after someone passes their test, if the opportunity is there.
I only started cycle commuting when I was working so looking back, that would have been the better option.
But I don't regret it as knowing how to drive helps with road safety and knowing how to cycle with drivers around.
Random comment on Clifton Suspension Bridge from BlueSky
"But it is a profoundly evil bridge. I was standing looking at it in 2017 by the observatory, somehow slipped and spent 8 weeks in plaster with a broken fibula which had to be screwed back together. Definitely the bridge wot done it, not me just being clumsy. The rehab got me cycling."
The Suspension Bridge Trust announced that they were coming off Twitter/X cos Elon, and apparently they were inundated on every other medium with people complaining and saying they were giving in to the woke leftist elite (or something).
I assume this was in relation to the Bridge AND MUSEUM leaving X.
Built by one of my relatives, that bridge. (Possibly)
Yes, it was by Cllr Emily Kerr (don't turn up on my doorstep sweaty from your bike !)
https://bsky.app/profile/emilykerr36.bsky.social/post/3laxzqxgabx2a
Road.cc are there now.
I'm there now too, if anyone wants a follow/wants to follow me. @cyclingtheseaso
You can be professional at this now? Are they selling NFTs of them or something?
Textbook overtake from a very patient driver today. Normally drivers risk the blind bend !
Comic Relief's Pudsey Bear you say ? there I've been for nearly the past 40 years thinking it was for Children in Need and the BBCs Pudsey bear instead.
Oh come on, it's easy to mistake someone with a comedy red nose for a yellow bear with a multi coloured eye patch.