A 28-year-old man has been injured following an alleged hit-and-run in which five cyclists were mown down in the suburb of Mount Louisa in Townsville, Queensland.
Police and ambulances were called at around 5:40am on Tuesday morning, with two of the cyclists hit initially described as being in a "serious condition", reports ABC News Australia. An abandoned car was then found dumped at a scrapyard nearby, with police establishing that the car wasn't stolen or linked to any recent crimes.
One female cyclist is reported to have suffered leg and pelvic injuries while another has serious leg injuries. Two men are been treated for back injuries, and another woman was allowed to leave hospital after been treated for minor injuries.
Police have charged the driver from Mount Louisa with four counts of dangerous driving and causing grievous bodily harm, and one count each of dangerous driving adversely affected by an intoxicating substance, and failing to remain at the scene and render assistance.
The President of Townsville Cycling Club told ABC: "To see what happened to these five people this morning was just deplorable.
"They're very well known in the cycling community, have been involved for a long time in some of the larger charity rides around the place. Just very, very nice people — nobody deserves to get hit by a car."
Police Minister Mark Ryan also commented: "My thoughts are with the victims of this senseless, heartless, cowardly attack.
"I have no doubt that this incident will hit Townsville's cycling community hard."
Add new comment
20 comments
Leicester; £1m/4yrs.
Exactly my reaction. It's a joke.
In regards to the RLJ'g I came across this earlier today.
Apparently 120k motorists across the UK have received a TS10 endorsement over the last 4 years for jumping red lights. As well as points and a fine, the TS10 is live on your licence for 4 years. This endorsement is only issued when a camera is triggered after 3 seconds on turning red. So I'm assuming the figure doesn't include the sub 3 seconds or the amber gamblers at those particular lights.
Let's not forget this figure doesn't include lights that are not monitored so the figure is actually quite frightening especially when the motoring RLJers are accelerating through these junctions at excessive speed. I've estimated that the junction my flat overlooks some motorists are hitting 40mph. Compare that to the cyclist who creeps through at 10mph. Who does whom the most harm I wonder?
So the next time someone chucks the "all cyclists jump lights" you can bounce back that figure. I've added the link for more info - apologies for the cluttered page https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/glasgow-drivers-worst-uk...
Also added a screen shot of the top 5. Glasgow and Edinburgh top it with figures heavily outweighing the rest of the UK.
Last years GBBO winner seems to be coming up with popular cyclist snacks,
This is one for Malt Loaf-
https://www.theguardian.com/food/2020/feb/19/david-athertons-recipe-for-...
He also has recipes for fig rolls and flapjacks.
Leicester's Access fund grant - I believe this is for soft measures like drawing up travel plans for schools. It's better than nothing, but only safe, convenient cycle routes will make a transformative difference.
So this thing with Juan Miguel Mercado. Was he the getaway rider?
I don't think that RNIB spokesperson could have actually read the article. Literally the first recommendation is to ban escooters from pavements and limit their speed.
The following recommendations all seem to be a positive benefit to the partially sighted and blind, such as creating segregated infrastructure, reducing access to cars and reducing speed limits where they are allowed.
23,000 KSIs on UK roads, most of whom were drivers or passengers in cars. Logically, therefore, to make a real dent in these figures, before focusing on cyclists, every motor vehicle should be painted in high-viz. They regularly travel at high speed, weight in excess of two tons and carry multiple passengers, after all. While we're at it, drivers and passengers should wear helmets and rally standard safety harness. Or wouldn't that be acceptable to voters?
Don't forget HANS for neck protection and Nomex fire suits, after all, if it saves just one life.
And all of the costs on our overstretched NHS.
Then there's the risks associated with not being active...
Truely amazing achievement by Sofiane Sehili but as regards to these ultra endurance races in general...at what point do you say hold on, people are taking too many risks with their health and we need to stop this? 2 hours sleep in 3 days seems a bit extreme?
I don't know the answers and couldn't manage on 2 hours sleep for 12 hours 😜 but yeah, I reckon conversations need to be had if this is gonna be the standard now (I'm aware it's always been this way to an extent, and maybe it's just part of it, I dont know)
Totally agree, the endurance scene is getting a bit silly now; time to mandate a daily minimun down-time for the riders, before someone loses their life.
'there is "some evidence" hi-vis can reduce risk' - I'd argue there is a lot of evidence that banning cars from the roads can reduce risk. Maybe we should try that?
"My son doesn't want to ride his bike any more" Unintended consequences of the perceived punishing of perfectly legal behaviour, whilst not punishing the illegal behaviour of others. It is always better to treat the cause not the symptoms; perhaps someone could tell Superintendent Andy Cox.
The benefits of hi-viz are questionable, but the police are wasting considerable resources, apparently because they have assumed that they are highly effective, just like helmets. I'm utterly astonished that an organisation based on examining the evidence, doesn't examine the evidence.
P.S. There is also the probability that telling everyone that cyclists must wear hi viz is conditioning drivers to only look for hi viz, thus making the roads much more dangerous for all the people who don't. What next? police resources wasted on hi viz for pedestrians?
The dooring definitely looks deliberate in both the manner of the opening, using the foot with force and suddeness, and the timing.
Let's not get over paranoid here - even though their actions may look different, the majority of car drivers aren't out to deliberately cause accidents. It was stupid, reckless and thoughtless, not deliberate. The fact that the car driver comes over to try and help afterwards - would he do that if he'd done it deliberately?
Do we know what happened? Did the police get involved? Seems like a pretty open and shut case (pardon the pun).
It's also ancient - previously reported on here in 2015 - https://road.cc/content/news/159991-video-doored-cyclist-falls-path-blac...
OK, thanks - didn't get that. And the answer to my question appears to be that no, the police didn't get involved and nothing more happened...
Notice the final para in that article...
... did that ever happen?
... did that ever happen?
[/quote]
Yep - very good and popular it is too!
I agree. It was just a thoughtless action. He went over to help and hopefully apologised. Good on the driver for posting the video and the others who helped too. I hope this cyclist's leg was ok.