Pidcock “worried about friends” on Israel-Premier Tech; “Cyclists should be banned” from road after collision with lorry driver… according to Facebook comments; World Championships preview as riders to use GPS tracking + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
"Cyclists should be banned" from Tarvie A-road after collision with lorry driver...according to Facebook comments
Today’s quota of internet frothing comes courtesy of the Ross-shire Journal’s comments section on an article reporting that a cyclist has been seriously injured and taken to hospital following a collision with a lorry driver.
The incident occurred on the A835 near Tarvie in the Highlands. The road, known locally for its ‘Tarvie corkscrew’ is no stranger to traffic collisions, with the same local outlet reporting earlier this year that the same stretch of road also saw the most collisions of any road in Scotland in 2023, and that the raw number of incidents is at a 10-year-high. The solution therefore: ban cyclists – according to the comments on social media.
Dan Urquhart wrote: “Cyclists should be banned on the A835 until a proper cycle path can be built. It’s the only solution to a safer road.”
Pete Bude added: “All cyclists should have a glow bright jacket with there own number on as like a car number plate a public liability insurance.”
Bill Barron suggested: “Cyclists should use the train to Garve if wanting to cycle to Ullapool. The road is better after Garve.”
Gary Parker went further:
“All cyclists should have a rear view mirror, a road worthy certificate, tax & insurance a road legal identification number, but mostly a written & practical test license.
Until then band [sic] them from all roads.”
Amid the anger and blame thrown towards cyclists there were a couple of more sympathetic commenters.
Robyn Thegrate added: “Obviously it would cost but there should be a bike path all the way to Ullapool. It would be used by lots of people not just tourists.”
David Miller (no, not that one) wrote: “Easiest way to get space for a cyclepath is to reduce the road to single lane with passing places.”
Alisdair Campbell meanwhile took issue with the story’s framing, writing “Teaching of patience to drivers probably needed.”
It’s amazing how when you pick out a variety of comments, you’re able to pick out a broad spectrum of opinion, maybe do your blood pressure a favour and give the wider comments (nearly 400 of them!) a miss.
UCI to use GPS tracking at World Championships
Some better safety news now, and it comes from the UCI. Remember the Women’s Tour de Romandie which saw five teams disqualified after a row over GPS trackers and who was to apply and use them?
Well, despite that fiasco, the result of the trial at that race is that the UCI is now able to state that “All riders in all categories (Men and Women Elite, Under 23 and Junior) will be equipped with a GPS safety tracking device attached under their saddle” during the 2025 World Championships in Rwanda which get underway this weekend.
The dispute at the Tour de Romandie centred over which riders would be fitted with the trackers, with the UCI only wanting to fit one tracker per team, and the disqualified teams refusing to take responsibility for choosing the rider selected and the fitting of the device. But with every rider now mandated to wear trackers, this issue seems moot.
The move is poignant considering the championships will occur one year after the death of junior athlete Muriel Furrer.
Furrer, riding her home World Championships, crashed off-course and wasn’t found for more than an hour. The lack of GPS tracking was subsequently cited as a key factor in the delay in finding Furrer and taking her to hospital where she died the following day.
The system was designed in consultation with SafeR, a coalition of several stakeholders in the peloton (riders, teams and race organsiers) with the intention of reducing the safety risks to riders. These consultations accelerated with the election of former rider Adam Hansen as president of the riders union, the CPA. Following the death of Gino Mäder, at the Tour de Suisse in 2023, those conversations took on a greater urgency.
The trackers will be operated and monitored from the UCI’s race control centre. In announcing the move, UCI President David Lappartient says “The UCI, together with SafeR and in close collaboration with all stakeholders of professional road cycling, is constantly working to improve the safety of riders.
“The introduction of a GPS safety tracking system for riders is important and necessary progress in this regard. Thanks to this system, any incident or accident that might have gone unnoticed can be quickly identified.”
Fingers crossed this measure can prevent similar tragedies occurring in the future.
'We want the most confusing email headline outlining our Vuelta achievements possible...no that's too confusing'
Q36.5 had their best ever results at the weekend, with Tom Pidcock securing the first ever Grand Tour podium for both himself and the team. It’s the first time any second-division team has achieved a Grand Tour podium since 2010 (or 2009 factoring in doping bans).
Pidcock himself came close to winning a stage on a couple of occasions so there were a wide variety of headlines to go with on their latest press release. So, what do they pick?
1647 UCI Points. My favourite metric, nothing screams success like it. I had a lecturer once who said I should never write a number without making clear if it was a big number or not.
Besides all that, no one really knows what UCI Points are. Even journalists pretend to know what they mean. It won’t even be enough for a World Tour license for the next three years. It feels like an email headline tailored for one Swiss executive who has made it their mission to ensure Q36.5 gain enough points to make a pretty line graph. In which case, mission accomplished.
Drivers want more bike lanes as Gen Z drivers are most nervous around cyclists - new survey finds
After last week’s tube strikes saw record numbers of Londoners take to the bike, a new survey suggests that drivers actually want better cycling infrastructure, and overwhelmingly so.
79% of drivers are high risk on the road, with two thirds of those surveyed saying they want more bike lanes in the city.
It’s not all rosy though with the same survey also finding more drivers believe cyclists don’t follow traffic rules than do (44% to 41%). 82% meanwhile thought that cyclists were putting themselves in danger by not wearing reflective gear, protective equipment or using lights. 56% felt nervous sharing the road with cyclists, with Gen Z drivers the most skittish, whilst two-fifths thought they shouldn’t be on the road at all.
The Censuswide survey of 1000 drivers, conducted for Cycleplan, also found drivers in Newcastle, Liverpool and Edinburgh most respectful of cyclists, whilst drivers were most supportive of new bike infrastructure in Sheffield, Plymouth and Cardiff. Something for everyone there.
Paris-Roubaix repairs begin in earnest
Before 👉 After 💪 pic.twitter.com/qB8IduvIBL
— Les Amis de Paris-Roubaix (@A_ParisRoubaix) September 19, 2025
No goats in sight just yet, but the friends of Paris-Roubaix have already started their repairs of the iconic cobbles. Whether they will have the effect of gaining or losing stars from each secteur we will have to wait and see.
World Championships TT preview:
Let’s look ahead to the World Championships which get started this weekend with the Individual Time Trials. The first elite championships to take place in Africa, Rwanda’s hosting of the Worlds is not without controversy, and several big names will not be lining up at the start line, citing distance and logistical complications.
A certain couple will be lining up on Sunday, and have already been spotted doing reconnaissance.
Tadej Pogačar already at course recon for Worlds ITT also with Urška. 🇷🇼🌈 #Kigali2025 pic.twitter.com/Si29rHl2W1
— Lukáš Ronald Lukács (@lucasaganronald) September 19, 2025
The women will set off first on Sunday morning and alongside Urška Žigart are former World Champions Chloe Dygert and Anna van der Breggen, Tour de France winners Demi Vollering and Kasia Niewiadoma and multiple European champion Marlen Reusser.
British hopes will rest on Anna Henderson, Olympic silver medallist from Paris and the only elite woman selected by Team GB for these entire championships, with national selectors instead opting to field a stacked team of riders in the under-23 races. Admin is meanwhile rooting for Anna Kiesenhofer, the Olympic Road Race champion from Tokyo who now combines her favourite discipline of the TT with coaching for Team Picnic PostNL.
For the men, Tadej Pogačar’s presence will send a shiver down the spine of reigning champion Remco Evenepoel. The 40km course is hilly enough to tempt the Slovenian to attempt the TT-Road Race double and, without Filippo Ganna racing these championships, the title will almost certainly come down to these two.
An outside bet might be Jay Vine. The Australian is fresh off two stage wins in the Vuelta a España and a second place to Ganna by less than a second in the race’s only individual TT. Other podium contenders include his compatriot Luke Plapp, Ineos and America’s Magnus Sheffield, and Stefan Küng who has five top-10s from the last six years, including a second and third place. The course might be just a little too hard for the Swiss specialist though.
Without any Brits riding, admin will be cheering for Estonian Rein Taaramäe. A former Giro and Vuelta stage winner, the 38-year-old left the World Tour last year and now rides for a Japanese Continental team. He’s also a long-term supporter of Rwandan cycling, regularly visiting and donating his team equipment and clothing. Sunday will likely be as much a celebration as it is a competition for Taaramäe.
Friday racing round-up: it's the Lidl wins that count
Lidl-Trek have been in fine form today, with two victories within the 15 minutes of one another.
First, Mattias Skjelmose took victory and the race lead on the third stage of the Tour of Luxembourg. The Dane outkicked TotalEnergies’ Jordan Jegat on the uphill finish and now sits four seconds ahead of the Frenchman on the general classification courtesy of bonus seconds. The race, which finishes on Sunday, will likely come down to tomorrow’s 26.3km Time Trial. Skjelmose’s strongest rival will likely be UAE’s Brandon McNulty, fresh from winning the GP Montreal, who will only need to make up eight seconds to take the race lead.
Jonathan Milan was never going to be at the World Championships in Rwanda, and the Italian has instead kickstarted his autumn campaign with victory at the one-day Kampioenschap van Vlaanderen (Flanders Championship), outsprinting Dylan Groenewegen and Tim Merlier to take his ninth win of the season.
The best Brit meanwhile was Matt Walls, finishing third on stage three’s bunch sprint at the Okolo Slovenska (Tour of Slovakia). Walls was unable to stop Soudal-Quick Step’s Paul Magnier taking his third win in a row.
Tom Pidcock: "I worry about my friends who ride for the Israel team"
Fresh from his Vuelta a España podium and gearing up for the World Championships in Rwanda, Tom Pidcock says protestors in Spain did not “think about the consequences of what they were doing” adding that he “worried about his friends who ride for the Israel team.”
Speaking to the BBC, Pidcock described how tacks were thrown on the road, riders were pushed off their bikes and he was hit in the face by a flag during his time trial.
But the Yorkshireman also cuts a relaxed figure, adding that he’s “not worried about it” and that it’s a shame we get mixed up in it all.”
“I think sport is about escape for people… light-hearted entertainment.
“For it to be so serious and every day you’re not sure where you’ll finish makes it all more difficult to do our passion.”
Pidcock is expected to co-lead Great Britain’s squad in the road race in nine days time alongside Oscar Onley, who finished fourth in the Tour de France. He is included in a nine-man team made up predominantly of climbers on what is the hilliest World Championships course in recent memory.
The World Championships are also unlikely to be disrupted due to protests. Rwanda is an authoritarian dictatorship where public and political dissent is heavily suppressed.
19 September 2025, 08:44
19 September 2025, 08:44
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
30 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@Hollis Jones as Rendel said, the key difference here is there were two strong pieces of evidence distinguishing this from "we all *know* they were aware of the cyclist", one of them a human witness. Outside that it's simply "but the prosecution cannot prove they didn't notice..." and legally that must fail. Like a "he said, she said" but where one of the sides is absent, because they're dead.
Having experienced this in Anglesey and most of it is unnecessary, it does give the driver a big lesson in 'looking extra', as travelling slower does that !
It's true, you aren't feeling yourself any favours wearing black/dark colours, BUT you've got to look, soo many dont and the campaign should be for motorist - look, simple as, it's not hard and drop the speed to, maybe if the police where actually outside rather than on Facebook looking for the naughty words/viewpoints, drivers would be caught speeding, not looking, pulling out, not braking in time, going through red lights, overtaking at a bad time, cutting up cyclists and a lot more..
@Rome73 There are still too many motor vehicles in the central Oxford Street area. There should be zero, except for delivery vehicles at proscribed... prescribed times
@Hollis Jones The crucial difference is the fact that Richardson stopped, exited the vehicle, tried to pull Mr Mullins free and when he couldn't got back in and drove on. He knowingly, actively and voluntarily engaged in the harmful behaviour that caused Mr Mullins' death, which is what made it murder. The hit and run driver hasn't deliberately hit a cyclist and although driving away is of course utterly reprehensible it's only covered by the laws regarding failing to stop at the scene of an accident, which only attracts a six month prison sentence maximum. It's high time the law was changed so that firstly the penalties for failing to stop and render assistance are far higher and secondly so that if the medical evidence is that the victim would have survived with prompt assistance then the driver can be charged with manslaughter or murder. However as it stands murder requires evidence of malice aforethought with an intention to kill or to cause GBH resulting in death. Richardson clearly displayed this by resuming driving even though he knew Mr Mullins was stuck under his car; the hit and run driver in an "accident" didn't have that intention so can't be charged with murder however atrocious their behaviour after the event.
@robgru76 "I am gobsmacked by the number of cyclists I see" So you had no problem in seeing them, what's the issue?
@jaymack I know, sorry! I do accept they deserve some credit for not trying to pass it of as a DBDD but the evidence is so clear it would have been s scandal even by British justice vs cyclists standards if they'd gone for anything below manslaughter.
@Rendel Harris yeah but it could have been spent on widening a few metres of road...
I have worked and socialised around Oxford street for decades. There has been major change in that time - as you would expect in a major metropolis. When I was young you could drive down the whole of Oxford St. When that was stopped everyone screamed the world was going to come to an end. Then it was narrowed in parts to a single lane, the pavements widened and New Oxford Street and Charing Cross road were closed to cars. Everyone screamed the world was going to come to an end. Then Tottenham Court Road was made two way!! And yes, you guessed it, the world was going to come to an end. Then cycle lanes were built all along Gower Street down to Shaftesbury Avenue and the taxi drivers went mental with rage, and the world was going to come to an end. Soho, where I worked for over 10 years, was slowly purged of through vehicles and every time a road was closed or made one way - the world was going to come to an end. But the pedestrian and cyclists increased and so did retail and bars. Thinking back to it, it’s crazy to remember how soho was once clogged with cars, all stuck in self imposed traffic, belching fumes and poison into the narrow streets - until ULEZ and road closures reduced all that. There are still too many motor vehicles in the central Oxford Street area. There should be zero, except for delivery vehicles at proscribed times.
@slc Just read that comment to Mrs H, worryingly she looked thoughtful and said, "Mmm...how nice a bike are we talking here?"
30 thoughts on “Pidcock “worried about friends” on Israel-Premier Tech; “Cyclists should be banned” from road after collision with lorry driver… according to Facebook comments; World Championships preview as riders to use GPS tracking + more on the live blog”
“Cyclists should be banned”
“Cyclists should be banned”
As always, the drivers get the solution the wrong way around.
Problem: Drivers crashing into things, each other and cyclists. Answer: ban cyclists. It’s taken generations to get to this level of driver entitlement, it’s going to take a long time to change it.
Certain people have always
Certain people have always felt a sense of entitlement and anything where they are made to feel some form of responsibility it is automatically the other party at fault, regadless of any facts, rules or principles. This is why we have so many people driving when banned or on illegal plates. They are also likely to complain vocally when money is spent on improvments to help or protect others.
If drivers could be trusted
If drivers could be trusted to drive safely around other road users we wouldn’t have speed limits, speed cameras, speed humps, traffic calming, traffic lights, roundabouts, zebra crossings etc. And we wouldn’t need cycle lanes. Especially in London but also elsewhere drivers through their attrocious driving have brought this woeful situation upon themselves where road space is taken away from them. Try finding a wands “protecting” a cycle lane that hasn’t been either scuffed or partially/completely destroyed by careless drivers who seem to have enormous difficulty placing their vehicle safely. Rant over I guess until the next one.
Pub bike wrote:
Did the UCI manage to cock-up
Did the UCI manage to cock-up GPS tracker use again? Wouldn’t the tracker be better placed on the rider, instead of bike?
I think there is more than
I think there is more than one Tarvie in Scotland. The A835 Tarvie isn’t in Perth and Kinross, but in Highland. The A835 runs from Tore, north of Inverness, to Ullapool and beyond.
I have cycled this road in the past. It is nowhere near the top of my list of roads where I have felt uncomfortable. I drove along it a couple of times last month while heading for a multi day cycling trip starting from Ullapool. What I did see were cars that wanted to go very quickly, faster than I was comforatble driving at. I did pass a number of cyclists on the road when I was heading south. With a little patience, it wasn’t difficult to pass them safely.
Quote:
Was that lecturer Tim Harford?
Quote:
First of all, for a sample of 1000, I suspect that’s going to mean they were within margin of error of each other, so ‘about as many’ would probably be a better way of putting it..
Secondly, if they literally asked “Do cyclists follow traffic rules? [Yes] [No]” then it’s a dumb question – pretty obviously to anyone with an ounce of sense, the answer’s going to be “Some of the time, some more than others” (as it would be if you inserted any other type of road user). No-one follows the rules perfectly, and no group of road users is homogenous.
In a way, if you interpreted it as 41% of people think that all cyclists follow the rules perfectly at all times, it would represent a very positive (if highly optimistic) view of cyclists.
mdavidford wrote:
First of all, for a sample of 1000, I suspect that’s going to mean they were within margin of error of each other, so ‘about as many’ would probably be a better way of putting it..
Two-tailed p=0.32, if you like that sort of thing. I guess they didn’t try to publish in an APA journal 🙂
“Nearly all Ulez fine evaders
“Nearly all Ulez fine evaders are persistent – TfL
Almost all penalty charge notices (PCNs) issued for non-payment of Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez) charges involve persistent evaders, Transport for London (TfL) says.
Some 94% of PCNs have been issued to drivers with more than four outstanding notices….”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0ezpjlz0jzo
How long untill all CCTV, including those of petrol stations – which is what I’ve been advocating for years, will be tied into the national driver and vehicle databases so that any wanted drivers and tagged/cloned plated vehicles are more easily traced?
There’s no point reading
There’s no point reading stuff on social media / local news etc about cycling.
It always boils down to the same comment: cyclist at fault.
“Well if the cyclist wasn’t
“Well if the cyclist wasn’t there…” is basically the argument for everything. Imagine if every crime was treated that way. “Well m’lud, if the victim wasn’t at home when my client tried to burgle them we wouldn’t be sitting here today. Perhaps if home owners put a “we’re out” sign up when they leave, we wouldn’t have this problem.
Well, logically it should
Well, logically it should also be “if the car wasn’t there…”
To be fair … there’s more
To be fair … there’s more chance of a burglary making it past the Procurator Fiscal than an incident involving a cyclist.
Police Scotland only attend cycling incidents when they have nothing else to do, and can’t get around it.
Not that I’m jaded against Police Scotland .. just had … experience.
Tell you what we should do is
Tell you what we should do is reduce the speed limits to sensible levels on our roads. Then again, perhaps 60 is the logical limit for cars on country lanes that can fit 1.5 cars on them and have countless blind corners.
mctrials23 wrote:
I see you … be bold! Assuming (!) there are more sensible drivers than nutters let’s increase it to 200!
Like in chemotherapy both the healthy and malevolent will die, but it should selectively remove the latter and (hopefully) they will be gone before the former.
Sad for all the vulnerable road users, livestock, wildlife, buildings though…
Now the longer nights are
Now the longer nights are coming it’s time for the annual advice for drivers to paint their cars a bright colour and to always carry a high-vis jacket in case they need to step out of their car in the dark.
bensynnock wrote:
And this one never gets old either
chrisonabike wrote:
And the comments are wonderful.
Om my goodness. So much
Om my goodness. So much scrolling and it just keeps going.
momove wrote:
Wait “till you see the “Car crashes into Building” thread here…
Not to mention all
Not to mention all pedestrians MUST wear day glow/night glow/hi-viz head-to-toe, as well as a flashing led white light to the front and a red flashing led on their back, and a helmet, and a certificate of competency when crossing the road?
Too many cars and lorries are being damaged when hit by pedestrians!
Priceless from Gary Parker –
Priceless from Gary Parker – let’s hope he grows at least a 2nd brain cell soon.
“All cyclists should have a rear view mirror, a road worthy certificate, tax & insurance a road legal identification number, but mostly a written & practical test license.
Until then band [sic] them from all roads.”
Where does one get one of
Where does one get one of these road worthy certificates? And do you then need a second certificate to certify the first one’s road-worthiness, or are they self-certifying?
Or am I misunderstanding the whole thing, and it certifies that you are a worthy of the road (and is presumably accompanied by the right to wear a tricorn hat and suitable regalia)?
mdavidford wrote:
Correct!
Cyclists aren’t worthy of the
Cyclists aren’t worthy of the road, as any motorist kno. Road worthy certificates are only for drivers.
> The World Championships are
> The World Championships are also unlikely to be disrupted due to protests.
> Rwanda is an authoritarian dictatorship where public and political dissent is
> heavily suppressed.
In other news, the Vuelta relocating to Saudi Arabia for 2026.
Gosh I hope the lorry was ok
Gosh I hope the lorry was ok
Pete Bude added: “All
Pete Bude added: “All cyclists should have a glow bright jacket with there own number on as like a car number plate a public liability insurance.”
Pete certainly sounds like an intelligent, well balanced lad.
That reads like it was written by someone with the intelligence of a fucking five year old for Christ’s sake.
I concur, I cycle to work and
I concur, I cycle to work and categorically refuse to wear “hi-viz” or “glow bright” (as I shall now always call it) for the following reasons:
1. It doesn’t work
2. It has been proven to “dehumanise cyclists’ and therefore make them more vulnerable.
3. You look like a 80’s rave reject.
4. Motorists are always banging on about “cyclists must wear hi-viz (glow bright 😎).
I think the local cycling group should ride 2 abreast up and down the road and campaign for a 20mph speed limit every weekend until Christmas?