At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Works in many countries - see e.g. Mr. Netenyahu (previous legal issues being at least deferred by him being in power - although these cases are...
It seems obvious common sense that a sprinter should be demoted if their win was clearly assisted by a teammate blocking a rival. It's akin to ...
If you ride on the superhighways in London they are often so crowded that you stay with the same group for very extended periods of time, so if one...
FTFY
I agree....
The game has closed down - some of us are trying out Velogames....
Presumably if you have actual employees - "I asked at a morning meeting, and nobody said they knew anything"....
Luckily a) it has to be proved it was you driving (obviously in Scotland you could just claim you have no memory of that! Although I believe you...
"In fact, a 76 degree seat tube angle wouldn't be out of place on a time trial bike, that isn't usually associated with sympathetic handling or...
Despite the ad-blocker message and the fact that I keep mine on, especially when gawping pointlessly at websites that do "reviews" such as this,...