At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Whilst one definition of aggressive is "prepared or ready to attack", something that does apply to a significant minority of drivers in any case,...
The Rochdale Canal which runs alongside the A646 is suitable for for leisure cycling and is very pleasant. Admittedly, it is not suitable for...
Not really fair to be complaining to professional cyclists about the cost of TV coverage, in my opinion. If it was association football, where the...
BMW Mini, not a proper one.
I don't have a power meter but I have tried to gauge the effect of different positions on my bike for the same effort. I seem to get a fairly...
See recently reported comments by elected labour party represenetives in Burnley to see how that works.
Parcours Chrono - so good you included them twice?...
I often come into Bristol along the dual carriageway there as it's quicker than trying to find my way on the bike paths, but then I'm used to...
I re-fuse to believe that not charging drivers is the current attitude
Most modern cars, especially SUV's perform very badly on the Moose test. Essentially a stunt driver has to weave through tightly spaced cones at...