Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
mdavidford
Replaced yourselves? What’s
Replaced yourselves? What’s happened to the originals?
mdavidford
It’s a swan uprising.
It’s a swan uprising.
(As opposed to a swan upping, which is a different thing altogether.)
April 1, 2025 at 11:12 am in reply to: Through traffic to be banned in parts of Bristol for ‘liveable neighbourhood’ scheme #1152443
mdavidford
slc wrote:A staggering five out of six city residents reportedly regard congestion as a stumbling blockShould look where they’re going.
mdavidford
Delete as applicable?
Delete as applicable?
“It’s a page.”
mdavidford
Looking at that, I wonder if
Looking at that, I wonder if they were actually just making a very bad job of reversing around the corner and cut across the ramp.
March 21, 2025 at 4:57 pm in reply to: Bristol – Pictures show exactly how Park Street will change after major transformation #1152205
mdavidford
Is that like when cars are
Is that like when cars are forced to veer violently across the road by invisible cyclists?
March 21, 2025 at 4:48 pm in reply to: Bristol – Pictures show exactly how Park Street will change after major transformation #1152199
mdavidford
hawkinspeter]
hawkinspeter wrote:“Traffic flows like water. Once you start stopping it up, it then moves into random directions.”Hang about – when did water start moving in ‘random directions’? I was under the impression it generally* followed the dictates of gravity.
[* Things like wicking and siphoning excepted.]
hawkinspeter wrote:“Traffic doesn’t work like water.
“There’s been lots of literature that shows if you restrict through-traffic, then traffic just evaporates.”
So does water, if you give it long enough.
mdavidford
David Tennant wrote:
David Tennant wrote:It had potholes extending from the verge into the carriageway.No – it has a section of the verge that’s been worn away by people parking/driving on it.
(Incidentally, he’s let himself go a bit since his Doctor Who days, hasn’t he?)
March 18, 2025 at 12:12 pm in reply to: Through traffic to be banned in parts of Bristol for ‘liveable neighbourhood’ scheme #1152053
mdavidford
chrisonabike]
slc wrote</strong></p> <p>[quote=chrisonabike wrote:[quote=slc]alas in the UK in many places they would be too expensive even if frequently used, because someone always crashes into them/ parks their vehicle on top…I think your cost-benefit analysis is off there – you’ve failed to account for the amusement value of the ensuing social media posts.
March 17, 2025 at 10:43 pm in reply to: Bristol pedestrians to have immediate priority over vehicles at traffic light crossings #1152031
mdavidford
This is going to give cross
This is going to give cross people something else to hang their crossness on.
mdavidford
Clearly the speed bumps are
Clearly the speed bumps are dangerous and need to be removed.
March 17, 2025 at 10:52 am in reply to: Car crashes into building – please post your Local news stories #1151997
mdavidford
I like the way it even makes
I like the way it even makes a cartoon-style hole in the wall too.
March 13, 2025 at 10:06 am in reply to: Through traffic to be banned in parts of Bristol for ‘liveable neighbourhood’ scheme #1151901
mdavidford
hawkinspeter wrote:I’m glad that they weren’t arrested for a peaceful protest. In their defence, the roads aren’t “essential infrastructure” as otherwise they wouldn’t be installing bus gates on them.Sounds like a solution – just keep saying every day that you’re going to install the bus gates – these people keep coming out and lying in the road – you achieve the same effect without the actual expense of doing the installation.

mdavidford
Doesn’t appear to be anything
Doesn’t appear to be anything to do with money in this case – rather it’s a legal dodge. From what I can understand, the government, in it’s wisdom, has told councils in England that it’s not lawful for them use ANPR to enforce parking charges. This is an attempt to say “It’s not the council wot’s doing it – it’s this private company (which just happens to be owned by the council).”
mdavidford
Makes sense – I mean Cormac’s
Makes sense – I mean Cormac’s also responsible for The Road, right?
-
AuthorReplies