Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“An error in judgement”: Police apologise for “dangerous” high speed close pass on cyclist during emergency response, which “dropped below standards expected”

“The officer has agreed to learn from this situation and be more careful when approaching and passing cyclists,” the police said following the incident, which also saw an oncoming motorist fail to slow down or move aside for the officer

Gloucestershire Constabulary have apologised to a cyclist who was “dangerously” close passed by an officer responding to an emergency incident – after an oncoming driver failed to slow down or move over – describing the manoeuvre as “below the standards expected” and an “error in judgement”.

Responding to a complaint lodged by the cyclist, who said he “could have easily fallen into the road” due to the speed of the overtake, the driver’s commanding officer said he accepted that he had passed “far too closely” and that he “will now take more care when responding to emergency incidents”.

The incident, which we reported on last month, took place on the B4063 in Churchdown, about five miles from Gloucester, as the officer approached the cyclist from behind while responding to an emergency call.

“The police car had both its lights on and siren going,” the cyclist, known as ‘The Cycling Nerd’ on social media, told road.cc.

“As soon as I knew that it was coming from behind, I pulled over to the side of the road as quickly as I could, but because of the speed of the police vehicle there wasn’t enough time to fully unclip from the bike.

“I am an experienced cyclist with thousands of miles cycled using clips, so I was able to maintain an upright position despite still being clipped in and despite the bow wave that hit me from the police car driving so close at such a high speed.”

> Cyclist criticises police car driver for “dangerous manoeuvre” while passing due to oncoming driver not moving aside or slowing down

The cyclist, who holds a professional bus and lorry driving licence and has experience at dealing with emergency vehicles, said that the oncoming car driver “definitely didn’t pull to the kerb”, and while he “couldn’t be 100 per cent sure”, he believed “they didn’t slow at all”.

He continued: “The oncoming car failed to slow down to allow the police car through safely which led to the police car making a manoeuvre they shouldn’t have done. Yes, they were responding to an emergency, but they still have to respect vulnerable road users in such situations.

“I never thought they were going to hit me, but it was when the bow wave hit me in an almost stationary state and still clipped to the bike that I felt unsteady. I could have easily fallen into the road at that point.

“My biggest complaint was that it shouldn’t have happened simply because not all cyclists are as confident.”

> Near Miss of the Day 430: Close pass ... from a police officer

After seeking the counsel of a retired police officer, who told him that the driver of the police vehicle “totally failed when presented with the predictable emerging hazard”, the cyclist reported the close pass to Gloucestershire Constabulary.

“Despite what a lot of keyboard warriors are saying, I’m confident I will get a positive result from my complaint as this is not the first time I have had to complain about police driving in Gloucestershire around cyclists,” he told road.cc at the time.

> Police claim they don’t carry out close pass operations on A roads due to “safety element involved towards police cyclists” — after cyclist complains of dangerous driving and “20 closes passes in a day” on national cycle route

And this week, in email correspondence seen by road.cc, the force has issued an apology to the cyclist for a pass which they agreed was “far too close”.

“I have spoken to the officer driving the police vehicle involved in your complaint as agreed and have explained that their driving dropped below the standards I would have expected on this occasion,” the driver’s commanding officer told the cyclist.

However, it was also noted that the driver of the vehicle was unable to view the footage due to the link sent by the cyclist expiring, but the officer said “I would have liked to have shown the officer this footage as I felt it was quite impactive”.

They continued: “However, even though the officer has not seen the footage, they have accepted my description of the incident and agreed that they would have passed too close in those circumstances. They have agreed to learn from this situation and be more careful when approaching and passing cyclists, other road users, and hazards as per our training.

“It was an error in judgement at the time which caused them to pass you far too closely, which again I apologise for. The officer is aware and will now take more care when responding to emergency incidents.

“I will complete my report and return it to our professional standards department, who will review the course of action taken and supply you with a copy of the report.”

> South Gloucestershire Councillor slams hilly cycle path plan and claims those who do use it will be "flying up and down" using it as "racetrack"

Accepting the force’s apology, and forwarding them another link to the video shared on social media, the cyclist said: “Thank you for the update. I am happy that this matter has been dealt with, however seeing the footage would enhance the officers understanding of the situation.

“I look forward to seeing a copy of the report from the professional standards department.”

Despite Gloucestershire Constabulary’s apology, the cyclist remains critical of the lack of attention afforded to dangerous driving around people on bikes in the county.

On the same day as he was close passed by the police officer, a van driver committed a careless overtake – but when the cyclist reported the incident, Gloucestershire Constabulary said there was “insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction”.

“Since the incident happened I have joined a national network run by Action Vision Zero,” the cyclist told road.cc this week. “The group is focusing on road crime reporting as so many reports are being handled badly where the police are taking no further action – which if you remember was my initial gripe that they ignored my report about the van and then performed a close pass themselves.

“It’s still very early days, we’ve only had one meeting, but the aim is to get the police to improve Operation Snap and for reporting incidents not to be a ‘postcode lottery’.”

Remarkably, or perhaps unsurprisingly, this isn’t the first time that we’ve reported on police officers in Gloucestershire close passing cyclists at high speed, with one similarly shocking overtake from a driver of a marked police vehicle on the A40 making our Near Miss of the Day series in 2020.

And the previous year, an officer from Gloucestershire Constabulary told a cyclist reporting a close pass from a coach driver, “Maybe you should consider trading in your bike for a Hummer”.

The force subsequently apologised for the comments and the coach driver was fined and had six penalty points put on his licence.

Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
Bungle_52 | 2 weeks ago
0 likes

Any connection?

https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/motoring/gloucester-drivers-b...

Gloucester drivers branded most dangerous in country.

Avatar
polainm | 2 weeks ago
2 likes

UK policing and cycling infra culture....both stuck in the 1970s.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to polainm | 2 weeks ago
4 likes
Avatar
brooksby replied to chrisonabike | 2 weeks ago
3 likes

Where's a big pile of cardboard boxes when you need one…? 

Avatar
Cayo | 2 weeks ago
6 likes

I'm going to buck the trend here a little and at least give them some credit for admitting fault, avoiding victim blaming and sharing more information on action they claim to have taken, which is far more than we usually here from businesses and other organisations who drive below an acceptable limit.

No, it should not have happened like that in the first place (and I'm pretty certain training will say they should stop, like any other driver should, rather than risk endangering anyone else), but given that it did, the response is about as positive as I think we could expect. I'd love to see all dangerous drivers named and shamed, but that's never going to happen, and I expect that emergency service drivers will, on the one hand get a bit of a free pass (no pun intended), whilst on the other hand hopefully getting a serious dressing down for coming all too close to causing another serious incident.

Doesn’t excuse inaction on other complaints they receive though.

Had a scary moment myself recently when I was almost finished riding through Grangemouth on the way home and heard a siren. But the nature of the buildings (oil refinery etc) made it seem like it was coming from way off to my left rather than, as it happened, behind me. Got a real shock when a car zoomed past at around 50mph. Fortunately, the driver on the other side slowed and I was in no danger as the police car left sufficient space. Got just enough warning when a van followed the car moments later!

Avatar
wtjs | 3 weeks ago
1 like

Ah! The old meaningless apology dodge again!

Avatar
brooksby replied to wtjs | 2 weeks ago
4 likes
wtjs wrote:

Ah! The old meaningless apology dodge again!

I'm sorry that you feel that way  3

Avatar
Oldfatgit | 3 weeks ago
5 likes

Surely this should be automatic Careless Driving?
Don't Police emergency response drivers undergo more advanced driver training than civilian drivers, so surely the bar for prosecution should be much lower than for a civilian?

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to Oldfatgit | 2 weeks ago
8 likes
Oldfatgit wrote:

Surely this should be automatic Careless Driving? Don't Police emergency response drivers undergo more advanced driver training than civilian drivers, so surely the bar for prosecution should be much lower than for a civilian?

The police motorcyclist who knocked me off my motorbike with his private car 20 odd years ago whilst travelling so fast I initially thought he was doing a runner got NFA so it seems the bar is set pretty high.

Avatar
lonpfrb replied to Oldfatgit | 2 weeks ago
0 likes
Oldfatgit wrote:

Don't Police emergency response drivers undergo more advanced driver training than civilian drivers, so surely the bar for prosecution should be much lower than for a civilian?

The System of Control as documented in the HMSO book Roadcraft is the foundation training for Traffic Division riders, with Class 2, and Class 1 built on top.
So a close pass on any vulnerable road user would be a professional standards fault and potential disciplinary.

No, you can't have two levels, rather Aggrevating Factors are defined by the Sentencing Council i. e. After conviction.

Avatar
bobbinogs replied to lonpfrb | 2 weeks ago
1 like

"An error of judgement", might give that a go if I'm ever nicked for speeding, etc. Although having a cop badge in my wallet seems the only sure fire way of getting away with pretty much everything, eh Wayne?

Latest Comments