A cyclist who was filmed being struck by a motorist making a right-turn into a no-entry road – allegedly to attempt a U-turn to avoid traffic – should be prosecuted for cycling without due care and attention, according to Nick Freeman, the lawyer famous for obtaining not guilty verdicts for celebrities charged with driving offences and often known by his Mr Loophole nickname.
However, the clip – which has so far been viewed over eight million times of X, formerly Twitter – has divided opinion on social media, with pioneering close pass police officer Mark Hodson describing the incident as a “straightforward” case of driving without due care and attention on the part of the motorist, who Hodson said should have been “expecting and looking” as they crossed the lane to turn right.
Meanwhile, broadcaster and cycling campaigner Jeremy Vine added that anyone who believes the collision was caused by the cyclist “should have their driving licence rescinded”, while the cyclist who filmed the incident – and narrowly avoided crashing, too – has used the debate to call for safer cycling infrastructure on a road he described as a “dog’s dinner” and “clearly dangerous”.
The crash took place on Sunday morning, at around 11am, on London’s A308 Hampton Court Road, between Hampton Court and Bushy Park.
The clip, which was posted later that evening on X by the Piggy Stardust account (who captured the incident on their bike camera), shows the cyclist riding on the road’s painted cycle lane, before taking a brief drink from their water bottle as the lane suddenly ends, to be replaced by a solitary painted bike symbol on the road.
As the cyclist puts their bottle back in its cage, however, the driver of a Mini – after another motorist left a gap – makes a right turn, cutting across the path of the cyclist, who collides with the back of the car, suffering bruises in the process (the car, meanwhile, escaped with a dented rear panel).
Describing the shocking collision, the cyclist behind the Piggy Stardust account, who wishes to remain anonymous, told road.cc: “I’d been out in the Surrey Hills and was coming back to Kingston. I found myself behind this guy at around Hampton Court.
“There’s a small section of cycle lane, that includes a floating bus stop, and a floating parking space, and then the road. So, you’re actually cycling up the inside of parked cars. We exited that little section of cycle lane – and we were in exactly the right place. There were cycle motifs painted on the road.”
He continued: “And I’ve seen people on social media suggesting that we were cycling too fast, but we really weren’t. He was off the pedals, he reached down to drink from his bottle, we were doing between 10 and 15mph.
“Then this Mini just pulled across in front of him. And the driver was pulling into a road, Campbell Road, that’s no entry for cars or motorcycles – it’s exit only, and there’s no access apart from for residents.
“I think the driver was basically doing a U-turn, to get out of heavy traffic. And certainly after the incident the driver turned around the way he had come.
“Doing a U-turn – for me, that’s driving without due care and attention. And I very nearly came down myself. The cyclist in front came down quite badly, and I only just unclipped in time, otherwise I’d have been on top of him. He was dazed and bruised, but he was able to stand up afterwards.
“The driver blamed us for riding too fast, and I blamed him for driving without due care and attention. There was no kind of nastiness, just a difference of opinion really. But the driver didn’t leave his details with the cyclist.”
In email correspondence following the collision, the rider involved told the camera cyclist that the Mini driver “gave me little space to brake” and that “I need to get one of those cameras”.
“I gave the cyclist the video and my details, but I haven’t heard from him since that first email,” Piggy adds. “If he doesn’t decide to pursue it, I certainly will.”
“The cyclist should now be prosecuted”
However, as Piggy Stardust noted while chatting to road.cc, not everyone on social media responding to the now-viral video agreed with his assessment that the Mini driver was “clearly” guilty of driving without due care and attention, causing the crash.
“Cyclist fault. Clear markings showing end of cycle lane. Cyclist continues undertaking without slowing despite stopped vehicle,” X user Layer 1 Hunter tweeted under the video.
“Cyclist’s fault, he wasn’t paying attention because he was drinking a drink and trying to put it back in its holder. He also should have been aware a car had stopped and left a gap for another driver to turn. Totally his fault,” added KingPin Giveaway.
“Mini driver turns across bicycle lane, missing obscured cyclist. Cyclist was focused on replacing his water bottle while knowingly speeding past stopped traffic (foolish in any vehicle). Fault 50/50,” wrote the marginally more diplomatic RQD.
Aside from Blue Check Twitter, the clip has also attracted the attention of notable names on both sides of the road safety debate.
According to lawyer Nick Freeman – whose archive of cycling-related comments in recent years includes making calls for compulsory high-visibility clothing, helmet use, and number plates, arguing cyclists should be forced to use cycle lanes, that lockdown created a “toxic culture of cycling”, and that the Highway Code changes introduced to protect vulnerable road users and pedestrians would cause carnage and more danger – the cyclist was at fault for failing to concentrate prior to the collision.
Freeman, who earned his Mr Loophole nickname by getting celebrities off the hook for driving offences on technicalities, tweeted: “Sorry cyclist was hurt, but [he] wasn’t concentrating on what was happening around him.
“Was going too quickly, swerving as drinking, putting head down, and so unaware car to his right had stopped to let Mini pass. Cyclist should now be prosecuted for cycling without due care and attention.”
> Mr Loophole makes renewed call for cyclist number plates, but gets shut down by Jeremy Vine show panel
However, Freeman’s conclusion was contradicted by Mark Hodson, the now-retired police officer who pioneered close pass operations in the force while advocating for third-party reporting from cyclists, who described the incident as a “straightforward” case of the motorist driving without due care and attention.
“The driver has a view of the cyclists at the start of the video, [and] crosses a lane without knowing if anything is coming anyway,” Hodson tweeted. “Actually, as the cyclists are higher than the vehicles, they would have been in sight throughout.
“If you were competent and looking for them, it’s not like they appeared from behind a large high sided vehicle – and even then if that were the case, the driver is duty bound to check/give way.
“Any competent driver would be expecting and looking. People defend the driving as they are also part of the incompetent problem group.”
> Should dealing with third-party camera reports from cyclists be outsourced? Close pass op pioneer Mark Hodson on the road.cc Podcast
That criticism of the widespread social media defence of the driver’s actions was echoed by broadcaster, journalist, and camera-using cyclist Jeremy Vine, who colourfully wrote: “Everyone in this thread saying ‘it was the cyclist’s fault’ should have their driving licence rescinded and their car crushed into a tiny metal cube that can be sold on Vinted as a coffee table.”
Responding to the social media reaction, Piggy Stardust told road.cc: “It was a predictable reaction from Mr Loophole – what else do you expect him to say? But I disagree completely. That was clear driving without due care. And at least, beyond the typical rubbish, the clip has started a healthy debate about safe driving around cyclists.”
> Jeremy Vine rides penny-farthing along cycle lane... gets blocked off by a driver who ignored cyclist priority
That healthy debate, the cyclist says, should be centred on the need for safe, connected, well-designed infrastructure for people on bikes.
“The road is an absolute dog’s dinner of different and inadequate cycling infrastructure,” he points out.
“There are floating bus stops, parked cars, and a cycle lane beside parked cars, before a section of road with just cycle motifs – so you’re encouraged to ride up the inside of traffic on that bend that we were approaching.
“And then further down to Bushy Park, you have a painted cycle lane that at the weekends is littered with parked cars. Further down towards Kingston, there’s a combined pedestrian and cycle lane, which most of us don’t use because you don’t want to ride with pedestrians walking towards you.
“So it’s really up to the London Borough of Richmond to sort out their cycling infrastructure, it’s a dog’s dinner. A friend of mine also nearly crashed on that road.
“Riding down the inside of parked cars, you’re at the mercy of drivers like this one, who was doing a U-turn to get out of traffic. It’s rubbish, and clearly dangerous.”
Add new comment
45 comments
Especially :-
"the cyclist, Brian Fitzgerald, who works as a banker with Credit Suisse,"
He's not got a lot going for him - a cyclist AND a banker.
Usual story: motorist stops to leave a gap, to be helpful toward their fellow motorist. I'd wager that they even waved the mini driver across, with a friendly smile. Mini driver makes the manoeuvre.
Neither party even thinks about other road users.
Not just that, they drive off as if nothing had just happened.
Even if it had been a normal side road to turn in, that's the drivers fault for not checking their route was clear.
And the driver not?
Well, the driver wasn't really cycling, unless that Mini is some kind of Flintstones contraption
With Hodson on this one, it's so simple it's worrying people are tying themselves in knots trying to blame the cyclist.
Proceeding road user A. Turning road user B turns into path of road user A. Collision occurs. I don't think there's an insurer would would bother disputing liability on this one, it's purely cost control.
Most of my cycling is done on country lanes and smaller roads so I don't ride much in places like shown on this clip but, when I do, I have zero faith that drivers understand, or are even aware of, the recent changes to the Highway Code which give cyclists priority.
I would therefore probably give way to vehicles indicating to turn left despite it being my right of way. Can people who cycle regularly on such roads comment on how they ride and their experiences with drivers. I guess if you stop to let cars turn then cyclists behind you may become frustrated.
If you keep stopping to let cars turn in a busy town you will get frustrated yourself as you will spend more time stopped than cycling!
That is a concern even in NL (e.g. debate about "priority" on roundabouts [1] [2]) and may suggest that "we can't get there from here" directly for some of their infra designs. Some will only work where there is a low enough motor traffic volume, speeds have come down and in general drivers are prepared to "play nice".
I'd certainly not want to encourage more "not invented here" UK cycle infra
bodgesbright ideas though. Our designers, planners and builders do that effortlessly almost every time!The driver in this instance wasn't turning left though, that can create conflict with cyclists coming up the inside and it can be the cyclist's culpability if they are riding too fast for the situation; in this case the driver was turning right across the oncoming traffic with it being 100% their responsibility to check that all oncoming traffic was stopped before proceeding.
To my mind, the cyclist would only be culpable if the driver was already indicating left when the cyclist attempts to filter up the inside. Otherwise, the driver must not overtake a cyclist on the approach to a junction if the driver is planning on turning left (the good ol' left-hook).
Not that it applies at all to this situation, as you stated.
Quite. It's bizarre that there appears to be some kind of doubt about this.
I can't wait for the BBC to have a few articles about this incident, totally exonerating the driver and not even bothering to talk to "The Cycling Lobby" just like they've done for the past few days about another incident.
"But the driver didn’t leave his details with the cyclist.” Oh dear, that's illegal: I wonder if the police will do anything.
They did have cycling UK Duncan Dollomore (?) on about 0850ish for a few minutes. He was very good. The only thing I would have added was to say if you do get convicted as a cyclist, you will go to prison but if you are a driver there is a good chance you won't.
Dollimore, 0855, and he was very good. Shame he was only given two minutes to respond to the four or five times that amount given to Matt Briggs etc.
Pages