“I’m done with the internet for the year”: Cyclists despair at Facebook “hack” claiming you can ditch your pump and instead inflate tyres with a syringe; Jeremy Vine’s cycling new year’s resolution; Festive 500… in one ride + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
Jeremy Vine reveals his new year's resolution is "not to get cross when I'm cycling and drivers do things like this", after latest cycle lane incident
My new year’s resolution is not to get cross when I’m cycling and drivers do things like this.
🎥Filmed 31.12.24 #HappyNewYear2025 pic.twitter.com/IH21aFFQoA
— Jeremy Vine | thejeremyvine.bsky.social (@theJeremyVine) January 1, 2025
2024 wouldn’t have been complete without one final Jeremy Vine video perfectly summing up some of the dangers and annoyances cyclists face riding every day in urban areas such as London. In this case it was a van driver turning across a cycle lane, not giving the rider priority as the Highway Code advises, the incident fortunately just about only resulting in a case of inconvenience and Vine having to turn off the route, rather than what could have happened if he was a couple of seconds further along the cycle lane.
The video then reveals the broadcaster was riding his penny farthing and Vine stops for a word with the driver of the van, who suggests he had seen the rider and it was safe. Anyway, one wave and an apology later and Vine was back on his penny farthing, explaining the apology “means everything” and elaborating that “if somebody even just waves an apology, it’s all fine”.
The video has been viewed more than a million times on Twitter/X, most of the comments really not worth getting into. Anyway, Vine has made it his new year’s resolution “to not to get cross when I’m cycling and drivers do things like this”, and fingers crossed some others have made it theirs to not do those aforementioned things that caused the video…
2024: The year of air-filled aero backpacks, crank length debates, falling bike prices and Tadej Pogačar
If you want to stay in 2024 for a few moments longer, here’s our round-up of all the biggest cycling stories of the past 12 months.
Plenty of mentions of a certain Slovenian cyclist in there. Ryan has taken a look at the history books and asked: ‘Was Tadej Pogačar’s 2024 the best season ever?’
Elsewhere on the site over Christmas, Rebecca rounded up all the best (and some more questionable) tech we saw in 2024.
But what’s coming next? Here are Emily’s tech predictions for 2025, including hookless wheels being here to stay, the return of full-fat aero bikes, and the rise of Chinese direct-to-consumer bikes. Chinese bikes made an impression on Jamie last year too, here are 10 things he learnt whilst making 101 cycling videos in 2024.
Completing Rapha's Festive 500 in one ride
Before Christmas we shared Lloyd Collier’s story with you on the live blog. Well, he was one of a group of riders to complete the Festive 500 in a single ride at Herne Hill Velodrome over the festive break. Chapeau, that’s a lot of laps… more than 1,000 in fact.
Lloyd was riding in memory of Annette ‘Netty’ Collier who sadly took her own life last year. He raised funds for the Essex & Herts Air Ambulance who attempted to save Netty that day.
“Each time the helicopter flies it costs almost £3,000, with EHAAT’s monthly total cost coming to approximately £1,000,000,” Lloyd told us. “They rely solely on charitable donations so I’m hoping to raise enough funds for their next three or four missions — wouldn’t it be wonderful if, with funds raised in memory of Netty, they can get to the next Netty, or Hetty, or Harry, in time.
“The family and I ask that her death also be a rallying call to all of us to be vigilant to our loved ones and their state of mind — a fleeting moment of weakness can last forever.”
The fundraiser had already hit the £6,000 mark before Christmas and is now at £9,200, approaching double the original target.. You can read more about Netty’s story, Essex & Herts Air Ambulance’s work, and donate to the fundraiser here.
"Could be wrong, but I reckon this is probably the bike light I ordered"
New year = new kits
All those riders who are changing teams for 2025 have finally been unleashed from the shackles of their old kits and bikes. No longer will they have to litter the team training camp with their old team’s colours, the new year means contracts are up and riders free to wear their new squad’s kit. In British national champ Ethan Hayter’s case, that means this Union Jack lid too.
You really have to wonder why Ineos missed a trick and didn’t get him blinged up on Alan Sugar’s Pinarello last season?
Apologies for reminding you of that picture’s existence.
Pauline Ferrand-Prévot also has a new team, the former world champ switching to Visma-Lease a Bike’s yellow.
It’s the same kit as last year, the team prioritising “reinforcing the recognisability” and building the “brand”.
Parent company of Raleigh and Lapierre claims "recovery well on track" despite 10 per cent drop in revenue
Accell Group posted a 10 per cent drop in revenue in its finalised 2023 accounts, Bike Europe reported. The business, which owns Lapierre, Raleigh and numerous other bike brands, is “well on track” to recovery, according to its CEO Tjeerd Jegen.
“2024 was a challenging year for both the bike industry and Accell,” he said. “However, we’ve normalised stock levels, made significant progress with our recapitalisation and are proud to see one of the key Accell brands, Lapierre, return to the UCI World Tour. As we look ahead, we are well positioned to benefit from the favourable macro trends and continue building on this momentum in the new year.
“All brands now benefit from joint stock management, and the stock levels of finished bikes, which peaked at the end of 2023, have now been brought back to normalised pre-Covid levels. The majority of the stock now consists of models produced in the past year. The inventory of parts and accessories had been brought back to normalised levels earlier in the year. We see sales to customers in our key markets increasing again.”
In June, Accell’s credit rating was downgraded for fourth time in a year, the blow coming at the same time that the group’s cargo bike company Babboe was criticised for a “shambles” recall of faulty frames.
The group also made job cuts to streamline its European production, with two facilities merging and some production relocated to Hungary and Turkey. In October, the major Dutch cycling company did hint at its recovery, Accell reporting that parts and accessories inventory is already back to normal and bike inventory levels are expected to reach the same point by the end of 2024.
Cyclists warned about fake Rapha site offering "too good to be true" deals
> Cyclists warned about fake Rapha site offering “too good to be true” deals
"The 1,500 hours a year of team manager duties became hard to mix with actual work": Two more British domestic teams close
The Cycling Academy, a Scottish-based racing team, will not be continuing in 2025. Sharing the news on social media, The Cycling Academy highlighted the end of its deal with Arnold Clark and “the 1,500 hours a year of team manager duties” becoming “hard to mix with actual work”.
The post continued: “Four brilliant seasons on the tarmac, mud and wood delivered loads of Scottish Champs, Scotland’s first British Junior Road Champ and some nice podiums in the UK and Europe. We also nudged some riders down the line of pro careers, enjoyed some proper digging in, and benefited from an amazing group staff and volunteers. Spending time with young folks striving in the worlds hardest sport is an incredible privilege and unbeatable experience.”
The British Continental also noted the closure of West Yorkshire-based A.Fawcett Racing.
"The bike industry will not get better this year": Brompton profits nosedive by over 99 per cent amid "really sad state of affairs"
"Really disappointing": Mathieu van der Poel's injury problems continue, cyclocross world champ out of tomorrow's action at Koksijde
Mathieu van der Poel’s ongoing rib problems have caused him to withdraw from tomorrow’s cross in Koksijde. Alpecin Deceuninck said it is also unclear if he’ll be fit to ride the World Cup round at Dendermonde on Sunday, a decision on his fitness to be made on Saturday.
“This is really disappointing because Koksijde is one of my favorite races,” Van der Poel said. “It’s where I won my first world title, but it’s just too soon. I hope to be ready for Dendermonde, although I fear it will be a close call.”
"I'm done with the internet for the year": Cyclists despair at Facebook "hack" claiming you can ditch your pump and instead inflate tyres with a syringe
It’s only day two but this ‘genius hack’ doing the rounds on Facebook already left one cyclist “done with the internet for the year”. We were having a scroll when the video popped up. It appears to have been re-shared from somewhere else, but shows how cyclists can (supposedly) ditch their pump and instead inflate tyres using… a syringe. Very handy for pro racers of a certain era…
Apologies, we can’t embed the vid, so click here if you want to endure it in its entirety, or just accept these equally baffling screenshots…
Anyway, the comments section is what makes all this really worth it. There’s a peloton’s worth of exasperated people having some fun… roll the comments…
“I love these ‘internet genius’ posts. Just because you CAN do something doesn’t mean you SHOULD.”
“Finally a good use for those discarded EPO syringes. Recycling is good.”
“I’d rather walk.”
“4.3 PSI”
“If you were shooting for dumbest video of the day you are right up there in the top three.”
Now we really want to see the other two videos…
Others made the shocking claim that instead of bringing all your kit and modifying a syringe at the roadside, you could just buy a pump. Nah, that’ll never catch on. Whoever made the video probably thought it would be one of those ‘fun’ social media videos that gets a silly amount of views, instead it’s just being roasted in cycling groups on Facebook. You win some, you lose some.
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
36 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
Link to the data: https://media.aspolice.net/uploads/production/20260204103554/JourneyCam-Report-October-2020-December-2025.xlsx
it’s a ‘game changer’. Use of this phrase means automatic disqualification from any further consideration Agreed! I automatically abandon any written, audio or video material, even scientific or medical, which includes any 'game changing' rubbish
But it's a 'game changer'. Use of this phrase means automatic disqualification from any further consideration, even if I can check that my helmet is at a suitably jaunty angle.
I don't know why the writer inaccurately describes the light output selection on this light. Three different things are conflated without properly first differentiating between them: The light mode (constant vs flash or "pulse"), power output (lumen rating), and the method of choosing these. Exposure combines the first two into three programs where each program has an individual output for the modes. So the copy-pasted text refers only to selecting the programs. Selecting between modes is as simple as in the Knog: "To cycle between the Constant and pulse options in each program press the function button once." Granted this might seem confusing at first but after that it is dead simple. The benefit of Exposure's choice is keeping things simple - once you've turned on the light you click either between constant and flash. In most cases FOR A COMMUTER LIGHT, this is just fine - when you ride a relatively short distance in most likely illuminated surroundings what the actual lumen output is is secondary. Connected to the above, marking as negative that the light puts out "only" 400 lumens in constant mode, is illogical. As the reviewer states, that amount is "a truly useful amount of light". There is ablosutely no challenge for Exposure in getting the light to put out 600 or more lumens in constant. But a) that would be more than "purposeful" and b) drain out the battery in an instant. The light has been designed as an ultra compact commuter light - where does it fail in that? Conversely, if you ride in "unlit rural voids" blame yourself and not the light if you chose this as your illuminating device. Furthermore claiming that the new alum. anti dazzle shield "makes zero difference" and is no upgrade is baffling - which do you think protects the lens better in an impact? Finally, moaning about the cost of the light without even mentioning what obviously plays a major role - the fact that it is manufactured in the UK, is appalling. So yeah if you "value" buying a light by Knog, Cateye and the likes that manufacture their lights in an undemocratic country where the list of ongoing human, labour, international law and environmental violations is nearly endless, and wish to support manufacturing processes where products are shipped across the world to endulge your "needs", then feel free to ignore all the above, and just focus on "user-friendliness".
Once again the CPS and Police are at fault There may be occasions in which the police and the CPS are independent entities, but in most of the cases on here, the CPS is just an excuse deployed by the police to excuse inaction over really blatant offences. What police officers are violently opposed to is people reporting offences, particularly when they send indisputable video, because the reports could take matters out of the hands of the police. They like to prosecute people they don't like, such as cyclists, and to have the option of forgiving people they do like, such as drivers in big cars or people they know. Whataboutery is getting a Bad Press on here, but it's a perfectly reasonable objection when, for instance, video is provided of drivers committing MUST NOT offences such as RLJs and they're forgiven by the police 'because everybody does it', yet a big thing is made of the offence when cyclists are involved. The assertion may not be palatable, but there are a lot of lying, crooked b******s in the Police.
I have both a Scott Spark RC and the Scale Gravel RC and find the Dangerholm builds really interesting by exploring what different directions can be achieved with a mix of imagination, DIY and professional resources. Probably not for the staid British mindset as shown by previous comments.
Once again the CPS and Police are at fault. They don't really worry about the law as they can usually find one to fit around their needs. And once again it's only when they are stood up to that they are forced to run away.
Lol. I’ve been saying the same to my watch. It keeps prompting me I need to do more calories on certain days and I tell it - but I did some gardening in the afternoon which included digging but u don’t let me record that. And then I have another biscuit with my tea.
"~15% of the riding time that I’m forced to use the road(because the infrastructure for cycling is insufficient or nonexistent) " Amsterdam?
Same here. I have a helmet with built in front and rear lights and have a red light clipped onto my bag plus lights attached to my bike front and rear but still have drivers putting me in danger. My commute is about two miles and I normally have around four incidents a week where I have to brake hard or take other evasive action to avoid being hit by distracted drivers. A big percentage of these are drivers coming on to roundabouts when I am already on them.
36 thoughts on ““I’m done with the internet for the year”: Cyclists despair at Facebook “hack” claiming you can ditch your pump and instead inflate tyres with a syringe; Jeremy Vine’s cycling new year’s resolution; Festive 500… in one ride + more on the live blog”
Quote:
Do they usually ship them with batteries included/charged?
Normally the battery will
Normally the battery will have some charge before the item is packaged and shipped, at least for items with a built in rechargeable battery.
But aren’t they usually
But aren’t they usually packed in such a way that they can’t just switch on in transit – not just shoved in a jiffy bag?
brooksby wrote:
I’m sure that there was nothing in the jiffy bag, there was never anything in Team Sky’s jiffy bags….
Of course it is company
Of course, it is company policy never to imply ownership in the event of a bike light, you always have use the indefinite article, “a bike light”, never “your bike light.”
Is it just me who thinks that
Is it just me who thinks that Jeremy Vine is a bit of an attention seeker and that he actually likes it when people drive dangerously around him. Why else ride a Penny Farthing?
Glad it’s not just me who
Glad it’s not just me who thinks that he is an attention seeker.
It tells you something that
It tells you something that the design of bicycle that followed the Penny Farthing was known as the Safety-bicycle due to the smaller wheel size that a chain and gears permitted while maintaining a similar speed.
Riding a bike like that is a gimmick. Modern bike infrastructure and roads are not designed for a bike that has such a long stopping distance and wide turning circle.
bensynnock wrote:
The safety bicycle moniker came about because it greatly reduced the risk of “taking a header” by shifting the centre of mass rearwards.
no its all about the
no its all about the attention clicks, 1million views for a 30 sec clip on social media ?, thats probably more viewers than he gets for his Channel 5 show. Most of the situations he clips, are all predictable, that I think any reasonably experienced road cyclist handles & avoids without thinking about.
and its not just the Penny Farthing, where you need to be planning more ahead anyway, he does it just as often on his commuter bike.
Not sure all is right. Partly
Not sure all is right. Partly an extension of his work that you look to put out a bit of clickbait. Some of it is to remind drivers (or even inform them) of what the rules of the road are – where else will they see this?
A penny farthing is bonkers though.
He does us no favours. It was
He does us no favours. It was clear the van wanted to turn in(they indicated) he should have started slowing and anticipated the manoeuvre. As for commuting on a PF. ?
Yeah … only, I’ve heard
Yeah, and as a “personality at large” no doubt he is seeking attention … only, I’ve heard that people don’t just buy cars on the grounds of practicality, durability etc. (see Stormzy story)?
Never had a chance to try a highwheeler (but would…) and I wouldn’t imagine it would be my go-to for commuting and shopping if I had one, but on the other hand I have a recumbent. And in fact a bike with drop bars – i must be a scorcher!
In fact, by cycling for transport I’m also an attention-seeker in many people’s eyes. I have a driving licence; why don’t I just drive like normal people?
Runtilyoudrop wrote:
Indicating does not give you any right of way over any other vehicle.
Runtilyoudrop wrote:
From Cyclecraft (Chapter 6: Sharing The Roads)
Cyclists, if anything have
Cyclists, if anything have MORE right to be on the road than drivers given we aren’t required to pass a test to do so.
If anything I think JV was a bit too soft on the driver for apologising.
The driver admitting to seeing JV and still turned left (cut him up) anyway.
The most usefull way to consider this situation is would the driver have done the same thing if the bike lane was instead a normal traffic lane open to motor vehicles with the van driver in the 2nd lane?
No. It would have been a definite cut up and at least a minor fault on a driving test if not a dangerous fault leading to failure.
CycleGaz’s recent clips showing a motor vehicle dashboard overlay highlight this very well.
mitsky wrote:
I think (IIRC) that cyclists, pedestrians, and horsists have a common law right to be on the road; motorists are only there under licence.
Yes… some truth there given
Yes… some truth there given that I was urged during my driving lessons to adopt a confident approach and move forward (when safe and appropriate to do so) as all the other drivers were expecting that …
BUT while having good “survival advice” given car-infested streets Cyclecraft is also coming from a particular viewpoint (ultimately a movement coming from US reaction against car-centricity – by aiming to ride … like a car). The most fundamental thing in that viewpoint seems to be not safety and certainly not “more people riding” but the right to ride on the road. Never mind that almost the entire population don’t, and won’t, and even fewer existing cyclists will ride on busy A-roads etc.
And it contains some startling things – when you consider this is a guide used for educating for “everyday transport” (children also?). See e.g. this article: quoting the “basic cycling skill” of “a good cadence to aim for is about 80, while a sprint speed of 32 km/h (20 mph) will enable you to tackle most traffic situations with ease.”
‘Vehicular cyclists’ like
‘Vehicular cyclists’ like Franklin and Forester have probably done more than anyone to hold back cycling in the Anglosphere.
In the vast majority of these
In the vast majority of these bike cam skirmishes (and in a similar % of car dashcam videos), the outcome is blatant from early on, and the “film director” does sod all to stop it. Situations are allowed to develop so we can all tut & sigh & raise our ire. More often than not, a simple “Oh, that van is pulling out across the cycle lane half a block ahead”, or “that van is signalling a turn across the cycle lane” followed by “Maybe I better slow down and be prepapred for stupidity” would probably make these videos pointless. Very few of these skirmishes come from nowhere and toally blindside anyone. JV seems to delight in pushing the envelope on these encounters, and even when on something as unwieldly as an ordinary takes no avoiding actions until very late in the game
But not close passes though?
But not close passes though?
Not a fan of the JV oeuvre so if you’re only referring to him, disregard above.
In the vast majority of these
In the vast majority of these bike cam skirmishes (and in a similar % of car dashcam videos), the outcome is blatant from early on…
Very few of these skirmishes come from nowhere and totally blindside anyone…
I disagree- most of mine do
https://upride.cc/incident/mt17ybj_navara_closepass/
https://upride.cc/incident/ca11abd_blackpoolboilers_closepass/
https://upride.cc/incident/yx74soj_greenpass_closepass/
https://upride.cc/incident/sc19usu_brosterbuilders_closepass/
https://upride.cc/incident/sk19evw_stagecoach42_closepass/ etc. etc.
bensynnock wrote:
Either way, too many folks don’t understand that having your indicators on does not give you permission to do anything.
belugabob wrote:
Yes, and the van driver should have been more observant and waited, but as with all forms of transport, a bit of give and take helps the world go round. Some drivers are happy to slow down a bit to ensure the gap in front is big enough to let a car exit a side street, and some will deliberately accelerate to close any such gap. As much as there are times when it is important to be confident enough to assert our priority, sometimes it’s better to do the easy nice thing.
I accept Vine is who he is and what he is, and that he loves the drama, but if he is going to post videos of wrong-doing with a view to educating the public on safer driving, it would land better if he showed any anticipation skills of his own. If he fees like it, he can still point out when he’s been inconvenienced by being forced to slow down, but a bit of minor inconvenience is a price most of us accept as soon as we enter shared spaces.
FionaJJ wrote:
The cycle lane Vine was in was not a shared space. It was for cyclists only.
FionaJJ wrote:
In many of his videos, and many others posted in NMOTD, it’s not being “inconvenienced by being forced to slow down” but “forced to emergency brake or swerve to avoid being injured or killed”, which is not a minor inconvenience and not one that anyone should have to accept.
FionaJJ wrote:
When people on road matters talk about “give and take”, it almost always seems to be the cyclist or other vulnerable road user who’s expected to do the ‘giving’…
Quote:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/02/stormzy-given-ban-for-using-phone-while-driving-rolls-royce
Amazing – the fact that he
Amazing – the fact that he actually got a ban having achieved the correct score (when thousands don’t) is enough to prompt suspicions of prejudice!
Or did he err in failing to employ that well- known cycle-skeptical self-publicist – sorry, lawyer?
There’s a correlation between
There’s a correlation between the cost of the car and the arrogance of the driver and how often such drivers are caught phone driving.
100%.
Just ask CyclingMikey.
100%.
Just ask CyclingMikey.
eburtthebike wrote:
Really? Prove it. Confirmation bias at its finest.
Really? Prove it.
Really? Prove it. Confirmation bias at its finest
This ‘confirmation bias’ stuff is usually deployed to support the hypothesis that BMW and Audi drivers are no more likely to be psychopathic nutters than drivers of other marques- Ho! Ho! There are some limited one-person data on this later hypothesis: catching HHMP drivers is difficult up here because there are very few traffic queues except at the A6 traffic lights where I attempt to remain incognito, so you have to have exactly the right lighting to catch offenders on the move. Even so I have ‘caught’ 4 offenders in the 6 years I have had the headcam. Under the reasonable assumption that the probability of me catching offenders is dependent upon the product of the probabilty of any random car being of the marque concerned and the probability of the driver of such a vehicle committing the offence we’re considering (all reports ignored, of course)
https://upride.cc/incident/yh66utp_audia1_handheldmobile/ Audi
https://upride.cc/incident/kd10wer_porsche_mobilephone/ Porsche
https://upride.cc/incident/ld71uom_amazonprime_handheldmobilephone/
https://upride.cc/incident/pk55fxa_focus_handheldmobilephone/
The last two are Fords, representing the common people against the toffs/ nutters, although I think the Amazon offender really represents van-drivers rather than Ford.
After extensive data
After extensive data gathering i can confirm that BMWs and Audis are not equipped with indicators
Brompton profits have fallen
Brompton profits have fallen by 99%! – https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/jan/02/brompton-profits-plunge-amid-bike-industry-turmoil
You beat me to it! I just
You beat me to it! I just logged in to post this.