Van driver intimidates female cyclist... doesn't realise she's plain-clothes cop; Would this cyclist be fined for using the pavement?; Colbrelli needs "miracle" to race again; What does it take to ride 1000km in 24 hours?; COBBLES + more on the live blog
It's Friday! We're one step away from some glorious weekend riding weather. Skive off Friday work with Dan Alexander on the live blog and start planning those routes.....
And with that we'll ride off into the sunset of another week on the live blog. Ryan's back on duty for you next week, enjoy the sunshine!
25 March 2022, 16:02
Wout van Aert wins E3 Saxo Bank Classic
It's another photo for the Jumbo-Visma scrapbook...
Wout van Aert crossed the line first, followed by Christophe Laporte. Behind, Stefan Küng's late attack earned him a spot on the podium, while Eritrean Biniam Girmay sprinted to fourth on debut.
What a race. What a win... Can anyone stop Jumbo-Visma next Sunday?
25 March 2022, 15:31
Wout van Aert being Wout van Aert II (ft. Christophe Laporte)
It's Paris-Nice all over again. There have been several splits and regroupings since we last checked in with the racing in Belgium, but the main facts are: Wout van Aert smashed his way up the Paterberg, taking teammate Christophe Laporte with him. The pair have been sharing the work since, in a two-up TT...
Their gap is over one minute, and the team's biggest headache looks like deciding which rider gets the win...(sorry Jumbo-Visma if that jinxes it)...
Anyway, my money's on Van Aert 'letting' Laporte have the win as a thank you for being an invaluable teammate. We'll see...
Behind, Benoot is in the chasing group, who aren't doing much chasing, including: Kasper Asgreen, Biniam Girmay, Matej Mohorič, Stefan Küng, Valentin Madouas, Jhonatan Narváez and Dylan van Baarle.
Van driver intimidates female cyclist... doesn't realise she's plain-clothes cop
Some delicious karma for your Friday afternoon...
This van driver decided to try and intimidate a woman riding a bike on Tuesday in Doncaster by getting far too close, revving his engine and sounding his horn. She was a police officer on a cycling course. He didn’t believe us when we told him. I wonder if he does now.. pic.twitter.com/AdItf52RbX
— Sheffield North West NPT (@SheffNW_NPT) March 25, 2022
Now it would be a real shame if this tough guy had his phone number and email address plastered all over his van, wouldn't it? Sheffield North West said they were only too happy to instruct the driver's employers on his attitude towards cyclists...Notice of Intended Prosecution in the post...
This is why we do cycling courses in plain clothes. Some people out there are bullies who shouldn’t be on the road. Remember people, if you choose to bully a vulnerable road user the chances they are a cop is increasing daily. The chances they have a camera too. You do the maths
— Sheffield North West NPT (@SheffNW_NPT) March 25, 2022
The Sheffield North West Neighbourhood Team has done a detailed write up of the incident over on the Strava activity, including: "Having been briefed to take primary early and manage the approach to the pedestrian refuge things went well and the traffic had to slow and give space to the cyclists controlling the lane.
"All good. But there's always one. One driver seeing a woman cycling in primary position who responds by getting too close, loudly revving the engine and sounding the horn.
"One driver who will be receiving an NIP [Notice of Intended Prosecution] through the post very soon. He should remember the incident as several rather annoyed cyclists approached his van and claimed to be police. But he left before we could badge him.
"Fortunately his van is fully sign written and now we know which company not to go for for roofing services. We will also be in touch with the phone number on the van and it won't be to book a job."
80km to go? Wout's bored...time to start racing...
25 March 2022, 14:02
Changes to law regarding using phone while driving
From today the law has changed, expanding the meaning of 'using' a phone behind the wheel. Offending drivers will now get a £200 fine and six points for:
Illuminating the screen
Checking the time
Checking notifications
Unlocking the device
Making, receiving, or rejecting a telephone or internet based call
Sending, receiving or uploading oral or written content
Sending, receiving or uploading a photo or video
Utilising camera, video, or sound recording,
Drafting any text
Accessing any stored data such as documents, books, audio files, photos, videos, films, playlists, notes or messages
Cofidis rider Max Walscheid is being treated in intensive care in Germany after being hit by a driver while training. The 28-year-old says he is lucky to be alive after the incident, and luckily avoided serious injury.
Walscheid did not lose consciousness and has not suffered any broken bones.
"The first thing that comes to my mind is that I was incredibly lucky to survive this accident. Even though we haven't done all the x-rays yet, I obviously don't have any broken bones. I was just doing classic training after Brugge-De Panne. I was on a calm road, in perfect conditions.
"Fortunately, I was not advancing very quickly, on the side of the road. A car came from the opposite direction. She suddenly turned to the right, without blinking, rushed at me and hit me. I didn't even have time to do anything, nor to be afraid before the accident happened.
"So I was hit in the face. I jumped over the car and fell a few meters away, luckily in the ditch and not on the asphalt. My bicycle was completely destroyed, 10 meters away… People quickly came to help me, the ambulance and the police too. I was then transported to the hospital and admitted to the emergency services where they made a scan of my whole body.
"Even though they didn't detect anything broken, I had to spend the night under observation. We will continue the tests and examinations this Friday, in particular for my head and to check my breathing and my electrocardiogram."
Sonny Colbrelli needs "another [miracle] to get back on the saddle"
Sonny Colbrelli has commented for the first time since collapsing in the aftermath of the opening stage of Volta a Catalunya, having suffered an unstable cardiac arrhythmia. The Italian collapsed shortly after sprinting to second on the uphill kicker in Sant Feliu de Guíxols, and admits it is a "miracle" he is alive.
"It's already a miracle that I'm alive, now it would take another to get me back on the saddle," Colbrelli told Gazzetta dello Sport.
"We will evaluate day by day. There are so many people who love me."
Bahrain Victorious released a statement on Thursday saying the team had "no further news" about the rider's condition, saying he remains in hospital in Girona.
25 March 2022, 11:26
Would this cyclist be fined for using the pavement?
General consensus in the live blog comments was that the optics of the situation probably didn't help and, if the rider had waited for the temporary lights to turn green before waving traffic through as he moved onto the pavement, it probably would have been fine.
Well, there's another video doing the rounds today, highlighting the other side of the badly-timed traffic lights/but not using the pavement coin...
Stick to the rules of the road to the letter and you might end up with this less-than-ideal predicament. You go through green, light turns red before you're fully through, next light turns green, you're now riding into oncoming traffic presumably with everyone and their dog shaking their heads at your 'red light jumping'...
Presumably (we're doing a lot of that this morning) our PC friend would have been alright with the cyclist hopping onto the footpath? That seems like common sense?
But maybe again we're back to the optics of the incidents...not slowing down riding straight onto the pavement while the light is red vs faced with oncoming traffic having waited for the light to turn green...surely no PC with common sense would fine a cyclist for riding on the pavement here?
Either way, it goes to show an underlying problem cyclists often face with temporary lights and lane closures. Do you break 'the rules' to get out the way or don't and struggle to make it through in time?
Anyway, who knows if any of that made sense to you reading it? Get in the comments with your thoughts...
25 March 2022, 11:04
Magical memes
Add this to the folder alongside Oli Naesen...
‘Yeah no it’s going to be tough for sure, but I do think Jumbo can do it this year. I’m just hoping they don’t ride defensively and really bring the fight to Tadej you know? Primoz can absolutely do it, he just has to stay on the bike and not crash’ pic.twitter.com/1SIey7OkWM
Another record-breaking month — Santander Cycles celebrates six record breaking months in a row, with more than 750,000 hires in February
🚲🚲🚲Santander Cycles celebrates six record breaking months in a row, with more than 750,000 hires in February - the most hires ever. 🚲🚲🚲 pic.twitter.com/FlCgIxZG1f
One of my favourite racing days of the year — E3 Saxo Bank Classic. The Flanders dress rehearsal: harder than Omloop — 204km, Kanarieberg, Taaienberg, Paterberg, Oude Kwaremont, Tiegemberg, plus many more of Flanders cobbled beasts. With Flanders next Sunday it's time to find the form...
— Intermarché-Wanty-Gobert (@IntermarcheWG) March 25, 2022
Nine times in the past 22 years, the winner of E3 has gone on to win Flanders. Will we get a tenth this year?
On the startline: Kasper Asgreen, Wout van Aert, Zdeněk Štybar, Florian Sénéchal, Tiesj Benoot, Victor Campenaerts, Greg Van Avermaet, Oliver Naesen, Bob Jungels, Gianni Moscon, Matej Mohorič, Stefan Küng, Jhonatan Narvaez, Luke Rowe, Dylan van Baarle, Sep Vanmarcke, John Degenkolb, Søren Kragh Andersen, Jasper Stuyven, Mads Pedersen, Peter Sagan, Anthony Turgis...now that's not bad, is it?
And, of course, it wouldn't be E3 without Oli Naesen memes...
The six-time Race Across America champ hit the record at the Zeltweg Air Base to beat the road record, he already holds the track record, in just 21 hours 6 minutes, before clocking an extra 26km, presumably just for fun?!
Strasser's record was aided by the support of his INSCYD coach Markus Kinzlbauer, who has now broken down exactly what it took to perform such an outstanding athletic feat...
Speaking to the athletic performance software company, Kinzlbauer, who also won two Paralympic medals in handcycling during 2021, said the effort was highly dependent on nutrition. We all recognise when we haven't eaten enough on a ride, the legs start to fade, the speed drops, until eventually you're crawling home pedalling through mud.
Well, if you're trying to ride for 24 hours, let alone at an average speed of 42kph, Strasser needed: "116g/h (grammes of carbs per hour) in the first 12h and a total of almost 105g/h in the 24h."
"Such a performance is highly dependent on the energy demand and intake. We experimented with nutrition intake. We tried a lot with sugar mixtures. During the race, we fed 116g/h in the first 12h and a total of almost 105g/h in the 24h," Kinzlbauer explained.
In total Strasser took on 13,450 calories, roughly five times the recommended daily intake for men.
"One of the puzzle pieces in the training prior to this historical benchmark was the INSCYD PPD test. We used the fat and carbohydrate combustion graph to calculate nutrition intake and pacing, and saw that the results were extremely reliable," Kinzlbauer continued.
The crucial balance was making sure Strasser has enough energy to complete the distance without suffering digestive issues.
Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.
Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.
...not slowing down riding straight onto the pavement while the light is red vs faced with oncoming traffic having waited for the light to turn green..."
Wait for the light to turn green then get on the pavement if necessary, if penalised one could produce the unrescinded Boateng guidance of 1999: "The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of the traffic, and who show consideration to other pavement users." Once you've gone through the red (even if, as in Wednesday's video, it doesn't really make any substantive difference) then all bets in claiming mitigation are off.
There's surely a case for pavements to become temporary shared use in any contraflow where the width and footfall makes it feasible?
There is a light near my house which I often go through when it is red: even though it is on a suburban B road, it has a sensor under the road, so it only turns green when it detects a large lump of metal waiting. Needless to say, it doesn't detect my aluminium bikes, let alone my carbon bike. So I either wait an eternity for a car to come along and activate it, or I go through on red.
There was a set of traffic lights that I had to deal with directly outside a police station in my old home town that were exactly the same. They would never turn green for a bike, which was a bit of an issue when I was cycling to a 6am spin class with hardly another soul on the road at the time
I had this when commuting into Chester at 6.30 am in the mornings. I found out that if you unclip one foot and lean the bike over at roughly 45 degrees, the sensors do a better job of detecting you.
As far as traffic lights are concerned, green means you may go on if the way is clear. If you head off when something is coming the other way - due care and attention at least I would say
I was wondering about that too. It seems obvious, but (as has been said) the drivers of those oncoming vehicles would probably all just assume that the cyclist had jumped the lights and so it's on them...
I have a theory that badly timed lights cause a significant proportion of 'evidence' for cycle haters.
Oncoming traffic meet the cyclist head on and assume they jumped the lights because the motorist went through on green.
Traffic behind cyclists who wait a phase to go at the front as soon as the lights turn assume the cyclists are selfish pricks who want to hold up traffic as opposed to not wanting to be flattened by oncoming traffic.
I've worried about temporary traffic lights turning green on me when in the middle of the works, but I don't think it has actually ever happened. They have sensors to detect movement, don't they?
The law on riding on the pavement may be black and white, but one would hope that the police would be able to apply their discretion. Indeed, even in Wednesday's video, I believe the outcome was a stern talking to and nothing more, and the "optics" are far more favourable here (cyclist went through on a green light; clear danger from the oncoming traffic, and the relevant bit of pavement is a bridge with no possibility of pedestrians suddenly stepping out, unlike a narrow and be-hedged residential street).
Bit of a difference between the video of the cyclist going straight up on the footway on a red light and the instagram video linked above.
In the former, it's an offence: mitigated by consideration of ministerial advice to chief officers to ignore otherwise considerate cycling when the cyclist rides on the footway out of fear of other traffic; but aggravated by the facts that the lights were on red and there was no sign of traffic of which to be afraid. That's more than just optics: the imperative to go through is not there, but could be implemented to justify riding up on the kerb mid-roadworks later (on green) if necessary.
Int he latter, the cyclist has done nothing wrong. Most of the drivers haven't either: they proceed on green woth nothing in view to consider otherwise. Once a cyclist comes into view, they should slow down: and it's arguable that they were mostly proceeding carefully in that regard. However, the van driver proceeds into the roadworks when he sees a green light, and adopts the time-worn assumption that green = inalienable priority. He should not have proceeded; and he drove unnecessarily close to/at our cyclist.
The cyclist doesn;t have many strictly-legal options. But out of fear of that grunt, mounting the footway is definitely an option. So is adopting the lane and playing chicken with the driver - but that assumes the driver is not actually out to kill, and it will definitely open up confrontation that will feel figuratively and perhaps literally like banging your head against a wall.
bloodylazylayaboutreplied to essexian |2 years ago
3 likes
The first couple of cars were already in the roadworks when they would have seen the cyclist, still be nice if they slowed a bit. No excuse for the van though, definitely should have stopped