Is it finally time to do the right thing for America's roads?
A rule which thankfully doesn't exist in the UK, drivers in North America can turn right even on a red light, leaving both cyclists and pedestrians vulnerable. Montreal, fast-becoming many cyclists' favourite destination, is one of the few cities in the continent to take charge and scrap this rule.
Now it seems that traffic advocates in other cities have taken notice, and are eyeing to implement to rule change, reports Canadian Cycling Magazine.
> "It exists, and it's beautiful!": Cyclists rave about Montreal’s "incredible" cycling network
The director of road safety and safe mobility programs at the injury prevention group Parachute, Valerie Smith said in an interview with Global News that the change would be beneficial to vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists.
She said: "When I consider the potential opportunities for collisions, for serious injuries resulting from those collisions or deaths, I think that it really makes sense to strongly consider a ban on right turns on red."
Currently, Montreal is the only large city in North America that bans right turns on red lights. It used to be that the entire province prohibited it, but that rule changed in 2003, making the Island of Montreal the only place left where it was disallowed.
> Montreal's "incredible" cycling network makes it to CNN as its Mayor calls on other cities to "do the right thing"
In New York City, there are some places that ban it as well. The city of Toronto has also considered such a ban several times as well. In 2020, city councillor Mike Layton floated the idea to, “proactively use right-turns-on-red prohibitions to make roads safer for pedestrians and cyclists.
Advocates for road safety, including the pedestrian advocacy group Pietons Québec, said that permitting right turns on red lights contributes to fatalities. However, people have noted that numerous drivers neglect the stipulated rule of coming to a complete stop before executing the turn, and they highlight the heightened risks posed by larger vehicles like SUVs to pedestrians.
“While we believe it makes sense to implement the no-right-turn-on-red ban, and we know that it’s going to protect the vulnerable road user, we want data to support that,” Smith said. “Does that blanket ban make sense from a vulnerable road user perspective? I would say yes. But for a city planner who’s trying to meet the needs of a variety of constituents, it’s going to be a little bit more challenging.”
Add new comment
33 comments
Since when was Van Aert Dutch?
One object is from a company with questionable business practices, the other object is from a company with a questionable business practices.
What are car manufacturers doing with all the extra space they gain by making vehicles so big? It's not just Tesla doing this.
My car is probably half the size of a Cybertruck and I can fit my bike if I remove the front wheel. It's also a seven seater if I want it to be, though not at the same time!
Is it a Citroen DS by any chance? Mind you, that was a rear wheel they removed.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O7AijogHtRc
That's quite amazing how stable they are!
Anyone buying a cyber truck obviously believes they will be colonising Mars before the decade is out. As for other manufacturers, the race to create novelty size vehicles is done to justify price increases
I would imagine that if the colony got to be of any significant size, it would be connected by pedestrian and maybe cycling tunnels. Any cars on Mars would have to have a pressurised capsule as the cabin, since there is very little atmosphere on Mars.
I wonder what cycling in 1/3g would be like... 🤔
I have received an email about a parliamentary debate on dangerous driving resulting from a petition that I was directed to by a nice person on here.
If you watch that Twitter video of Roglic, you'll see a sly dig from the background image right as the video stops.
I think it's fair to say I am gutted for all the people who were a part of GCN+. The presenters and the BTS crew are a passionate bunch of cycling loving nerds and what they managed to provide was nothing short of spectacular.
Unfortunately the funding for building the platform came from WBD group when they invested in the project and bought out PSN. GCN and Play Sports Network were always going to be at their mercy where money was coming. No independent cycling media outlet would have the power or money to build what GCN have as an entertainment platform without big money backers, and that's what WBD provided when they invested in Play Sports Network.
As frustrating as their move is, it does kind of make sense. There are so many different streaming services out there, and all are on seperate subscriptions. If you had them all you would probably be spending £/$100 a month and consumers are not willing to pay that, especially when providers drop titles when they start getting popular, in order to save paying out shit tonnes of royalties. There aren't any decent options providing multiple subscription services under one bill so consumers are picking and choosing between what services they prefer and which provider offers the best value. Disney are looking to consolidate FX and Hulu onto Disney+ so it's not surprising that Warner Brothers are going to do the same thing. I just hope they don't waste the talent, effort and also the existing material that has been created on the platform.
Tesla truck:
Horrible looking
Can't get a cycle in the back or fit a cycle rack
Almost certainly doesn't have a CD player.
That's 3 strikes.
I'll keep my Kermit green 13 year old Clio right now.
Blue, orange & white are colours that should be easy to combine in an aesthetically pleasing way, and that aint it.
At least it wasn't a mid 2000s Rabobank style call back
I've always thought that the Cybertruck looks like the sort of vehicle that They thought we'd be driving around in about now, but in films made in about 1982 and with a soundtrack by John Carpenter...
One of the only times I remember riding in the "middle of the road" was because I was forced to do so.
https://youtu.be/0-WYxz0J6Hw
I was in the Houses of Parliament last night and I walked past a room where the Bicycle Association appeared to be launching their manifesto. However (other than an action to invite your MP to the event) I can't find anything more about it on line.
Reluctant as I am to quote someone who has #gotBrexitdone in their Twitter bio, here is Selaine Saxby's Tweet about it.
I'm sure there Bicycle Association is delighted that she helped destroy their industry.
Ta - I was tempted to gatecrash, but carried on to the event I was supposed to be at!
Is the Elon Schmuck Tonka Tanker legal in Europe yet?
Can't say I've followed the Cybertruck since the initial announcement was all over the news, but isn't the body made out of a few sheets of simple bent steel to make it cheaper to make - i.e. sharp, rigid corners and edges, and very minimal crumple zones? I doubt it would ever meet EU crash/pedestrian safety regulations (such as 78/2009 which requires a certain amount of deformation to protect pedestrians in a crash - looking at the Cybretruck, it'd just cut the ped in half).
This could have been exhaustively discussed before though, I just haven't been paying attention...
Re Ballad, I was wondering that too about that stupid truck thing. It looks like it would fail every modern certification for pedestrian safety. Doesn't the US have such legislation?
Anyway, it'll be horrifically expensive and guaranteed to be driven by absolute dicks.
I need to watch that Not Just bikes video on SUVs/Pickups in the US again because I forgotten most of it - if memory serves, they do have pedestrian/crash saftey regs in the US, but pickups are (hilariously) exempt from them (as well as being exempt from certain taxes and stuff - hence their popularity over there). This is the reason you get stuff like this:
This is correct, the reason US manufacturers like to flog "full size" (i.e. F***ing enormous) trucks is because if they made then smaller they would have to comply the relevant legislation for cars. Make it big enough and it is exempt from the requirements for cars on both safety and emissions.
Isn't the whole point it drives itself ?
I thought the whole point of "pick-ups" was that they got a free pass on passenger car safety/emissions standards. Otherwise, what is the point of them?
Edit - oh, ninja'd, like
threefour hours ago!Why are you doubling down on the truck/MTB nonsense? Yes the truck looks stupid. Yes Elon is a strange and horrible man... but as was pointed out yesterday that's literally the standard, most effective and space efficient way of transporting MTBs in pickup trucks. It's how you're supposed to do it.
There is a difference between "in a truck" and "half in a truck"!
And I'm not sure I'd appreciate the damage to the down tube from it resting on the top of the tailgate.
Plus, I think you'll find the most space efficient way to transport your bike in on the roof bars.
On the subject of the body design, I can only assume someone had borrowed the design team's French curves and just left the straight rulers behind.
https://p.vitalmtb.com/photos/users/109/photos/101169/s1600_IMG_0055.jpg...
More efficient than that?
Again, thousands of mountain bikers around the world shuttle their bikes in pickup trucks in exactly this manner every day. It's a totally normal thing.
Indeed, that's why these things exist:
https://www.singletrackbikes.co.uk/m11b364s487p79900/Evoc_Tailgate_Pad_O...
There's no way I'd transport my bikes outside of the vehicle though.
You would fit a pad on the gate if you were doing anything but posing the bike for a picture: https://www.sicklines.com/2017/10/21/tested-dakine-dlx-pickup-pad/
Yes, much as I hate pretty much everything about this abomination it apparently does have a flatbed of 198cm x190cm dimensions, so a bicycle could easily be fitted within its confines lengthways or widthways; as you say, that is just the standard way to put a mountain bike in a pickup.
Pages