Shari Bossuyt had been expecting to enter 2024 with her sights firmly set on a gold medal in the Madison at the Paris Olympics alongside Belgian teammate Lotte Kopecky.
But instead, the Canyon-Sram rider’s first action of the new year was to announce that she will not appeal a two-year ban imposed by the French anti-doping authority (AFLD) following her positive test for the cancer drug Letrozole, citing a lack of resources and willpower to fight her case, while lambasting the current anti-doping rules and agencies for lacking “nuance” and humanity.
In a lengthy Instagram post last night, the 23-year-old – who won the Madison world championships alongside Kopecky in 2022 – detailed the effect of her looming suspension on her mental health, as well as arguing that, despite being sure that her positive test was a result of food contamination, it’s impossible to prove the drug’s source.
In June last year, it was revealed that Bossuyt had tested positive for Letrozole at the Tour de Normandie in March, where she won a stage and finished sixth overall, and was facing the same two-year ban handed down last year to Toon Aerts.
> “It’s like being wrongly put in prison for murder”: Canyon-SRAM’s Shari Bossuyt protests innocence following doping positive
Belgian cyclocross star Aerts also submitted a positive out-of-competition doping control for the metabolites of the drug – which is primarily used to block oestrogen during the treatment of breast cancer, but is banned by WADA due to its ability to boost testosterone levels and reduce or prevent the feminising effects of anabolic steroid use – three days after racing the cyclocross World Cup round in Flamanville in January 2022.
Last month, before this season’s World Cup round in Normandy, Aerts and Bossuyt’s agent warned riders taking part to avoid the region’s dairy products for fear of contamination, while the Canyon-Sram rider compared her case to that of Alberto Contador in 2010, who launched his infamous ‘tainted beef’ defence after testing positive for clenbuterol at that year’s Tour de France.
> Wake up to (anything but) milk: Pro cyclists warned not to eat or drink dairy products at cyclocross race after positive doping tests
But, despite her insistence that her positive at the Tour de Normandie was the result of contamination, Bossuyt last night revealed that she will not appeal her suspension in a scathing criticism of the anti-doping authorities.
“After some time of silence and patience, I wish to respond to the verdict of the AFLD. On 4 December I received the verdict from the AFLD regarding the proposal of my suspension. As expected, they propose a sentence of two years,” she wrote.
“They confirm and acknowledge the fact that the contamination was not intentional. But we cannot, as in the case of Toon Aerts, prove the source of the contamination exactly, as a result of which the legal framework does not allow them to give us further sentence reduction.
“And just here this whole case frustrates me immensely! No humanity or nuance and no consultation whatsoever. Explain to me how an athlete should be able to prove contamination from food? The Clenbuterol 2.0 story is in full swing,” she said, alluding to Contador’s lengthy, and ultimately unsuccessful, defence of his Tour title.
Bossuyt celebrates a UCI Track Nations Cup win in Canada with Lotte Kopecky in April 2023, weeks after her positive test (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
She continued: “Puzzle piece by puzzle piece, we now know almost with certainty where the contamination comes from. But unfortunately, we just can’t prove this officially. For this, we need official reports… Unfortunately, such studies cost tons of money and take a very long time. After consulting the food agencies, it turns out they don't even test for letrozole... No food safety risk or no knowledge that letrozole is used in Europe because it is banned here.
“And OK, I understand all too well that this product is on the banned list and does not belong in an athlete’s body. But there just isn’t any kind of nuance here.
“As an athlete, you are just completely on your own… I am a 23-year-old girl who happened to be able to make her hobby her profession. I am not a doper and have never considered this for any day. I will also keep repeating this until it all comes out one day,"
“I now have the chance to still appeal but I simply don’t have the strength or money for this. The feeling of having to fight a losing battle, the nights of sleeplessness due to continuous worrying and hurting me financially by having to spend another tens of thousands of euros on an already lost case made me decide to leave it at that.
“No one seems to realise what an impact this has on someone’s mental health. My Olympic dream is destroyed and having to walk around every day with the ‘stamp’ of a doper. It's almost unbearable. Fortunately, I find support from people who really listen to me, believe in me, and I also just keep doing sports because it does me good. I will prove that I will come back stronger!”
Add new comment
19 comments
If only the cyclists were in Lancashire !
https://twitter.com/SurreyRS/status/1746454089297252738
Although the actual offence isn't shown for some odd reason - a nuance loss on many twitter readers.
“Vote Labour in Doncaster and you get this. No vision, no plan, no leadership. It’s time for a change.” Nick Fletcher.
It's certainly time for a change Nick, starting with you. Swap "Tory" for "Labour" and you'd have a point, and not just in Doncaster.
To all camera reporting people
"These snidey little narks are the rats who'll implement the coming Social Credit Score system, grassing people up for any infraction.
As reward they'll get bonuses on their own scores - these rats happy to betray humanity to lead the race to a society-disintegrating bottom "
"For each driver you 'catch' you get to leave your 15 Minute City one extra time" !
Is it possible the author is on crack ?
What do you reckon? Should ‘protected’ be cited as the preferred term for cycle lanes separated from traffic?
Aren't cyclists using cycle lanes TRAFFIC (just not motorised)?
Exactly
I like the term 'kerb-protected cycle track'.
I prefer "Kingdom of the Bollards" myself
Yeah, should be "protected from dangerous traffic".
I think "protected" and "separated" should be preferred over "segregated" as that word does carry a lot of cargo with it.
Yep, well spotted, five points heading your way. It's been a long week...
Conservative politicians, so predictably vile...
What a terrific team pursuit GB win yesterday, and so fast. Must have been especially satisfying putting away Denmark after that GB/Dk crash at the Tokyo Oympics in 2021.
I wouldn't use AC's defense of tainted beef as a positive. Nobody believed him. Especially as he was never the same after
Dear MP Nick Fletcher.
Tell us that you're too incompetent to serve in office without saying it out loud.
[NF posts online with proof of lawbreaking drivers which he incorrectly blames on cyclists/cycle lanes.]
Thank you.
That brake-lever angle-measuring tool looks as if it was designed by a non-engineer on a work placement. More UCI useless cycling ignobleness.
So run this by me again...
Lots of athletes including cyclists take part in events in Normandy. There are lots of dairy products from Normandy available throughout France and the rest of the world. And yet, the only athletes that test positive are two cyclists who are represented by the same agent? That is one hell of a coincidence.
As for not being able to prove where it came from, it eminently possible to do this. Daryl Impey did years ago as a result of very thorough record keeping and sample retention. I am fascinated that other cyclists haven't learned from this, and as a result my sympathies lie solely with Lotte Kopecky who will struggle to develop an effective partnership for the madison in the next 6 months.
I hear what you're saying and strict liability certainly applies. But if you're an athlete who hasn't been quite as on the ball as Impey with records then it is also the case that you'll likely need very deep pockets to have a realistic chance of challenging a suspension, or at least reducing it.
Record-keeping would help, and it's surprising that a pro athlete in a doping-rife sport hasn't been doing that.
Her argument isn't exactly strong though: "I was caught with a PED in my system, I had some dairy in Normandy, there's no evidence that Norman dairy doesn't contain the PED: therefore that's where it came from."
I'm sure there has been an effect on her mental health, but it's a foreseeable consequence of being caught cheating and it's a bit shameful to use it as an insinuation that she should be let off.
Part of this is why a lot of teams are very particular about supplement usage, the manufacturers have a legal duty to maintain sealed samples of every batch produced explicitly for future testing due to the risk of contamination in the supplychain.
There was one recently that was a cheap supplement bought as they didn't like the sponsors product causing a positive and the supplement showed the contamination but because it was an "amazon special" they were unable to find any still sealed of that batch to prove that it had come from upstream of the athelete.
It's a weak argument but it doesn't mean something hasn't got into the food processing chain from someone trying to save a few quid, Findus and their horse lasagnes are a pretty solid example of that.
No idea if she did or didn't, but if shes that good of an actor holywood would be a hell of a lot easier and more lucrative than bike racing.
"They confirm and acknowledge that the contamination was not intentional", she states. If this is in fact the case then it changes her culpability somewhat, perhaps even to mere carelessness. Though I must agree with Mr. Spalding that it is strange not to learn from previous events.