The extent of money owed by WiggleCRC to brands across the bike industry has been laid bare in the recently published administrator’s report outlining the state of play since the online cycling retailer entered administration in October.
Two weeks ago, we reported that administrators are “optimistic” about the prospect of selling the business, with Wiggle making a “considerable trading profit” during the administration period involving the Black Friday sales and run up to Christmas.
However, the administrator’s report, published on Companies House, also highlights a significant list of individuals and brands from across the cycling industry and beyond who were owed money at the time Wiggle entered administration, although it is also worth mentioning that in speaking to sources road.cc learnt that some creditors mentioned have since been paid in full.

Haribo is listed as being owed £20,275 by WiggleCRC, but did not respond to a request for comment, while major UK distributors Madison and Extra UK LTD are listed as due £1,095,272 and £925,614 respectively. Also at the top end of the scale are Taiwan-based manufacturer Ideal Bike Corporation, listed as being owed £1,291,050, Garmin Europe Limited (£853,762), Saddleback (£815,082), Science in Sport (£662,558), POC Sweden (£507,968), Selle Italia (£400,922), Endura (£387,329), and Vittoria (£208,920).
From speaking to figures within the bike industry road.cc understands some debts have been paid in full since Wiggle entered administration, while other brands may in fact be owed less than the stated figure due to contractual factors.
British-based brands such as Raleigh (£235,781) and Muc-Off (£99,647) are also listed as being owed the aforementioned debts.
An industry source also suggested the scale of Wiggle’s business means the company may “not be necessarily that far behind, it could be a monthly turnover that they have not paid once, and that is half a million pounds to some of these companies”.
Speaking from their role at a company who had been paid in full, they pointed out the administrator’s statement also only notes the debts owed when Wiggle entered administration in October, not as of mid-December when the report was published – for example, road.cc’s own parent company Farrelly Atkinson Ltd is listed as being owed £720, that the company understands has now been paid. However, the industry source says they are aware of other brands who have not yet been paid.
The administrator’s proposal notes that it was agreed following consultation with management “that the best course of action was to continue to trade the business while a buyer was sought.”
Wiggle entered administration in the weeks of heavy retail activity leading up to the Black Friday sales and Christmas shopping period, something which is reflected in the report, administrators saying trading had been “very positive during the administration process” with a “considerable trading profit achieved”.
> Is it safe to spend with troubled retail giant Wiggle Chain Reaction?
The administrators added that they had “taken the opportunity to augment stock held within the business with opportunistic purchases to generate additional website traffic and profits”.
Heavy discounts have continued beyond Black Friday, Wiggle’s website currently promoting an ‘Epic Winter Sale’ with up to 70 per cent savings on offer.

Wiggle Chain Reaction recorded a pre-tax loss of over £97 million in 2022, compared to £14.5 million for the previous year, as the company’s former chief finance officer blamed the aftereffects of Covid, Brexit, and ongoing economic uncertainty for the significant drop.
Alarm bells began to ring in the autumn of last year, Wiggle Chain Reaction’s parent company Signa Sports United (SSU) reporting “severe liquidity and profitability challenges” and announcing the delisting of its shares. As a result, SSU’s €150 million funding commitment from its own parent company, Signa Holding, was withdrawn and in turn painted an increasingly bleak picture for Wiggle and the group’s other cycling business, which include Bikester, Probikeshop, and Farrhad.de.
By mid-October, word was spreading of Wiggle’s reported impending entry into administration, news confirmed shortly afterwards.
Wiggle Chain Reaction was put up for sale as its parent company filed for insolvency, the month of November beginning with more bad news as 105 redundancies were announced.
Administrators reported “considerable interest” for the business from potential buyers, Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group which owns Evans Cycles rumoured to be one such party, and in last month’s report the administrators said they remained “optimistic” over the possibility of a sale.





















57 thoughts on “WiggleCRC owed Haribo £20,000, plus millions of pounds to other cycling brands, administrator’s proposal document reveals”
£20k owed to Haribo was an
£20k owed to Haribo was an unnecessary debt. I never wanted a packet of sweets and just chucked it in the bin, as did several other cyclists I know. Doubtless some people like that chewy ultra-processed non-food, but to me it was just unwanted garbage.
That just seems like inept
That just seems like inept management. Never mind paying Haribo, why were Wiggle not charging Haribo, for product placement? Honestly, I’d assumed that was what was going on there.
It is not always easy in such
It is not always easy in such commercial relationships to determine who pays who for what supposed benefit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdr96nGHWzI
you did? I cut them into
you did? I cut them into small chunks and used them for fishing.
Were you fishing for me?
Were you fishing for me?
Those were my favourite parts of ordering!
alchemilla wrote:
It’s one of the recommended remedies for diabetic hypoglycaemia, as it gets into the bloodstream so quickly. The little bags are exactly the right size/dose to keep in a saddle pack for emergencies. It’s not “non-food” to everyone, and I doubt your diet is 100% beyond reproach.
It’s just a bonus that Tangfastics are also delicious.
It seemed an odd choice to me
It seemed an odd choice to me given that Haribo aren’t vegan. Presumably a significant percentage of their customers wouldn’t appreciate them. I asked for them not to be included in my order but they were anyway.
bikes wrote:
No that’s a normal choice
Left_is_for_Losers wrote:
No that’s a normal choice— bikes
Normal maybe, hard to see it being the best business move though.
I have never met a vegan who
I have never met a vegan who didn’t tell me they were vegan within a few minutes of being introduced.
I have never met a vegan who
I have never met a vegan who didn’t tell me they were vegan within a few minutes of being introduced
Total Logic Failure alert
bikes wrote:
I’d imagine if they’re sending out 1000’s of orders a day it may have been difficult to single out the orders that requested not to have them. Tis a shame they couldn’t find a Vegan option mind, are all Haribo non Vegan I wonder?
IIRC when ordering from
IIRC when ordering from Wiggle there is a box for “Order notes” where you can make such requests. It does state that adding notes can delay the order, but it would seem pointless to appear to give customers that option and then ignore the request.
Yes, Haribo do have some vegan options. I would note that “normal” haribo (Starmix, Tangfastics etc.) are not only not vegan, they are not even suitable for vegetarians.
Yes there’s a couple of vegan
Yes there’s a couple of vegan Haribo packs. My vegan wife will steal my Haribo occasionally.
bikes wrote:
Seems unlikely that many will care. 10% of Europeans identify as Vegan (6% in US), lets be generous and say 15% of cyclists would. Then subtract the Vegans who couldn’t care less about the Haribo’s arriving and those who give them away – you’re back to looking at less than 10% of orders. Not much for Wiggle to care about tbh.
Secret_squirrel wrote:
I’m vegetarian (well pescetarian actually, but the principle is the same) which is a dietary choice rather than a political choice like veganism. When I get the Haribo, I just pass them onto someone else due to their gelatine content although my refusing to eat gelatine is probably more political than dietary due to the very small amounts involved. It’s just a shame that they didn’t choose a different type of sweet that doesn’t use boiled up animals – there’s plenty of them around.
(A vegan will refuse to wear leather shoes and a vegetarian will refuse to eat them)
hawkinspeter wrote:
Meat is murder, but fish is justifiable homicide.
(with thanks to the late, great, Jeremy Hardy.)
Steve K wrote:
I just don’t eat anything with a face
Fish have faces do they not?
Fish have faces do they not? I suppose your mindset would fly with something like an oyster though.
HollisJ wrote:
Fishes don’t have faces as they don’t have ears, a nose or a chin.
hawkinspeter wrote:
mark1a wrote:
Just to clarify – I have never eaten, nor plan to eat Billy the Fish.
Good old Billy the fish!
Good old Billy the fish!
hawkinspeter wrote:
Well they have ears, just not external ones. Chin… debatable.
I’ll give you no nose, but they have nostrils.
chrisonabike wrote:
Well, they can’t wear a pair of glasses, so they obviously don’t qualify for having a face
hawkinspeter wrote:
That’s odd – I’m sure I’ve seen mention of fish-eye lenses. Perhaps they prefer contacts, what with the lack of ears?
What about Golden Moles? Are
What about Golden Moles? Are they (like Capybara) fish on fridays? They’ve a nose, true, but don’t have external eyes, ears or a noticable chin…
chrisonabike wrote:
Can’t recall seeing them down my local Tesco
hawkinspeter wrote:
They sometimes have this one from Potts?
chrisonabike wrote:
I do indeed enjoy a tasty mole poblano from time to time and also guacamole
hawkinspeter wrote:
Bit plastic-y for me.
Nor do clocks, watches, or
Nor do clocks, watches, or cliffs.
Hywel wrote:
Well, clocks and watches are often fixed by engin-ears and cliffs often have mountain-ears on them
A philosophical choice, not a
A philosophical choice, not a political one. ☝?
‘Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.’
HollisJ wrote:
I think it’s both as vegans will often try to influence others with the aim of stopping exploitation and cruelty to animals. I agree with the general idea, but I do have some merino wool products and possibly an old leather belt somewhere.
For sure, there are politics
For sure, there are politics in play as in the grand scheme of things we want the current broken system to be changed, but the actual motivational driver for a person to align their actions with their belief system isn’t politics.
Thankfully I’ve never liked the feel of merino so its a non issue for me. Hardest part was getting my motorcycle gear up to scratch, though.
HollisJ wrote:
I don’t disagree with that but veganism is definitely more political than vegetarianism and there’s nothing wrong with that.
I do agree with much of veganism, but I would find it a lot more difficult finding food to eat if I gave up eggs, fish and dairy products. Unfortunately, a lot of vegan products in shops rely on a lot of wheat which is problematic for me, so I’d have a very restricted diet of vegetables, fruits, nuts and some select grains – that’s almost a fruitarian diet.
I don’t personally eat many
I don’t personally eat many vegan ‘replacement meat’ products, but my diet certainly isn’t restricted – it’s full of legumes, vegetables, tofu, nuts, soy etc. I eat the same meals, enjoy the same flavours and my health is in the best shape of its life. It really isn’t that hard.
If you want to be vegan because you truly care about animals (first and foremost) then adapting your diet is really a non issue. Having said this , i was not vegan a few years back so i do fully appreciate that it feels like a massive life change. Thankfully its a game changer!
Anyway, sort of back on topic (if there even is one), i don’t understand why all vegan sweets can’t be free of animals? I get chocolate because of dairy, but not sweets…
HollisJ wrote:
With sweets, a lot of companies just use gelatine because it’s cheap and what they’ve always used rather than switching over to using pectin instead (possibly xantham gum).
hawkinspeter wrote:
I’m not going to evangelise, it’s your personal choice, but I just will point out that tofu is gluten-free (try pressing it to get the water out, I’ve only just started doing that and it makes it a ten times more interesting product) and there a wide range of gluten-free vegan products available nowadays, including a lot of the Marks & Spencer Plant Kitchen range, White Rabbit pizzas, a substantial amount of the Linda McCartney range and so on.
Rendel Harris wrote:
I do eat tofu now and again. I’m surprised about M&S (not that I shop there) as when I first started eating vegetarian (approx 30 years ago) their prepared food was almost totally meat based – even simple things like egg fried rice would have little bits of ham added etc. Also, the Linda McCartney range used to use extensive amounts of gluten – when I made a connection between gluten consumption and my health, it explained why I never got on with her sausages.
If you like tofu, have a read of this article I came across the other day: https://asteriskmag.com/issues/02/america-doesn-t-know-tofu
hawkinspeter wrote:
Interesting article thanks, quite agree, tofu as cooked by Chinese, Japanese, Thai or other Far Eastern chefs is nothing like the insipid flabby stuff a lot of Westerners serve up.
Yeah M&S have really gone for it, I shop there a fair bit because it’s my nearest “minimart” and there’s a full size one half a mile further on. Some incredible vegan alternatives available. Not cheap, mind.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Sounds about right – maybe the odd insect too. https://howlongdosquirrelslive.com/squirrel-food-pyramid-2/
I gave my packets away and
I gave my packets away and then didn’t buy from them again.
A few percent in sales of a big business does seem significant to me. Perhaps not if it had much bigger problems though.
+1 here! My son is Type 1
+1 here! My son is Type 1 diabetic also so Haribo are a great and cheap (or indeed sometimes free when I used wiggle) treatment for low blood sugar.
And I doubt branded energy gels, powders, blocks have genuinely anymore nutritional value. Other than to provide the same glucose hit.
As per other comments also though, I’m surprised the Haribo wasn’t product placement though.
They owe BicycleLine, the
They owe BicycleLine, the Italian clothing company over 400K, still, which will put their lights out. I’ve stopped buying off them as it is only hurting the bike trade’s future.
Interesting. Do Bicycle Line
Interesting. Do Bicycle Line make the DHB kit – I’ve not seen BL as a brand on wiggle.
Don’t know, my DHB jacket
Don’t know, my DHB jacket says made in China. A friend works for Endura who hasn’t been paid and were not permitted to removestock from warehouse in Wolverhampton.
But would not them going
But would not them going kaput and paying nothing at all to suppliers with the subsequent potentially huge amount of very cheap stock onto the market be a lot worse?
DHB I imagine use a range of suppliers, Bicycle line could be one of them.
So, the market is already
So, the market is already filled with cheap stock. That damage has already been done to the industry, and to be fair to Wiggle, they are as much victims of that situation, as contributory to it.
What Wiggle brought to the industry, which I hope will become a part of the industries history now, is incredibly aggressive buying tactics. They were brutally cut throat, but again, to be fair, they did have the shop window to be so.
That window has gone, I can’t see it returning to what it was – the market is not there, and will never be there again, and suppliers will surely be less willing to jump back into bed with a partner that, having always pushed the limits, literally ran off with the cash.
I suspect we are about to see a new supply chain model come to market. Amazon-esque but with a bricks and mortar / showroom element attached.
The debt needs some context
The debt needs some context adding – it maybe that WiggleCRC had failed to pay Company A £X and hadn’t the means to pay. But it is more likely that these debts are part of normal retailing – retailers buy goods intending to pay for them when they are sold – possibly 90 Days after the goods landed in the warehouse.
It may not be a case of WiggleCRC having not been able to pay these companies (suppliers will often only sell on cash terms if a suppliers credit is poor). But the goods had been bought and shipped on normal terms and at the time of administration the accounts hadn’t been settled.
From what I’ve seen, a lot of
From what I’ve seen, a lot of invoices were arranged with due dates after the 1st November, so I’d say this whole episode had been planned for a while.
I really hope that CRC/Wiggle
I really hope that CRC/Wiggle doesn’t end up owned by Mike Ashley’s Sportsdirect.
I used to use our local Evans a bit but since Mike Ashley bought them they’re useless. They just don’t stock any highend or quality products anymore. Even Halfords have a better range.
I use CRC quite a bit so it would be a shame to see them so degraded to SportsDirect level.
Looks like you had a proper
Looks like you had a proper premonition dude, what a ghastly prospect.
PS: Any tips for the Euromillions on Friday?
I wonder what £20,000 worth
I wonder what £20,000 worth of Haribo looks like.
A major gut ache !
A major gut ache !
Sod Haribo. I was made
Sod Haribo. I was made redundant as part of the administration process and they owe me over £26k. Of which I’ll probably see 2p of every pound…if I’m lucky