Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Covidiots? Lancashire cyclists snapped on group ride contrary to lockdown rules

Longstanding cycling campaigner says riders he photographed are “getting us all a bad name”

How lockdown restrictions should be interpreted has dominated the headlines over the weekend, but leaving aside whether you should be taking a 60-mile round trip in a car to test your eyesight (no, you shouldn't), rules on exercise clearly forbid group rides – something these cyclists photographed in Lancashire seem to be ignoring.

The picture was taken by road.cc reader Matt Hodges, who also happens to be one of Cycling UK’s longest-standing Right to Ride volunteer campaigners. He said that the sight of groups of cyclists such as this one is “getting us all a bad name.”

He encountered the group on A588 between Cockerham and Thurnham about a mile north of Cockerham.

“It is good to see so many cyclists on our roads especially families,” he said.

“But it is not good to see groups like this getting is all a bad name by totally ignoring the guidelines on social distancing.

“Can you not see that this sort of behaviour gives motorists the justification they want to condemn ALL Cyclists as selfish idiots who shouldn’t be allowed on the roads because they break all the rules?”

Matt continued: “I don’t recognise any of them. I don’t think they are one of the Lancaster clubs as they would be unlikely to be returning to Lancaster so early, also they usually have several members in club jerseys.”

In England, the emergency regulations currently state that “no person may leave or be outside of the place where they are living without reasonable excuse,” with one of those being:

to visit a public open space for the purposes of open-air recreation to promote their physical or mental health or emotional wellbeing —

alone,

with one or more members of their household, or

with one member of another household.

So, a bike ride with your family, if they live with you, is fine, as is going out and meeting a friend to ride as a pair. Riding in a group of eight, though? That’s not allowed.

> Cycling dos and don'ts in a time of pandemic – how to be a responsible cyclist

Moreover, even if you find yourself on the road with other cyclists, you need to keep much further behind them than the standard 2 metres recommended social distance.

While the pair of cyclists at the rear are a little further back, we'll take Matt's word that they were part of the same group, given his years of experience within Cycling UK, and the point remains that even if you are maintaining social distance, you should not be out with more than one person who is not in your household.

> How much distance should you leave to the cyclist ahead?

We’ve reported a number of times during lockdown on how some images in the press taken with telephoto lenses appear to show cyclists riding in a group when, in fact, there is distance between them and they are riding alone or in pairs.

One of the most striking examples of that was a photo published in The Times of people riding bikes on the popular Box Hill climb in Surrey, with a picture taken from one of the riders’ perspectives at the very same moment underlining how misleading the press picture was.

> Times latest newspaper accused of trying to shame cyclists with dodgy telephoto pics

That’s not the case here, however, and unfortunately it’s not the first time we’ve heard of actual groups out on the road ignoring social distancing rules – sometimes in club kit.

Some might disagree with Matt’s assertion that the sight of such groups gives all people who ride bikes “a bad name,” but you only have to look at the comments beneath pretty much any local newspaper story on cycling to see the stereotyping that goes on.

That, plus a large section of the press that is actively hostile towards cyclists – including giving a platform to columnists for example talking about stringing piano wire across the road – in turn gives rise to acts of aggression against bike riders, whether from motorists, or people spreading tacks on the road or setting other traps.

> ‘Tempting’ – Sunday Times columnist Rod Liddle on stretching piano wire across road to target cyclists

In its latest COVID-19 advice, meanwhile, British Cycling highlights that cycling outdoors could even be banned should people not do so responsibly – and that includes avoiding riding in groups. The governing body says:

While the restrictions on cycling outdoors will be eased from Wednesday 13 May, the Government had made clear that this is contingent upon people continuing to act responsibly.

The infection rate will increase if people begin to break these rules and, for example, start to meet up and ride in groups. This will also trigger the need for further restrictions.

By riding responsibly and following the guidance, you’ll be securing our right to ride outdoors, protecting the NHS and saving lives.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

75 comments

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
6 likes

Rich_cb wrote:

Would you rather be left alone to agree with each other? It's interesting that nobody has bothered to actually disagree with what I've said.

I disagree with whatever it was you said.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

I doubt it will make much difference, everyone knows you're a inveterate lier Burt.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
4 likes

Rich_cb wrote:

I doubt it will make much difference, everyone knows you're a inveterate lier Burt.

I disagree with that too, and I can spell.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

It's been proved you're a liar on a regular basis.

It's hilarious how much you purport to dislike Johnson's dishonesty when you and he are so similar in that regard.

In fact, it's just struck me how incredibly similar you are to Boris.

You both lie continually, when you are proved to be lieing you either resort to bluster or ignore the proof and continue to shamelessly repeat the lie.

Burt the liar and Boris the liar.

Two sides of the same coin.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
4 likes

"It's been proved you're a liar on a regular basis."

Come on.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes

That's the case.

Burt lies routinely on this forum.

There are have been so many occasions where he tells a blatant lie and then gets called out on it.

Never an apology or even an acknowledgement and then a few weeks later the same lie again.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
0 likes

I have now  3

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
5 likes

We've had the scientists and doctors leading the lockdown strategy breaking lockdown in both England and Scotland.

The difference is that the scientist admitted what he did was wrong and resigned from Sage. Matthew Hancock said he was speechless and would back the police if they took action.

When it's Cummings, Matthew Hancock ties himself in knots trying to justify what happened, looks ridiculous, and insults our intelligence.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes

They did.

But they also did not give any justification for their actions. (Well the Scottish doctor did, then admitted another breach and then eventually resigned.)

In the case of the Conservative and Labour politicians who did give justifications there have been no resignations. Even when the justifications have been very questionable.

My point was not that Cummings has done nothing wrong, it was that blaming him for the increase in noncompliance with lockdown is disingenuous and smacks of political opportunism.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to billymansell | 3 years ago
2 likes

billymansell wrote:

It's easy to joke but this situation is the result of a PM who gave his loyalty to one person ahead of his responsibility to the nation. Why should people be beholden to a govt that a)breaks with impunity the rules they set and b)puts the interests of their friends above those of the nation.

I've been wondering why Boris and the cabinet, sadly not a pop group, would be quite so dogged and vociferous in their support of Cummings, then I realised; he knows where the bodies are buried.  Elections and the referendum were won by cheating, lying and various underhand methods, and Cummings knows all the details, so maybe he'd talk if he loses his job.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
5 likes

That's my conclusion too. The logical reason why Boris would be defending a single advisor ahead of ministers (let's send out a few more ministers to bolster Good Ol' Dom) is that Dominic has some serious blackmail material on him.

Anyhow, let's just move on (and by moving on, I mean firing Cummings).

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove | 3 years ago
11 likes

Tell him not to worry.

I've been out over 8 times giving cyclists a good name, so us cyclists are coming out even/slightly ahead.

 

Avatar
Merchant of Cool | 3 years ago
3 likes

Can we see the video...looks like there is a lot of overtaking going on here.

Avatar
handlebarcam | 3 years ago
13 likes

Looks like eight concerned fathers (maybe one or two mothers) just doing whatever they think is best for their families. Not sure how, but presumably something could be cooked up with a couple of days to think about it. I'm sure the Prime Minister will rush to their support soon thereafter.

Avatar
Expatpat | 3 years ago
13 likes

Look, this was clearly a potential emergency and they are using their instinct, who knows what might have happened otherwise.

Their eyesight was probably affected by Covid-19 that they didnt actually get but could have done, and they needed to test it using an approved government method. How irresponsible would it have  been to go out individually (OK normal protocol for testing eyesight is to drive with your wife and four old son in the back)?

I expect they stopped at Barnard Castle (its easier to group the northern counties into one i find) so everythings alright. Job done, move on peasants, nothing to see here.

Pages

Latest Comments