Sunday Times columnist Rod Liddle has said in today’s edition of the newspaper that he finds it “tempting” to stretch piano wire across the road to target cyclists – something that, as we reported last month, resulted in a man being injured when he was riding on a trail near Leeds with his son.
The column was published under the title, ‘The BBC is doing its job again. All it took was thousands of deaths and a useless cabinet’ – but it opened with Liddle’s anti-cyclist rant:
Every day it’s the same. Walk out of my front door with the dog to be swept aside, into a hedge, by a middle-class family from the city who think they’re all Bradley bloody Wiggins. Daddy and Piers, 11, in the peloton. Mummy bringing up the rear with little Poppy, 6, and Oliver, 4. All in Lycra, all with their energy drinks and fatuous expressions on their faces, expressions of self-righteousness and irreproachable virtue. This is a local lane for local people — go back to your tenements, I shout at them. My wife has persuaded me that, strictly speaking, it is against the law to tie piano wire at neck height across the road. Oh, but it’s tempting.
A reference to Halfords’ recent sales boom and “An entire nation that wants nothing more than … a bike with which to cause havoc in every country lane” in the second paragraph excepted, Liddle then moved on to the main point of his column, the “rebirth” of the BBC, where he was editor of the Today programme from 1998 to 2002, making the anti-cyclist rant look particularly gratuitous and out of context.
Moreover, it comes at a time when there have been a number of incidents since lockdown began of cyclists being targeted with drawing pins and tacks, pieces of wood studded with nails and, yes, wire stretched across paths – with police in West Yorkshire releasing pictures (see main image above, and the one below) and appealing for witnesses after one such trap resulted in a cyclist being injured when he rode into it.
> Cyclist injured by wire stretched across West Yorkshire trail
It’s not the first time that Liddle, who also pens a column for The Spectator, where he is associate editor, has taken a swipe at cyclists in The Sunday Times.
In 2016, Cycling UK demanded an apology from the newspaper and the retraction of what it termed an “inflammatory and dangerous” article in which Liddle appeared to applaud Chris Grayling after the then transport secretary doored a cyclist while getting out of his ministerial car outside the Palace of Westminster.
> Sunday Times: Rod Liddle wasn’t condoning ‘dooring’ cyclists – he was just using “heavy irony”
In its response, the newspaper claimed that the column had been written with “heavy irony” – a reaction that dismayed not only the national cycling charity, but also the widow of a cyclist who was was killed in Southport in January 2014 after a motorist opened her car door into his path without looking.
The column brings to mind one written in sister paper The Times back in 2007 by former MP Matthew Parris, who wrote: “A festive custom we could do worse than foster would be stringing piano wire across country lanes to decapitate cyclists.”
The complaints received in response to that article, published under the headline, ‘What’s smug and deserves to be decapitated?’, elicited what might be best described as a grudging apology from Parris, who claimed that the remark “was meant humorously but so many cyclists have taken it seriously that I plainly misjudged. I am sorry.”
No doubt Liddle’s remarks were also meant “humorously,” but we wouldn’t advise you to hold your breath while waiting for Liddle to issue any apology, grudging or otherwise, for his latest piece.
We have contacted Cycling UK for a comment.























66 thoughts on “‘Tempting’ – Sunday Times columnist Rod Liddle on stretching piano wire across road to target cyclists”
That surely has to come under
That surely has to come under the rulings of inciting someone to illegal activity. Hopefully this idiot will shortly be having a discussion with the local constabulary regarding endangering life and limb.
That surely has to come under
That surely has to come under the rulings of inciting someone to illegal activity. Hopefully this idiot will shortly be having a discussion with the local constabulary regarding endangering life and limb. <Website claimed a crash and posted twice> maybe some idiot used piano wire instead of CAT5
What a rotter.
What a rotter.
He has form… Found this
He has form… Found this from 2013, with much the same ranting going on.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/off-yer-bikes-cyclists-are-a-menace-to-society-and-self-righteous-to-boot
Can’t be arsed to complain to the times as it’s paywalled
what a sack of shit. liddle
what a sack of shit. liddle or the paper he writes for you ask? whats the difference…
say where does he live again? I suppose he would find piano wire at ankle height outside his front door suitably tempting as well…
Don’t rise, to it (or
Don’t rise, to it (or rather sink to it)
There’s always the press
There’s always the press complaints commission, if you have a soft spot for toothless watchdogs.
http://www.pcc.org.uk
sure. I’ll travel back to
sure. I’ll travel back to 2014 and report him xD
you mean the new place? https://www.ipso.co.uk/
Good catch. Thx
Good catch. Thx
He’s a self appointed “rebel”
He’s a self appointed “rebel”. Always has been. He’d love it if this were followed up by the authorities because it’s validate his punk fantasy. Just ignore the fat wobbly cunt.
please may have a bit of
please may have a bit of sympathy for this poor chap, in his time he just about abused every group in society in attempt for attention, those of us with children will recognise the typical tantrum of pay me attention syndrome, in a late middle age man I think its more a issue of pitying him rather than heaping abuse
Given that the two old
Given that the two old biddies who booby trapped a cycle route were spoken to by the police, I sincerely hope they will be visiting this oxygen thief forthwith.
This is one of the real gripes I have with the msm, not only do they refuse to mention the overwhelming benefits of cycling, but they pay vast sums to obnoxious twats to be obnoxious. Whatever he’s getting paid, I’ll do it for half the price.
Why didn’t someone, maybe an
Why didn’t someone, maybe an editor on the paper, point out to this monumental prick that putting a wire across a highway isn’t “strictly speaking” an offence IT IS f*****g offence under section 162 of the highways act 1980.
The times group commitment to cycling didn’t last long either.
Psychopath
Psychopath
It would be tempting to tie
It would be tempting to tie some 20 metre piano wire around his balls and then tie the ends to two bikes facing away from each other.
On your marks, get set, go!
every mention of this sort of
every mention of this sort of thing just gives it currency and fractionally increases the chances of some copycat idiot with just a comic book view of the consequences turning into a perpetrator. Kick him out, Mrs Liddle!!
Clarkson, Liddle and Parris.
Clarkson, Liddle and Parris.
What a threesome, all spouting their bile at a perceived easy target. Parris lives just down the road from me, in real life he’s just as obnoxious as he comes across in some of the drivel he writes. I also know where Clarksons farm is too, perhaps the pair of them need a well hidden police stinger across their farm roads so that they can see what it’s like from the other side.
Haven’t got a clue where Liddle lives, but I know plenty of people who move in those kind of circles who would. It would be highly amusing to see the irascible idiot learn his lesson for his stupid remarks.
It’ll never happen though, mores the pity.
Ok we get you know people….
Ok we get you know people….
Woah fella!
Woah fella!
It’s not what you know that counts, but who you know.
Always has been , always will.
Sorry if that offends you 🙂
I remember getting really
I remember getting really hassled by a car driver in a q of traffic once – he was revving me, hooting, trying to ‘nudge’ me all the usual – and I stopped by his open window and asked “why?”
What am I doing that is so upsetting you? I am just going home after work. On a bike, through a long q of traffic. And this ”rant” feels the same. Why? what is this (fictionalised) cycling family or any cyclist doing that is so upsetting you?
Either there are whole groups
Either there are whole groups of cyclists riding on the pavement past his house, or he’s walking his dog in the road. I smell bullshit. Not exactly surprising to hear that a right wing, elitist gobshite like Liddle is still completely full of shit.
I have made a complaint to
I have made a complaint to IPSO about this article, it is dangerous enough cycling around without articles like this inciting further violence.
I wonder if The Times would make alterations if enough of us complained
Have complaine too, and also
Have complaine too, and also to the Times. Not that it will do any good.
brightonbiker wrote:
Well, it made some difference when they received more complaints than anything else about Matthew Paris’ disgusting comments about doing the same, and he issued an apology along the lines of “I’m really, really sorry. That you don’t have a sense of humour.” I left comments on his twitter feed which were promptly deleted. Scum.
eburtthebike wrote:
Trying a different tack – I’ve reported it on the government’s website for reporting hate crimes (including inciting others to commit hate crimes).
Rod Liddle writes column to
Rod Liddle writes column to provoke outrage in the way he has been doing for nearly 20 years, do people still fall for this nonsense? Are they genuinely surprised by it still after all this time ? What would be shocking is if he didnt for once write in that style, but theres more chance the roads will become a new cycling nirvana than that happening.
The outraged responses is
The outraged responses is what keeps him in orbit. The guy is a desperate douche best ignored. Stop giving him what he wants.
What’s very rarely
What’s very rarely acknowledged is that the columnists and publications that are ‘outraged’ make good money from the clicks and views that their ‘outrage’ garners.
They are essentially reliant on ‘outrageous’ people like Liddle for part of their income.
Ignoring him would be by far the better option but there’s no money in that.
Quote:
It’s uncanny…


Or better yet…
Or better yet…
As if he’d ever have the
As if he’d ever have the balls to actually do it.
I’d assume not too, but the
I’d assume not too, but the issue is that writing this crap and having it distributed via a mainstream publication normalises hatred of a particular identifiable group and feeds the prejudices of an extremist minority who will feel perfectly justified in setting and have actually in the past set piano wire and other booby traps capable of causing serious injury.
Anyway, at least no-one here is suggesting that a breeze block be dropped on his car from a motorway bridge, albeit in an attempted humurous way, which would be a fair analogy.
Or doing anything else,
Or doing anything else, however violent and reprehensible, with extreme irony of course.
Completely agree, don’t get
Completely agree, don’t get me wrong, I condemn this utterly for precisely that reason. It just seems all the more contemptible to call for it from the safety of the keyboard.
Well, there was that chap who
Well, there was that chap who worked in London and moved to Norway/Denmark who did post that concrete block idea on here.
His name escapes me.
hirsute wrote:
Arthur?
Kevin?
Peter?
Brian?
Arthur again?
From Sweden?
They went to Copenhagen, we
They went to Copenhagen, we haven’t heard from them since.
Paving slabs, they liked the paving slab.
Legs_Eleven_Worcester
Legs_Eleven_Worcester
If you do not know the person
If you do not know the person’s name, there is no need for a facetious reply.
Ktache clearly remembers the poster.
Could someone with a Times
Could someone with a Times account enquire his preferred option for this family? Is his intention with the Piano wire to potentially create three new orphans for the state to care for? Or is he proposing piano wire at 6/4 year old height to teach the evil parents a lesson? Presumably as they live “in a tenement” the children can’t be considered actually human and deserving of fresh air or exercise which they should be getting up chimneys?
Is this not incitement to
Is this not incitement to murder?
Is this not incitement to
Is this not incitement to murder?
Is this not incitement to
Is this not incitement to murder?
Is this not incitement to
Is this not incitement to murder?
I beg your pardon?
I beg your pardon?
Nope – probably ‘incitement
Nope – probably ‘incitement to manslaughter’ (no intent to kill) or something like that.
Didn’t the Times used to campaign for safer cycling (in London particularly) after one of their journalists was killed? Or did I imagine that?
yes they did campaign for
yes they did campaign for safer cycling in London after the death of one of their journalists. The campaign didn’t last long.
Nope – probably ‘incitement
(duplicate – got an Ajax error, sorry)
Ive written to the Sunday
Ive written to the Sunday Times complaining about the article and have asked for a retraction and public apology…I wont be holding my breath!
Complaint made to ipso. Quite
Complaint made to ipso. Quite easy to complete online.
Looking at the Editors’ Code
Looking at the Editors’ Code it’s unclear which provision this would breach. (Not condoning, just don’t get your hopes up – I stopped reading anything the appalling Liddle wrote years ago.)
I’ve also submitted a
I’ve also submitted a complaint to IPSO as this is a clear incitement to violence
I’ve also submitted a
I’ve also submitted a complaint to IPSO as this is a clear incitement to violence
I’ve also submitted a
I’ve also submitted a complaint to IPSO as this is a clear incitement to violence
3 complaints?
3 complaints?
Every day it’s the same. Pick
Every day it’s the same. Pick up my newspaper and there is some gammon faced, girlfriend beating, racist, islamaphobic, slightly overweigh, probably hypertensive and diabetic middle aged man with a chip on their well padded shoulder. A plethora of Farrages, Clarksons and Liddles. All in tweed jackets with their 20 Bensons, pints of poor quality ale and fatuous expressions on their ruddy faces, expressions of self-righteousness and irreproachable indignation. This is a just a nice way of getting exercise — don’t be such NIMBY dickheads, I shout at them. My wife has persuaded me that, strictly speaking, it is against the law to cough Corona Virus in their faces. Oh, but it’s tempting.
We must all write to the
We must all write to the police because this is hate speech exactly the same as if it were directed at a religious belief!
I am glad this article has
I am glad this article has been picked up on. I think I was one of the first to leave a negative comment about it on The Times. I was then accused of needing a sense of humour implant by another reader – a comment that got 36 likes compared to the 5 mine got. This really shook my faith in humanity and left me questioning whether it was my judgement at fault!
Good for you for having a go.
Good for you for having a go. The first response of bullies is usually “we were just having a laugh…”
I’d be more inclined to think
I’d be more inclined to think that it was a joke if there weren’t cases were people do actually set booby-traps for cyclists. It’d be more obviously a joke if it was something implausible, but as it does happen, that takes it out of the realm of humour and into the realm of nastiness.
And yeah, anti-cycling comments on websites usually overwhelm the pro-cycling ones. It’s not you.
Well I’ve complained to the
Well I’ve complained to the Times and to IPSO. Weight of numbers is all these organisations care about. And vote with your wallet – don’t buy the Times – there are plenty of other ‘news outlets’ available.
This Liddle guy is NUTS, the
This Liddle guy is NUTS, the Sunday Times needs to fire him and send him to the insane asylium. I can assume that with the Sunday Times being non reactive to the insanity of Liddle that they support this sort of behavior. I would suggest that people stop reading the Sunday Times. It’s just a matter of time before Liddle snaps and he does something really really bad, and when this happens they should hold the Sunday Times partially responsible for failure to take action to stop this mad man.
Apparently its against the
His Wikipedia page makes interesting reading… nice guy.
Well I had a reply from the
Well I had a reply from the Sunday Times today saying:
“Rod Liddle’s remark was not intended to be taken seriously. We’re sorry he’s caused offence. We believe that cyclists should have their say in our pages. To that end, we intend to publish a letter from Cycling UK putting their view of the column this coming Sunday”
The damage has still been done, though
I have also complained to the
I have also complained to the Sunday Times, as I assume hundreds have. This is what I said.
I would hope that I do not need to repeat what so many people have said about the foolishness of your publishing remarks that incite to hate crime, but the feebleness of your response so far — that the remarks were not intended to be taken seriously, at a time when at least two such incidents have taken place and an innocent cyclist hospitalised as a result, compels me to do so.
And the point is not only whether the remarks were in bad taste or dangerous, but that they contribute to a corrosive culture of treating people who are doing nothing worse than cycling to the shops or work, or enjoying a great form of outdoor recreation, as pariahs and people deserving of harassment, insult and a disregard for their safety, vulnerable as they are, rather than the courtesy of concern for their welfare as legitimate users of the road — all things which are far too common, even if they stop short of actually garrotting an innocent family out for a ride. Nor is the point that Liddle has given offence. The point is that he is disseminating opinions that make our society less tolerant and more dangerous and which actively discourage ordinary people from following the lead of countries like the Netherlands and Denmark where cycling is normal for the majority of the population, to the detriment of our clean air, our use of carbon, our health and the congestion of our roads.
In 2012 The Times campaigned for cycling safety after the death of one of its journalists, Mary Bowers. Today, with so many people finding out how enjoyable and convenient cycling can be if conditions are made safe, as the huge reduction in traffic during lockdown helped to do, you would do well to emulate The Times’s Cycle Safe campaign with one that meets the need of our time to have safe infrastructure throughout the UK to enable us to meet the challenge of global warming and the demand that lockdown has revealed, rather than giving publicity to Liddle’s vile outpourings, insulting the memory of Bowers.
On the offchance anyone’s
On the offchance anyone’s interested, here’s the link to the Independent Press Standards Organisation in order that you can lodge a complaint about Liddle’s article.
I did, simply because if the reference to cyclists had been swapped for gays, blacks, gingers etc then it would have been truly offensive and the public at large would have complained. In the same way that I don’t think it’s acceptable to publicly hate on gays, blacks, gingers or any other group, I don’t think it should be acceptable to publicly hate on cyclists.
Here’s the link:
https://www.ipso.co.uk/complain/complaints-form/#