Charlie Mullins, the Pimlico Plumbers founder who claimed in 2020 that “cycle fascists” were making van journeys longer, has been suspended from X, formerly known as Twitter, after posting a series of tweets attacking and appearing to threaten London mayor Sadiq Khan over this week’s expansion of the capital’s Ultra Low Emission Zone, writing that “it’s time to dump the Muslim mayor” and that “someone should kill him”.
Mullins’ racially charged tweets were posted within ten minutes of each other on Sunday night, two days before the ULEZ – inside which motorists are charged £12.50 a day for driving older, non-compliant, high-polluting vehicles – was extended to outer London, following months of political debate, protests, furious online discourse, and legal challenges over a policy described by Labour mayor Khan as “not easy but necessary to reduce the capital’s toxic air pollution”.

Replying to tsuk78639968’s tweet calling for Mullins to stand at the next mayoral election, to “make London what it used to be”, the 70-year-old multimillionaire businessman tweeted: “I am on it, and it’s time to dump the Muslim mayor”.
Nine minutes later, Mullins replied to ChrisFi65328659’s post claiming that the “government is doing nothing to stop” Khan, tweeting: “Someone should kill him”.

The posts have led to Mullins’ account being suspended by X, due to a “violation” of the social media platform’s rules.
road.cc has contacted Mullins’ representatives about the suspension, but is yet to receive a response.
The posts, which have been described by other Twitter users as “racially motivated hate speech”, aren’t the first time Mullins has been put under the spotlight due to inflammatory comments concerning travel policies.
In 2020, the then-boss of Pimlico Plumbers, one of Britain’s largest plumbing firms, commissioned a Transport for London parody poster of a cyclist struggling to carry tools, which claimed that people on bikes were “taking f***ing liberties”.
An additional blog post, shared on the company’s website, then took aim at cycling infrastructure and “cycle fascists”, which Mullins’ PR team claimed were responsible for increasing the length of van journeys in the capital.
“I’ve had enough of cycle fascists whining about their precious road space when what they really want is to run all non-cycles off the road,” the blog, written in the first person as if by Mullins himself, said. “And I’m also sick of the bike bureaucrats who have taken over TFL, and who as we speak are painting great swathes of Central London’s roads blue, making it next to impossible to run any kind of service business.
“Businesses like mine, and many others that rely on the transport of large amounts of equipment, tools and goods about the city cannot operate on bicycles. It is a ridiculous proposition. Any fool can figure out it doesn’t work. And please don’t tell me to get a cargo bike because unless they are the size of a van or a lorry and can be made secure they are exactly as useful as a chocolate teapot.”
> Pimlico Plumbers worker caught using phone at the wheel by Cycling Mikey
The blog, which was subsequently watered down following an online backlash, concluded: “London is a city of commerce but that cannot continue if we hand the roads to these freeloading helmet heroes who believe they have a god given right to the roads to the detriment of all other users.”
Less than a month after that controversial blog post, Pimlico Plumbers then posted a video to Twitter calling for help in tracking down a cycling “criminal” who allegedly kicked out at a wing mirror on the Mullins’ Bentley.
> Pimlico Plumbers appeal to catch cycling ‘criminal’ – but get accused of faking footage
However, a number of users called out the footage as fake, with one accusing the firm of staging a publicity stunt and a “false flag” attack to whip up resentment against bike riders.
Mullins sold the company to US home services group Neighborly in a deal worth up to £145 million in September 2021, though his son remained involved as chief executive.
> Bike shop owner – who owns nine cars – says ULEZ expansion will cause “chaos”
These latest highly controversial posts from the London-born businessman, a former donor to the Conservative Party and business advisor to David Cameron and George Osborne, appear to represent the darker side of the politically charged opposition to the extended ULEZ, a scheme branded by Boris Johnson – who introduced the policy to London in 2015 during his stint as London Mayor – as a “mad lefty tax” on “hard-pressed motorists”.
At the end of July, a legal challenge launched by five Conservative-led councils, who claimed that the extension was “illegal”, was quashed by the High Court, while this week’s implementation of the scheme has been marked by confusion and misinformation.
> Bike brands bank on ULEZ expansion – but will enlarged clean air zone boost active travel?
Following the High Court ruling last month, Simon Munk from the London Cycling Campaign told road.cc: “It’s really good news that London’s ULEZ zone is now set to expand in August. London must act on pollution, at too high levels across the capital, and the expansion will be a positive step in not only delivering cleaner air but enabling people to use alternatives to cars.
“The legal action came primarily from councils that are among those who have done least on delivering action on air quality, climate emissions and walking, cycling and wheeling… We hope the leaders of the London boroughs involved reflect on what they have cost their own residents, and more, on how they now need to work with the rest of London on delivering cleaner air, lower emissions, and to enable residents to ditch car journeys whenever possible.
“ULEZ expanding is another step in the right direction for a healthier, cleaner, greener London.”





















103 thoughts on “Pimlico Plumbers founder Charlie Mullins suspended from Twitter after posting that “someone should kill” Sadiq Khan over ULEZ”
Good God, you have to go some
Good God, you have to go some to get suspended nowadays from the channel formerly known as Twitter.
Miller wrote:
Ex-Twitter.
Back in 2011, a couple of
Back in 2011, a couple of teenagers posted on Twitter that, someone should come and loot their high street.
They received 4 years in jail.
Don’t suppose the Police will act on this invitation?!
He should be arrested and
He should be arrested and jailed. I hope Cycling UK pushes to get this done. He literally incited people to kill someone he earlier referred to in a derogatory manner as muslim. His OBE should be taken from him, unless the King supports his views.
. . . . tsuk78639968’s tweet
. . . . tsuk78639968’s tweet calling for Mullins to stand at the next mayoral election, to “make London what it used to be”, . . . .
It’s funny because I was
It’s funny because I was roundly castigated in these pages (mainly by people who are now banned) some months ago for suggesting that there was a racist, violent and Islamophobic element to a significant minority of the protests against the ULEZ, with particular reference to the poster below which apparently in no way at all is intended to represent a target on Khan’s forehead and can’t possibly be interpreted as such. And here we are. I’m sure Mullins is just an outlier, a bad apple, and in no way representative of the views of other protestors…
I honestly can’t recall a single issue in my fairly long lifetime, not even Thatcher and the poll tax or Blair and the Iraq war, that has attracted such villification of the politician rather than the policy. Go to at any anti-ULEZ demonstration and count the proportion of posters that are “Khan Out” rather than “No ULEZ”, it’s quite instructive. Just what could it be about the Pakistani heritage Muslim mayor that engenders such passionate ire, one wonders…
Absolute rubbish. You’ve
Absolute rubbish. You’ve clearly been living under a rock for a long, long time.
Do you think Rishi blames all the hate he gets on race? No, in the same way other politicians don’t. I bet he’s had a lot more death threats than Kahn
Just because it’s your beloved Kahn, you seem to have this imaginary race hate/politics thing made up in your head.
I’m not saying there is an element of that, and its the same for all politicians. But it’s not exclusively aimed at Kahn for a start.
Jeremy Corbyn for PM wrote:
You really haven’t being paying attention have you?
Jeremy Corbyn for PM wrote:
Another band I saw at the Hope and Anchor back in…. I think…1977, or it could have been 78?
I preferred “Talking Bullocks” but I suppose its all a matter of personal taste.
Spot on with the analysis.
Spot on with the analysis. Khan’s race is undoubtedly being used to leverage anti ULEZ support. It is no different to Brexit where the vote was carried after a campaign that was clearly racist and xenophobic in tone. The facebook and instagram posts are a disgrace. I don’t follow twitter/X. The Government are leveraging this with the goals of distracting from the state of the country and to get Khan out at the next election; they don’t care about ULEZ or what it costs, as the correspondence from Grant Shapps demonstrates.
When I was growing up in the 1960’s racism was rife and you knew the silent majority were also racist in their views. Today I believe the silent majority either aren’t racist or are ambivalent, but they are complicit in racism by not speaking out.
Sadly the Conservative Party is still full of racists, it’s why Truss got elected instead of Sunak. It’s exemplified by the policies and utterances of Braverman and the silence from Sunak when challenged about her. And their argument that they are the most diverse cabinet ever (therefore they cannot be racist) holds no water, judge the words and the actions not the skin pigmentation.
The Conservatives have a stated goal of focusing on the things that divide us as a nation rather than those that unite us. The policy is to divide and conquer and damn the consequences. It is the only way they believe they can win the next election.
Legin wrote:
Are we talking about Start Trek, is this the Wrath of Sadiq Khan?
Because that makes sense if we are becuase that rather good actor but odious human Bendingberk Cucumberbap did knock a cyclist off his bike with his massive 4×4 a couple of years back – https://road.cc/content/news/259291-benedict-cumberbatch-slapped-cyclist-he-knocked-bike-while-driving-his
Or maybe I’ve read this wrong, should adjust my spoktacles?
I’m wondering how bad the
I’m wondering how bad the Tory racism will get when Sunak loses the next election by a massive margin?
Jem PT wrote:
Pretty hefty, one imagines: there was a poll of Tory members during the 2019 leadership election (when Sadiq Javid was one of the candidates) in which 43% agreed with the statement “I would sooner not have a Muslim as prime minister of Great Britain” so one doesn’t imagine they would be much kinder to any other non-Christian non-white person. Don’t forget this is the party that refused to vote for Sunak as their leader even though he was the majority choice of their MPs and when the alternative was the manifestly unfit for purpose Liz Truss.
Jem PT wrote:
Laughable. Remind me which party has never elected a woman or somebody from a racial minority background to be its leader….
Or which party has had the most ethnic minorities in high ranking cabinet jobs for example.
I wonder how bad the Labour anti-semitism will be when Sunak wins the next election?
Jeremy Corbyn for PM wrote:
The Tory party for one, Sunak was declared unopposed without an election. When he did try to get elected the party chose Liz Truss instead of him, that tells you something about how much the members want him.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Err, what about Benjamin Disraeli, the first PM from an ethnic minority who was Conservative then?
Also – it’s not declared, elected unopposed. Only because a female candidate who was also in the running, pulled out.
Not to mention that in the leadership race to replace Johnson, half the contenders were women, and half from an ethnic minority background.
Jeremy Corbyn for PM wrote:
Ah well then, if you’re counting Jewish as an ethnic minority (something that is fiercely debated within Judaism) then Labour has had Ed Milliband, so your accusation that Labour have never elected an ethnic minority leader is false. Do you need a plaster for that foot in which you’ve just shot yourself?
Rendel Harris wrote:
Sorry, please remind me when Ed Miliband was the Prime Minister?
Just proves lefty labour is anti-semitic, racist and wholly unfit to lead a dog on a walk, let alone govern a prestigious country like England
Jeremy Corbyn for PM]Remind
No real comment required, your own words make you look stupid enough.
Rendel Harris wrote:
In fairness to those Tory party members, Truss did dress up like Margaret Thatcher which left them no option but to vote for her.
Dnnnnnn wrote:
The Iron Weathervane
But have you seen who the
But have you seen who the Tories have put up to go against Kahn, they are trying even less hard than the lack of effort that went into Shaun Bailey.
They put more work into their lockdown busting partying.
Just looked up Wiki, and Boris made Bailey a Baron…
Rendel Harris wrote:
That statement is simply wrong. Have we had a ULEZ riot yet?
You do post some crap.
People don’t riot anymore.
People don’t riot anymore. They simply crawl out from under their bridge and post on Twitter/ other soical media.
Gimpl wrote:
That statement is simply wrong. Have we had a ULEZ riot yet?
You do post some crap.— Rendel Harris
Reading comprehension needs a bit of work there. I didn’t say it was the issue that has attracted the most violent or riotous response, I said it was the issue that seems to have attracted the most personal attacks on the politician implementing the policy rather than the policy itself. Try again.
Rendel Harris wrote:
If you want personal attacks, you only have to look to Labours “attack ads” on Rishi Sunak that even some Labour leaders don’t agree with.
Jeremy Corbyn for PM wrote:
Not good at History either; the Conservative Party introduced attack ads to the UK and the Tory party alongside Saatchi & Saatchi benefitted greatly from them https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/saatchi-saatchi-the-agency-that-made-tory-history-744791.html
Legin wrote:
I always felt that the Labour attack ads on our inglorious leader were more attacks on his nasty policies and hypocritical self-serving, employing many of those policies to enrich hisself and mates at large cost to the taxpayers and conditions of life for 99% of British subjects.
Jeremy Corbyn for PM wrote:
— Jeremy Corbyn for PMThe media went to town on the man whose name is in your username.
I wasn’t a paid-up fan but he was willing to offer far more for ordinary people of this country than those who preceded him or his successor so the media attacked at every opportunity. I got the impression that as a result of the media witch-hunt most people in this country never got to read or hear anything honest or truthful about him. Whether you agree or disagree with his policies is irrelevant, that is not the way to run a democracy or a ‘free’ press.
Simon E wrote:
Really?? JC was willing to offer far more?
He isn’t even in favour of arming Ukraine…straight away that’s a far greater threat to our overall security and livelihoods let alone the damage he would have done to the country.
Oh Jeremy Corbyn for PM, has
Oh Jeremy Corbyn for PM, has it been so long? I’m pretty sure you were offering everyone a modestly-priced cycle (or at least free trouser clips) and an expansion in the number of council bike sheds.
Rendel Harris wrote:
I understood exactly what you wrote – it’s your comprehension skills that need work.
Blair and Iraq was not
Blair and Iraq was not personal in the same way, many of us felt that he wanted to invade a country and start a war based on a dodgy dossier (and Dubya’s desire for the USA to control the oilfields). Many thousands dead and Iraq is still a fucking mess, politically and environmentally. Unforgiveable but I don’t see ‘prominent’ people calling for him to be killed.
And it appears that, unlike the invasion of Iraq, ULEZ is a good thing. Like the congestion charge, it will hurt some people’s pockets, but it is probably the only way that such positive changes can happen.
The modest numbers protesting have been given prominent and repeated exposure in certain well-known media outlets, implying that the number of people who are strongly against the ULEZ expansion is far greater than the reality:
https://twitter.com/peterwalker99/status/1696781008975110417
Which is odd when apparently 90% of vehicles are compliant and London has a public transport provision that all the other people on this island can only look at and weep with frustration. And that’s before we consider active travel.
The UK’s Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants (COMEAP) estimates that 29,000 to 43,000 Britons over 30 die every year as a consequence of air pollution
https://twitter.com/TransportActio2/status/1690299334393270272
Air pollution is the largest environmental risk to public health – BMJ, 15 May 2023
https://www.bmj.com/content/381/bmj.p1037
Air pollution causes harm to people at all stages of life
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-65296752
98% of schools in #London are in areas where air quality is considered #Toxic.
https://twitter.com/sabrodrigues61/status/1650704242657710081
https://www.mumsforlungs.org/our-campaigns/ulez
A total of 130,000 healthy years of life are lost to noise pollution in the UK each year alone, according to data from the UKHSA
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/19/light-and-noise-pollution-are-neglected-health-hazards-say-peers
Rendel Harris wrote:
For a man who has definitely got a photographic memory you do seem to struggle with recalling things.
Targeting a figurehead politician at protests is pretty much par for the course, Thatcher even had protests at her funeral.
Rich_cb wrote:
I don’t recall any of the protests you show mentioning the fact that these politicians were Christians and I don’t recall any death threats specific to those politicians and demonstrations being in the public domain at those times.
Did you actually read the article?
Can you read? He’s responding
Can you read? He’s responding to Rendell’s claims.
Gimpl wrote:
Which are linked to the article that clearly shows that Khan is targeted both as a politician and a muslim.
Did you read the comment I
Did you read the comment I was replying to?
Implying that all anti-Khan banners are motivated by racism ignores the fact that anti-politician banners are routine at protests against policies.
There have been death threats against all manner of politicians over the years. It’s not unique to Khan.
Remember the ‘Hang the Tories’ banner from conference season a few years ago?
Rich_cb wrote:
Yes and I refer to my earlier responses. The comments are linked to the article that demonstrates Khan is being targetted for being a muslim as well as a politician.
Indeed – but to return to the
Indeed – but to return to the article in this case there certainly seems to be a side-order of a certain prejudice in this case. I believe some other examples have been given in the past.
I suspect this is what moves it out of “political bantz” into something more concerning.
I imagine if someone had posted stuff threatening the life of “that kafir Boris” or Ken when they were mayor it would have attracted some concern. Clearly this chap thinks (if he did) he’s got more popular support saying this kind of thing in a public space or believes this is just airing opinion – it’s a throwaway line. (I doubt he’s personally going to run over Khan – although if he claimed the sun was in his eyes…)
Did anyone hang the Tories? (Possibly the Whigs?) OTOH I’m pretty sure that racially / religiously motivated violence is a current, real occurrence albeit thankfully rare in the UK.
Rich_cb wrote:
Never claimed to have a photographic memory except for text location, you and the now-banned trio Martin73, Rakia and thisismyusername took that statement and twisted it in your rather nasty little bullygroup way. Username’s still here in a different guise so I’m sure you can get the band back together.
More importantly, I did not of course claim that politicians aren’t vilified for their policies, I said that I can’t recall in this country a politician receiving more personal vilification under the guise of attacking their policies. Perhaps you could point me to an instance where any other high-profile businessman has suggested that a politician should be killed and referenced their religion against them (and apparently received no greater sanction that the slap on the wrist of a Twitter suspension, road.cc appear to be the only news outlet even reporting it)?
So in your entire life you’ve
So in your entire life you’ve never read an article refering to protests against Boris or Cameron or Thatcher?
How strange. Almost unbelievable…
Death threats against politicians are unfortunately incredibly common. The fact that this particular idiot is a prominent businessman doesn’t really add anything.
Rich_cb wrote:
To repeat, even though I know that you are deliberately being obtuse, of course there have been protests against every politician and always will be, however I cannot remember an issue, even the poll tax, where the protestors against the issue were so focused on attacking the person rather than the issue. I hope you’ve got it now because I don’t have time to keep on repeating it until you understand.
I’ve provided three examples
I’ve provided three examples of political protests that were highly personal.
They weren’t atypical examples.
Personal protests against Thatcher were routine to the extent that her funeral was targeted.
That memory of yours would be better described as selective.
However, attacks and
However, attacks and criticism of Thatcher reflected views drawn from decades of right wing governance. During that time, the issues that led to those views were addressed repeatedly by people tackling the issues.
We had the Poll Tax riots, not the Get Thatcher riots.
The miners’ strike was addressing the conditions they were put under – and much of the violence (reported at the time as being attacks launched on the police) were shown to be re-edited timelines of police attacks on strikers.
Villification is, by definition, ad hominem attacks designed to change opinion – necessarily an influencing factor; whereas the criticism of Thatcher was the culmination of opinions formed as a result of the issues – a receptive factor.
What we have now, demonstrably, is a series of attacks in predominantly right-wing media and online social media that seek to target and discredit the character of those in charge – often with implied abuse based on ethnicity or religious views, in lieu of dealing with the issues based on the evidence and reason.
The fact that sarcastic insults are aimed at Rendel’s ability to understand and aimed at very specific points that don’t deal with the generality of his argument rather proves his point.
It is therefore reasonable to disregard Mr Mullin’s level of reason and argument because he fails to address real issues; instead he targets the proponents of policy with which he disagrees using insults and pejorative mischaracterisation.
It’s a good thing that we’ve
It’s a good thing that we’ve never seen such attacks against Conservative politicians…
The idea that Khan’s treatment is in some way unusual is a laughable attempt at deflection.
That is not to condone threats against Khan but to simply point out that threats against politicians are, sadly, commonplace.
None of the banners or posters I’ve seen at ULEZ protests have been markedly different in tone or content to those frequently seen at protests against the Conservatives.
We still understand and you
We still understand and you’re still an idiot.
I don’t know those lyrics.
I don’t know those lyrics. What song are they from then?
Isn’t that from Green Day’s
Isn’t that from Green Day’s “American Idiot”?
I did wonder, I wasn’t sure.
I did wonder, I wasn’t sure.
Gimpl wrote:
That’s your fourth reply to me today, I believe. Pretty good going considering you don’t give two figs about me, nothing better to do hun?
Gimpl wrote:
Unfortunately for the rest of us, he doesn’t understand that he is himself an idiot.
In fairness, credit for getting out of his box so many times, just to be squashed each time.
Which rest of us would that
Which rest of us would that be then?
Out of his box? Another great
Out of his box? Another great band. Saw them at the Leadmill in Sheffield a few years back. Their version of Where have all the good trolls gone? is an all time classic.
perce wrote:
A bit before my time, that one. My dad used to sing it on long car journeys though. How does it go?
Where have all the good trolls gone?
The mods have blocked them, every one.
Oh, When will you ever learn?
Hmm… that can’t be right.
Rendel Harris wrote:
You are looking at this from an incredibly biased viewpoint. Many, many politicians receive abuse on a daily basis, death threats are very real.
Not to mention that when someone suggested I’d be better off as a KSI stat on no less than this road.cc forum, the mods were very reluctant to remove it, suggesting it wasn’t actually meant.
Now work that one out.
Jeremy Corbyn for PM wrote:
When did this happen to you? I know a now banned user raised a similar point several months ago. Are you admitting to being the same banned user then?
Rich_cb wrote:
I honestly can’t recall a single issue in my fairly long lifetime, not even Thatcher and the poll tax or Blair and the Iraq war, that has attracted such villification of the politician rather than the policy. Go to at any anti-ULEZ demonstration and count the proportion of posters that are “Khan Out” rather than “No ULEZ”, it’s quite instructive. Just what could it be about the Pakistani heritage Muslim mayor that engenders such passionate ire, one wonders…
— Rich_cb For a man who has definitely got a photographic memory you do seem to struggle with recalling things. Targeting a figurehead politician at protests is pretty much par for the course, Thatcher even had protests at her funeral.— Rendel Harris
There are a few things he’s ‘claimed’ that don’t add up and I am deeply suspicious of.
Gimpl wrote:
Ooh, do share them with the rest of the class! What are they, let me put your “mind” at rest. You’re not going to accuse me of lying about things and then not say what they are are you? That would be the behaviour of a silly little bully with no proper arguments.
Don’t need my mind put at
Don’t need my mind put at rest and really couldn’t give two figs about you.
Bullying though! From you and your cadre – hilarious
Gimpl wrote:
So in other words you’re going to accuse me of lying but you’re not actually going to tell me what these supposed lies are? A good technique in primary school but doesn’t really work past the age of about seven. I’m very happy for you not to give two figs about me but I do wonder why then virtually your only appearances on this site are in order to attack me personally or something that I have said? It really has become quite a habit for somebody who allegedly doesn’t care.
I have a cadre? Cool, when do we meet? I’ll bring flapjacks if somebody else can organise the tea urn.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Alternate Thursdays, after the meeting for the Evil Cycling Lobby 😉
Rich_cb wrote:
Indeed. Ding-dong.
Cugel wrote:
Indeed. Ding-dong.— Rich_cb
You can’t threaten to kill a dead person, being dead is actually a pre-requisite to a funeral.
Legin wrote:
Tell that to Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna.
chrisonatrike wrote:
I think it was confirmed that the leg was dead before they buried it 😉
Think you’re wrong on this.
Think you’re wrong on this. Absolutely no fan of Thatcher, but even in her lifetime she got highly personalised abuse that went way beyond anything I can remember anyone else having.
Wishing her dead was a mild and unproblematic sentiment, and I can’t imagine a pop star of today with the clout of a mid-80s Elvis Costello releasing a song in which he/she looks forward to tramping the dirt down on Sadiq Khan’s grave.
I agree that the personalisation of the anti-ULEZ types’ attacks on Khan is racist and extremely worrying. It’s hyperbole though to claim it as the worst in our lifetimes. (Not forgetting that the murders of e.g. Mountbatten and others were not exactly seen as outrages by some mainstream sections of the left).
Brauchsel wrote:
This is the problem when people like Richcb start obfuscating and claiming that people have said things that they haven’t, it somehow becomes an accepted narrative. I didn’t say that Khan is receiving the worst abuse of anyone I can remember, and I would certainly agree that there is a case to say that Thatcher got worse. What I actually said was that I couldn’t remember any specific issue (poll tax, Iraq, ULEZ) that had been fought in such a vicious and personalised way focusing on the policymaker rather than the policy. Screenshot below of my exact words otherwise one of the rightist cadre will doubtless try to say that I’m lying.
Rendel Harris wrote:
You must be younger than me, Thatcher the milk snatcher’s name was mud to us 11 year olds!
Backladder wrote:
I was alive but preschool I think, my older sibling remembers it! Don’t recall prominent businesspeople saying somebody should kill Thatcher for it though…
Rendel Harris wrote:
Well, the IRA actually had a go. They were extremists, of course, egged on by a certain flavour of pseudo politics (the sort in which everyone is a tribal extremist and no one compromises, so not politics at all).
Nowadays, even cowboy plumbers made-good are extremists, it seems; along with vast swathes of Faecespuke and Twatter denizens, who have got used to Trump-talk and seem quite anxious to take up concomitant actions.
Don’t forget either that a British MP was killed by a hate-loon not that long ago. I believe the hate-loon was upset about some small policy matter which he’d inflated into something Very Important Indeed (but only to a certain kind of loon).
Will CH4RLE have motivated such a loon to perform a similar act of self righteous indignation? There’s plenty of loons about just needing a little tug on their hair-trigger.
Backladder wrote:
Don’t forget her using the police as her political enforcers or trashing the housing market with the Right-to-Buy policy: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/jun/29/how-right-to-buy-ruined-british-housing
You cannot reduce all the
You cannot reduce all the opponents to ULEZ or Sadiq Khan to a single, narrowly defined, straw man. There are many vocal opponents to ULEZ in Ilford for example with near identical backgrounds to the Mayor who vehemently attack any restrictions on their car use.
Bill H wrote:
Well it’s a jolly good job I didn’t do so then, isn’t it? If you’ll excuse me quoting my exact words (emphasis added):
Funny isnt it, I logged on
Funny isnt it, I logged on this morning expecting to read about bicycles…and here I am reading about ULEZ and a death threat.
Not really relevant is it, but well done – some good bait to get people like Rendel frothing and foaming.
When Costa coffee first
When Costa coffee first appeared on our high streets I think they used to have bands performing at their outlets. I seem to remember seeing Frothing and Foaming at one of these early gigs although I may be mistaken. They did a great version of Under the Bridge – you’d have liked that one.
A common misunderstanding –
A common misunderstanding – but I’m surprised to see it repeated here. Frothing and Foaming were actually a barbershop quartet and were employed to promote members of the Barber Shop group’s salons. Are you thinking of the association between Clickbait with Jessops?
Extreme metallers Death Threat apparently did try to offer their services to advertise the Coop funeral homes but this proposal was quickly buried.
It’s very confusing – at one
It’s very confusing – at one time there were two bands with the same name which resulted in a lengthy court case. I can’t remember who won. In fact nobody can.
The Lawyers won, as they
The Lawyers won, as they always do
.
The Lawyers’ second album is
The Lawyers’ second album is worth a listen.
Ah, “Finger my briefs.” Now
Ah, “Finger my briefs.” Now there is a blast from the past.
Well, that’s my morning taken up. I was going to read over this appeals submission but instead I’ll send my secretary out for some safety pins and zips and relive some of my youth.
essexian wrote:
As in Jonny Fingers of the Boomtown Rats??
mark1a wrote:
Seconded! Though I wouldn’t bother with The Accountant’s recent follow ups. Same tired old tunes under a different name, and bar the odd die-hard fan didn’t find favour with audiences or reviewers.
Frothing and foaming was
Frothing and foaming was actually in the original Beach Boys lyrics for Barbara Ann (original couplet “You got me frothin’ anna foamin’/Squealin’ anna moanin’, Barb’ra Ann…”) but it was banned as the authorities feared it would exacerbate the growing problem of over consumption of espresso by teenagers.
When I was at school, our A
When I was at school, our A-level maths teacher decided to have some sick time with a trifling condition called a heart attack, being diligent students we didn’t see the point of revising the work he had taught us the week before so we started singing Barbara Ann a capella while unsupervised in the classroom. This was going well until the headmaster walked in on us, I don’t think he was a Beach Boys fan! As an aside, the maths teacher was the real life husband of Nora Batty.
perce wrote:
As an aside, an ex-girlfriend of mine was a massive Red Hot Chilli Peppers fan. I used to wind her up by saying I preferred the All Saints version of “Under the Bridge”.
I can understand that,
I can understand that, although Richard Hawley did play guitar on it.
Jeremy Corbyn for PM wrote:
In fact, it’s that political, I notice it has even made an entry line into the “POLITICO London Playbook” – solid reading too for a good, daily non-biased politics overview.
I remember Politico playing
I remember Politico playing our student union in 1986/87. They were a bunch of PhD students from the Social Sciences faculty, a sort of in-house band. Did a lot of Smiths covers.
I’m a very firm believer in
I’m a very firm believer in the saying, “Don’t judge a book by its cover”. It’s obviously impossible to discern a person’s political persuasion, or their attitude to Brexit, or their personal beliefs or ideologies, merely by looking at a picture. That would be absolutely ridiculous.
Oh, wait.
Daddy Feebs wrote:
Why do you assume he supported Brexit? He didn’t. You obviously are judging a book by its cover.
Damn – well, It looks like
Damn – well, It looks like the cover gave most of the rest of it away. “Never Judge 9o% of the contents of a book by its cover”, how’s that? 🙂
I have been told multiple
I have been told multiple times that “all racists voted for Brexit”.
This doesn’t seem to fit that pattern does it.
I wouldn’t want to speculate
I wouldn’t want to speculate about Brexit etc but the photo suggests that he is a rich (flash) bastard who has screwed lots of people many times over the years and doesn’t GAF about anyone or anything except himself.
He must have been like a pig in shit playing “business advisor” for the clueless Eton boys Cameron and Osborne.
I’m particularly keen to hear
I’m particularly keen to hear his thoughts on climate change ….. I need a good laugh
How to judge other persons?
How to judge other persons? No easy matter, since all of us are filled with human nature, a very queer stuff that’s not just highly variegated but a fantastical shape-shifter, leaping easily between angel and devil in a second, then back again, often via 13,890 conditions between the two. However …..
Being cyclists and therefore needing to judge the possible intentions forming and morphing within others about us, especially others with lethal weapons at their disposal (cars, vans, lorries and big fists sometimes clutching a knife) we must reduce those other humans to manageable sets defined by, “Most likely to do X”.
The cyclist’s 6th sense develops. We can read lotsa signals given off by them others, especially the ones in cars.
See that CH4 RLE? That sorta badge is a signal that often indicates a certain, er, solipsistic mental state that frees the incumbent from the normal reining-in of human nature’s worst indulgences. The personalised number plate, in many cases (not all) tends to indicate that the owner harbours a tendency to regard others without such a thing, especially cyclists with no number plate at all, as not-persons – The “Others I hate ‘cos I just do”.
Ole CH4RLE seems to have decided that Muslim mayors are not-persons – some sort of vermin to be extermnated by like-CH4RLE persons like hisself, a glorious crusader agin’ the monstrous regiment of not-CH4RLEs.
Anyroadup, if you see him comin’ at you in his Big Blue Status Symbol, I advise a quick scuttle out of his sight line. If he gets you, he will be defended by that Loophole and the victory celebrated by The Daily Hate Mail, not to mention The Dictator (editor: Joseph Goebbels Ghost).
But you never know ….. that gasguzzler must put out a lot of gunk so perhaps CH4RLE will become so filled with particulates that he’ll have a volte-face, welcoming a full-ULEZ and calling for a different sort religious adherent to be murdered instead? (He’s a leopard with certain indelible spots, after all).
**********
Meanwhile, we can all continue this thread and supply the creature with the oxygen of publicity to counter those particulates he seems to enjoy generating and breathing-in.
Cugel wrote:
* In fact, C114 RLE with a fixing strategically located so as to both (a) better represent the intended personalisation; and (b) although perhaps not intentionally, confound anyone who might want to report driver of said vehicle.
C114 RLE with a fixing
C114 RLE with a fixing strategically located so as to both (a) better represent the intended personalisation; and (b) although perhaps not intentionally, confound anyone who might want to report driver of said vehicle
Of course it’s intentional! There are loads of intentionally misplaced fixing bolts in Lancashire, designed to lead to a mis-identification
Dear Charlie, I think I found
Dear Charlie, I found one that better suits you:
As if we didn’t have enough
As if we didn’t have enough clowns in public life, here comes Charlie Mullins (2018)
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/25/as-if-we-didnt-have-enough-clowns-in-public-life-here-comes-charlie-mullins-pimlico-plumbing
picture is from a May 2023 Daily Mail story – here’s a flavour:
“The former boss and founder of the multi-million-pound plumbing empire said he tried to let another car past during traffic chaos caused by closures and diversions in London’s West End at the weekend for a cycle race.
[wouldn’t you just know it]
The entrepreneur has other things on his mind after popping the question to singer Rachel, 32, last year, for what will be his third marriage.
The couple live together in a £10million Thames-side apartment in London. Mullins sold Pimlico Plumbers last year and is pursuing a career as a media personality
He said he was often mistaken for Rod Stewart, adding: ‘People do recognise me for the hair these days and call me Rod, which I don’t mind at all.’
Mr Mullins has just filmed a pilot for a show called the Naked Millionaire, in which he has to build a business from scratch. There is also a possible reality TV show in the pipeline for him and his fiancée.”
Certainly had my popcorn out
Certainly had my popcorn out reading through this LOL!!
Best of luck getting his
Best of luck getting his account back. I joked years ago that America should united and euthanize Trump…got a perks ban ?
Gkam84 wrote:
It’s a hard problem – how to not-tolerate the seriously intolerant. So easy to slip into their modes and practices.
Even a seemingly standard, democratic and traditional process to rein-in the intolerant loons can go seriously awry if the loon has somehow acquired lotsa loon-fans. The legal cases agin’ the Trunttosser seems to be generating even more avid support for the monstrous creature! The legal prosecutions play to that commonly-found righty-tighty whinge-bellow that they’re a poor persecuted underdog.
Personally I’m guilty of hoping that the Trunter will drop dead of self-indulgence but even that is a suspicious meme to house in one’s noggin. Anyway, a more practical solution to such intolerant monsters is probably that they become more and more excessive to the point that even their loon-fans have second thoughts, so they fail.
For many monster-loons, failure is the spell that will do for ’em, at least in terms of their ability to themselves cast spells on the foolishly hypnotised loon-fans. Good and pungent mockery is often a catalyst that will induce their failure.
*********
I’l do a Godwin now. 🙂
That Hitler owed a portion of his success to his claim to martyrdom via a gaol sentence imposed by the already enfeebled German authorities of the time. Ranting Adolf emerged even stronger and more righteous in the eyes of many, acquiring another herd of loon-fans. “Poor Adolf, gaoled just for sayin’ things”.
They’d have been better off taking the mick out of him, a procedure many intolerant monsters find the most uncomfortable experience they ever have. They are “serious men & women”. Being laughed at pricks their big bag o’ importance-gas. They gurn, flabber and often end up looking even more ridiculous, as the scales fall from a few of their observers’ eyes.
Consider the Boris Bokum arc from popular posh-yob to abhored evil-klown. His japes and quips strayed far beyond the pale. Instead of him guffawing at us, we laughed incredulously at him, before booing him orf the stage.