Home
News of operation comes as names released of two recent fatalities

A massive police operation is planned next week to try and halt the run of crashes between cyclists and motor vehicles in London that has seen six fatalities so far this month.

According to the Evening Standard, traffic officers will be on duty on every major street, looking out for drivers using mobile phones, stopping in Advanced Stop Line ‘bike boxes’ and cyclists riding on the inside of HGVs.

The operation comes despite Boris Johnson and Transport for London insisting they would not be rushed into action after the recent deaths.

However, London’s cycling commissioner, Andrew Gilligan, said the move was essential to reassure cyclists and prevent further loss of life.

He said: “This is a new zero-tolerance approach with a police officer on every main road in central London from Monday which is a huge escalation to the checks we are doing already.

“They will be stopping lorries and cars and where there is unsafe driving they will be taken off the road. We will also target unsafe cyclists. It is a short-term measure but the Mayor and the police feel we must act as a result of the recent spate of appalling accidents.”

Chief Superintendent Glyn Jones, head of the Met’s Traffic Command, said: “This is a police response to save lives and save injury.

“We have reviewed the level of deaths in the last weeks and in response to public concern we are redeploying officers during the rush hour to where we know there are a high number of collisions. We will be applying road traffic laws to all road users. We will be focusing on people driving carelessly or recklessly, whether they are lorry or car drivers or cyclists.”

Mr  Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries. “They may well have the right to be there but the fact is it is a dangerous manoeuvre.”

Most recent crash victims named

The planned operation comes as the victims of the most recent fatal cycling crashes on London roads were identified as 60-year-old Richard Muzira and 21-year-old Khalid Al-Hashimi.

An inquest into the death of Khalid Al-Hashimi from the NW6 area of London was opened in Poplar today, but no further details have yet been made available. 

Originally from Zimbabwe, Richard Muzira had been imprisoned and tortured for his role in the struggle against white minority rule. He was described as a “local hero” and a “wonderful man” who had won an award for his voluntary work.

His daughter Niadzi, a 24-year-old web-designer, said: “I’m so proud of my dad. He wrote books, plays and poetry, he was a bit of a maverick. He was always very active learning and teaching himself.”

Mr Muzira had volunteered for many years at mental health charity  CoolTan Arts. The organisation’s chief executive Michelle Baharier, said: “You couldn’t ask for a more lovely person than Richard. He was a fantastic friend. He was really community-spirited and was a complete and utter intellectual. He was a very calm and really astute person.

“This has come as such a shock to all of us here.”

Yesterday evening another cyclist was taken to hospital after a collision with a lorry less than half a mile from the junction where Richard Muzira died.

Paramedics were called to the junction of Camberwell New Road and Wyndham Road at 5pm last night where they treated a man in his 30s for leg injuries before he was transferred to hospital.

Six cyclists have died in collisions with vehicles in London this month, and a total of 12 have been killed in the UK.

Our official grumpy Northerner, John has been riding bikes for over 30 years since discovering as an uncoordinated teen that a sport could be fun if it didn't require you to catch a ball or get in the way of a hulking prop forward.

Road touring was followed by mountain biking and a career racing in the mud that was as brief as it was unsuccessful.

Somewhere along the line came the discovery that he could string a few words together, followed by the even more remarkable discovery that people were mug enough to pay for this rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work. He's pretty certain he's worked for even more bike publications than Mat Brett.

The inevitable 30-something MAMIL transition saw him shift to skinny tyres and these days he lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

29 comments

Avatar
mad_scot_rider [581 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

great - that's what is needed a solution that lasts only one week and about which we've already warned the drivers *sigh*

Avatar
AyBee [85 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Not sure whether I'm keen on this method of policing - whilst I have seen a lot about, they're all in hi-viz and you can spot them a mile off so everybody behaves. 1 week down the line and all the bike boxes will be full with mopeds and cars. Much better to be plain clothed and handing out fines to keep them out of the boxes long-term.

Avatar
VeloPeo [300 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

This will only work if these crackdowns are sustained, repeated and not announced in advance.

Until people get the message that they can't get away with taking the piss (and I include all road users in this) then they will continue to take the piss

Avatar
Goldfever4 [213 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries. “They may well have the right to be there but the fact is it is a dangerous manoeuvre.”

Simple. 50% of cyclist deaths are completely avoidable by cyclists not being thick as mud.

The other 50% is down to all sorts of factors, and this doesn't necessarily carry across to injuries, but it's a good point well made.

Avatar
duc888 [39 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

well said goldfever4. lets wait for the response backlash from the righteous

Avatar
mckechan [208 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I second undercover traffic enforcement. I actually think a great way to catch both cyclists and drivers who *break the law* would be undercover coppers on bikes. If it was a permanent measure, I think it would change the attitude of drivers around cyclists and make cyclists think twice about anti-social cycling (RL Jumping etc.),

Although, the way some drivers behave around cyclists, they'd probably claim entrapment because the copper hadn't paid road tax and was hogging the road!

Avatar
Bikebikebike [186 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Goldfever4 wrote:
Quote:

Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries. “They may well have the right to be there but the fact is it is a dangerous manoeuvre.”

Simple. 50% of cyclist deaths are completely avoidable by cyclists not being thick as mud.

The other 50% is down to all sorts of factors, and this doesn't necessarily carry across to injuries, but it's a good point well made.

Thick as mud, or just cycling along the cycle lanes and filter lanes to the ASL, where they are being directed to?

One mistake should not mean a bloody and brutal death. I hope you never make a mistake on the road, and pay for it with your life.

You can fck right off.

Avatar
Matt_B [24 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I'd have thought the policeman in the picture would have stopped the cyclist for carrying an inappropriate load in his basket.

Avatar
mrmo [2019 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Goldfever4 wrote:
Quote:

Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries. “They may well have the right to be there but the fact is it is a dangerous manoeuvre.”

.

Going up the inside or on the inside? But yes being going anywhere near stationary hgvs is pretty stupid. Then again where are the feeder lanes for ASLs! nothing like joined up thinking!

Avatar
nuclear coffee [205 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Goldfever4 wrote:
Quote:

Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries. “They may well have the right to be there but the fact is it is a dangerous manoeuvre.”

Simple. 50% of cyclist deaths are completely avoidable by cyclists not being thick as mud.

The other 50% is down to all sorts of factors, and this doesn't necessarily carry across to injuries, but it's a good point well made.

Source?

If you're telling 50 or so people a year they deserve their deaths, personally I'd feel pretty ashamed at myself if I hadn't researched that sufficiently well to be sure first.

(edited since I didn't realise there's no swear filter here)

Avatar
P3t3 [198 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

London's streets are so unsafe that they need policemen on ever one!!! What happens the rest of the time.

Come on, build some infrastructure Boris!!!!!!!!!!!

Avatar
northstar [1108 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Avatar
Cyclash [5 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It may not be a long-term solution, but at least this will raise awareness of cyclists at a time when accidents are spiraling...

Also makes me wonder whether if you took a picture of a car/lorry in a bike box with the red light (and their numberplate) in sight and sent it to the police - would they be fined?

Avatar
therealsmallboy [162 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

You'd probably get a letter like the one the cycling silk received:

http://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/metropolitan-police-letter-...

Avatar
Cyclash [5 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
therealsmallboy wrote:

You'd probably get a letter like the one the cycling silk received:

http://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/metropolitan-police-letter-...

This says that it's illegal for a cyclist to enter the bike box if the lights are red? That's ridiculous!

Avatar
AyBee [85 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Bikebikebike wrote:
Goldfever4 wrote:
Quote:

Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries. “They may well have the right to be there but the fact is it is a dangerous manoeuvre.”

Simple. 50% of cyclist deaths are completely avoidable by cyclists not being thick as mud.

The other 50% is down to all sorts of factors, and this doesn't necessarily carry across to injuries, but it's a good point well made.

Thick as mud, or just cycling along the cycle lanes and filter lanes to the ASL, where they are being directed to?

One mistake should not mean a bloody and brutal death. I hope you never make a mistake on the road, and pay for it with your life.

You can fck right off.

If you're not in a position to determine whether you're safe riding (wherever that may be), you shouldn't be on the road, it's akin to a route leading you off a cliff - would you still drive it?

Avatar
OldRidgeback [2554 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
P3t3 wrote:

London's streets are so unsafe that they need policemen on ever one!!! What happens the rest of the time.

Come on, build some infrastructure Boris!!!!!!!!!!!

Err, must be a different London to the one I've lived in for donkey's years. Some roads in the London I live in are very dangerous, but most aren't.

Avatar
mrmo [2019 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Cyclash wrote:
therealsmallboy wrote:

You'd probably get a letter like the one the cycling silk received:

http://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/metropolitan-police-letter-...

This says that it's illegal for a cyclist to enter the bike box if the lights are red? That's ridiculous!

It actually gets better, it is illegal to enter the box by any route other than the feeder lane, you know the one, in the gutter partially blocked by a car or bus or truck!!!!!

Avatar
OldRidgeback [2554 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Cyclash wrote:

It may not be a long-term solution, but at least this will raise awareness of cyclists at a time when accidents are spiraling...

Also makes me wonder whether if you took a picture of a car/lorry in a bike box with the red light (and their numberplate) in sight and sent it to the police - would they be fined?

No the vehicle driver wouldn't be fined. You would need video evidence to prove the vehicle entered the ASL box after the light turned to red. Vehicles can be in the ASL box if they have to stop because the lights are changing, otherwise they'd risk running a red light which is vastly more dangerous for everyone.

Avatar
PsiMonk [26 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

"Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries."

Was on twitter this morning trying to work this out with Mark from the ibikelondon blog. Along with so many other things the Met have done recently, I reckon this is dead wrong.

It's accurate to say that half of cyclists killed in London since Jan 2010 were crushed by HGVs in left-hooks. But many of those, as far as the commentaries of the time had it, were killed off the lights by an HGV surging forward, or killed by a lorry passing them and turning. Hardly the same thing as a cyclist going down the inside!

Can anyone confirm this detail (John Stevenson)? Cos I think it's fairly important that the Met understand that their spokesperson is essentially blaming cyclists for heading down the left of a lorry (into the ASL feeder, ho hum) and being killed, when in actual fact it may only be a small proportion of cyclist fatalities that are happening because of the cyclist going into the blind spot, and more happening because the blind spot is being moved on top of the cyclist.

We need to stop blaming cyclists for their deaths, btw. Even those who died going down the inside of an HGV are not to blame. No one likely told them how dangerous that move was - and most of our roads are designed, with cycle lanes, feeder lanes etc. to reinforce the idea that a cyclist's place is to the left of traffic at all times pretty much. In many other EU countries they've largely designed out these moves - making it impossible for cyclists to do this. The blame, clearly, falls on road design, vehicle design (those giant blind spots) and having lorries all over narrow, congested streets, with drivers incentivised to rush to make their next stop.

Avatar
velobetty [71 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Really, this is all boondoggle. What's the point of burning money having police out giving tickets when people aren't even prosecuted for killing cyclists while driving and using a phone?

Avatar
Old Cranky [257 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

How's this going to work safely?

If cars stop in the ASL then are the drivers going to be handed a ticket on the spot, without holding up the flow of traffic?

Equally, if the police stop cyclists in the narrow cycle lane then won't the obstruction cause cyclists to spread out over the road - at a congested junction?

Avatar
Bikebikebike [186 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
AyBee wrote:
Bikebikebike wrote:
Goldfever4 wrote:
Quote:

Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries. “They may well have the right to be there but the fact is it is a dangerous manoeuvre.”

Simple. 50% of cyclist deaths are completely avoidable by cyclists not being thick as mud.

The other 50% is down to all sorts of factors, and this doesn't necessarily carry across to injuries, but it's a good point well made.

Thick as mud, or just cycling along the cycle lanes and filter lanes to the ASL, where they are being directed to?

One mistake should not mean a bloody and brutal death. I hope you never make a mistake on the road, and pay for it with your life.

You can fck right off.

If you're not in a position to determine whether you're safe riding (wherever that may be), you shouldn't be on the road, it's akin to a route leading you off a cliff - would you still drive it?

What does that even mean?

Avatar
mckechan [208 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

PsiMonk - Interesting point regarding the Met spokesperson. The cynic in me says they put a spin on this for the mayor. Once they've made a statement, many will take it as a fact and blindly recite it.

There are people out there who still think that Jean Charles De Menezes jumped the ticket barrier (he didn't - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Jean_Charles_de_Menezes#Ticket_bar...).

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... [1113 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
PsiMonk wrote:

"Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries."

Was on twitter this morning trying to work this out with Mark from the ibikelondon blog. Along with so many other things the Met have done recently, I reckon this is dead wrong.

It's accurate to say that half of cyclists killed in London since Jan 2010 were crushed by HGVs in left-hooks. But many of those, as far as the commentaries of the time had it, were killed off the lights by an HGV surging forward, or killed by a lorry passing them and turning. Hardly the same thing as a cyclist going down the inside!

Can anyone confirm this detail (John Stevenson)? Cos I think it's fairly important that the Met understand that their spokesperson is essentially blaming cyclists for heading down the left of a lorry (into the ASL feeder, ho hum) and being killed, when in actual fact it may only be a small proportion of cyclist fatalities that are happening because of the cyclist going into the blind spot, and more happening because the blind spot is being moved on top of the cyclist.

Agree entirely that this is a crucial detail. And I see I'm not the only one who found himself thinking of the DeMenezes case! The track record of the Met is not that great in such matters.

I would like to see the Met backing up this particular claim (or publicly withdrawing it - one or the other)

Avatar
John Stevenson [249 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
PsiMonk wrote:

"Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries."

Was on twitter this morning trying to work this out with Mark from the ibikelondon blog. Along with so many other things the Met have done recently, I reckon this is dead wrong.

Can't say I disagree. The Met press office didn't have anything to say about this operation when I spoke to them this morning, but I have to admit the sheer wrongness of that stat is amazing.

I'm trying to speak to a senior officer during the traffic operation next week so when I call them tomorrow to try and make that happen I'll seek clarification.

Avatar
KiwiMike [1074 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Dear Goldfever4: You win. Such concise ability to offend, display ignorance and generally waste pixels puts you waaaay ahead of the other asshats I've read today.

Avatar
congokid [252 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Goldfever4 wrote:
Quote:

Mr Jones said half of all cyclists killed on London’s roads since January 2010 have been going down the inside of lorries. “They may well have the right to be there but the fact is it is a dangerous manoeuvre.”

Simple. 50% of cyclist deaths are completely avoidable by cyclists not being thick as mud.

The other 50% is down to all sorts of factors, and this doesn't necessarily carry across to injuries, but it's a good point well made.

A point made seemingly without reference to any actual instances. I'd like to see the data on that 50 per cent figure rather than leap on it with glee as a stick to beat victims.

Also, nearly all bike 'infrastructure' in London is on the left of one or two lanes of motor traffic. The attractions of using one of these lanes instead aren't always immediately apparent.

Avatar
thereverent [390 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

There was a Met Police HGV check running just south of Blackfriars bridge this morning. I imagine thye will find a very high number of faults and illegal vehicles agains as they always do with these checks.